<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Read all sections. Which quality is appropriate for these part of an article ?   by ELİF HAZAL YILMAZ</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo</link>
      <description>Validity(which one) ? Reliability ? Why ? Discuss.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-07 14:18:43 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-11-08 13:44:52 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>1</title>
         <author>yilmazelif</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1872927936</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;To assess the factorability of the data, we inspected the strength of intercorrelations among items and used two statistical measures: Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity and Kaiser–Mayer–Olkin (KMO). Correlation coefficients were greater than .30 (Tabachnick &amp; Fidell, 2007). Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was significant, χ2 (105) = 1,264.74, p = .00, for psychological; χ2 (105) = 819.71, p = .00, for sexual; and χ2 (105) = 1,340.50, p = .00, for physical samples. KMO values (.92, .88, and .93 for psychological, sexual, and physical samples, respectively) exceeded the recommended minimum (.60). Both statistics ensured the factorability of the data (Hair et al., 2006).&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-07 15:29:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1872927936</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2</title>
         <author>yilmazelif</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1872930018</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; For the psychological vignette sample, the EFA yielded two factors with eigenvalues greater than one, explaining 58.03% of the total variance. However, the scree plot indicated a clear break after the first factor and implied a single factor solution. Moreover, the results of the EFA (based on the Kaiser’s criterion) implied no interpretable solutions&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-07 15:30:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1872930018</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3</title>
         <author>yilmazelif</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1872933125</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;The new factor structure accounted for 47.57% of the total variance (eigenvalue = 7.14) for the psychological vignette sample. Identical procedures were followed in analyzing the data obtained for the sexual and physical violence vignettes.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-07 15:32:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1872933125</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Özce</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1875061966</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>construct</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-08 13:44:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1875061966</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1875062990</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Construct </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-08 13:44:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/yilmazelif/p9gcnq1j0x0kaevo/wish/1875062990</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
