<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Q&amp;A session-Literature Review by DR NUR WAHIDA ZULKIFLI</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0</link>
      <description>Please write your questions here. I will answer them by 21 November 2024, if possible.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2024-11-17 06:46:33 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-11-22 23:40:46 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3223829335</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dr Wahida for your informative presentation. I have a question about balancing the inclusion of landmark studies and recent research in our literature review. For my topic, many of the landmark studies were published between 2016 and 2019. However, I’m also aware that we must include more recent studies, ideally within the last five years, to strengthen the review.</p><p>Is there any guideline or rule about how many percent of our references should come from studies within the past five years?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-11-19 08:01:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3223829335</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229183265</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dr Wahida for the insightful presentation. I wanted to clarify something regarding the objective of the study. I am wondering whether is it sufficient to have only two objectives for the study, or if there are any specific guidelines or references that suggest how many objectives should typically be included in a master's level study? Thank you Dr.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-11-22 01:57:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229183265</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229492639</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr. May I ask, is it important to include a conceptual framework inside our literature review?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-11-22 05:42:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229492639</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229717250</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr Wahida, can the citation between subheadings are repeated in one to another subheadings? Because sometimes the paper discuss things that can be cited in different topics. Is that will affect the quality of LR if referencing is jumbled up and repeated?</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-11-22 09:14:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229717250</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>sframli63</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229881508</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr, for master coursework mode like us, typically how long should our LR chapter be? e.g in terms how many pages or how many words</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-11-22 11:46:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3229881508</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3230528655</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Salam Dr. Wahida,</strong></p><p><br/></p><p>I watched the pre-recorded lecture on tips for producing a good LR. Thank you very much for the wonderful and useful tips 👍.</p><p><br/></p><p>I have two questions:</p><p><br/></p><p>1. Should the table for the LR be drafted for each sub subsection instead of the main-sections?</p><p><br/></p><p>2. Are there any specific tips for identifying the research gap after summarizing the table?</p><p><br/></p><p>Thank you!</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-11-22 21:32:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/wahidazulkifli/o8kz6790x88jj3e0/wish/3230528655</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
