MCT Case Study Workshop Discussion Board by Jeffrey Blackwatters

Perspective One: What questions do you have about this perspective?

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-26 17:25:50 UTC

Perspective One: Naming This Perspective

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-26 17:37:18 UTC

Perspective Two: What questions do you have about this perspective?

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-26 17:38:29 UTC

Perspective Two: Naming This Perspective

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-26 17:38:47 UTC

Perspective Three: What questions do you have about this perspective?

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-26 17:39:20 UTC

Perspective Three: Naming This Perspective

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-26 17:39:53 UTC

END

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-26 17:40:19 UTC

Do these perspectives represent the range of views on this topic?

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-27 21:59:36 UTC

What are we missing?

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-27 21:59:41 UTC

What kind of outputs would you like to see from this project? E.g., infographics, list of best practices

jjblackwatters — 2024-02-27 22:15:35 UTC

Did you see a difference among participants views depending on whether they were grantees or other types of particpants?

2024-03-01 00:21:27 UTC

Curious how you interpret the one Q-card statement ranking so high which states "I don't really understand what MCT's role is for the region, and that's a problem" among this group, compared to the other two groups

2024-03-01 00:26:39 UTC

Intermediaries contribute to equity

2024-03-01 00:29:53 UTC

Intermediaries bridge the gap

2024-03-01 00:33:23 UTC

There seems to be a lot of similarity between perspective 1 and 2 with "intermediaries as pathways to equity," and therefore challenging to assess

2024-03-01 00:55:01 UTC

Intermediaries are helpful but constrained seems to capture it well

2024-03-01 01:01:56 UTC

2024-03-01 01:04:13 UTC

Intermediaries - grantees relationships needs support too

2024-03-01 01:04:14 UTC

Also like helpful but constrained

Were other funders disaggregated by public vs. private? Public funders in general are less flexible than private funders.

2024-03-01 01:10:56 UTC

A path to justice requires more than sufficient conservation funding

2024-03-01 01:18:02 UTC

Intermediaries should seek to alleviate administrative needs on grantees

2024-03-01 01:19:48 UTC

2024-03-01 01:27:14 UTC

Mostly

mostly

2024-03-01 01:27:36 UTC

Mostly

2024-03-01 01:28:27 UTC

Mostly

2024-03-01 01:28:37 UTC

Mostly

2024-03-01 01:29:21 UTC

mostly

2024-03-01 01:29:21 UTC

Presenting at donor forums?

2024-03-01 01:42:55 UTC

It may be helpful to the Micronesia Challenge Socioeconomic Measures Working Group to have Q-methodology itself as a tool introduced and explained a bit, with best practices specifically highlighted based on your experiences here (i.e. a case study of the Q-study methodology)

2024-03-01 01:44:34 UTC

I'd like to Co-Author!

jjblackwatters — 2024-03-01 01:48:33 UTC

The community perspective

jjblackwatters — 2024-03-28 16:42:55 UTC