ATP Thread by

2019-03-20 13:13:54 UTC

Testing 123

2019-03-20 14:05:55 UTC

How can we effectively communicate about the validity-diversity dilemma to a non-technical audience?

2019-03-20 14:10:06 UTC

The Psychometrics info presented at the slides identifying potential bias can also be tevieeed by test takers’ comments

2019-03-20 14:10:36 UTC

I'd agree, but note that we have evidence of predictive validity on a video based sjt that demonstrates additive value over and above the GPA/MCAT. With validity evidence at the same levels of GPA 3-6 years later with different outcomes than gpa

2019-03-20 14:12:48 UTC

Do meta analyses show the same results as these slides w relatively small samples (<2000)?

2019-03-20 14:15:08 UTC

Have you ever seen decreased measurement of bias in situations where test programs provide equal access for disadvantaged socioeconomic students to test preparation or subsidized repeat testing?

2019-03-20 14:15:23 UTC

Could non cog be measured and together is a rounust test?

2019-03-20 14:17:25 UTC

Might you see more improvement in adverse impact levels by weighting the non-cognitive Assessment or making the cognitive cut a bit lower?

2019-03-20 14:29:02 UTC

Can vendors claim that their assessment or product is "bias-free"?

2019-03-20 14:33:37 UTC

We have been seeing our medical school performance on our medical licensure exams is getting higher, our exams have different innovative item types

2019-03-20 14:38:09 UTC

Use of technology to measure job-related constructs can be useful when that technology is required for the job, but one must be careful and realize that you may have substantial method variance at the expense of construct rated variance.

2019-03-20 14:45:04 UTC

Will your slides be available after the conference? Thank you!

2019-03-20 14:45:04 UTC

Knowing and educate the impact of diversity is as equal important as validity argument