Consideration: to justify requiring specific funding from funders, how will this cost be justified thru the outcome/ROI

(E.g. using the YLSCMI assessment tool for pre-post evaluation)

2) Examples of benchmarks for a good fidelity training

3) Inclusion of Internal Ethics Review form

4) Guidelines of how to decide minimum sample size for data collection & on how and how much to follow up on participants that did not respond/missed surveys

5) Guidelines on whether we should reconsider participant criteria if there is low response rate, and if so, how should we restructure the criteria while meeting the intended aim of the data collection

6) Inclusion of sector-specific governance for data collection (NCSS sector eval framework) & Inclusion of SHINE specific policies regarding data collection from clients

7) Inclusion of a document to highlight different methods of data collection (pros and cons), and to also be able to justify the choice of data collection method.

Resources also useful because they're all located in one place

Would be useful to have resources on possible factors to bear in mind when looking for funders. E.g. track record of potential funder's past partnerships, administration and budgeting procedures (example, disbursement vs reimbursement method)

• Is there a need for this service? Inward alignment and external alignment

• Who are the interested parties? Who are our competitors? Who will be supportive?

• Program decision tree (finance?)

• Obtaining inputs from key stakeholders for further refinement

○ May/not precede ToC and LM

○ Youth-led is if input from key stakeholders come first, professional-led is if it does not come before ToC and LM

○ For certain programmes (e.g., CRESTY), the key stakeholder input is alr determined before ToC and LM