<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Week 2 Article by Merve Elbirlik Tülek</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm</link>
      <description>Post your summaries here</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-02-01 13:09:24 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-05-14 16:44:49 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Summary of week 2 article </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395028364</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The article entitled ‘’Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity’’ by Stazyk <strong>et al. (2014)</strong><del>, Moldovanova and Frederickson</del> focus on sustainability ‘s meaning and equity between current generation and future generations. <strong>Make sure you state the authors' main argument here. The w</strong>riters explain sustainability’s function according to the Un General Assembly which says sustainability reflects a growing awareness that current human needs and expectations must be balanced against the immediate and long- term capacity of supporting ecosystems <strong>(make sure you express the ideas in your own words) </strong> and they add Bruntland Commission’s depiction which says future generations should meet their own needs <strong>(you need to also state what is our responsibility?) </strong>. After that, the writers use example to indicate that sustainability <strong>has </strong>exist<strong>ed</strong> for 2.500 year<strong>s</strong> <del>ago</del> but <strong>with a </strong>different concept with citizens of the Athanian city’s oath. Second the writer<strong>s</strong>  claim that sustainability is a form of equity. They say current generation <del>should</del> has important obligations to future generations about reaching current needs for provide balance between two generations. Following this, they address three pillars of sustainability which are environmental, economic<del>al</del> and social sustainability and the authors believe that people should take responsibility on these three pillars to intergenerational fairness <strong>(you need to briefly state what did they highlight)</strong>. The authors conclude by stating that they try to convince readers on solution which is people should seek to adopt and implement policies that support intergenerational fairness <strong>(the idea is OK, but make sure it is expressed in your own words)</strong>.<br><br>Please go over my comments.<br>Best,<br>MET</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/393819750/f18ded76360cd27c0bc42bd5fa1e41a8/summary_of_week_2_article.docx" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-08 13:51:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395028364</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Summary</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395282063</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>   In the article “Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity” by <del>(</del>Stazyk<del>)</del> (2014) focuses on Sustainability for future. The writer<strong>s</strong> argue that sustainability is associated with environmental movement <strong>(make sure you state the author's main argument)</strong>. The writer<strong>s</strong> first claim<del>s</del> that without maintaining supporting ecosystem today and into the future, health and survival of humanity is questionable <strong>(make sure you rewrite the ideas in your own words)</strong>. Following this, example of Athenian city-state’ s rules which are public duty, obeying the city laws, clearly explain how people can maintain their life with sustainably for future generations <strong>(use your own sentences)</strong>. The writer second<strong>ly</strong> claims that current people have obligation for future generation these are parts of a balance .Last claim is that resources <strong>which are economic and ecological need to be used (check language here)</strong> in balance for future generation. All in all, the writer emphasize<strong>s</strong> and inform that current people have responsibilities to protect to future generations’ environmental, economic, social resources <strong>(good concluding sentence)</strong>.<br><br>Dear Ahmet,<br><br>Thank you for the task. You need to write the ideas in your own words, write down what you understand rather than copying chunks from the original.<br><br>Best,<br>MET  </div><div>                                                                                                          Ahmet Ortaç </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-08 19:47:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395282063</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Selale Ozcan Week 2 Text Summary </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395292026</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the article ‘’Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity’’ by Stazyk <strong>et al.</strong> (2014) focuse<del>s</del> on sustainability for future generations.The writer<strong>s</strong> argue<del>s </del><strong> the sustainability in 3 pillar that environmental,social and economic (check grammar).</strong>Firstly, he asserts that environmental sustainability is important because natural resources are a common heritage of mankind to fairness of intergenerational <strong>(express ideas using your own words)</strong>.Besides, he states socail <strong>/ social </strong>sustainability helps future generations build to a healtier <strong>/ healthier</strong> society.And also,he indicates economic sustainability <del>is</del> ensures the continuity and growth of the existing economy. As an example,he points out two models of economic sustainability, that one of the models <del>Heal (1998) who</del> defends the idea that the task of saving the future belongs to the government. Against this,the other model <del>is Bratland (2006)</del> considers that for resources and the future,private ownership is the only way.The writer<strong>s</strong> observe<del>s</del> that although sustainability is so important,even if most people are aware of the limited resources,they will continue the use them for their own benefits,therefore social cooperation is not possible.The writer<strong>S</strong> conclude<del>s</del> that if they are all articulated consciously,the future can be positively affected and these positive solutions and effects bring new ones,therefore people must adopt policies that preserve justice and protect the future.<br><br></div><div> <strong>Good job, but make sure all ideas are expressed in your own words.<br><br>Best,<br>MET</strong><br><br></div><div>Şelale Özcan - Week 2 Text Summary<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/415956123/04bc8f21c9034c05eeed5313689f2010/_elale__zcan_Week_2_Text_Summary.docx" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-08 20:09:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395292026</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zulkufcan Akyildiz Week 2 Summary</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395323552</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the article "Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity" by <del>(</del>Stazyk<del>)</del>(2014) is about to keep the sustainability for future generations. The writer mentions that without maintaining a supporting ecosystem today and into the future, the health and survival of humanity are very questionable for people's lives. Besides that writer claims that the current generation should have crucial obligations for future generations about economic<del>al</del> and social sustainability. In light of what was the writer mentioned above, people should adopt policies which are preserved justice and protect the future.<br><br>Dear Zülküfcan,<br><br>Thank you for the task. You need to mention social equity factor and  environmental sustainability. You need to state two different views on economic sustainability. Make sure you rewrite the ideas in your own words.<br><br>Best,<br>MET </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-08 21:41:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395323552</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tuana Özten Week2Summary</title>
         <author>tuana_ozten</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395331118</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this article <del>from 2014</del> ‘Sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity’ <del>written</del> by<del> Edmund C. </del><strong>Stazyk et al (2014).</strong><del> Alisa Moldovanova and Gergo Frederickson.</del> <strong>the a</strong>uthors argue that current generations’ responsibility versus future generations <strong>(check the language, the sentence is incomplete)</strong>. To exemplify, form of equity, economic, social sustainability and intergenerational fairness are all about authors’ references regarding the transition of generation <strong>(you need to briefly state what do the authors stress abıut these pillars of sustainability?)</strong>. Writers compare the Athenian city-state to Greeks. Both of them <strong>value of their oath to left more (check language here) </strong>comfortable life to future generation. Moreover, they refer that environment which is most significant issue in sustainability because of the fact that the resources which have been given us to use cautiously must be protected. Such duty is <strong> the </strong>formula of the how we will sustain this world. As the authors refers that economic sustainability is <del>the</del> another aim of sustaining. Unless people are careful about their life, scarcities can be an extreme problem for them. It <strong>causes their social life (language hinders understanding) </strong>which is writers’ other point. Authors conclude that people must find a solution to interchange high level of standard life for the future generation.<br><br>Dear Tuana,<br><br>Thank you for the task. Make sure you use linkers to guide the readers and use reporting verbs to reflect the author's attitude.<br><br>Best,<br>MET</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-08 22:09:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395331118</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The article ‘’sustainability and social equity’’ that is written by Edmund C. Stazyk,Alisa Moldonova, and H.George Frederickson in 2014 states influence of intergenerational fairness to provide sustainability which is effortfull because of increasing consumption. The author claims that intergenerational equity should be arranged  by current generation to provide sustainability by fallowing three principles. First of all ecology  is vital for sustainability. Therefore, environment and natural resources  have to be conserved to be utilized by future generation. Moreover, the author argues that current generation should increase a  economic level of production to create a beceneficial income for future generation. However while extending economy should maintain environmental assets At the point two different economic model for economic sustainability one of them is builded by heal (1998) claims that environmental assets must be regulated by government except that Bratland(2006) finds the argument unethical he argues that promoting private ownership because the ownership rises awereness of natural resource abuse and pollution. On the other hand , the author emphasize natural resources  and environment are  vital for future generations to continue its healthy life. (water hard wood mostly exhaustion) current balance between their needs and future generation rights. In conclusion writer hopes providing intergenerational equity seems difficult at these conditions.However, current generation should be act for the purososes of sustain human life.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395482847</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The article ‘’sustainability and social equity’’ <del>that is written</del> by <del>Edmund C.</del> Stazyk,<del>Alisa Moldonova, and H.George Frederickson in </del><strong> et al. (</strong>2014) state<del>s</del> <strong>the </strong>influence of intergenerational fairness to provide sustainability which is <strong>effortfull</strong>  (<strong>check this word in a dictionary) </strong>because of increasing consumption. The author<strong>s</strong> claim<del>s</del> that intergenerational equity should be arranged  by current generation to provide sustainability by f<del>a</del><strong>o</strong>llowing three principles. First of all ecology  is vital for sustainability. Therefore, environment and natural resources  have to be conserved to be utilized by future generation. Moreover, the author<strong>s</strong> argue<del>s</del> that current generation should increase <del>a</del> economic<del> level of </del>production to create a beceneficial <strong>/beneficial</strong> income for future generation. However while extending economy <strong>they </strong>should maintain environmental assets. <strong>The authors also mention</strong> <del>At the point</del> two different economic model<strong>s</strong> for economic sustainability one of them <del>is builded by heal (1998)</del> claims that environmental assets must be regulated by government <del>except that Bratland(2006)</del> <strong>the other model </strong>finds the argument unethical <del>he</del> <strong>and </strong>argues<del> that </del>promoting private ownership because the ownership rises awereness <strong>/ awareness</strong> of natural resource abuse and pollution. On the other hand , the author<strong>s</strong> emphasize natural resources  and environment are  vital for future generations to continue its healthy life. <del>(water hard wood mostly exhaustion) current balance between their needs and future generation rights.</del> In conclusion <strong>the </strong>writers <strong>are concerned about </strong> providing intergenerational equity seems difficult at these conditions.However,  <strong>they hope that </strong> current generation should be act for the <strong>purososes (can't understand because of spelling)</strong> of sustain human life.<br><br>Please go over my comments.<br><br>Best,<br>MET</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-09 09:33:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395482847</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abdelrahman Nashaat week 2 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395549037</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the article ‘ sustainability and Intergenerational Social Equity’  Stazyk et al. (2014) stress<del>es</del> the importance of generational responsibility towards sustaining valuable resources for future generations claiming that ‘without maintaining the supporting ecosystem today and into the future, the continued health and survival of humanity is questionable’ and that our view should be directed towards the three pillars of sustainability being the environmental, social and economic pressures .Also to reaffirm his point the author<strong>s</strong> demonstrate<del>s</del> that the idea of sustainability is not as new as it is viewed by giving an example of the oath taken by the Athenian society 2,500 years ago. Furthermore the author<strong>s</strong> r<strong>a</strong>ise<del>s</del> the point that not only  it is something beneficial for current generation but it is also an obligation for the betterment and growth of future generations, but as stated by the author<strong>s</strong> giving the example of the theory “ the tragedy of the commons” explaining that while the population might be aware of the issue their natural reaction is to try and maximize their profit and short term goals and ignore the more logical long term goal of sustainability. To conclude the author<strong>s</strong> strongly suggest<del>s</del> that we seek to adopt and implement policies that support intergenerational fairness as a solution. <br><br><strong>Dear Adelrahman,</strong><br><br><strong>Thank you for the task. Make sure you also mention two models of economic sustainability and their relevance world resources.<br><br>Best,<br>MET</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-09 12:48:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395549037</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Atabe</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395593473</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-09 13:49:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/merveelbirlik/p3ncwwip02wm/wish/395593473</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
