My own view is that __________. Though I concede that ______________, I still maintain that ______________. For example, ________________. Although some might object that _________________, I would reply that _______________. The issue is important because ________________.

My own view is that the immigrants should be able to stay. Though I concede that they could easily cause some problems in the workplace, I still maintain that (to my knowledge) they're innocent and don't deserve to be kicked out. For example, they provide lots of manpower to put into jobs that they could help in. Although some might object that it might cause some job competition and kick Americans out of jobs, I would reply that there are lots of open jobs out there that would fit anyone. The issue is important because the number of immigrants is growing fast, and if we don't solve it soon people will get angry.

My own view is that we need reform the immigration policies so that there is not as many people coming in that cannot provide for themselves. Though I concede that many of these families are escaping dangerous situations or poverty, I still maintain that America needs to be able to sustain ourselves before we can continue to bring in more people. For example, encouraging legal immigration so that we can track the amount of people we have coming in. Although some might object that America should let everyone in, I would reply that it needs to happen in a way that is both legal and sustainable. The issue is important because it determines whether or not our country to flourish economically and provide and protect its citizens.

On the other hand, however, others argue that American tax payer dollars should not be given to non-US citizens and that these migrants put a strain on society. In the words of Byron York, on of this view's main proponents, "The immigrants know the city will feed them, give them a place to stay, deliver other social services, educate their children, give them a municipal ID and a driver's license." According to this view, it is both unwise and unfair to pay for illegal immigrants to become established in America, when that money could go to helping legitimate American citizens and immigrants who have entered America legally.

My own view is that our southern border must be strengthened to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country. It is also not the government or taxpayers responsibility to provide aid to these migrants. While I concede that many of these migrants are valuable humans who are in very unfortunate situations, I maintain that it is unjust to take tax payer dollars from programs that benefit US citizens, in order to pay for illegal immigrant's food and housing. Some might object that these migrants have the potential to hold jobs and contribute to the labor fore and society as a whole. However, I would reply that these illegal immigrants are currently hurting the labor force and putting a strain on society. For the majority of jobs, potential employees are required to provide proof of citizenship, a work visa, or some other acceptable form of identification. This means that very few of these migrants will be able to hold a job that can provide for themselves and their families. Thus, tax payers will have to continue to have their hard earned dollars given to programs that do not benefit themselves. Some might suggest that this problem would be solved by granting these migrants citizenship, but I would argue that an approach like that is entirely unfair to the migrants who have waited and worked hard to gain citizenship properly. This issue is important, as migrants continue to flood America's southern border and do no show any signs of stopping.

My own view is that the sheltering and safety of our own citizens is paramount to the support of migrants. Though I concede that it is compassionate to support these struggling migrants, I still maintain that resources should first support struggling citizens of our own country. For example, because there is limited space in homeless shelters, the sheltering of US citizens should be prioritized and served first. Although some might object that we want to be seen as a welcoming, kind country, I would reply that we must first be kind and supportive of our own people before we can focus on the needs of migrant people. The issue is important because shelters are full and people, migrants and citizens alike, are awaiting decisions on where they are going to sleep.

My own view is that we should detain and deport nearly every one of those goofy migrant families. If they wish to integrate into the United States, they must do it the right way. Though I concede that this is a strict observance of the problem, I still maintain that it is the most logical. Although some might object that _________________, I would reply that _______________. The issue is important because ________________.

Our own view is that upgraded border security is essential. Though we concede that many of these people are in need, we still maintain that it is too much of a stressor on law enforcement and local government officials as well as the residents of the state. For example, the streets of New York are lined with immigrants who don't know where to go, and hotels are required to house them while losing income and facing a potential shutdown. Although some might object that it is our responsibility to help these people seeking our assistance. We would reply that foreign affairs are secondary to those within the nation, and a proper system is needed in order to process those entering the country. This issue is important because it effects everyone, not just the immigrants or the citizens and potentially our future.

migrants' time should be limited in order to provide shelter for other migrants coming in and keep the cycling going. In the words of Camille Joseph Varlack, Chief of Staff, Adams Administration, one of this view's main proponents, "The process of figuring out where families are going to move is not going to start on the 60th day..." According to this view, the goal is to help the migrant families as much as possible by providing a short-term place for them to stay, while helping them get out of it so they can make room for the next set of people. In sum, then, the issue is whether the migrants' time in shelters should be unlimited or given a limited period of time in order to make room for the next set of people.

My own view is that the time in shelters should be limited. Though I concede that having to make people move out of the shelters isn't ideal, I still maintain that the time should be limited. For example, The mayor himself, Eric Adams, stated that he needed solutions to the problem and not just criticism; acknowledging that there simply wasn't a good solution. However, some may object on the grounds that it is unfair to only allow them housing for a certain period of time. I would reply that there is no other good current solution, because if they don't rotate migrants out what are they going to do with the ones coming in? While not ideal, this at least creates a cycle, giving as many migrants as possible time in a shelter. The issue is important because it involves real people, the migrants coming in, the politicians trying to figure out what to do, the residents of New York City, and so many more. The migrants need places to go, but New York only has so much room and resources.

My own view is that the 60 day limit should stay in place. Though I concede that people might think that this is not harsh enough, I still maintain that we should help others but not house them forever. For example, Anne Williams-Isom said the time limit allows migrants to have enough time to get connected with other family members and allows NYC to get ready for new migrants coming in. Although some might object that the time limit is an act against humanity, I would reply that it is not an act against humanity because the time limit allows for the city to help more people. The issue is important because NYC is trying to balance helping the migrants as much as they can, but they only have so much space and money that they have to put the limit.

My own view is that New York City should not be providing resources and shelter for these migrants. Though I concede that many of the migrants are struggling and in need of shelter, I still maintain that this should not be happening. For example, the more they provide, the more migrants there will be in the city. Although some might object the belief that NYC shouldn't provide for the migrants, I would reply that providing for them is only harming the city. The issue is important because it affects many families living in New York City and coming from different countries.

According to this view, he seems to be indicating his belief that migrants are taking advantage of the available services, and that the services should be reduced or taken away. In summary, the issue is whether New York City should increase, reduce, or completely dissolve their aid to migrants.

My own view is that we should provide aid in the areas that we are able to migrants, but that the aid should distributed, and migrants should be given opportunities to integrate with and contribute to society. Though I concede that this will put a financial burden on our cities, I still maintain that this burden can be mitigated. For example, New York City faced a budget cut of about 3%. Although some might object that no resources should be given to those from others countries, I would reply that we are commanded by our creator to help others with what we have been blessed with. The issue is important because migrants will never stop coming into our country, we just need to decide what to do about it.

My own view is that an overhaul of the in place immigration and asylum system needs to be preformed. This will help to fix the current failure of the system which has prompted illegal immigration. Increasing border security doens't help the people who need help, and is a temporary fix. Though I concede that the current influx of immigrants is causing stress to the system, and increased border control can help the situation now, I still maintain that it is not a permanent fix, and doesn't address any of the core problems with the current immigration policies and asylum system. For example, stopping people form entering from one place will decrease immigration for a short period until another place to get through is found, in which the same problem will occur as that which is presently faced. Although some might object that an increase in border security can be a permanent fix, I would reply that doesn't actually solve any of the problems that are causing the influx, the current system clearly has several short comings that need to be addressed to bette help provide refuge and better opportunities. The issue is important because the US has been a beacon of hope and a better life for people for years, and we need to be able to allow for the number of immigrants that come through with policy reform so that we can fulfill those coming to the US the same dream of a better life as we have done for so immigrants before.

My own view is that we help them to an extent and keep in mind that our economy may not be able to do everything. We should also strengthen our borders to help keep immigration fully legal. Though I concede that we are called to help the less fortunate and these migrants are fleeing terrible things, I still maintain that they need to be entering the country legally. For example, if they enter legally and still need help, we can help them. Although some object that this is unjust and heartless, I would reply that helping too much would only grow the issue and encourage illegal migrants. The issue is important because it affects many people as well as the economy.

My own view is that our tax dollars should not be funding illegal immigrants. Though I concede that families need help, I still maintain that if they are doing this process illegally for example, then we should not help these people who are breaking our laws. Although some might object that they are still people who are in our country, I would reply that they are also breaking our laws in our country and you wouldn't want a criminal to rome freely, even if they are a citizen of the United States of America. The issue is important because, our tax dollars, money that we earn is helping people who break our laws.