• Noget, I undrer jer over, som I gerne vil undersøge.

• Noget, I synes fungerer dårligt, som I kunne gøre bedre

• En idé, som har inspireret jer, og som I gerne vil give videre

• Kilder: Hvilke kilder er nødvendige for at fortælle din historie?

Ekstra ting, du kan tænke over:

Forklar, hvorfor din historie er interessant for andre end dig? Hvorfor skal vi bruge tid på det, du har at sige? Brug eksempler og fakta, der viser at historien rummer et generelt perspektiv. Hvad kan vi andre lære af historien? Kan du vise eksempler på løsninger?

• Jeg vil fortælle, at ...

• Det vil jeg fortælle, fordi ...

• Hvad er vigtigt at vide?

• Hvem skal spørges om hvad?

Ekstra ting, I kan tænke over:

• Hvordan vil I fortælle historien?

• Hvem skal interviewes?

• Lad de mennesker, der er direkte involveret i historien, fortælle den. Ægte stemmer og interviews giver din historie troværdighed og autenticitet.

• Du kan også bruge din egen fortællestemme.

Senest dagen inden vi mødes, skal I have gjort følgende:

1. Vælg et gruppenummer

2. Lav et kort med gruppeinfo

3. Lav et kort med beskrivelse af idéer

•add more laws surrounding AI and it’s public usage

•Neutral news only

.Fake news detection of some sort. How? Dont know

.Some form of bias reduction (i.e by automatically including all different perspectives within the topic)

.The inclusion of VR and AR in the way we consume media

.Media would be consumed via Neural link type technology

.Purposefully delayed news in order to ensure information validation. Done so to mitigate biases.

.Events are reported in a vacuum. Analyses and opinions are proposed to the reader form them to chose.

• mixtures of media and social media ex. Say you watch the news one night - they might be biased and have a specific narrative, this should not be your only platform with news but a part of how you gather news of the same subject. So after you watched the news on tv, you would go on social media and see the same news but it may be from at different perspective from citizens with freedom of speech. It could also be reading studies and books. But in conclusion, a mixture of different types of news, while forming your independent thoughts while also being curious and open to other views and perspectives.

• Ai might ruin this dream cause it can be untrustworthy and used for harmful purposes.

For the future:

• can’t reach 100% objectivity, have to accept that

• Should be able to have news stories that purely represent the facts

• Can we split those facts from opinions, be able to read opinions separate from facts

• Norwegian example

  
  

*Neuralink brain chip enhancement

• ministry for fact checking ai

• Earlier critical thinking for navigating the internet - subject(s) in elementary schools

• need for human interaction and listening to actual human voices will get bigger - podcasting etc

  • As a counter reaction to the fake news and ai generated stuff

long term:

• decentralized internet

• Ai integration

Limiting AI access.

Developing apps, such as TikTok closer to “home”. In European data factories.

Quality over quantity.

Could A.I. destroy biased news?

Competition between news sources. Who makes most profit? / who has the most readers?

Finding the balance between new technology and nature/relationships/the present moment.

Possibilities for customization of how you receive media, sort of like a filter(videos < articles). The possibility of disconnecting, when you desire.

Including all social classes, especially if news and media move over to more modern and expensive solutions = the price has to be reasonable, so no one gets excluded.

Mirror (that is connected to the whole house) that could help humans with organising their day. Suggesting outfits appropriate to the weather, measure the body and it’s needs, read news out loud etc.

No options for being anonnomous

Display potential biasis' that can be political

More transparency ( being able to choose media and articles)

Higher Age/be More mature to be able to use social media

You need to be educated in social media

More government and juditial oversigt but also available for free speech

- Marcus, Arthur, Yna and Ada

• - removal of advert

• -going back to a strong public service away from lobbying and agendas

• A.I. news media (no bias)

• A.I. terms of use/laws (limit misuse)

• TikTok, YouTube, Instagram… reels’ regulations & options to turn off similar features

• More agency for users in regard to your feed etc.

• More Data protection and control of your own data for users

• Less advertising (control of if you want advertisement)

• Better control/more restrictions of how “adictive” a platform is supposed to make itself and how much it’s allowed to access users (eg. notifications and alerts)

• More sustainable and environmental

More democratized media platforms instead of corporate ones.

Uniting different platforms/apps etc. that serve the same function but without making it a giant monopoly

Ai not being used for creative works

(Movies and cinema still thriving)

Automatisation etc. being controlled and democratized

More happy news

More focus on actions being taken in relation to reporting on problems etc

Better transparency of the sources of information

Showing differing opinions on the news

Better transparency and agency for users instead of it all being controlled by the companies that own the platforms

-Quality over quantity

-Stop polarization

-More critical thinking/encourage critical thinking

Right now it’s like a factory, where it’s about the amount of news rather than the quality of the news and the articles addressing these.

Maybe a solution:

Dividing the news in two categories, breaking news and thorough articles. Breaking news are the important news, that actually matter (for instance if the prime minister resigns), whereas the thorough articles addresses the breaking news and not so breaking news once a week in depth.