<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Subway Samaritans by Tulika Chatterjee</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl</link>
      <description>Piliavin et.al Study</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-02-09 15:47:51 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-02-04 19:39:54 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>AIM</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1182850038</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>-To study bystander behaviour in a natural setting. <br>- To investigate the effect of four situational variables on helping behaviour or ' Good Samaritanism';<br>- the type of victim<br>- the race of the victim<br>- the behaviour of a 'model'<br>- the size of the group of bystannders.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-09 15:49:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1182850038</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BACKGROUND</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1182884320</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- A key trigger for research into bystander behaviour was the murder of Kitty Genovese.<br>- Darley and Latane (1968) hypothesized this particular behaviour of not helping if they believed there are other individuals as the "diffusion of responsibility".<br>- Alternatively, if we witness those around assisting or 'modelling' helping behaviour, we may be more likely to imitate and engage in helping.<br>- People are more willing to help those who are perceived as similar.<br>- Schopler and Matthews,1965 suggested that bystander helping occurs more when victims are not seen as responsible for their circumstances.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-09 15:55:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1182884320</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>METHOD</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183159913</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- FIELD EXPERIMENT<br>- Realistic environment ; the New York City Subway.<br>- INDEPENDENT GROUP DESIGN<br>- The trials were repeated on different days and involved different participants in each condition.<br>- 4 IV's :<br>- the type of victim : the levels were 'drunk' or 'ill' victim.<br>- the race of the victim : the levels were black or white victim.<br>- the behaviour of the 'model': the levels were a model who was either close to or distant from the victim helped, either early or late in the event.<br>the size of the group of bystanders; this level was the naturally occuring number of passengers present in the subway carriage.<br><br>- DV was the level of bystander helping.<br>- This was operationalised as quantitative data was collected by noting the time taken for the first passenger to help, as well as the total number of passengers who helped.<br>- The race, gender and location in the carriage of each helper were also recorded.<br>- Qualitative data was recorded in the form of verbal remarks made by passengers during each incident.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-09 16:35:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183159913</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>SAMPLE</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183238598</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- Participants were passengers travelling on an underground service between Harlem and the Bronx weekdays <br>- Time between 11am and 3 pm.<br>- It was an opportunity sample as they were not deliberately selected for participation.<br>- Total estimated no. 4450 people.<br>- 45% black, 55% white.<br>- Mean number of passengers per carriage was 43.<br>- Mean number of people in critical area (where the incident took place) was 8.5.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-09 16:47:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183238598</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>PROCEDURE</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183271557</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- 4 teams of student researchers carried out the study.<br>- On each trial, 2 males and 2 females boarded the trains..<br>- Female confederates sat in the area adjacent to the immediate'critical' area.<br>- The observed the passengers and recorded the data during each trial.<br>- Male confederates took the role of victim and model.<br>- The victim stood at the pole in the centre of the critical area.<br>- The model remained standing throughout the trial.<br>- Each trial used the same route, because it included a 7.5 minute gap between two stations.<br>- At 70 sec. into the journey, the 'victim' staggered forward and collapsed.<br>- He remained lying on the floor looking upward.<br>- If he received no help, the model would help him to his feet at the next stop.<br>- The victim was played by different males during the study but all were made to look similar; identically dressed, causal clothing.<br>- They were aged 26- 35years; 3 were white and 1 black.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-09 16:52:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183271557</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CONTINUED..</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183360882</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- 38/103 trials the victims smelled alcohol and carried a bottle of alcohol wrapped in a brown bag.<br>- In the remaining 65 trials they appeared sober and carried a black cane.<br>- They all behaved identically.<br>- Models were all white aged between 24-29years and all dressed informally.<br>- While helping, the model raised the victim to the sitting position and stayed with him until the train reached the next stop.<br>-Trials were split into :<br>- Critical/early: model stood in critical area and waited 70 sec. to help victim.<br>- Critical/late: model stood in critical area and waited 150 sec. to help victim.<br>- Adjacent/early : model stood in adjacent area and waited 70 sec. to help victim.<br>- Adjacent/late : model stood in adjacent area and waited 150 sec. to help victim.<br>- No model condition : the model did not help the victim until the trial was over and the train had reached the next stop.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-09 17:06:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1183360882</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RESULTS</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187452758</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- Overall the frequency of helping in this study was much higher than had previously been reported in the laboratory.<br>- Majority of helpers were males.<br>- Nearly 80% helped before the model intervened or in a no-model condition.<br>- 60% of cases more than 1 person helped.<br>In terms of TYPE OF VICTIM ;<br>- The cane victim received help in 62/65 trials. Spontaneous helping occured.<br>- The drunk victim received help only 19/38 trials. No spontaneous helping.<br>In terms of RACE OF VICTIM;<br>- Both black and white cane victims were equally likely to recieve help.<br>- Some minor evidence of same-race helping in the drunk condition, hence participants were more willing to offer help to those of their own race.<br>- Drunk condition; black victim received less help overall.<br>- Early model intervention at 70 seconds was slightly more likely to result in helping behaviour than waiting until 150 seconds had passed.<br>- The hypothesis of 'diffusion of responsibility' was rejected as they did not find any eveidence to support it.<br>- Alternatively it was found when the number of passengers was high the rates of helping was also slightly higher.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-10 14:11:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187452758</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CONTINUED...</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187528429</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><br>- From the graph; <br>Hypothetical speed to respond for 7 person groups  is slower than for 3 person groups.<br>- Natural 7 person group was faster to respond than predicted and faster than the 3 person group. </strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/636501301/fdae1789125e6da7c5932be7ba0b15d6/Screenshot_20210210_195230.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-10 14:24:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187528429</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CONTINUED...</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187626547</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- In 20% of trials, passengers actually moved away from the critical area.<br>- Higher number of comments made during trials without helping.<br>- More comments made during trials with a drunk victim.<br>Piliavin proposed an alternative explanation for their finding's ; "COST-BENEFIT MODEL".<br>They suggest;<br>-Witnessing an emergency raises an indivduals arousal.<br>- Feelings can be of disgust and aversion, or even sympathy and courage.<br>- This heightened arousal prompts individuals to act, in order to reduce difficult feelings.<br>- Potential responses include helping directly (as seen in trials) or indirectly; leaving the critical area (seen in trials).<br>- Comments by passengers towards the drunk victim shows their feelings towards them and is the final response.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-10 14:40:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187626547</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CONCLUSION</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187702346</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>- In a natural setting, many people would offer help to a stranger, even in a group situation.<br>- No evidence to support diffusion of responsibility hypothesis.<br>- Several other factors play a role in helping behaviour ;<br>- type of victim ( someone using a cane will be helped more than a drunk person)<br>- gender of the helper (men are more likely to help than a women)<br>- People may be more likely to help members of their own race if the victim is drunk.<br>- Longer an emergency, less likely it is that anyone will help and more likely it is they will find another way of coping with arousal.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-10 14:53:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1187702346</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>STRENGTHS </title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1203773787</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>1- Good </strong><strong><em>ecological validity</em></strong><strong> as it was a field experiment using an independent measure design.<br>2- Participants were train passengers who were unaware of the study hence would have </strong><strong><em><mark>behaved naturally</mark></em></strong><strong>.<br>3- Around 4500 individuals participated; it was a mix of ethinicities and gender.<br>4- The large sample is likely to be </strong><strong><em><mark>representative</mark></em></strong><strong> and has </strong><strong><em><mark>greater validity</mark></em></strong><strong>.<br>5- </strong><strong><em><mark>Quantitative data ensured objective record.</mark></em></strong><strong><br>6- The data was </strong><strong><em><mark>reliable</mark></em></strong><strong> due to the presence of two observers.<br>7-</strong><strong><em><mark> Qualitative data</mark></em></strong><strong> in form of remarks or comments made by the passengers were also recorded which helped the researchers to know about their thoughts and behaviours.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-15 14:13:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1203773787</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>WEAKNESSES</title>
         <author>tulika_1991</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1203798017</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>1- Less control of </strong><strong><em><mark>extraneous variable</mark></em></strong><strong> which could </strong><strong><em><mark>lower the validity and reliability</mark></em></strong><strong>.<br>2- Methodological issues:<br>- Experimenters can't be sure that the participants were not repeated as they took the same route everday.<br>- Participants may have been exposed to more than once condition of the experiment.<br>- Suspecting the emergency was a set-up might have made the participants more or less likely to offer help, creating </strong><strong><em><mark>demand characteristics.</mark></em></strong><strong><br>3- Passengers were subway passengers from New York, that means the sample is </strong><strong><em><mark>unrepresentative.</mark></em></strong><strong><br>4- Ethical Issues :<br>- Participants </strong><strong><em><mark>did not give consent</mark></em></strong><strong> to participate in this research.<br>- They were not </strong><strong><em><mark>debriefed</mark></em></strong><strong> after the study finished.<br>- They were </strong><strong><em><mark>deceived</mark></em></strong><strong> during the study.<br>- They might have suffered </strong><strong><em><mark>psychological distress </mark></em></strong><strong>as a result of the study, guilt at not helping or concern about the well-being of the victim.</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-15 14:21:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tulika_1991/nxbky8lfcb2syxtl/wish/1203798017</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
