by

While the Sage report is longer, it is easier to navigate and visually pleasing.

2014-04-04 12:19:21 UTC

It demonstrates clear hierarchy and uses tables, images, and space which increases readability. The Interaction Design report is also very clearly structured and much more concise, which is nice, but is formatted more formally and professionally than Sage.

2014-04-04 12:20:26 UTC

Sage has a directory, Interaction Design does not. Much easier to navigate knowing where to find what

User is pretty cool

2014-04-04 12:20:35 UTC

While it's a little ugly, it elaborates each problem

fully and provides examples and recommendations

for each problem. It's a slow approach to fixing a

website, but it's definitely breaks it down to

manageable chunks.

User.com

2014-04-04 12:20:42 UTC

The report relies mostly upon the designer's own experiences;

whereas the Sage report has taken into account human testing.

2014-04-04 12:20:45 UTC

MLN report establishes credibility as opposed to the Sage

Headings

2014-04-04 12:21:24 UTC

Sage uses easily-identifiable headings

Sage is clearly organized

2014-04-04 12:22:25 UTC

The color coding for the Sage report makes it easier to navigate, especially at a glance

Personal pronouns

2014-04-04 12:22:25 UTC

Interaction Design uses 'I' but Sage keeps it formal

2014-04-04 12:23:58 UTC

I contest that the Sage report establishes credibility

throughout the entire report by constantly referencing

users. I would be more inclined to believe the results from

the sage report because I know more than one person will

access my site.

Sage

2014-04-04 12:24:38 UTC

Sage ranks the issues as Low, Medium or High priority enabling readers to determine what should be done first.

2014-04-04 12:25:31 UTC

Interaction Design addresses consistency

Things to consider when writing your usability report for ENG 317

2014-04-04 12:34:49 UTC

Credible: Use the heuristics; screenshots;

checklist;

by