<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Lesson 6.3 Learning Assessment by Ranse Blankenbeker</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-04-13 23:58:37 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-02-01 22:29:31 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Selection Process</title>
         <author>rblankenbeker</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747563</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Presidents typically want to nominate someone with extraordinary personal integrity and professional expertise. They'll also often want a group of justices who are somewhat representative of the country.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-14 00:00:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747563</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What Happens When They&#39;re Selected</title>
         <author>rblankenbeker</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747805</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>After a Justice is nominated by the president, they have to be confirmed by the Senate. This can be difficult if the Senate wants to work against the president. The nominee has to go through a hearing, and then the Senate decides to confirm them or not.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-14 00:04:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747805</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How They Interpret</title>
         <author>rblankenbeker</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747953</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Two main principles dictate how the Supreme Court decides on a case: precedent and judicial philosophy.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-14 00:07:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747953</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Precedent</title>
         <author>rblankenbeker</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747976</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Under this principle, once the Court rules on a case, its decision serves as a precedent on which to base other decisions in cases that raise the same legal issue. This allows for less chaos as courts can expect a certain outcome.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-14 00:07:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251747976</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Judicial Philosophy</title>
         <author>rblankenbeker</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251748015</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;This is the idea about what guidelines to use when interpreting the Constitution. Judicial philosophies have evolved throughout our history, and Justices will have different views and philosophies that they adopt.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-14 00:09:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rblankenbeker/nu2kvnj1tbf5/wish/251748015</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
