<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Liza Mukeriia Padlet by liza mukeriia</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/lizamukeriia/fdkbfndbk12ss_vklfz</link>
      <description>Compare and contrast hypothesis, theories and laws of nature. </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-08-30 15:49:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-05-17 07:46:03 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Compare and Contrast: Hypothesis, Theories and Laws of nature</title>
         <author>lizamukeriia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lizamukeriia/fdkbfndbk12ss_vklfz/wish/120608031</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- A hypothesis is a reasonable guess based on what you know or observe. A scientific theory consists of one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. Scientific laws are short, and always true. So&nbsp; basically, hypothesis is more of a vague prediction that later on is turned into a theory after several tests; only if the tests succeed, the theory becomes a Law.&nbsp;<br>- All three terms are equally important for science, because without hypothesis and theories there wouldn't be any laws; and if there weren't any laws, then science would be very confusing and pointless. Though laws are what scientists use; they would never use hypothesis or theories, because they are not proved yet.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-08-30 15:59:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lizamukeriia/fdkbfndbk12ss_vklfz/wish/120608031</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
