https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq "What went wrong?" en-us 2022-05-01 13:30:26 UTC 2022-05-02 07:01:39 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f4d4.png https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166380412 1. Joseph failed to get the information of the work time of the farmers thus making it a conflict in taking the interviews. We must always collect data from the respondents in their most convenient time.
2. Mary did not consider the answers of the people in her interview but in worst of it, fabricated it so that her favorite candidate would have a good boost in the election. She failed to practice intellectual honesty.]]> 2022-05-02 06:37:22 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166380412 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166384250 1. The Principle of data collection that he missed taking into account the work time of farmers and so there was a conflict of schedule and the place where the interview would take place.
2. The research ethics that she failed to consider was that she fabricated a different result because she was a fan of the other candidate, so her biases led to this.]]> 2022-05-02 06:40:39 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166384250 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166385769 1. Joseph failed to gather information about the availability of the farmers thus it resulted to conflict in conducting the interview. We should always conduct data gathering at the most convenient time for the respondents.
2. The research ethics she failed to consider is intellectual honesty. After finding out that the majority of her respondents will most likely vote for Presidential Candidate 1, she fabricated the responses she gathered. ]]> 2022-05-02 06:42:14 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166385769 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166386357 What principle in terms of data collection did he miss to take into account? 
- The principle that he missed out on is that He didn’t ask about the schedule of the farmers and he didn’t set a schedule where on he will be able to interview the farmers.

What research ethics did she fail to consider?
- The research ethics that she fails to consider is that intellectual honesty is absent.

]]> 2022-05-02 06:42:50 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166386357 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166388360 1. The researcher failed to consider the farmer's work time and tried to conduct an interview at an inconvenient time because the participant was out in the fields, planting.

2. She did not consider the answers of the participants and fabricated the responses she gathered from her data collection.]]> 2022-05-02 06:44:47 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166388360 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166389897 1.  The researcher, Joseph, did not continue to communicate with them to get their consent to participate in the study and also to give them the date of data collection as well. That's why the participants are not aware and when he conducted the interview, all the participants were out in the fields.
2. The research ethics that Mary failed to consider is she fabricated the responses she gathered from her data collection, that shows that intellectual honesty is not practiced. ]]> 2022-05-02 06:46:35 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166389897 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166390378 1.) Joseph failed to consider the farmer's most convenient time to do the interview. This resulted in a disagreement in the schedule. The researcher must observe professionalism by setting an agreed schedule, but still, give the farmers the right to reschedule and withdraw from the interview.

2.) She modified the data and fabricated the results due to biased reasons. This is deemed unethical because she falsified the data and turned it into something of her preference.]]> 2022-05-02 06:47:11 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166390378 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166396412 Joseph forgot to evaluate the farmer's most convenient time for the interview. As a result, there was a scheduling disagreement. The researcher must maintain professionalism by adhering to an agreed-upon timeline while also allowing the farmers to postpone and withdraw from the interview.

Due to bias, she manipulated the data and faked the results. This is immoral since she fabricated the data and manipulated it to her liking.]]> 2022-05-02 06:54:21 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166396412 https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166398883 1. The Principle of data he missed out on is Joseph failed to gathering information of the farmers work time

2. The research ethics was that she failed to practice intellectual honesty because she fabricated the answers]]> 2022-05-02 06:57:10 UTC https://padlet.com/markjoshuabalingit1/npsdv1lnrlo83jwq/wish/2166398883