These various textbook pages explain smoking behavior and how it has revolutionized since the 1950s. -brief description of the article- The textbook pages zeros-in on how smoking through undergoing scientific discovery concludes that smoking is extremely harmful towards the human body and mind defining it an addiction, which revolutionized the outlook of smoking behavior. It recapitulates how psychologists and public health officials found out the effects of smoking and then for the rest of the information, it relatively explains the effects of that vital piece of knowledge from 1950 to modern times. -a comment on the intended audience- The author wanted the reader to understand the fundamentals of smoking behaviors throughout the times. -rhetorical appeal- The author clearly explained the evaluations that people figured out about smoking behavior through discoveries and facts that occurred throughout that period of time. Which brought forth solutions to solve the issues that the author explained in the textbook. -explanation of how the source helps, define, complicate, or clarify the topic. -Through the issues of the old and modern smoking behavior to society, the author explained thoroughly how smoking is bad for you with various facts, and how people can learn to stop smoking. - explain any defect, weakness, or bias- The only bias that the author could be accused of is the fact the smoking might help others cope during high level stressful situations. These textbook pages have helped explain psychological and physical effects of smoking and described indefinitely the only true way to fix/help an addiction of smoking which is to stop smoking.

This article from WHO establishes the history of their conflicts with tobacco. This article is packed with every detail of history that WHO has done towards tobacco. It explained the social, economic, and political situations that have been brought by tobacco use and the history of their actions. They have done multitudes of work to maintain control of smoking. The author wanted to establish that WHO has contributed towards tobacco use since the 1950s and expresses the history of the multitudes of strategic things the have done in this article. They used multitudes of facts and occasions that the WHO attended too towards negotiation and success in WHO purpose towards tobacco use, this was effective because they kept changing plans overtime and is still keep going to change plans until one of them works the best towards tobacco use. This helps grants information towards the topic because there is so much information that can help towards why smoking should be illegalized. There were many biases and defects in this article for example the main one was that smoking boost the economy, and trade towards other nations. Thought the WHO cares about health more than money, so they keep pushing their plan to help others quit smoking. This article might not be relevant to the topic though it presents multitudes of information that goes with reasoning for the topic, and it comes from a valid resource.

These various pages in this textbook expresses the factual foundations of cigarettes and the harsh reality that smoking cigarettes harm individuals. Including the various ordained details, these textbook pages concentrate thoroughly on the main objective of the chapter, which is to acknowledge the harsh reality of the multiple consequences smoking brings upon the human body. The author wanted to showcase the dangers of cigarette smoke using resources from the WHO (World Health Organization), and the CDC (Central Disease center), that are both great resources, which exceedingly validates the text, and which thus brings upon inclusive factuality in the authors critique writing. The author wants to explain to people that cigarette smoke is bad for you and explains near the end how to stop smoking. There were many factual statements in the textbook that used logos mainly as it rhetorical appeal. It was definitely useful since it gave information and facts about smoking cigarettes and its harmful nature. The source helped bring understanding to the topic because it gives a full detailed explanation that smoking is harmful towards human beings. The only bias towards smoking is the fact that people like to do it since it initiates a dopamine in the brain once you smoke. This was very useful to the relevancy to the topic because it explained that smoking is bad for you and that it is an addiction that needs to be stopped.

This article created by gale, part of Cengage Group, shows an overview of smoking and it causes. This article briefly overviews what smoking is and how it leads to disease and addiction like cancer. The author wanted t to make sure to amplify the fact that smoking can cause cancer and that it has mental side effects. The author used logos and pathos in his article to describe how smoking is a leading cause to lung cancer the deadliest cancer. Though the cancer part can be described as logos because it can scare the reader to stop smoking because of the fear that they might get cancer. It was useful towards the article because it showed how smoking really is bad for you. It clarified the topic of this article which is smoking and health because the author tied smoking to various health problems in the article. The only weakness the article has is the lack of explanation of the mental and psychological side harm that smoking brings forth in a human. This article was pretty useful for my topic because it dials in on the cancer component of smoking which is a very scary topic to think about.