<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>COMS-371: Reflection Journal  by Kati D</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af</link>
      <description>Kati Dolyniuk (30129598)


</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-09-09 18:28:58 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-03-22 02:55:53 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #1: What do you want to learn in this course? Why is this course interesting to you? What topic(s) are you most excited about? (1 paragraph)</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1744191134</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Within this course, I would like to learn more about media and how it is interpreted, related, and impactful within the social world. I hope to further attain knowledge within the area of media studies to help further expand my thoughts and opinions towards social and political aspects. After having watched the introductory lectures I can say that Critical Media Studies is a field that involves research related to various disciplines in media including Film, TV, Radio, Music, and the Internet (Keller 2021). I enrolled in this course because I believe it will push me to think beyond my thoughts and try to push me to question subjects I may not have before. This course seems to use theory to examine specific media which will assist in guiding me towards more meaningful and educated assumptions (Keller 2021). I am most excited about subjects relating to political economy, power, governmentality, and post-structuralism as these subjects interest me most because they relate to the field of Political Science. Combining the study of Communication with the discipline of Political Science allows for me to relate both of my passions together in one area. I can say I am also curious to learn about areas I am not too familiar with such as Race Theory and Queer Media Studies. I am eager to begin learning about Critical Media Studies and its application within society!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-15 23:44:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1744191134</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #2: The Knot (on D2L) What is Engstrom’s main argument? Why is political economy an important approach for her research? What was your main “take-away” from this article?(1-2 paragraphs)</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1744192042</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I believe that Engstrom's main argument has to do with examining the hegemonic representations within the media, more specifically within wedding media. Engstrom utilizes the Knot as an example of a company that exhibits the idea of media consolidation (Engstrom 2008, 60-82). The Knot demonstrates this idea of media consolidation because it is a few large conglomerates that own the majority of the wedding media produced. This concept allows for companies to further attain their agenda. The Knot is self-proclaimed the #1 wedding website with over 2.1 million visitors per month and is said to be the largest retailer of wedding supplies and goods (Engstrom 2008, 60-82). With the number of exposure advertisements and products received on their website, it has begun to conform into a hegemonic figure within the wedding community. Hegemonic media representations typically reflect the status quo and serve those who already have power, which is how the Knot can capitalize on selling products people do not need (Keller 2021). The Knot article emphasizes the idea that perfection must be achieved and that the only way to achieve it is through consuming their products (Engstrom 2008, 60-82).&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>A political-economic approach typically allows scholars to study media production and distribution and how it shapes audiences and their practices (Keller 2021). Engstrom utilizes a political-economic approach within her research because it outlines how capitalism and consumerism are dominant and hegemonic ideologies within our social spheres of influence. This idea is seen within this wedding media examples along with other mediums from music, to TV and radio. The capitalistic essence of 21st-century society is taking over various mediums and what was once a website to promote a couple getting married and celebrating life together is now used as a ploy to capitalize on the market. Engstrom also uses a political-economic approach to analyze key ideas within the Knot, such as the “superbride” and the “bride as a physical object” (Engstrom 2008, 60-82). These two concepts demonstrate a capitalistic approach as a wedding to The Knot is now an organized social event that is used for advertising and selling products rather than celebrating relationships (Engstrom 2008, 60-82). The Knot describes this as the bride always being the one to cause errors and freak out on the wedding day or how the groom rarely has a say in wedding planning and receives little to no attention at all on the big day (Engstrom 2008, 60-82). My main takeaway from this article is how you cannot influence your life based on what is seen within the media because most of the time your best interests are not at hand because of the ulterior motives entrenched in media and advertising. The Knot is a prime example of how media synergy possesses people and influences them to consume a product they probably do not need.&nbsp;</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-15 23:45:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1744192042</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #3: Reflect on the Ross piece in relation to what you’ve learned about the Frankfurt School: What is the main argument that Ross makes in this article? Ross writes, “Of the clouds and shadows that hung over Clinton in the press, the darkest, perhaps, was the prospect of boredom.”What does he mean by this? How does it relate to the argument made by the Frankfurt School? (2-3 paragraphs). </title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1758235044</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Ross’s article provides insight into how Mass Culture and the Culture industry shape how people think about political economy. Within this article, Ross uses the 2016 election in the United States as an example of what the Frankfurt School would call the Culture Industry and its impact on how Mass Culture is created (Ross 2016). Following Donald Trump's election as president Ross examines potential reasons why so many people voted for him from a mass culture approach. My takeaway from this article is how many people voted for Donald Trump because of his persona persuaded within the media (Ross 2016). The article mentions how many people enjoyed the idea of having a millionaire TV personal running as president which may have persuaded more people to vote in his favour. Within this text, there are also concepts of Media Synergy as the companies who owned the streaming services, endorsed Trump's campaign where they are then making money off “selling” the MEGA slogan (Ross 2016). This article ultimately demonstrates how the hegemonic ideals of the Culture Industry are practiced when people vote for Trump because of the image they are seeing within the media. Ross goes as far as to say that people are deceived by the Culture Industry and Media.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>When Ross proclaims the “prospect of boredom” he is demonstrating how Hillary Clinton's campaign and the idea of her are simply not as compelling as that of Donald Trump (Ross 2016). Like I had mentioned previously people liked this idea of a rich TV personal running the show. The people wanted the excitement and ambiguity that he brought to the table. Trump made for a better story which the Culture Industry could then use to capitalize and create wealth because more people were “buying” what Trump had to offer over Hilary (Ross 2016). Trump as a president was most definitely a product of Mass Culture, but Trump as a person one could also say is a product of Mass Culture because of his family and his time working in television and film. Trump was a commodity that the Culture industry was selling and enough people bought it which shows the impact of this industry in our lives. I believe that the Frankfurt School is not only right about their assumptions regarding Mass Culture but also how it creates a false need rather than what consumers actually want.&nbsp;</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 19:28:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1758235044</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Donald Trump in THE GUARDIAN</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1760979896</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Figure #1</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1336594412/c790951b3694c3da09f6292a04b938bf/Unknown.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-22 19:11:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1760979896</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Donald Trump in the TIME</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1760984405</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Figure #2</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1336594412/7c507f148ca25ae7cf873d6c36e21f61/images.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-22 19:13:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1760984405</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #4: How does the political activism of fans, as you read about in the article by Kelly, demonstrate one key component of cultural studies? Can you think of another example of fan political activism? (2 paragraphs): </title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1775947381</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Kelly article demonstrates a few different ideas when it comes to culture studies. One of the main ideas proposed by the Birmingham School is how everyday ordinary people are influenced by culture and popular culture. Within the Kelly example it demonstrates how the K-pop community comes together and mobilizes for a cause because they are influenced by the story of George Floyd (Kelly 2020). They realize how large of a platform they have and utilize it to their advantage to spread awareness for the BLM community. This example also demonstrates the concept of what Stuart Hall would call active audiences in that they are responding to the messages which are being portrayed within the media (Keller 2021). They are standing up for what they believe in even if it is against the dominant hegemonic code. The K-pop’s political activism within the media also shows how they have adopted an oppositional code from what the government was making out of the story of George Floyd. They took what was being said in the media and by being an active audience they stood up and said that racism is not okay and never has been and now they are trying to fix it which is against the dominant hegemonic code therefore making it oppositional (Kelly 2020).&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Throughout society today the most impactful way to spread a message is through social media or fans. Many celebrities and influencers have extremely large fan bases, that they can advocate for whatever they believe in and their followers will do the rest. As seen in the Kelly article, fan political activism has to do with a fan base reaching out and advocating for reform (Kelly 2020). Another example of this is seen within Lady Gaga and her fans back in 2010 when the Dont Ask Dont Tell (DADT) policy was almost not revoked within the US military. This policy essentially made LGBTQ+ members keep their sexuality private when applying or serving in the military. This policy was forcing many LGBTQ+ members to hide who they truly were and many were refused entry and discharged because of their lifestyle. Lady Gaga invited four people who were released to join her on stage for a performance at the MTV music awards and the fans took it from there. "TheReal_JakeK '' started a<a href="http://twitition.com/vzkp6"> Twitition</a> to assist in repealing the policy along with many other fans. The fans took to social media and anywhere they could advocate for getting Dont Ask Dont Tell repealed. This is an example of fan political activism because Lady Gaga’s fans were using their platform to create change and reform in society. Eventually DADT did get revoked in December of 2010. Fan political activism works to demonstrate how impactful media can be in influencing political and societal policy which is a main concept relating to cultural studies as a main concept has to do with how people make meaning from media (Keller 2021).&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 20:59:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1775947381</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #5: Pay attention to the media you consume this week and choose one media image that operates semiotically. Include this image in your journal and do a mini semiotic analysis–what is the signifier? Signified? Sign? (2 paragraphs) This entry is an opportunity for you to “practice” applying semiotics, so don’t worry about being “right”!:</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1794306714</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on the media I consumed weekly, I have chosen an advertisement from one of the stores I am subscribed to. This image is an advertisement email put out from the clothing store Aritzia (Figure 3). This store specifically caters to the typical young adult audience and follows what is known as fast fashion trends. This store provides business-style clothing and everyday casual outfits, and I would say most people cannot leave Aritzia without spending at least $100 for one item. The store is known for being pretty expensive but the quality of the clothing is fairly decent from my experiences. The reason I choose this example is that it provides a solid outline for a semiotic analysis because of the complexity of the content and the number of elements used (Figure 3). I found this advertisement to be captivating and it persuaded me to go on the website and browse their selections. This example is typically what I see daily and I believe this will be an adequate example to help me practice applying semiotics.</div><div><br></div><div>The first thing I notice within this image is the bright red coat, the idea of being cool and looking hot, and the well-known celebrity modeling the coat, Kendall Jenner. I would say based on this being a clothing advertisement the <strong>signifier </strong>within this image is the coat (Figure 3). This is because the coat is what is being sold and it stands out the most within this image. The <strong>signified </strong>within this image would be the concept of clothing and wearing a coat (Figure 3). Within this primary level of analysis, no underlying assumptions are provided as it is simply analyzing what is being presented. The <strong>signs</strong> within a media image communicate meaning which is why it can be interpreted in different ways, this is known as being polysemic (Keller 2021). Signs are polysemic in this nature because individuals have differences of opinion and influence causing them to make different meanings from a sign. The sign within this image would simply be the bright red winter coat, the red car, the glasses, the super puff logo, and the odometer (Figure 3). The <strong>denotation</strong> within this analysis is still a part of the primary level as it depicts the basic descriptive meaning which most individuals would agree with (Keller 2021). The denotation within this advertisement would be the concept of benign super warmth in a winter coat. This is ultimately what the advertisement is promoting since no further assumptions or previous knowledge are taken into account. The <strong>connotation</strong> within the image becomes more invested in outlining the political purpose and leads to the overarching ideologies proposed within the media (Figure 3). Connotation creates a wide and diverse understanding of a media image and allows interpretation from across various media audiences (Keller 2021). Within this example, the connotation is the idea of staying warm during the winter while looking “cool”. This is because based on previous knowledge of Aritzia along with the assumption of a huge celebrity modeling this coat is it safe to assume if one is to buy this coat they will be warm and look cool just like Kendall. The media image is ultimately proposing that if one is to buy this coat they will look rich or of higher class and will “look hot” while “staying warm” during the winter months.</div><div><br></div><div>Finally, within a semiotic analysis, the <strong>myth</strong> is the most important aspect of a media analysis that understands the political and ideological meaning proposed by the media. The myth is also used to understand how meaning is produced in popular culture through defending prevailing power structures and ideologies which actively promote the values and interests of the dominant groups in society (Keller 2021). The myth within this advertisement promotes the idea of wealth and if one is to buy this coat they will look rich and fashionable (Figure 3). It exemplifies superiority in that being white and skinny is what society prefers and also what society determines to be most successful. It promotes the underlying assumptions that purchasing expensive jackets and goods is what will make you prosperous. This advertisement is also suggesting that the ideal life is being rich and of high class. This is because Kendall Jenner is rich and is a well-known figure online with millions of followers of people who wish they could have a life like hers. Aritzia is simply feeding into the societal mentality of what the “typical” successful person in media looks like (white, skinny, and rich). One could conclude that the myth within this advertising is the circulating ideologies of capitalism and elitism.</div><div><br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-05 20:05:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1794306714</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1794310296</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Figure #3</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1336594412/94b05df93d4f9220913e03f7b5a39a26/9lziCvN8n6Ld.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-05 20:06:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1794310296</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #8: Which two concepts did you find most important in this week’s readings? Why? How do they help us understand the representation of gender in mediaculture? (2-3 paragraphs).</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852285970</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The first concept that resonated with me this week was the idea of popular feminism. Within the popular misogyny article by Sarah Banet-Weiser, she does a great job of demonstrating what feminism looks like within society today. Feminism is known to be a historical movement that enabled people to fight for women and their rights, or at least this is what the idea of feminism was (Banet-Weiser 2015). When I was first introduced to feminism it embodied critical movements like women in Canada getting the right to vote, or critical figures like the famous five. Nowadays I am sure children still learn about critical feminist movements and figures but feminism is demonstrated and displayed with media in a completely different way. Banet-Weiser proposes the concept of popular feminism and how it almost makes feminism a trend or something that can be celebrated instead of its true quality of being a movement like it once was (Banet-Weiser 2015). I found this riveting because throughout my life and most of even my parents' life, women not being equal was never a primary concern. I think many people would agree that my generation does not see that there is still inequality even though we have moved forward from what was the feminist movement. Celebrities and media now think of feminism as almost a way to capitalize and create profit instead of a movement for rights. An example that came to mind when thinking about this reading was a character from a popular Netflix Movie called <em>To All The Boys I've Loved Before</em>. The main character's little sister wears a necklace that says feminist, she appears in many scenes with this necklace and it relates to this idea of popular feminism. This is because she embodies the rebranded version of feminism which treats this movement as a fad. The underlying values of popular feminism have pure intentions but they do not seek to get to the root of the problem which can create opportunities for direct criticism and backlash.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Popular feminism also tends to treat gender in the media like it is no longer a movement and that it is not as important anymore. The backlash that popular feminism creates moves towards the idea of popular misogyny (Banet-Weiser 2015). This concept has to do with valuing traditional gender roles and the denial of gender inequality. One reason for this transition is how popular feminism almost devalues the core concepts of feminism making it seem less important in society and creating opportunity for backlash (Keller 2021). Popular feminism has become mainstream and it has caused individuals to fight the movement and promote their misogynistic values. The male gaze is another concept that intrigued me this week and I believe it relates to how women are represented within media culture. This idea has to do with women functioning as a spectacle for men to look at (Keller 2021). This concept suggests that women are only placed in media for men to enjoy looking at and it completely devalues women and their contributions to media culture entirely. Learning about this concept provoked me to think about the individuals in my life and the media I consume and how they treat women in this degrading way. It is very disheartening to think that in 2021 there are still misogynistic men who look at women like objects. Popular misogyny is taking over the media and instead of women becoming more represented and respected it begins to make a fool out of them (Keller 2021). However, there is more women representation in male-dominated areas, but there is still not enough focus on women and the values they bring to the table.&nbsp;</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-28 19:38:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852285970</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852287369</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Figure #4</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1336594412/bebd46529d650632970f85a39ffb9f64/tumblr_pdoqld66gx1w5yfc0o1_1280_png.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-28 19:38:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852287369</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #11: What is hooks’ main argument in this chapter? What does it mean to “eat the Other?” Choose one quote from the chapter that you think is the most powerful–why did it stand out to you?(2-3 paragraphs).</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852318635</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The hook reading focuses on critical ideas which relate to race and the commodification signifying oppression and appropriation within society. Hook's main argument within the reading has to do with cultural appropriation within consumer culture and how it continues to exploit cultures to maintain the status quo (hooks 2014, 21-39). Within her reading, she depicts the concept of “eat the other”, which is a primitive process which is initially described as “the heart of a person may be ripped out and eaten so that one can embody that person’s spirit or special characteristics” (hooks 2014, 31). This idea conceptualizes how when one is to appropriate another culture it is essentially the equivalent of ripping their heart out. Hook demonstrates how harmful cultural appropriation can be to people of colour and how white people assert power and privilege when doing so. Within eating the other, people of colour are seen as exotic and a product which must be consumed. She provides an example of this idea from the film Mooney, where the white supremacist capitalist patriarchy is maintained through “[insiting] that white male desire must be sustained by the “labor” (in this case the heart) of a dark Other”(hooks 2014, 31). She reinforces the fact of duality within the concept of the “other” and how it describes exotic vs normal, or dangerous vs safe, and so on. These are common ideas seen within the concept of the “other”. She also looks at how the “Other can be continually exploited, and that such exploitation will occur in a manner that reinscribes and maintains the status quo.” (hooks 2014, 22). She demonstrates here how cultural appropriation is maintained as the status quo. She ultimately concludes the article by understanding that society must address racism on all fronts for anything to change.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>“Concurrently, marginalized groups, deemed Other, who have been ignored, rendered invisible, can be seduced by the emphasis on Otherness, by its commodification, because it offers the promise of recognition and reconciliation.” (hooks 2014, 26). This quote stood out to me because it truly captures the essence and impact which eating the other has. This quote embodies the impact that cultural appropriation has on various cultures which pushes to marginalize them even further. Within this quote, hook addresses racism and how without addressing it first hand and confronting the concern within society nothing will change (hooks 2014, 21-39). The quote signifies how marginalized groups are looked at as a commodity that needs to be consumed which is the purpose of hook coining the term “eating the other”. When society is “seduced by the emphasis on otherness” it demonstrates how people use culture as a path of enlightenment which demonstrates their privilege (hooks 2014, 26). Without further confronting racism and cultural appropriation firsthand, the uplifting marginalized groups cannot be attained as the privilege of the dominant groups will still be present.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-28 19:59:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852318635</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #12: What is a “queer reading” and why might this concept be useful for thinking about popular media cultures? Can you think of a contemporary media example that where a queer reading would be useful? (1-2 paragraphs).</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852319620</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A “queer reading” has to do with locating queerness within certain media and media cultures. It originated in the late twentieth century and has to do with the idea of queerness as a cultural reception practice that is shaped by different kinds of people (Keller 2021). A queer reading is defined as a cultural studies approach because it looks at media audiences and their reception to make meaning on various levels. The Doty reading describes it as a <em>“result from the recognition and ar- ticulation of the complex range of queerness that has been in popular culture texts and their audiences all along.”</em>(Doty 1993, 15). Doty proposes the idea that a queer reading is not a new concept to media culture and they analyze how this way of looking at media has always been around, but not prominent due to dominant societal structures (Doty 1993, 1-16). This idea is normally demonstrated in areas that are known to typically be heterosexual or “straight”. A queer reading demonstrates an alternative approach to looking at media which some would address as challenging the norms (Doty 1993, 1-16). This way of looking at media is useful within popular media cultures because it recognizes gender as a spectrum and challenges existing power structures and ways of thinking.</div><div><br></div><div>A contemporary example that comes to mind when thinking about a queer reading is the character Jughead Jones in the popular CW show Riverdale. Within this television show, some characters do identify within the LGBTQ+ community, but Jughead Jones in particular is not typically "seen" as one of those characters. For most of the first few seasons, he is typically interested in women and is not viewed as an LGBTQ+ member within media culture, but I think he demonstrates an excellent example of what a queer reading is. Most of his relationships do not work out with women, he is more focused on other activities such as writing rather than his relationships, and he seems more interested in himself than anything else. When looking at these aspects of his character one can see that he could potentially be a queer character or even an asexual character as he is not typically interested in that many women and he almost seems more self-involved. This would adopt the idea of a queer reading because his character to mainstream media may look “straight” but there are no boundaries in reality as to what a homosexual or heterosexual man “should” look like. This is why Jughead Jones can be presented as a queer character because he adopts qualities that can pertain to any sexuality as there are no set characteristics to sexuality, gender, or even race.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>See the image of "Jughead Jones" in Figure #5.</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-28 20:00:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852319620</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Question Week #14: In this final journal entry, I’d like you to meaningfully reflect on the course: Read through your journal entries from this semester--what was the most compelling thing you learned? Why did you find it compelling? Did any of the content challenge what you thought you knew about media culture? Which reading stands out to you as the most important of the course? Finally, give one specific example as to how you will approach media differently–this might be in your personal life, your job, or your studies--after taking this course. (3 paragraphs).</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852320536</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I thoroughly enjoyed this class and all the captivating topics which were discussed within the lectures, readings, and throughout the lab time. For me, many compelling topics were discussed within this class. For starters, I really enjoyed the second week's discussion on Marx and Media Studies. Being from a political science background I enjoy learning about concepts related to influential political scholars such as Karl Marx. I was already familiar with his concept of ideology and his perspectives on the mode of production and how those ideas shaped the working class, but what I did not know was his involvement within ideology parleys into media studies. I am very intrigued with the idea of ideology being a way for the media to promote certain agendas and how it suggests different ways to look at the world. Gramsci and his work within hegemony also captivated me as it demonstrates how media and society typically serve those already in positions of power and maintain existing power structures within society. Now having studied these various areas, when consuming media I have a different perspective than I did coming into this class. I agree with Horkheimer and Adorno in the fact that I was somewhat passive when consuming media before because I was not truly understanding the underlying ideologies proposed by media producers and was simply thinking nothing of media in general. For example, before this class, I would have never taken the time to reflect on society and watch a film such as Disclosure. Disclosure allowed me to become an active audience and listen to a community with which I am not very familiar. I do not know any people within the Trans community and many individuals within the media I consume are not as well. Disclosure opened my mind to the reason why there are not many Trans characters within the media I consume and it is because their voices and identities do not maintain the existing power structures and status quo.&nbsp;<br><br>Before this class, I was not familiar with many topics within media studies and all the different areas and fields which can be studied. I think many concepts challenged me and everything I knew about media culture. For starters, the disclosure film as mentioned above demonstrated how clueless I was about issues which are happening right in front of me. The Frankfurt School was a challenging concept for me in regards to media culture as I never understood what the culture industry was and the impact which it has on society. Within the Trump reading that week I enjoyed learning about another reason why Donald Trump was elected from a media standpoint. After having read the article I began to understand that his persona and the downfall of Hillary's in the media ultimately won him the presidency. He portrayed himself as a character like the one he used to play which was exciting and frankly a less “boring” option compared to Hilary. This persona or character was taken up by the viewers as something which could be exciting for politics and the political economy which pleased the people. Another reading which stood out to me was Engstrom's article on Unraveling the Knot. I was intrigued by this entire concept of how hegemony and ideology circulate within wedding media. I enjoyed this article because it took a political-economic approach to examine capitalism within wedding media. The Goop example also shared similar ideas to Engstrom's article in demonstrating how women are targeted as specific consumers for the beauty industry which capitalizes on their insecurities. I believe this course has helped me analyze the media I consume better as I too have been a victim of this popular consumer culture.&nbsp;<br><br>Going forward I now believe I have a greater skill set to study and examine the media I consume daily. Before this course, I never realized some of the media I consume is strategically portrayed in certain ways to promote the hegemonic values in society. For example, the movies and TV shows I consume do not demonstrate the concept of intersectionality which is critical in uplifting marginalized groups who are typically suppressed by the media. Before having taken this course I would probably not have seen how significant this pattern is within suppressed and marginalized groups, and I will now try to veer away from it. Hall’s approach to decoding will also help me going forward in my future endeavors to realize the range of possibilities to make meaning and that I cannot assume the dominant hegemonic idea which I have been susceptible to. My view towards media consumers and producers will also look different going forward as I know now that there is no right or wrong way to make meaning. Within my studies I look forward to utilizing these new skills when reading, writing, and any other task where inspecting media may be involved.&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-28 20:00:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1852320536</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1909345572</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Figure #5</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1336594412/ba8c26af3c0301cb411cdd90a8308fed/yql6ygxa_640.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-23 22:10:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1909345572</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1909355726</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Figure #6</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9434BoGkNQ" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-23 22:22:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1909355726</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>References:</title>
         <author>katidolyniuk55</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1921310260</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Banet-Weiser, S. 2015 “Popular Misogyny: a Zeitgeist.” Culture Digitally. https://culturedigitally.org/2015/01/popular-misogyny-a-zeitgeist/.&nbsp;<br><br></div><div>Doty, A. 1993.&nbsp; “Making Things Perfectly Queer : Interpreting Mass Culture.” <em>Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.</em> ProQuest Ebook Central. 1-16.<br><br></div><div>Engstrom, E. 2008.“Unraveling The Knot: Political Economy and Cultural Hegemony in Wedding Media.” <em>Journal of Communication Inquiry</em> 32, no. 1: 60–82.&nbsp;<br><br></div><div>hooks, B. 2014. “Black Looks: Race and Representation (2nd ed.)” Chapter 2: Eating the Other: Desire and Resistance. <em>Routledge. </em>21-39.</div><div>https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.4324/9781315743226<br><br></div><div>Keller, Jessalynn. 2021. Lecture Material and Powerpoint Presentation. Coms 371: Critical Media Studies.<br><br></div><div>Kelly, E. 2020. “ ‘More than Stans’ K-Pop Fans Are Mobilizing for the Black Lives Matter Movement” <em>Bitch Media</em>.&nbsp;<br><br></div><div>Ross, A.2016. “The Frankfurt School Knew Trump Was Coming.” <em>The New Yorker</em>, sec. Cultural Comment.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 19:58:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katidolyniuk55/oujluh2ocklfu8af/wish/1921310260</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
