<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Types of Argumentation (section B) by Poulomi Das</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w</link>
      <description>Once you have established a working thesis, it’s time to think about how you’ll organize your argument. While it’s important to note that you should continue in your quest for resources and support throughout this process, even as you locate source material, you can begin to think about how you plan to bring your ideas and your sources together into a clear, organized manner.

As is the case with all types of writing, there is no one right way to organize or structure an argument. However, there are some basic structures and formats that can help you get an idea of how you want to organize your work and, at the very least, provide you with a baseline structure for your argument.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-30 10:52:22 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-11-30 12:17:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>1. What are the component parts of this argumentation style?</title>
         <author>poulomidas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920192677</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:07:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920192677</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2. What follows what?</title>
         <author>poulomidas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920193595</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:08:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920193595</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3. What kind of situation demands this style of argumentation?</title>
         <author>poulomidas</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920194404</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:09:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920194404</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Parts of the Argument</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920199431</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Claim, grounds, warrants, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:12:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920199431</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1. and 2. introducing the topic after brainstorming (you try to write as many points in support of your opinion before starting). 2. you state your opinion- present all the points followed that support your opinion by the opposing points. you also cite references. 3. essays, research papers, op-eds</title>
         <author>nehagupta_yif22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920201098</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:13:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920201098</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Situation</title>
         <author>samyukthavibhu_yif22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920201608</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When there's no clear right or wrong side - to present an opinion.<br>Would work well in Op-eds</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:14:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920201608</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Situations</title>
         <author>samyukthavibhu_yif22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920203039</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Academic papers need to be comprehensive, the Rogerian style is structured and systematic.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:15:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920203039</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1. your opinion and acknowledgement of the other&#39;s opinion (the opposition). 2. state your point then bring the other points also. ask for feedback to incorporate all points. 3. op-eds which generally bring both sides together but it is usually important for the writer to state their stance. </title>
         <author>nehagupta_yif22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920204926</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 12:17:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/poulomidas/oiynok7wp4lpdx5w/wish/1920204926</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
