<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>NA 2 by sean trischett</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r</link>
      <description>Made with mirth</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-04-02 21:37:53 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-04-04 20:27:11 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>CCTV</title>
         <author>sean214tri</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1378826444</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>"Stressing that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights also stipulates that certain rights and freedoms may be subject to restrictions as prescribed by law if necessary in the interests of national security, public safety, public order, or the rights and freedoms of others, the spokesman said."</div><div><br></div><div>-It just proves this news outlet is used for Chinese propaganda to protect the state’s image, trying to undermine the U.S report by using words like debunked, smear, myths, and many more to discredit what the U.S state department uncovered in their findings.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>-Especially after the week 11 lecture and readings, it is easy to say that&nbsp; CCTV is a speakerphone for the Chinese government.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>-Title shows how this outlet rejects U.S&nbsp; “so-called” Hong Kong policy report act&nbsp;</div><div>Argues that U.S sanctions “ . . . Interference in China’s internal affairs. . .” and tries to explain that it is a violation of human rights and democracy.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>“Smearing the national security law in the HKSAR out of political motivation is clear hypocrisy in adopting double standards, the spokesman said.”&nbsp;</div><div>- More evidence that the outlet is government-backed.</div><div>-Ideas favor mainland China.<br>-This type of news reported is to discredit national viewpoints, and to protect the image of China and its laws.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://english.cctv.com/2021/04/02/ARTIYJS2KL9WHzhXMabY84T0210402.shtml?spm=C69523.P89601117162.EEy8zkAGlNk4.26" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-02 21:40:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1378826444</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CCTV 2 </title>
         <author>sean214tri</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1378868613</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-&nbsp; further explains the disapproval of the state on U.S report and firm opposition&nbsp;</div><div>"The report is a gross violation of international law and basic norms governing international relations and an outright interference in Hong Kong affairs, which are China's internal affairs."(CCTV)<br><br></div><ul><li>Words like distorted, demonized, gross, vilified to describe what was reported by U.S officials.&nbsp;</li><li>Claims the U.S openly endorsed “anti-China forces”&nbsp; that cause trouble within Hong Kong's Border.&nbsp;<br><br></li></ul><div>&nbsp;</div><div>“Noting that the U.S. lags behind Hong Kong in global rankings both for freedoms and the rule of law, the spokesperson pointed out that the United States' own human rights situation is bleak, with recurring racial discrimination and police violence and record-high gun trade and shooting incidents.”(CCTV)<br><br></div><ul><li>I feel safe shit-talking China, Biden, Trump, or any other influential figure in the global world from my home in Mckinney, TX. I can not say I would go around and bad-mouth china in Hong Kong without looking behind my shoulder the entire day or hearing a knock on my door at 3 AM. The fact that they are trying to compare U.S internal issues to their issues is almost comical.&nbsp;</li><li>CCTV again reiterates that Hong Kong is part of China and that its affairs are China's internal affairs. I think this means mind your beeswax. CCTV goes further to say this by saying, “ stop meddling with Hong Kong affairs and China's internal affairs at large in whatever form."(CCTV)<br><br></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://english.cctv.com/2021/04/01/ARTIoqbMXIBkgcB4soNAgV6U210401.shtml?spm=C43394269523.P89601117162.EUH7LNrtbQHG.6" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-02 22:28:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1378868613</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CCTV 3</title>
         <author>sean214tri</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381145557</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Qingming Festival is an important day for the Chinese people, and it is when people visit to honor their ancestors and national heroes.&nbsp; It is a perfect time for President Xi Jinping to use it as a tool to influence people to believe in his ideas and goals of China. &nbsp;</div><div><br>-CCTV reminds the audience that Xi, the President, is general secretary of China Central Committee, chairman of the Central Military Commission, breaker of chains, mother of dragons, queen of Targaryen, etc. I hope everyone got the reference I was trying to make to GOT. CCTV has made a point to remind the reader just how powerful President Xi Jinping is and should listen to what he has to say.&nbsp;</div><div>“The purpose of learning from the heroes is to apply their spirit in everyday work and demonstrate a strong sense of responsibility toward people's lives and safety.”(CCTV)&nbsp;<br><br></div><ul><li>Things he said had me question if he remembered their heroes or tried to remind the people of China that those heroes served a greater purpose for the state’s benefit, which will benefit you. That there needs to be more heroes, and to be a hero, look at the past heroes.<br><br></li></ul><div>“Only by respecting heroes will other heroes emerge, and only by hailing them will more appear in their place.” (CCTV)&nbsp; - They are pushing for more people to stand by the government because if you do, you will be a hero. It would be very manipulating if the only information received was this kind of state-run media.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><ul><li>I haven't found one single article with a criticism of the Chinese government. I also believe this outlet has been infiltrated by a third party other known as the government if it is not owned by the government already.<br><br></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://english.cctv.com/2021/04/04/ARTIwueKbk8qeiyWCTRL7asW210404.shtml?spm=C69523.PDoRdCIUTBov.EiFD0kE9SqhK.9" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-04 17:56:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381145557</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Arirang</title>
         <author>sean214tri</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381277105</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Arirang’s ideas and beliefs are pro-democracy and pop culture. When first glancing through the websites Tv, I knew what kind of topics are essential to the Arirang media. With titles of shows like Diplomat Talks, Peace &amp; Prosperity, Peace insight, K-BIZ, it seems to be following an American news type culture.&nbsp;</div><div>-They also bring full-spectrum stories and show what both sides want to say for themselves.</div><div>For example,</div><div>-In the Foreign Correspondents Segment, Arirang showed neutrality and studio guest from both sides of the spectrum. They had a TASS Correspondent(Russia) and an Australian Freelance Journalist on the show talking about U.S-China relations. Doing so helps create a non-bias approach and helps guide the audience to see what both sides see and value.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.arirang.com/Tv2/Tv_Home.asp?PROG_CODE=TVCR0802&amp;MENU_CODE=102346" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-04 19:34:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381277105</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Arirang 2</title>
         <author>sean214tri</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381309522</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In this show, the outlet Arirang showed restraint to show its own opinion; instead, they helped the audience understand the how, what, why, and the possible futures. They showed accountability and seems to be pressured by no outside source.&nbsp; If anyone knows history, they will understand that the U.S helped south Korea and, over time, has been influenced by U.S culture and ways.&nbsp;</div><div>The 30-minute segment was over the rising tensions in the Korean peninsula covers China-U.S relations, China-North Korea relations, and U.S- North Korea relations. My Theory is that they cover issues that will directly affect South Korea and its future.&nbsp;<br><br></div><ul><li>Pro-Democracy</li><li>Told facts and withheld from opinion</li><li>Very formal and informational<br><br></li></ul><div>Seem to report on topics and give a whole spectrum perspective, being American, this news is almost dull, but it is also very insightful and helps the viewer see both sides of an issue/topic.<br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.arirang.com/Tv2/Tv_Home.asp?PROG_CODE=TVCR0849&amp;MENU_CODE=102651" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-04 20:01:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381309522</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Comparing the 2 </title>
         <author>sean214tri</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381337044</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When Comparing CCTV and Arirang TV, I saw two very different approaches to reporting on topics.&nbsp;</div><div>-When CCTV reported on issues and topics, they had little to no criticism towards The Chinese government, while Arirang agreed that human rights violations were happening in China.&nbsp;</div><div>-CCTV Discredited all information that was not from an official Chinese spokesperson.&nbsp;</div><div>Arirang did the opposite and brought insight and information given from both sides.</div><div>-CCTV is a weapon of manipulation for the Chinese government instead of a platform for accurate information.</div><div>Arirang is a weapon for facts and truth.&nbsp;</div><div>Arirang -Pro-Democracy&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div>CCTV -Pro-government</div><div>These two outlets are very different from each other One is an extremely bias operated outlet. In contrast, the other practices ethical Journalism, and it is effortless to point out the two.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://media0.giphy.com/media/LRkv2LHyW2mCiAEXNZ/giphy.gif" />
         <pubDate>2021-04-04 20:25:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/sean214tri/nui2ie66s93gif3r/wish/1381337044</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
