Which of the 2 websites would you use? Briefly explain the positives and negatives (if any) of both. by Anne Ken

i would use the the first one because the information post on the second did not any credit and it was made by a white group.

2015-11-17 21:00:22 UTC

i would not use the second website because it is hosted by a white pride website, while the first one is more source reilable website

2015-11-17 21:00:36 UTC

ｉ　ｗｏｕｌｄ　ｎｏｔ　ｕｓｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｅｃｏｎｄ　ｗｅｂｓｉｔｅ　ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ　ｉｔ　ｈａｓ　ｎｏｔｈｉｎｇ　ｃｏｒｒｅｃｔ　ａｂｏｕｔ　ｈｉｍ　ａｎｄ　ｉｔｓ　ａ　ｂｉａｓｅｄ　ｇｒｏｕｐ　ｏｆ　ｗｈｉｔｅ　ｐｅｏｐｌｅ　］

2015-11-17 21:00:45 UTC

2015-11-17 21:02:37 UTC

the source for the second website is false and is made by a biased group of people

i wouldnt use the second source because it doesnt have any of the "requirements" on the sheet.

2015-11-17 21:02:53 UTC

I would use the first source, mainly due to it being a reliable source, with it coming from an actual source, called the King Center, not a racially biased source that is unacceptable.

2015-11-17 21:03:46 UTC

I would not use the second website because it is highly inappropriate and is not relevant to any of the requirements.

2015-11-17 21:04:39 UTC

I would most likely use the first source because it is more reliable and the information is listed more clearly and in an organized fashion.Meanwhile,the second source is less credable and not as clear.It is also complicated and confusing

2015-11-17 21:04:42 UTC

The first source is more credible than the second source because the article is updated with useful and reliable information .

2015-11-17 21:04:44 UTC

chris

2015-11-17 21:07:46 UTC

i would use the second one because it gives more valid information than the second one, also the second one doesnt give mery much information about the author nor about dr king