<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Theory Construction by Ali Iskender</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ali_alexander/no9tq0khgdru</link>
      <description>Discussion</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-10-19 19:53:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-10-20 00:00:20 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>ali_alexander</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ali_alexander/no9tq0khgdru/wish/294999117</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q1: Hunt (1983) briefly mentions the structure of general theory. What type of general theory structure would be more appropriate to develop a general theory for T&amp;H? (Hierarchical or Collection form) how and why?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-19 19:53:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ali_alexander/no9tq0khgdru/wish/294999117</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>ali_alexander</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ali_alexander/no9tq0khgdru/wish/295028136</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q2: Davis (1971) comprehensively talked about “interesting theory” and encouraged theorists to construct interesting theories. Do you think a theory’s being interesting is under control of his founder? How do you perceive the role/authority/power/control of theorists on that “interesting” issue?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-19 23:59:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ali_alexander/no9tq0khgdru/wish/295028136</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
