<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment 1  by Sarah Marino</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4</link>
      <description>By: Sarah Marino</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-02-11 22:50:45 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-02-11 23:31:44 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Post #1 Pseudoscience: Assignment 1</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330129176</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Made by Sarah Marino, working individually </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-11 22:58:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330129176</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #2 Red Flag: Ancient Wisdom (Article)</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330129413</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition: </strong>The red flag<strong> Ancient Wisdom </strong>is the belief that medicines and practices from ancient times are more effective than modern day medicine.<br><br><strong>Connection:</strong> This article is about a woman who opened up a shop called "<strong>Ancient Wisdom Holistics</strong>". The sales she makes relies on people believing in <strong>Ancient Wisdom</strong>, such as healing crystals. This is also a connection to the <strong>pseudoscience watchlist</strong>, as holistic products are being sold to make a profit. There is no scientific proof suggesting healing crystals exist, or that people benefit from essential oils.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.mykawartha.com/community-story/8994743-lindsay-resident-proud-to-share-ancient-wisdom/" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-11 22:59:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330129413</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #3 Red Flag: All Natural (Article)</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330134892</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition: All natural </strong>refers to the belief that any natural substance is good for you.<strong> It is important to note that this isn't true, as there are many toxic substances that are natural.<br><br>Connection: </strong>This article is claiming that certain ingredients found in products such as skin care, and shampoo are harmful to humans, and that people should be looking for <strong>all natural </strong>products instead. One thing to look out for in this article is the use of <strong>scientific terms</strong> throughout it. They make comparisons between chemicals used in something such as coal tar is used in certain shampoos. What they don't take into consideration is that depending on what chemicals are mixed with, they can react in different ways. An example to prove this is that we drink water on a daily basis, but it is also dangerously reactive with certain elements on the periodic table, causing explosions. This doesn't mean water isn't safe, but it shows that depending on what substances are mixed together, different things happen.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.treehugger.com/htgg/how-to-go-green-natural-skin-care.html" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-11 23:28:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330134892</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #4 Red Flag: Correlation Vs Causation (image)</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330139998</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition: Causation </strong>means there is a reason something has happened, while<strong> correlation </strong>means it happens, but it isn't the reason a specific thing happened<strong> (correlation </strong>is more of a coincidence<strong>).<br><br>Connection: </strong>This comic strip displays a <strong>correlation vs causation</strong> between cancer and cell phone users. one person in the comic doesn't believe it, and states there are problems with the data, while the other just accepts it as fact. The<strong> limitation</strong> is that there isn't anything proven by science confirming the link between the two.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://i2.wp.com/www.skepticalraptor.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/cell-phones-cancer.png?resize=480%2C156&amp;ssl=1" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-11 23:57:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330139998</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #5 Red Flag: Appeal to Authority (Video)</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330143187</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition: Appeal to Authority</strong> is giving a product, statement, etc, credibility because of authoritative imagery.<br><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This video shares a recipe created by Dr. Oz, claiming to burn fat quickly. People believe in this sort of thing because they believe Dr. Oz is a credible source, and they don't usually check the facts. <strong>Skepticism and critical thinking </strong>should be applied to this recipe as there isn't a magical product that burns fat away. Through proper diet and exercise results can be achieved. Another reason to be <strong>skeptical</strong> is the fact that many people disprove Dr. Oz's beliefs, and even Oz himself has said he isn't the best source and has over exaggerated his products.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtH4lZGmb20" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-12 00:15:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330143187</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #6 Red Flag: Confirmation Bias (image)</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330147483</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: Confirmation Bias </strong>means people find information supporting their belief, while ignoring the rest.<br><br><strong>Connection: </strong>People who believe in astrology and read their horoscope on a daily basis tend to only look at the traits that apply to them, while ignoring the traits that they don't really display. <strong>The problem </strong>with this is that there isn't any way to <strong>scientifically prove </strong>that people born under a certain star sign will act a certain way. The star signs have also shifted over the past 1000 years or so, which means people born under one sign, are under a totally different sign in recent years, further disproving any connection.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://i2.wp.com/www.whats-your-sign.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AboutAstrology5.jpg?fit=1600%2C865&amp;ssl=1" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-12 00:37:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330147483</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #7 Reason for belief: Patternicity (Image)</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330152715</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Description: </strong>The human instinct to look for patterns, even when there isn't one<strong>. <br><br>Connection: </strong>This image shows a face that looks like Jesus burnt onto a piece of toast. <strong> Skepticism </strong>could actually apply to these scenarios, as some people could claim that this just happened by accident, but in reality people could have done this on purpose either by buying a toaster that burns pictures onto toast (yes they exist), or by scraping some of the burnt parts off causing a face to appear using contrast between the burnt parts and the lighter parts.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.ctvnews.ca/polopoly_fs/1.1809292.1399416254!/httpImage/image.png_gen/derivatives/landscape_620/image.png" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-12 01:04:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330152715</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #8 Reason for belief: Unexplained (Image)</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330162031</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition: </strong>Something that we try to explain ourselves when there is no certain explanation.<br><br><strong>Connection: </strong>This is a picture of the Loch Ness monster, which many people believe is an actual monster. Other people believe that it might just be a normal sea creature. without a clear view, people make up their own ideas and stories. <strong>Skepticism </strong>should always be applied to the unknown until there is solid evidence to prove what it is.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5e/Hoaxed_photo_of_the_Loch_Ness_monster.jpg/230px-Hoaxed_photo_of_the_Loch_Ness_monster.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-12 01:47:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330162031</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #9 Reason for belief: Emotional Connections (Image</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330164737</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition: </strong>Emotions obscure rational thought, allowing us to believe what we want to be true instead of the facts.<br><br><strong>Connection:</strong> This image is of the popular medium, Theresa Caputo. Theresa claims she can talk to the dead, and her show is about her having these sessions with people to try and ease their mind. <strong>Skepticism</strong> should be applied since you can't really talk to the dead, and it's all for television reviews and entertainment. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://i0.heartyhosting.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/teresa-caputo-tweeting-scandal-happy-sq.jpg?resize=1200%2C600&amp;ssl=1" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-12 02:01:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330164737</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #10 Critical thinking process responses</title>
         <author>calmtasticfood22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330169401</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I chose to evaluate the article <a href="https://www.treehugger.com/htgg/how-to-go-green-natural-skin-care.html">https://www.treehugger.com/htgg/how-to-go-green-natural-skin-care.html</a><br><strong>Define Problem: </strong>Are natural products better?<br><strong>Gather Information: </strong>This article claims that using natural products on your skin is better for your skin, as opposed to ones with chemicals. They claim that the chemicals are dangerous to the skin.<br><strong>Evaluate the evidence: </strong>This article doesn't link to any sources to back up their claims of these chemicals being toxic. Many of these products people use everyday, with no problems. If problems occur, there could be plenty of reasons, such as the product might not be right for their skin type, or they might have sensitive skin. This article does not consider these options.<br><strong>Recognize Assumptions, Emotions, Biases: </strong>This article is based on the writers beliefs and assumptions on the affects of natural products on the skin. This would be considered their personal opinion since there isn't really  any proof to back their statements up.<strong><br>Synthesis Evidence, Identify Alternatives: </strong>Alternate Solution 1: Natural products are better, and the chemically made ones are bad, supported by the writers belief.<br>Alternate Solution 2: Natural isn't necessarily better, based on whats known about chemicals in these products, and multiple reviews.<br><strong>Select best alternative: </strong>I believe that natural isn't necessarily better.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-12 02:26:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/calmtasticfood22/pg01xadlgcm4/wish/330169401</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
