<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Intro Video and Group Assignment by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/lbaikens0825/o7hii2xe3fwy</link>
      <description>Q &amp; A</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-01-10 22:30:25 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-01-15 00:27:30 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>1.Q: Who were two contributors to the various perspectives in psychology AND what was the primary focus?</title>
         <author>lbaikens0825</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lbaikens0825/o7hii2xe3fwy/wish/220415125</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A: I chose Sigmund Freaud, the father of the psychoanalytic perspective and Ivan Pavlov because their beliefs are almost uncomparable...and just as difficult to internalize. I get the part about our early childhood experiences, especially the relationships with our parents and how they are bound to play a significant role in the construction and development of the people we will inevitably will become. Almost all of my friends learned to blame their problems on their parents around middle school. And later on high school if a girl was somewhat weird, we all blamed it on "daddy problems". What throws me off is the most important source in the development of this theory, the unconscious.&nbsp; If most of our issues are related to issues buried to deep we will never reach them, then how is there any hope of modifying them so that the abnormal has a chance at becoming normal one day. According to the video the most important forces which influence our psychoanalytical perspectives are buried deep in our brains and most have to do with sex and aggression.This is a truly scary theory.<br><br>When I compared psychoanalytic perspective with behavorism I found myself wondering what to compare? According to behavorism we are what we do, no mention of parents or childhood experiences. The question to me then is why do we do what we do, not just change what we do and we will become a diffferent person. The dog and he bell are fairly simple to understand. That is why even a dog understood the relationship between getting a free meal and the ringing of a bell. Dogs are a lot smarter and more capable than that experiment. &nbsp;<br>I guess the reason i chose Freud and Pavlov is because one concentraits purley on external stimuli or forces and the other focuses on internal relationships. To be honest, a lot of this information is confusing and somewhat disturbing. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-01-10 22:32:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lbaikens0825/o7hii2xe3fwy/wish/220415125</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
