https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080 landmark supreme court case summary en-us 2019-03-06 19:05:03 UTC 2019-03-12 17:26:53 UTC hello@padlet.com 0347235 https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/338572085  Fifteen year old, Gerald Francis Gault, was taken into custody for allegedly making an obscene phone call. Gault had previously been placed on probation. The police did not leave notice with Gault's parents who were at work, when the youth was arrested. After proceedings before a juvenile court judge, Gault was commited to the State Industrial School until he reached the age of 21.]]> 2019-03-06 19:24:40 UTC https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/338572085 0666023 https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339134201 The case changed Juvenile Law In 1967 a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process rights as adults. It determined that the juvenile court must follow the Fourteenth Amendment.]]> 2019-03-08 00:11:38 UTC https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339134201 0666023 https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339134700 No, the proceedings of the Juvenile Court failed to comply with the Constitution. The Court held that the proceedings for juveniles had to follow with the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. ]]> 2019-03-08 00:14:19 UTC https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339134700 0666023 https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339135857  Were the procedures used to commit Gault constitutionally legitimate under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ?]]> 2019-03-08 00:20:09 UTC https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339135857 0666023 https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339519237 2019-03-09 03:31:51 UTC https://padlet.com/0347235/p7yvln0bx080/wish/339519237