<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Based on your reading in FFA &amp; the article, how are historical events and fictional events similar/different?  by Brooke Vozar</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-09-17 12:40:51 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-09-10 14:56:06 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ashlyn</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179145</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on my reading in Flowers for Algernon and the article I have concluded there are many similarities differences between historical and fictional events. To begin, Fictional events can take place in the future or the past, they could also take place in the present. However, Historical events only take place in the past. Continuing. Historical events are fully true, meanwhile, fiction event, while they can be based on true events, are made up or fake. Moving away from differences, both fictional and historical events are similar in ways also. Starting off, both, while fiction is not ever fully true, may contain truthful information or may be based on a real event. To add on, both may be on a real person but fiction may tell fake adventure, or daring tales to make the character sound interesting while history, interesting or not, will tell the complete truth. All in all,  fiction and history events are similar and different in many ways.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:28:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179145</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Addi-</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179465</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on information from "Flowers for Algernon" and the Rorschach article, there are many differences and similarities between fictional events and historical events. First off, one similarity is  that both genres can have real events in them, of course historical will have real events in it but fiction can too. An example of this can be found in "Flowers for Algernon" in the story, the main character, Charlie Gordon gets a surgery to make him smarter. There may not be a real man named that who got that surgery but someone did and that's the truth. A difference between the two genres can be easily found. Historical events are always real because they happened earlier in history. Fiction is always 90% not true. In conclusion, Fictional and Historical events are similar, but also different.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:29:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179465</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alec</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179557</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on my reading in Flowers for Algernon and the article, I can see that there are many similarities and differences. To start off, a similarity is that in both texts, the test is used to find a disorder, or see their mental ability. In opposition, a difference in the two texts is that in the article, the problem was that it wasn't popular anymore, and in the book, they were more focused on testing Charlie Gordon for a disorder. Another difference is that in the book, they were testing for a disorder to see if Charlie needed to have surgery, and in the article, they were trying to find out what different people thought. To wrap it up, Flowers for Algernon and the article are talking about the same test, but in similar and different ways.</div>]]></description>
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:29:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179557</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mitchell-</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179758</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based off of "Flowers for Algernon" and the information article, I can tell  that there are many similarities and differences. The differences are that in the article it says that the test is used to diagnose the Klecksographie disease and in FFA it never explained the disease that Charlie might have. A second difference is that the article has historical events and historical events are things that are real and fictional events are not real events and can happen any time. A similarity is that the test is used to find the personality of someone in both texts. In conclusion, historical and fictional events are very similar and different.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:29:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382179758</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Helen</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382180167</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based off of "Flowers for Algernon" and the informational article, "Flowers for Algernon" and the article both have the Rorschach test and they work about the same way. Where as the article tries to push the fact that the test is not accurate, FFA just briefly describes it. The article also talks a little bit about Herman Rorschach and when and where he wasborn\\\</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:30:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382180167</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Evvan</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382181285</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> Based off flowers for algernon and the informational article the are many similarities and differences. One off the differences is in the article it talks about the flaws and what the rorschach test is mainly used for now. Also a similarity is they are also used to find mental disorders. Another difference is in the story FFA It is based on just one person and in the article it talks about a lot of people who took it. The story FFA Is fiction while the article is Non- fiction. . </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:31:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382181285</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Isaac- </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382181480</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on flowers for Algernon I can tell that there are many similarities and differences. To start, they used the test as a way to see mental disabilities. A difference in the text is that people in the article use the Rorschach test to diagnose the Klecksographie disease in the text of FFA it never explains the disease that Charlie has. Another similarity is that the test is used for personality in both of the texts.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:31:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382181480</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kaleb</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382181594</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on the information from the article about the Rorschach test and "Flowers for Algernon", there are many similarities and differences between the two. Some similarities are that the article said that the test was used to diagnose people with mental disorders and in "Flowers For Algernon" they gave Charlie the test to see if he had a mental disorder that made him not so smart. A difference is that the article talks about diagnosing people with mental disorders while in FFA they never diagnosed Charlie with any </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:31:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382181594</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marcus</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382182337</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based off of "Flowers for Algernon" and the Hermann Rorchach article, there are many similarities and differences between historical and fictional events. One reason that they are similar is that they both provide information as to why something is happening. An example of this is in Flowers of Algernon, Charlie Gordon's "journal" says that he is in a class for slow adults. Also, in the "historical" article, it provides many details as to why the Rorchach test isn't as popular anymore. This shows that both types of writing provide background information as to what is happening. One difference is that historical events are things that are real and in the past, and fictional events are not real events that happened and can br of any time period. Some fictional events are events that take place at a real location, but the actual event and dialogue that took place in the story isn't real. Those are just some of many similarities and differences of historical and fictional events.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:32:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382182337</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kenzie</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382183436</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based off of " Flowers for Algernon" and the informational article, you can see many similarities and differences. Some similarities include the fact that the test can show diseases and personality. The mind creates it's own meaning which was what the man was trying to do with Charlie, but Charlie didn't want to lie about people so he didn't answer right. From him failing the test it showed that he didn't have much personality, and that's what the test was made for. SOme differences are that the test wasn't exactly accurate. Yes the test showed that Charlie didn't had something wrong, but everyone could get different answers on it. Another difference is that the test only showed the basic while Charlie could use something more modern and practical for him. By talking to Charlie you can find personality, not by a test because his personality goes against the test.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:33:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382183436</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marisa</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382183901</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based off of "Flowers for Algernon" and the information article, there are similarties and differences between ficional and historical events. One example for the similarities is the test is to find a disorder or tell about a personality. For example Charlie didn't want to answer because he knew that would be lying so the person who test hjim on it now knows that he doesn't lie. One difference is that the article used the ink blots to find Klecksographie but in FFa they never said the disease they are trying to find for Charlie. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:33:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382183901</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reid</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382183918</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based off of "Flowers for Algernon" and the informational article,  there are many similarities and differences between both of them. To start off, they both are similar because they provide information as to why something has happened or that will maybe happen . In opposition, Fictional events are something that may of happened, but the characters are not real, but historical events that have happened at some time in the past. All in all, there are many similarity and differences of historical and fictional events.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:33:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382183918</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kylie </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382200193</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based off of Flowers for Algernon and the informational article there are many similarities and differences that can be seen. For example a similarity is that they can diagnose diseases and disorders. Our minds are supposed to create thoughts on what the picture might be. In Flowers for Algernon the man giving Charlie the test said it was for personality. In the article, however, it was stated that Hermann Rorschach noticed it pointed out schizophrenics instead of it making up someone's personality. To conclude, Flowers for Algernon and the article are talking about the Rorschach test in somewhat similar and different methods.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-10 14:51:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vozarb/RorschachTest/wish/382200193</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
