Gist Parking Lot by Katie Keehner

Gist by Hazel

2024-02-09 15:09:11 UTC

The gist of this article is we can help fight climate change by many ways.Including having healthy diets with low environmental impact, also limiting food waste.

Josh

2024-02-09 15:11:12 UTC

They are trying to figure out ways to stop or slow down climate change by being on a diet or not eating as much as you would. It also explains some dangers of ways food is transported

gist rylee

2024-02-09 15:11:25 UTC

the gist is how we can help to stop climate change by changing our diet

Caden

2024-02-09 15:11:46 UTC

trying to stop Climate change in all wrong ways.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-02-09 15:11:47 UTC

The Gist of this article was that what we eat is also a big factor in climate change and that if we eat a more plant based diet that we can decrease climate change heavily.

Haley

2024-02-09 15:11:48 UTC

The gist of this article is farming is very important for everyone all over the world. The climate change can be fought.

Sequoia

2024-02-09 15:12:17 UTC

The dist of this article is about how all of us can help fight climate change if we all work together. It is also about how they are still trying to find out how to stop the climate change. Once they do, then it can be fought.

Jayson

2024-02-09 15:12:58 UTC

The gist is someways to fight climate change one of them is to stop eating meat. while another is to stop buying as much technology such as phones / computers.

Gist James

28shongjam — 2024-02-09 15:13:14 UTC

it is how people are trying to fix climate change

Gist by Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-02-09 15:13:32 UTC

The gist of this article about Fighting our climate change with our food choices is showing the ways we can help, what it is, diets, and the consequences. Based on this article every one can help in there own ways.

Gist by Laney

2024-02-09 15:13:48 UTC

The gist of this article is trying to inform people what climate change is doing and ways we can change it. A big factor in climate change is what we eat. We could also limit food waste.

maddy

2024-02-09 15:14:25 UTC

the gist of the article is climate change and what is happening and what is causing the climate change and how or what we can do to stop it with our everyday decisions

Danyiel

2024-02-09 15:15:34 UTC

The gist is to understand how the climate has so many effects on our life. And how we can stop making greenhouse gases.

Wyatt

2024-02-09 16:14:36 UTC

The gist to understand that climate change effects on our life and the nature

Gist by Rilee

28bethkril — 2024-02-09 16:15:47 UTC

The gist is understanding that climate change is a problem from our diet and we should do something about it. Helpful tips we should try doing is eat as few animal-based food as possible and limit food waste.

Anna

2024-02-09 16:15:53 UTC

The gist of this article is mostly about farming and that its very important for everyone all over the world. That its trying to stop the climate change in all wrong ways.

Daniel

2024-02-09 16:15:55 UTC

If you do your part of not buring fossiel fuel it coulf help us in the long run yo keep the climste change

Gist by Jada

2024-02-09 16:16:42 UTC

The author believes that what kind of food you eat, your mode of transportation, and how your food is transported adds more less to your carbon footprint. The author also believes anyone can keep there carbon footprint in check if they pay attention to the 3 things above.

Jaylen

2024-02-09 16:16:46 UTC

The gist is about how what we eat can affect how the climate is and we should stop making greenhouse gases

Mason

2024-02-09 16:16:51 UTC

The gist is to understand if we did not have farmers we would not have food and be able to live. And when farmers get sick it is also bad because they have to work at a slower paste and wont get as much food as fast as normal. That climate change effects are lives very hard

zane

2024-02-09 16:17:31 UTC

the gist is climate change can do a lot to crops.

they are trying to stop climate change by not eating as much but it also is not good for food being transported by:Austin

2024-02-09 16:17:57 UTC

eliza

2024-02-09 16:18:57 UTC

The gist is to understand that Climate Change is a problem for our health, and our livestock. And it gives us helpful tips on how to help.

gist that was made by seth

2024-02-09 16:20:01 UTC

the gist is to teach kids how to help make an impact in attempting to stop global warming and making the kids who read this think "hey, If I become a vegetarian and start growing a whole bunch of fruits, i can make a difference in the world and I'll be famous all over the world" but that isn't the case. the kid did it for a whole decade and nothing changed, in fact it only got worse. The kid will wonder why global warming isn't over, and once the kid figures it all out, he becomes wiser and returns to his old ways of devouring beef and ignoring all fruits

ethan

2024-02-09 16:20:09 UTC

the gist is that she said that we need a healthy rich diet and we need to reduce the meat that we consume and we eat a lot beef and not to burn fossil fuels and we should have electric cars so we do not pollute the air

Sophie

2024-02-09 16:20:43 UTC

The gist to Help Fight Climate Change was about how to help are earth out. There are so many bad things that we do in are day to day life that affect the world in ways we never thought of. Lots of things we do are polutting the earth. In the text it states "Human activities have been putting too much pressure on natural systems...... driving cars, eating to much meat and many more. There are so many ways we could make are world a different place. We just have to change some things to make are place different.

Araceli

2024-02-09 16:36:20 UTC

The gist of You can help fight climate change with your food, is don't eat the things animal need for food. More plants would have to be planted. And animals can cause greenhouse gasses by the carbon dioxide. Eat less animal base food. Don't eat flone food. don't waste food. Drink water instead of other beverages. Eat local food. Change your traveling motive. The climate change with greenhouse gasses. Change your diet. And the environment. Help the world so nothing bad happens.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-02-12 15:29:22 UTC

The gist of "Does Beef Waste Water" is that we need to eat less meats to decrease the amount of greenhouse gases that are produced in the making of beef and in turn use less water.

Hazel

2024-02-12 15:30:58 UTC

The gist of the article is the author claims beef does not waste water because 94 % of there water is green water, which is rain. 6% of their water is blue water that comes from streams,etc. That only leaves 1% of drinking water which isn't a lot. She also claims their grazing encorgunize plant and root growth, which actually increase the soil's water capacity.All in all the gist is beef do not waste water.

Haley

2024-02-12 15:31:58 UTC

The article states that 1,800 gallons of water per 1 pound of beef is wasted. Water is very important to everything including people, animals and plants. Beef also drink rain water. To conclude this article says beef is wasting water.

Sequoia

2024-02-12 15:32:27 UTC

In the article, the author states that the cows are not a waste of water, she proves that by going to a farm to make sure that they don't really drink 1800 gallons of water. Instead, she finds out that at that farm, the cows drink 36 gallons of water. She also then found out that there are different types of water that they could be using. They could be using green water or blue water instead. At the end of this paragraph, the author then claims that they don't think that the cows are a waste of water. Thus concluding that thought that beef doesn't waste water.

rylee

2024-02-12 15:32:44 UTC

the gist is we need to eat less meat to decrease the greenhouse gasses because green water goes straight into the soil and blue water

Danyiel

2024-02-12 15:33:42 UTC

Does beef waste water? No because either way your just going to consume it either if it is in liquid form or beef. It seems like beef uses a lot of water but if beef didn't have that much water what would beef be then? In the text it says " It's often said in studies that it takes 1,800 gallons of water". don't get me wrong I can see where people come from if their saying beef wastes water but at the same time what would you swap out the water with? The author states that she doesn't think that beef is a waste of water because beef uses only 1% of drinking water.

Josh

2024-02-12 15:35:01 UTC

The gist of Does Beef Waste Water, talks about how the water calculator is wrong because they don't usually kill the cows that late. The article also states that nuts waste about 100 gallons more of water than beef. with 1,900. The article says that if we don't sell meat it would be better but some people would argue about chicken and other meats because they take less.

Jayson Klingbeil

2024-02-12 15:35:07 UTC

The gist for "Does beef Waste Water" is to stop eating meat or the animals that eat grass because if we do we are technically helping climate change (which we don't want we want to prevent it) so we should stop eating as much meat.

Gist by Laney

2024-02-12 15:35:20 UTC

The gist of Does Beef Waste Water is yes it kind of does but at the same time it is a big source of food. I says 1,800 gallons of water per every 1 pound of beef. That is a lot of water per every pound. But at the same time beef are big animals and they are a big source of food. Chicken and pork use less total water compared to beef. So yes it does take a lot of water to produce beef.

maddy

2024-02-12 15:35:25 UTC

The gist of "food for thought: does beef waste water" is how the production of beef wastes a lot of water and how we need to eat less and produce less beef but also how a lot of the water usage is rain and other natural things but is still a high number of water waste but other food uses more water then beef

Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-02-12 15:36:26 UTC

I believe that Beef does waste water, this article shows so many supporting facts and many support this claim. The article says, that 441 gallons of water are used per pound of beef, this number shows how much water is used for out biggest food source. The graph on page 19 shows how the worlds irrigated acres have risen over time. A huge amount of the world water is being used for beef, but the beef is also one of our biggest food sources in the world and helps so many people.

Caden

2024-02-12 15:37:09 UTC

You need to know what a source is including before you make a claim

James

28shongjam — 2024-02-12 15:37:54 UTC

I think not because she says that it only waste 1% of drinking water

MASONTHEGOAT611 and RYLEETHEGOAT711

2024-02-12 16:37:07 UTC

yes it waste water because it takes alot of gallons of water do to the thing

Daniel

2024-02-12 16:37:56 UTC

They compare only speacif stuff to each other but not other stuff so how would they know all the info on it if its not on there

Gist-Rilee

28bethkril — 2024-02-12 16:39:35 UTC

The gist of this article is the author thinks that beef does not waste water. Her main points are that other natural resources use blue and green water. For example nuts use more green and blue water than pig meat eggs chicken meat and other meats. Beef animals need food to eat and food grows on water so therefore the author does not think beef waste water.

Anna

2024-02-12 16:40:08 UTC

that the cattle is drinking more water but only got to 36 gallons of water per pound of beef. and that its plays when it comes to beef production.

ethan

2024-02-12 16:40:33 UTC

the gist is about it takes 1800 gallons to make ground beef and it 108 for corn and cattle they eat grass and hay so if you see there is a lot of other thing in peoples meat

Sophie

2024-02-12 16:41:12 UTC

The gist of the article, "Does beef waste water?" I don't think beef is wasting water because beef need water to live. There is also blue water where the animals get the water from natural sources. In the article is states "... beef uses a lot of blue water" This shows that the beef are using a lot of natural sources but are using them for good needs. What else are you going to use the water for? Beef need water to drink, food ,bath and many more. I think they could maybe try less water, but they're using the best the can.

eliza

2024-02-12 16:42:18 UTC

Does beef waste water, yes it does because 1,800 gallons of water is used for only one pound of beef so just think of how much water would be used for three pounds.

Jada

2024-02-12 16:44:04 UTC

The author doesn't believe that beef wastes water. They discredit WFC by adding up the water they used for their cattle and get 36 gallons, and say ask where the other 17,000 comes from. They also point out most of the water the cattle get is from rain water that goes into the plant that the cattle eat. Actually 94% of cattles water footprint is rain water. They also state in the WFC study it literally says that the actual number doesn't matter, which shows the study invalidity about it's numbers.

Wyatt

2024-02-12 16:44:13 UTC

the gist is that their is a lot of water in 1 pound meat, cattle spend most of there time in the pasture at least grazing for have a year,

James

28shongjam — 2024-02-13 15:23:42 UTC

This article is about pesticides and why we should use them. The person who wrote this stated that we should use pesticides so the bugs cant get to our food. So that is why we should use pesticides

caden

2024-02-13 15:24:13 UTC

Pesticides are needed to make food for all the people. and make more food with less land

Sequoia

2024-02-13 15:24:23 UTC

The author writes that the pesticides in food and farms grows lots of our food off, making our percentage of food grown every year go up a little. Another thing that is stated is that our pesticides help fight pests and disease. The pests kill off lots of the farmers plants, making the pesticides work more and more to reestablish their plants and soil. Most of the food that is grown is due to the chemical pesticides helping fight off the pests and disease.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-02-13 15:24:54 UTC

that we need pesticides and without we would lose much of our crop yield

80% of rice

70% of corn

50% wheat

gist rylee

2024-02-13 15:26:05 UTC

they needed pesticides and without it they'd lose crops

HAZEL

2024-02-13 15:26:09 UTC

The gist of this article is we need to use pesticides.Without pesticides there wouldn't be enough food to feed the world. Another reason is that since the 1960's farmers used pesticides and the chemicals had slashed pesticide toxicity by 98%. The last reason we need to use pesticides is we need to grow 70% more food by 2050 to feed the 10 billion people that will come into the planet.

Josh

2024-02-13 15:30:45 UTC

I think that we need pesticides because then we wouldn't have enough food. "Without pesticides, the losses would be catastrophic: as much as 50% for wheat, almost 70% for corn, and nearly 80% for rice." This quote tells you that without pesticides it could be a lot worse for crops. Another reason that we need pesticides is that all farmers have been using pesticides. That would mean that without pesticides crop survivability would be lower because there would be a lot more pests and diseases than with pesticides.

Danyiel

2024-02-13 15:30:53 UTC

The gist of of this article is that we need to use pesticides. If we didn't have pesticides we would be forced to cut down more of the natural habitat and vegetation just so that we could plant more. All farmers use pesticides to help with global hunger if farmers weren't to use pesticides then crop production wouldn't be very productive.

maddy

2024-02-13 15:31:29 UTC

the gist of "only part of the recent rise in food is because of COVID-19 bottlenecks" how food prices have been going up for decades and soon we wouldint have enough food and how most farmer use pesticides which is toxic and how organic farming is better.

Gist by Laney

2024-02-13 15:31:50 UTC

In the article Modern chemical pesticides, the gist is we need chemical pesticides to grow crops and produce food. Farmers are going to have to have to cut down forest so they have room for their crops so they can keep up with producing food for everyone is the coming years. The article also states that 50% of wheat, 70% for corn, and 80% of rice is lost to pests, that's all food that we could be eating. SO all in all we need chemical pesticides to keep producing food.

Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-02-13 15:32:00 UTC

The gist of, We need to use pesticides, is that using pesticides is a huge part of americas food history. Pesticides in our food is a huge thing that has been happening since the 60s and 70s. Every kind of farmers use pesticides which is very bad for our earth. Pesticides release ten percent of greenhouse gases into our earth. This articles talks about so much information on how pesticides effect or earth but also how is it used in all of our food. If we do step up and take more action it could effect other things in earth.

Mason

2024-02-13 16:21:28 UTC

Senses covid the prices have went up and down. We need to use pesticides. And if we don't use pesticides we will not have enough food and we might die. All of the farmers used and had to use pesticides. Also we don't even know what is COVID-19 bottlenecks

Wyatt

2024-02-13 16:21:59 UTC

the gist is that we need the pesticides to grow food if we didn't have pesticides we would not have enough food we need to grow 70% more food by 2050 to feed 10 billion people who will be in this world

Daniel

28hammadan — 2024-02-13 16:27:45 UTC

90,000 pest and diseases that have plagued agriculture throughout human history. Without it we would lose up to 40% of crops, 50% wheat and 70% corn and 80% rice.

zane

2024-02-13 16:28:18 UTC

90,000 pest and diseases that are plaguing agriculture throughout history. without pesticides we would lose "50% for wheat, almost 70% for corn, and nearly 80% for rice."

ethan

2024-02-13 16:30:18 UTC

the gist is about modern chemical pesticides are needed more than ever to fight rising food prices climate change and world hunger dering covid 19 there was a labor shorted also we needed to use pesticides also we may also have not alot of food and also farmers used pesticides and that was my gist

Rilee- Gist

28bethkril — 2024-02-13 16:37:43 UTC

The author thinks we should use pesticides because we wont have enough food in the future to feed everyone on the planet and that all farmers use pesticides to kill pest and diseases on the crops. If we don't use pesticides we would be killing a lot of crops which then we wouldn't have to feed the future.

Sophie

2024-02-13 16:40:46 UTC

The gist of the article was about if we should use pesticides or not. The reason for this is that the author thinks we need them to survive. One reason is we wont have enough to eat. It also would help farmers with their crops. If we don't have pesticides we wont survive.

eliza

2024-02-13 16:46:03 UTC

We won't have enough food , the stopped making any real progress against world hunger 10 years ago. The gist is that we need to use pesticides to help our crops grow and keep any disease and pest away from our crops

Austin

2024-02-13 16:46:35 UTC

this article is about pesticides and if we need them to have food and farmers need it to

Jada

2024-02-13 16:49:17 UTC

The author believes we need to use more pesticides because if we don't, we will not have enough food to feed the population. The author supports this by saying 50% of what, 70% of corn, and 80% of rice would be lost due to pest. The author states this will become a problem because NGO want to ban pesticides. Another plot point is that all farmers use pesticides. The author states that organic farmers use pesticides heavily, but they didn't give any prove for that so ya.

Araceli

2024-02-13 16:52:34 UTC

The article by Jon parr gist is pesticides are needed for the crops. Without pesticides there will be lost of crops like 50% of wheat,almost 70% of corn, and nearly 80% of rice.

HAZEL <

2024-02-15 15:18:12 UTC

The gist of this article is we should buy food from polyface food. The reason we should is it tastes better. ANother reason is you know where the food comes from,and that it comes from happy animals. The last reason is people like coming on the farm and seeing the animals where their food comes from.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-02-15 15:20:28 UTC

the gist of this article is that joel is pro farmer and thinks that it would be better if everyone bought locally and fresh instead of imported food.

Pro poly James

28shongjam — 2024-02-15 15:20:36 UTC

The point i have to back this up is that they say the food that they bring to people they say it the best food they have ever had. Also their customers they keep coming back. They also said that being poly is they best way to get good and reliably food

rylee

2024-02-15 15:21:19 UTC

the gist of this article is we should buy food from polyface because of the different seasons winter and summer are the main ones because that most the animals are born in the summer and cant be ate until the the next summer or throughout the winter

Jayson Klingbeil

Thoughttale_Leo — 2024-02-15 15:21:50 UTC

The gist for "The Omnivore's Dilemma" is that we shouldn't buy food from the grocery store and buy polyfood (sorry i forgot name) so global warming will be reduced.

Sequoia

28wieseseq — 2024-02-15 15:21:52 UTC

The author believes that food from local farms are better and fresher. This is stated when the author says that the food is cheaper in town than it is at the farm, this is because the food is not as fresh or as good as the farm fresh food that Polyface has.

Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-02-15 15:23:10 UTC

The gist of the omnivores dilemma, is that they are pro polyface foods, well it might be a higher price for these types of food, they know were it is coming from. This chapter shows that many customers are shocked at how fresh their food is, how it taste. The article also shows how far people travel for fresh food.

Laney

2024-02-15 15:24:00 UTC

The author in the article Omnivore's Dilemma believes that all farmers should become pro polyface. For example the article states "Chefs across the country, like the ones who buy from polyface om VIrginia, are trying to teach consumers that food actually taste better when it is fresh." This shows that chefs and farmers are trying to change people on what they think. And that the food the is pro polyface is better for you than non polyface. It also states "It is a movement away from the industrial food chain and toward a more local, organic food system."

Danyiel

28boettdan — 2024-02-15 15:24:39 UTC

The gist is we should buy more foods from polyface farms because their more natural ingredients there's also no chemicals in polyface farms. Some people think polyface farms are expensive but in reality they're were you can get the cheapest food. Polyface farms have seasons that the food is based off of like the eggs in the winter are paler than in the summer.

caden

2024-02-15 15:25:07 UTC

the author thinks all farms should be poly and organic. which is not a bad idea but organic farms make less then half of what a non organic farm can make so we would need many more farms to make the same food.

Josh

2024-02-15 15:25:27 UTC

The gist of "Omnivore Dilemma" is that what you do on to grow your food or animals is important. One way they did this is by having to re-grow a lot of things so the environment wouldn't be getting worse. Another thing is when they told us the comments, "This is the chicken I remember from my childhood . It actually tastes like chicken," there are many more that are positive like this. The last reason I think is that when they cracked the egg in the pan, when it didn't really move in the pan and the yolk was bright yellow they were all amazed. They said this was because of the way they grow there grass.

The gist" is that beef takes up more water then it should a waste" we need to need to eat less or stop eating a meat diet so we can decrease the greenhouse gases that are produced making beef and then we can use less water.

2024-02-15 15:29:25 UTC

Daniel

28hammadan — 2024-02-15 16:31:29 UTC

The main claim is that he is pro making stuff local. A supporting detail is that you shoould buy it in season they say its in season when they are shipping it to them. It more fresh when its local. That they are seeing that eggs fluff up if it dosen't have any antibiotocs

Gist-Rilee

28bethkril — 2024-02-15 16:31:32 UTC

The Author Michael Pollen want people to start buying locally to help improve the food chain. The three main points that help support this claim are, people will get fresher meat. Buying locally can help support local farmers, and buying locally you get better tasting food and meat that isn't chemical infested. Michael wants us to buy locally to help improve the food chain.

zane

2024-02-15 16:33:33 UTC

main clam pro making local food. first supporting detail is seasonal food is good to have fresh. his eggs yolks are better them all store buy eggs.

pesticides can put chemicals in the food

2024-02-15 16:33:39 UTC

Jaylen Ramsey

2024-02-15 16:34:37 UTC

buy food localy

Jada

2024-02-15 16:34:47 UTC

The author is pro poly face for many reasons. One reason is that the customers were able to be connected to their food, making them think that the food tastes better. Another reason the author is pro polyface is because they make sure you get what you pay for because they facture in the environmental cost. Their last reason is because of the diet the cows and chickens have, the byproduct is the food tasting better.

Sophie

2024-02-15 16:35:04 UTC

The gist of the article "The omnivore's dilemma" is that we should get food from polyface. The reason why is that in the article it states " These people were paying higher price for polyface food, and in many cases driving more than an hour to come get it." "The chef called his staff over to admire the bright orange color of the yolk." These quotes help support that we should buy food from ployface.

Wyatt

2024-02-15 16:35:07 UTC

Michael pollen is famer that he makes everything fresh and people always buy from him when you crack on of his eggs it stands straight up in the pan you would say people were amazed when they saw the egg stays up in the pan

Eliza

2024-02-15 16:35:34 UTC

The gist of this article is about this family of farmers and how they are trying to solve the Omnivores Dilemma. So they used organic whys to grow there produce, so they didn't have to go to the supermarket to buy food or anything, they even tried making paper towel and toilet paper out of the trees on there farm.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-02-19 15:24:40 UTC

The gist of this article is that scientists want to genetically modify wheat to withstand harsh conditions and diseases. They want to do this by either changing the gene that controls growth or making them more disease resistant or both eventually.

HAZELLLLLLLLL

2024-02-19 15:26:46 UTC

The gist of the article is Genetically modified food is better. Genetically modified food is better because Wheat can be modified to withstand severe weather and disease,so less wheat is wasted. Also genetically modified food can reduce the need for pesticides and fertilizers making agriculture more sustainable. The last reason is the crops can have their DNA modified to improve traits like drought resistance

Jayson

Thoughttale_Leo — 2024-02-19 15:28:32 UTC

The gist of "The Future of Eating: GMO's" is That we should support GMO foods because it helps prevent global warming and so that plants use less water to grow.

rylee gist

2024-02-19 15:29:51 UTC

how genetically modified food will better withstand the climate change there pro, they think its better for climate change

Sequoia

28wieseseq — 2024-02-19 15:30:16 UTC

In this article, the author states that when they genetically modify food, they can make the food withstand whatever weather that they are growing with. This can be like with the rice. The rice would be tampered with so they can survive the floods and be able to grow and thrive. The corn can be much safer with the modification too, it can be in less danger of getting pesticides. In th last paragraph, the author states that even though the modified food might be better, they might not work all of the time, they might just be the answer to some of our future problems.

ethan

2024-02-19 15:31:19 UTC

the gist is about food will wist stand climate change and it tells us how we will save some foods to climate change

Haley

28strauhal — 2024-02-19 15:32:44 UTC

The gist of this article is climate change is transforming how we heed ourselves. The crops also need to be stronger. Floods, droughts and new diseases can have a big impact on the crop we help on for foods including staples such as wheat maize and rice. GM crops can be engineered to require less water to grow or to resist diseases or pests. Many farmers and other people have to face climate change. All in all this article is pro GMO and not anti GMO.

Josh

2024-02-19 15:33:01 UTC

The article "The Future of Eating: How Genetically Modified Food Will Withstand Climate Change" the main idea of this article is that Genetically Modified Food is positive and a good idea. They would use DNA from other crops on different crops so they could be more drought resistant and so they could withstand more weather. They can also reduce the pesticides which could help even though from the other article we read it is good.

Laney

2024-02-19 15:33:04 UTC

The gist of "The future of eating" is about finding different solutions to crop growth. Scientist are trying to find different DNA's so mix with corn, wheat, rice and others crops around the world. They are doing this becuase it is believed that it will help the world in the long run. For example lots of the crops are being lossed to sever weather, floodings, and disease. Also climate warming and pests are a big part of it to. But scientist and people are trying to find a solution to all the problems. The author is supporting this becuase he states "There is no magic fix to climate change and no sure-fire way to make agriculture more sustainable, but GM crops are helping farmers to adapt to the issues and presented by climate change." This quote shows that the author is supporting this solution the problem.

Danyiel

28boettdan — 2024-02-19 15:33:42 UTC

The author is pro for the future of eating gmos because he believes that if we change the genes of plants it could help save world hunger and and help with all the greenhouse gases. And it could help if you live in an area that the food doesn't naturally grow in that climate with changing the genes of that plant it could help them grow faster and stronger.

James

28shongjam — 2024-02-19 15:33:55 UTC

They are pro GMO I know that because it can help the crops so the can be stronger crops. The bugs wont kill them

caden

2024-02-19 15:34:16 UTC

We need GMO crops to feed the World

Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-02-19 15:34:17 UTC

The author of "How Genetically Modified Food Will Withstand Climate Change" supports that modified food will help our climate. It supports that wheat is the most commonly grown crop across the world by acreage, it also shows how helping withstand severe weather and disease will help our climate, how decreasing the maize, rice and other major food sources play a huge role in our climate.

maddy

2024-02-19 15:35:34 UTC

the gist of this article is the future of our food and how these crops will withstand climate change like floods and droughts by making modifications some can be good and some can be bad but they are pro genetically modified

Daniel

28hammadan — 2024-02-19 16:27:17 UTC

If you keep on using gmo goods it will effct the enverment . Why its bad is because if it keeps on effactingus whats going to happen in the near furture. It also does climete change how are we going to fix that later on if we don't change what were are doing for the plants and the world

Jalen Ramsey

2024-02-19 16:30:22 UTC

When you eat genetic food it helps with the climate change and other things.

Wyatt

2024-02-19 16:33:33 UTC

The gist is Climate change is transforming how we feed ourselves. Future farmers could genetically modified food be the answer.

Jada

2024-02-19 16:36:58 UTC

The author is pro GM plants because they see how it could help reduce agricultures carbon footprint and also be able to sustain enough food for the growing population. The author states in the article that GM plants can be engineered to release less greenhouse gases, require less water, need less pesticides, etc. And overall these modifications would help farmers overall by getting more yeilds.

Sophie

2024-02-19 16:37:32 UTC

The gist of this article is that the crops will do better off droughts and floods. The author was telling us about how the population is going up while they are making the gasses go down.

zane

2024-02-19 16:37:54 UTC

GMO is a good thing. the plants would not need as much water to grow. it can decrease the chemicals and energy needed to grow them.

Gist-Rilee

28bethkril — 2024-02-19 16:38:54 UTC

In this article the author is pro that GM crops are helping farmers to adapt to the issues presented by climate change. One supporting detail from the author is these crops are being engineered to require less water to grow. Another supporting detail is that GM crops can result in better yields and survival of droughts and floods. These type of crops will help to make sure there is enough food available for an increasing global population while also reducing the carbon footprint of agriculture.

Mason

2024-02-19 16:40:09 UTC

In this article it says that we use a lot of what the farmers make for us humans. And when farmers get sick we will always be sort on some kind of crop always. We always will be sort on something in the world. Some of the crops the farmers make go to the farm animals so we are losing something but we are also not losing something at the same time. They have strong plants so they don't get ate by bugs

this article is about how farmers make food more chemically

2024-02-21 15:45:32 UTC

zane

2024-02-29 20:16:58 UTC

is that we should eat less meat to decrease the greenhouse gas's

HAZEL

2024-03-18 14:26:41 UTC

The gist of this article is GMOs improve people's access to healthy food. The article states between 1996 and 2016 showed that GMOs had increased production of corn by 25 percent. All in all this gist of this article is that GMOs improve people's access to healthy food.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-03-18 14:27:01 UTC

the gist of this article is that we do not know if gmo's are safe or not because it has not been long enough to seen the effects of their usage.

Jayson

Thoughttale_Leo — 2024-03-18 14:27:02 UTC

The gist of this article is to point out harms and healthy foods. Like how corn is not a cows diet therefore making Gmo's bad for cows and another is that we are completely unharmed by it to some extent and some ingredients in Gmo's will hurt us.

Haley

28strauhal — 2024-03-18 14:27:58 UTC

In this article is talks about gmos and the access to healthy foods. People say there are many cases in which gmos seem to improve americans access to healthy foods. This author says that corn makes cows fatter but it is also bad for them.

Danyiel

28boettdan — 2024-03-18 14:28:33 UTC

The gist of this essay is an argument weather gmo's are helping food increase or if gmo's are decreasing food intake. In the article the author exclaims evidence from multiple different articles and evidence that backs up their answers.

Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-03-18 14:29:18 UTC

The gist of the "Model essay: "GMOs"" is showcasing that there are many questions about GMo impacts, and how it's is effecting food. The authors main points state the GMOs improve access to healthy food and the safety and benefit of GMO that are being questioned. They included points from multiply sources and how the food is being effected but also shows multiply points on commonly asked question about GMOs.

Laney

2024-03-18 14:30:32 UTC

The gist of this article "GMO's" is that GMO crops have many good impacts on healthy food availability and growth but also has some negative impacts. For example the author writes "This is important because much food supply depends on many animals eating corn. Also, corn is used in many other food products." This quote shows that GMOs is needed to produce more food. The author also writes "GMO canola oil has fewer trans fats than regular canola oil...This means that GMOs may actually increase people's access to healthy food." But there are some negative effects too, for example in the essay it says "Cattle in feedlots are fed corn because it fattens them quickly. However, corn is not their natural food...Their corn-based diet..makes them ill."

Sequoia

28wieseseq — 2024-03-18 14:31:47 UTC

In the article that we read, they start by stating a lot of facts with the background knowledge of what people think about the GMO's. Then they start to talk about how the GMO's influence our healthy food and how they help with the pesticides and the pests that they could be saving the food from. In the 3rd paragraph, they talk alot about how the GMO's are decreasing our healthy food and how they are making it so that we don't get all of our healthy food and how even though GMO's can be good for you, they can also be very bad. The last paragraph is how the are non-GMO people.

caden

CadenKarow — 2024-03-18 14:31:58 UTC

The author thinks that Gmos are too new and we don't know the long term effects

Josh

2024-03-18 14:33:49 UTC

The Gist of "Model Essay" is about trying to decide if GMO's increase our access to healthy foods or if it decreases out access to healthy food. It tells us about how some Genetically Modified Organism can help the growing season start sooner for better healthier crops. But the article states that it might cause some diseases and it could cause some people to get a type of cancer.

Gist- Rilee

28bethkril — 2024-03-18 15:39:26 UTC

The gist of this article is that GMO's can increase our access to healthy foods but then there is also questions that still remain about side effects. The author gives many quotes about why the do increase our access but then they also give the side of questions that still remain in wonder to this day.

eliza

28daineli — 2024-03-18 15:39:36 UTC

This GMO essay is about how it is hard to get healthy food, and which it also talks about how GMO's are not very safe

..................(complete silence. the one thing you guys have wanted for so long)

2024-03-18 15:39:47 UTC

the gist of the model essay is that GMOs either increase or decrease out access to healthy food. with this essay, it's hard to tell.

Jaylen

2024-03-18 15:39:48 UTC

The Model Essay is about how GMO's effect the foods we eat and they are a bad for the food but they are supposed to keep them fresh longer and stuff like that.

Daniel

2024-03-18 15:40:04 UTC

The gist is that people think gmos are bad well other people think that they are good

zane

2024-03-18 15:40:05 UTC

people think gmos are bad for the crops but others think gmos are good and help the crops.

Sophie

2024-03-18 15:40:29 UTC

The gist of the article GMO's is how GMO are effecting the good and bad. They are helping with crops to grow but at the same time they are causing cancer along with some other things. There are many different effects GMO have to are world.

Paul

2024-03-18 15:41:02 UTC

The gist of this article is that a lot of people think that gmos hurt crops but most people think that they don't hurt crops

Anna

2024-03-18 15:41:10 UTC

This article is about GMO's

GMO's seem to improve access to healthy food and the safety of using GMOs. GMO's are there to improve people to the access to healthy food.

Wyatt

2024-03-18 15:42:23 UTC

This text is about GMO'S and how they could be bad and not be bad and how they are used for famers and how it doesn't help famers

Jayson Klingbeil

Thoughttale_Leo — 2024-03-19 14:21:02 UTC

the gist of "CSAs" is That people eat GMOs and don't mind because they support that decision but that might change if someone gets really sick.

Sequoia

28wieseseq — 2024-03-19 14:21:37 UTC

In this article it tells us about how they believe that CSA's are a very important part of our farming culture. It tells us that though some people didn't like them, they still use them. This author is pro-CSA's

HAZEL

2024-03-19 14:21:50 UTC

This gist of this article is CSAs improve people's access to healthy food. Ways CSAs improve access to healthy food are having a positive impact on the use of fossil fuels. Another way is CSAs can produce high-quality food. Another benefit is local grower that grows CSA's gives out information and recipes about how to use fresh food.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-03-19 14:23:47 UTC

The gist of CSAs is that they can produce much healthier food. They can also reduce fossil fuel use because food will not move as far.

Caden

CadenKarow — 2024-03-19 14:24:40 UTC

the author says that CSA's are good and should be used more

Danyiel

28boettdan — 2024-03-19 14:25:13 UTC

The gist of this article is how CSA's can help your access to healthy food the article states that if the food is harvested and sent off to people that ordered the food the nutritional value goes down. Like vitamins A, B, C, and E.

Everyone

2024-03-19 14:26:35 UTC

Okay everyone you slay, Well not everyone but most people are good.

Laney

2024-03-19 14:26:36 UTC

The gist of the "CSAs" article is that CSA produces healthier food for us and it is better for the atmosphere. The article states "The climate of the planet is changing; the average temperature has gone up 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1800. Burning fossil fuels is the major cause of this increase." This shows that getting food from across the country is going to affect our access to healthy food and the atmosphere.

Josh

2024-03-19 14:26:48 UTC

The gist of "Model Essay" is that CSAs can influence our access to healthy foods by have a positive impact on the use of fossil fuels. Another reason is they can produce high-quality food.

maddy

2024-03-19 14:27:13 UTC

The gist of this article is that CSA influence our access to healthy food and are important to our local communities

haley

28strauhal — 2024-03-19 14:27:15 UTC

The gist of this article is access to healthy foods. There us general agreement that csas can produce high quality food. This means that CSAs can be a problem. All in all this article is about how CSAs influence our to healthy foods.

Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-03-19 14:27:20 UTC

This article "CSAs" both positively and negatively effects the access to healthy food, multiple sources prove that this goes both ways, and the author provides multiple facts.

CSA

28shongjam — 2024-03-19 14:29:35 UTC

the are pro CSA because they put sources that are pro CSA and it is also a one sided essay

Daniel

28hammadan — 2024-03-19 15:37:25 UTC

That some people belive that some csa. Are healther then gmos and people belive that more people should help support it in the long run

Gist- Rilee

28bethkril — 2024-03-19 15:39:07 UTC

In this essay the gist that is presented to me is CSA's increase our access to healthy food by having a positive impact on the use of fossil fuel.

gist...

2024-03-19 15:39:11 UTC

the model essay we had to read is about community supported agriculture (CSA) and why we should turn to that instead of grocery stores.

Austin

2024-03-19 15:41:25 UTC

csa increase our access to healthy food it also is making a huge difference because it is burning fossil fuels

eliza

28daineli — 2024-03-19 15:41:28 UTC

The gist of CSA's is that they have an influence on our healthy food and have access to healthier food and can grow healthier food

Sophie

2024-03-19 15:43:16 UTC

This article of CSAs tells us why CSAs help with people that are trying to find food and buying it at the store. It shows how this impacts the world with the fossil fuel use and how great it is become. In all CSA has helped with many peoples lives and has made a differences since it was created.

Jada

2024-03-19 15:43:16 UTC

CSA's help people get access to better food by getting people more nutritious food, and help with using less fossil fuels. CSA's get people more nutritious food because if people get food closer to the time the food was harvested, there's more healthy vitamins in the food. CSA's also help with using less fossil fuels because the farm are closer to the consumer, causing shipments to not have to use as much fossil fuels.

zane

2024-03-19 15:44:39 UTC

people think csa is good because it makes high quality food. csa is doing more than we think.

Anna

2024-03-19 15:46:02 UTC

in america today many healthy food and csa can produce high quality food the food that comes far away is older because is travel longer.

Mason

2024-03-19 15:46:42 UTC

The climate of the planet is changing fast.

Burning fossil fuels is the major cause of this increase. The average temperature has gone up by 1.5 degrees fahrenheit.

Jaylen

2024-03-19 15:46:55 UTC

This Essay is about how we should stop burning so much fossil fuels because they are effecting the climate change, and they are effecting how animals work and different things it's doing to the earth. If lots of people keep burning lots of fossil fuels, things lots of bad things could go wrong in the earths atmosphereand stuff.

Jayson Klingbeil

Thoughttale_Leo — 2024-03-26 14:35:08 UTC

We should eat local foods in my opinion but its also alright to bring food here. Because we need food that isn't around and if food is in one area its harder to get more.

Caden

CadenKarow — 2024-03-26 14:36:24 UTC

Stop hating on farming, gmos and Beef/Dairy

Sequoia

28wieseseq — 2024-03-26 14:36:37 UTC

The last statement that was made is that we need to buy locally. This could be a really good thing for that area. This could make it so that way the local farmers could buy more land so that they can make more food. The other end of the argument is that then if all of the food is sold and bought locally, then they might not be able to feed other people in places that might not be able to make that type of food.

Zale

28pettizal — 2024-03-26 14:38:14 UTC

Buying locally can reduce carbon emissions from transport trucks significantly. It also ensures that the product is fresh and safe to eat.

rylee

2024-03-26 14:38:25 UTC

buying from local farmers, you get healthy clean food and many other types of foods

Hazel

2024-03-26 14:39:28 UTC

My action to take is having insurance company cover equine therapy so it cost less out of pocket so more people will do. I also want to bring awareness to this therapy, so more people know about it., and so more people will offer this therapy.

Danyiel

28boettdan — 2024-03-26 14:39:56 UTC

In my infographic I'm going to explain how I'm anti genetically modified cows. And awareness on how it impacts the life of the cow.

Josh

2024-03-26 14:40:31 UTC

Trying to inform people that electric vehicles aren't as great as some people say because they don't realize that they are causing more harm to the environment than good.

James buying from local farmers

28shongjam — 2024-03-26 14:41:03 UTC

The reason why I choose that question is because i buy from local farmers to like caden i buy his eggs so that is why I choose the question that I did

Laney

2024-03-26 14:41:13 UTC

I think farmers should be able to slotter and sell pig meat locally. Because if they are raising them and can only slotter a certain amount each year they are going to start and lose money and the pig population could get out of control. This also gives local slotter houses a chance to

Breleigh

28brudebre — 2024-03-26 14:42:14 UTC

Pro-Chickens

Purchasing a dozen of eggs from local farms over stores- challenge
Promote fundraiser for plants- fertilizer was used from chickens
Use chickens at your home for s pest control option that is better for the environment in your yard

maddy

2024-03-26 14:46:23 UTC

I am pro gmo because gmos can rise the levels of nutrients and other good stuff in crops, they also protect the crops from pests and other stuff. Gmos also help the crops grow more and bigger another good reason gmos are good is because it decreases the use of pesticides

seth

2024-03-26 15:54:22 UTC

don't do anything because if you don't do anything, you won't be roped into this nonsense. you won't have to pick a side. you will not have to put in any effort because you aren't a part of it.

Daniel

28hammadan — 2024-03-26 15:54:34 UTC

I am pro bringing fictional chartecters to life because they could help us get stuff done. We need to start reaschering how to bring them to life by funding the people doing it and the way it could helps us grow

Rilee

28bethkril — 2024-03-26 15:55:49 UTC

I think Sheep help with agricultural growth. To help around Wisconsin some action plans are, raising money for some sheep to take care of and then sell the meat locally. Raise money to buy sheep for the people to sign up for a fundraiser to get a sheep or two to raise at there home. Finally do a event that has interaction with sheep to get families to buy sheep and raise them!

Sophie

28bergmsop — 2024-03-26 15:55:50 UTC

We could buy from farmers close, so the drivers of the trucks don't release more greenhouse gases. This could help with showing awareness that the little things can lead to bigger problems.

Jada

2024-03-26 15:56:59 UTC

I'll make a poster about a already existing fundraiser saying how good it is and how you can donate.

mason and Jaylen

2024-03-26 15:57:11 UTC

you can do a pick up day.

Eliza

28daineli — 2024-03-26 15:57:22 UTC

I think people should be able to buy local meet and meet from different places but they should pay attention to where it came from and what was the process of making the meet, and also what did they feed the animal before they butchered it

zane

2024-03-26 15:57:54 UTC

pro GMO because it can make the crop resistant to something. GMO can also increase the nutrients in the food so the food is more healthier.

Araceli

2024-03-26 15:58:05 UTC

Supporting local farms by spreading awareness or fundraiser.