<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title> Judicial Review by Joshua Mitts</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88</link>
      <description>Judicial Review
Anabel, Yarlin, Dehye,Josh </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:18:55 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-02-15 18:18:18 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Miranda V Arizona</title>
         <author>hcps_mittsjt</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026665</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><figure class="attachment attachment--preview" data-trix-attachment="{&quot;contentType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;height&quot;:280,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.crimemuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Miranda-1.jpg&quot;,&quot;width&quot;:191}" data-trix-content-type="image"><img src="https://www.crimemuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Miranda-1.jpg" width="191" height="280"><figcaption class="attachment__caption"></figcaption></figure></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:18:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026665</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)</title>
         <author>hcps_mittsjt</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026668</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>this case is about a man that got arrest but the officers forgot to read him his rights.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:18:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026668</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> case brief</title>
         <author>hcps_mittsjt</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026670</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed and held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:18:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026670</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>summary</title>
         <author>hcps_mittsjt</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026671</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination requires law enforcement officials to advise a suspect interrogated in custody of his or her rights to remain silent and to obtain an attorney.Supreme Court of Arizona reversed and remanded.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:18:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026671</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Judicial Review</title>
         <author>hcps_mittsjt</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026673</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Anabel, Yarlin, Dehye, Josh Anabel Lopez<br><br>●<br>1m<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:18:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232026673</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Brown v. Board of education</title>
         <author>hcps_diazbenye</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232034493</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;<figure class="attachment attachment--preview" data-trix-attachment="{&quot;contentType&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;height&quot;:146,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;http://www.easynotecards.com/uploads/271/4/_53022d86_13d85ffda7d__8000_00003395.jpeg&quot;,&quot;width&quot;:195}" data-trix-content-type="image"><img src="http://www.easynotecards.com/uploads/271/4/_53022d86_13d85ffda7d__8000_00003395.jpeg" width="195" height="146"><figcaption class="attachment__caption"></figcaption></figure></div><div>In Topeka, Kansas in the 1950s, schools were segregated by race. Each day, Linda Brown and her sister had to walk through a dangerous railroad&nbsp; to get to the bus stop for the ride to their all-black elementary school. There was a school closer to the Brown's house, but it was only for white students. Brown went to the white school but all people from that school discriminate her just because she was the first girl black going to the white&nbsp; school &nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:31:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232034493</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896) By:Anabel</title>
         <author>hcps_lopezai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232036126</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Summary: The Plessy vs. Ferguson was in the segregation time and they where doing something very risky and when they did that they r</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:34:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232036126</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Plessy v. Ferguson</title>
         <author>hcps_mittsjt</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232039464</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><figure class="attachment attachment--preview"><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Plessy_marker.jpg/220px-Plessy_marker.jpg" width="220" height="197"><figcaption class="attachment__caption"></figcaption></figure> 163 U.S. 537 (<strong>1896</strong>), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court issued in <strong>1896</strong>. It upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal". </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-15 17:39:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hcps_mittsjt/oq9azatebh88/wish/232039464</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
