https://padlet.com/usictech/ojt4jtwoyfu9eenh According to authors such as Kenichi Ohmae, what are the main reasons behind the demise of the Nation-State? How did technological innovations contribute to it? Would you consider authors like Kenichi Ohmae and Susan Strange to be Globalist, Internationalist or Transformationalist? Explain your answer. According to the author of the article, Alasdair Roberts, has the nation-state been under threat before? Could you provide examples from the text? How have states responded to challenges posed by the Internet according to Roberts? Is Alasdair Roberts a Globalist, an Internationalist or a Transformationalist? Explain your answer. Is the Nation-State dying or ‘alive and well? Which position do you find more convincing? Explain your answer en-us 2022-02-25 17:12:55 UTC 2022-02-25 17:50:13 UTC hello@padlet.com ykunqiqiake1 https://padlet.com/usictech/ojt4jtwoyfu9eenh/wish/2066761336 1. Economic globalization- countries dismantled barriers to international commerce;technological changes; the shift in geopolitics in the late 1980s and early ’90s- the end of the cold war.

2. the development of internet and satellite changed the way people interrect with each other, the way that news spreads, which further damaged the autonomy of foreign ministries and military commanders.

3. pessimistic globalist, because he said “Nation-states, have already lost their role as meaningful units of participation in the global economy of today’s borderless world,”He has lost trust in the authority of the state and society.

4. The main culprit was alleged to be economic globalization. In the 1980s and 1990s, governments around the world dismantled barriers to international commerce.the Soviet threat stiffened the backbone of the state in the West as well, countering the tendencies toward “indecision, disunity, and disintegration” that many people believed were intrinsic to democratic politics.

5. By developing sophisticated new methods of “insider threat detection” to prevent further leaks. 

6. Transformationalist, Even he recognize that nation-state is losing some power, he still believes nation- state still has a significant role both domestical and international. 

7. We found ' nation state is alive' more convincing. The article mentioned the conflict between China and the United States, it shows that nowadays in the world stage nation state still plays significant role, even though there are countries have greater power than others, still the authority of nation states are strong.]]> 2022-02-25 17:45:07 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/ojt4jtwoyfu9eenh/wish/2066761336 syang901 https://padlet.com/usictech/ojt4jtwoyfu9eenh/wish/2066767739 1, economic globalization

2, The world was beginning to rewire itself with scant regard for national borders. people use Technology to connect  with others and get some news from television..

3, Globalist.
    Kenichi Ohmae: pessimistic
                                he put more focus on the problem about global economy
    Susan Strange: postive
Susan think world market is more powerful.

4, The Internet might have threatened national sovereignty, but so did the advent of railroads and the invention of the long-range nuclear bomber.

5, building up armed forces, asserting sovereignty over land and sea routes, and crafting alliances that secure its access to critical resources.
 rebuilding its diplomatic and military capacities to meet the challenge posed by this rising power.

6, he may be a internationalist 
he think the influence of the state over daily life is more extensive than ever, with good consequences as well as bad.

7, alive and not really well?
some developed countries like the USA, they still really powerful in the whole world. and seems like the most important threat for the nation-state is the internet? but it is really important for everyone and people may cannot abandon it. also some small threats cannot easily destroy a strong and powerdul nation state.


]]> 2022-02-25 17:49:23 UTC https://padlet.com/usictech/ojt4jtwoyfu9eenh/wish/2066767739