10B Documenting Destiny- Lesson 4 by Mr. Cole https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2 Perspective, Balance and Bias en-us 2021-04-24 09:37:25 UTC 2025-08-25 06:23:38 UTC hello@padlet.com Fox News Reporting mandarinsam https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1454391832 1. What do you notice about the coverage in the two events?
2. Why might this be the case?
3. Try to characterize the type of person who might be drawn to such coverage. Think ethnicity, age, political perspective, wealth status etc.]]> 2021-04-24 09:40:27 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1454391832 Questions: mandarinsam https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455593847 Link: https://youtu.be/j6lIbGGA8Z0
Answer the questions below.]]> 2021-04-25 05:39:25 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455593847 Questions: mandarinsam https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455594644 Link: https://youtu.be/J2Pjudf0810
Answer the questions below:]]> 2021-04-25 05:40:07 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455594644 Individual Research mandarinsam https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455643241 Identify ONE persuasive device used in documentaries. Find a definition and an example (could be a clip, audio or written example). Add it below. If someone else has added it first, you start again at the beginning with a new device!]]> 2021-04-25 06:21:18 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455643241 Homework mandarinsam https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455645276 Rewatch any of the news report videos in today's lesson. Using the Persuasive Devices from the list in Task 2, identify AT LEAST 3 examples from the videos. Describe the example, and include a time stamp as well as stating what video it is on...]]> 2021-04-25 06:22:59 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1455645276 Roudha roudhaaltamimi https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488866666 1. Ignorant beyond belief. This is a clear example of racism. The fox reporters believe black people are wrong to protest being murdered by cops "there is absolutely no reason, no excuse that this continues to take place", but white people are right to protest for wearing a mask "you cant take everybody's freedom".

2. This Fox News originates from a racist country and so, it portrays the US’s political perspective. The perspective or view of any event or issue in the news is always portrayed in a political perspective.

3. The type of people who would be drawn to such coverage are white teenage and adult men and women, who have the same political perspective as their country of the black people community. 

]]> 2021-05-04 09:30:52 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488866666 Muhammad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488868623 1. Both events of the new coverage experience a bias in which, in this case, the news anchor tries to persuade the audience using manipulation of what they think happened versus what actually happened. 
2. This may be the case due to different opinions. This news anchor, in particular, their side of political beliefs to the audience. In which pertaining to the different political beliefs in the country. 

3. Obviously, the type of people who would be drawn to this type of news coverage are people who side with their views of politics. This may range in between people who are in university, to people who are adults due to their needs of following whats right to them and of course listening about it along with their educational senses. It would be seen as people with more power or a huge hubris would tend to acknowledge this news coverage as this news anchor vehemently shows their opinion(s) based on beliefs of divided politics. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:31:45 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488868623 Michaél michaelkonig1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488883213 1. Each event had been described in two different perspectives and opinions depending on the side to which the news channel leans towards, unfolding the news in both the citizens perspective, and in governmental perspective. 

2. This would be the case due to audiences preference and opinions, as each news channel tends to feed their audiences the news in the specific opinions and ways they tend to better accept, whether it be in a liberal perspective or a conservative perspective. 

3. I think each channel is watched by a variety of people depending on their personal political perspective which tends to originate from ones background which includes age, ethnicity, wealth status, etc. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:38:15 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488883213 Sarah https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488886637 1. There is a clear difference in how both topics are discussed. When speaking of the Staten Island protests, words such as 'fighting for freedom', or 'protesting', the news anchors clearly justify this behavior by stating 'you cant just take away freedom' or 'people are on the edge'. Whereas when discussing the BLM protests, terms such as 'brutality', 'criminal activity', and 'uncontrolled', are used. This gives the audience the impression that the BLM protestors are less justified and more dangerous than the Staten Island protestors, and it is clear that the news channel excuses the Staten Island protests, but not the BLM. Whether consciously or nor, this clear bias leaves an impression on audience. 
2. Racism. Fox News clearly does not approve of the BLM, even though they are also 'fighting for their freedom' in a similar sense to the Staten Island protestors.
3. Someone who is against the BLM or sides more with the police force would approve of this news coverage. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:39:44 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488886637 Serene serenefarah1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488887934 1. there was a clear difference in both events , they were ignorant and biased against the black people who were wearing masks and protesting against the BLM movement, whilst talking about the white people protesting against wearing a mask they were a lot calmer and agreeing to the situation and finding out excuses and ways to justify the “lockdown” and why people may be upset as well as solutions, however, with the black people and the BLM protests they name them as criminals and are passive aggressive and when giving solutions or asking why they are let free the tone in Trevors voice suggests he was angry but with the white people he was mostly monotoned or just extra polite about it. 
2. This may be a case of pure ignorance and and racial injustice towards the black people and the white supremacy towards the white people. 
3. the video can be targeted towards people with a strong political point of view, more middle aged and probably caucasian ]]> 2021-05-04 09:40:17 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488887934 Alberto https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488888037 Discrimination is applicable to both issues justify by the two sides of the card. But what is clear is that the public reaction to both events when from little support to significant events, and both supporters or opposition were definitely in agree with their points without seeking for any solution.]]> 2021-05-04 09:40:20 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488888037 Firas https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488889304 1. Both events had been covered very differently, between one event (staten island protest) they had been more supportive and defensive whereas with other event (BLM protest) it had been the opposite. 
2. As the news channel covering the events (fox news) is very bias. 
3. Those who would be drawn to such coverage would be possibly those against the BLM movement. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:40:55 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488889304 Tehya tehyakinghorn2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488890439 1. The converage of the staten  island protest is covered more as a political event as it effects the whole of the people and goes against the bill of rights where as the Blm Protest have happens several times over the history of America as a country most recent prior to this was the 2015 Baltimore protests 

2 . The news network that this aired  on is Fox News which is a very biased news network that thens to not address these stituations


3. The people that would be drawn to this would be the republican party or households that practice christian religion ]]> 2021-05-04 09:41:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488890439 Faiza faizaalariqi2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488890868 1. BLM were ignorant, bias and racist and state island protest portrayed more about how you cant control peoples freedom. 
2. Portrays US political perspective, which is racist and characterize black people as violent and criminals. 
3. White middle aged adults. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:41:37 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488890868 Danyal https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488893996 1. The coverage for the anti-mask protests was defensive whereas the coverage for BLM was ignorant, misleading and even hostile. This shows clear racism.
2. Racism and a bias against black people within the news station.
3.  White people who are anti-BLM and who hold generally right-wing and conservative ideals.]]> 2021-05-04 09:43:04 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488893996 Lauren laurenwatson3 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488895109 1. I noticed that the coverage is only reported by middle aged white men and women. I also noticed that when talking about the Staten Island protest they used "softer" words while using harsher words when talking about BLM protests.

2. Their word choice is crucial because it subconsciously changes a person's point of view on a situation. Using harsher words can escalate a situation and therefore make it seem worse.

3. The coverage targets white middle aged men and women that have a semi-wealthy background. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:43:31 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488895109 Ali alialshamsi1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488895911 1. Every occasion had been portrayed in two alternate points of view and sentiments relying upon the side to which the news channel inclines towards, unfurling the news in both the resident's viewpoint and in legislative point of view. 
2. This would be the situation because of crowds' inclination and assessments, as every news channel will in general channel their crowds the news in the particular sentiments and ways they will in general better acknowledge, regardless of whether it be in a liberal viewpoint or a moderate viewpoint. 
3. I think each channel is watched and depicted relying upon political point of view which will in general start from ones foundation which incorporates age, identity, abundance status, and so forth]]> 2021-05-04 09:43:54 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488895911 Evandros https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488896413 1. The staten island protests are being excused by the reporters, they are saying that you cant take away peoples freedom without this sort of thing happening. When a cop got hit by a car the reporters defended the guy who drove into the cop, but in the BLM protests they were saying that they needed to arrest people and put those who were protesting in jail, even though the BLM protests have a more justified cause than the Staten island protest.
2. This may be the case due to racism within the reporting channels, as the BLM protests were defending black people and they were harsher towards it.
3. The people who would have been drawn to this coverage are middle aged citizens.]]> 2021-05-04 09:44:10 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488896413 Michaél michaelkonig1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488896672 1. C-Span provides all coverage to the news channels

2. Each channel include their own "understanding" of what is being displayed through small visual boxes.

3. CNN have too many people talking and conversing at the same time, preventing efficient and clear news coverage. 

4. The critic suggests to instead read or observe news articles and written news such as newspapers instead of live coverage of news. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:44:17 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488896672 Yousef yousefabuaisheh2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488903574 1. There is a bias in the coverages
2. The tv news programme/network is known to be a very biased
3. I think people who would be drawn to politics or lower status people, in which the events happening may affect them]]> 2021-05-04 09:47:19 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488903574 Rayan https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488903775 1. Though both stories being covered are similar the fox news news reporters seem to contradict themselves in almost every point they present
2. This could be happening to show a clear bias amongst the news broadcasters which they share towards one event, compared to the disapproval they show towards the other event
3. Anyone who is against the BLM movement or who believes that racial inequality is not an issue. Maybe showing an uneducated approach to the news they are covering, suggesting a much more informed and educated opinion should be introduced]]> 2021-05-04 09:47:24 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488903775 Muhammad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488905610 1. C-Span provides all the raw footage to news anchors
2. They put their own graphics on the scene. Implementing their own opinion or understanding of the content.
3.  They referred to it as being called a "witch-hunt".
4. It can be difficult to comprehend due to the amount of people talking on political analysis shows. 
5. He suggests to watch to coverage of C-Span or turning off the TV to look at blogs from news sources such at the Washington Post or New York Times.

]]> 2021-05-04 09:48:10 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488905610 Roudha roudhaaltamimi https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488910844 1. All cable networks use one feed for their coverage: C-Span 

2. Each cable news adds its own graphics and small visual boxes with their view of the coverage.

3. Witch hunt

4. Difficult to comprehend and understand the news because too many reporters are talking.

5. Suggests to turn off the tv and watch live blogs, Washington Post, New York Times, Politico or watch C-span unfiltered with no political analysis. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:50:19 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488910844 Michaél michaelkonig1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488911117 1. MSNBC had understood Michelle Obama's speech to be "perfect" in both its "tone" and "content", clearly providing their understand and political view of her appearance in this matter.

2. Fox had mentioned Michelle Obama's speech to be "generic" and "not say too much", defiling Fox news's understanding and political forecast of what they think about her. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:50:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488911117 Sarah https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488911805 MSNBC: They described her speech as 'perfect'. Stating that it was 'pitch perfect'. They described Michelle's speech as perfect in both tone and content, as well as stating it is a reason to be proud of the country, and that it could not have gone better for her. They referenced the mentions of 'country', painting Michelle in a positive and patriotic light.
Fox News: They continually point out that Michelles speech lacked content in their eyes. They stated that the mentions of country were too brief, 'there was only one reference to the troops', which is a direct contrast to MSNBC which painted these references as positive. They did provide justified reasons for their disapproval, but there was many unjustified negative remarks that were deflected by complimenting her appearance. Overall this news channel is biased against Michelle Obama's speech and portrayed her in a negative manner. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:50:43 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488911805 tehya tehyakinghorn2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488913653 1 C-span 
2. Fox News, Msnbc, CNN add their own graphics to the coverage 
3. witch hunt 
4. CNN is a biased network that presses there political opinions
5. turn off the tv or Washington post, New York Times or live vlogs. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:51:32 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488913653 Ali alialshamsi1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488913851 1. C-Span gives all inclusion to the news channels 
2. Each channel incorporates its own "understanding" of what is being shown through little visual boxes. 
3. CNN has an excessive number of individuals talking and chatting simultaneously, forestalling proficient and clear news inclusion. 
4. The pundit recommends rather peruse or notice news stories and composed news, for example, papers as opposed to living inclusion of information.]]> 2021-05-04 09:51:38 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488913851 Faiza faizaalariqi2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488918405 MSNBC was more supportive towards Michelle's speed. They described her "pitch perfect" with the balance of content and tone. They support her references to the country and claim her overall speed was very good and ends by saying "case closed". 

On the other hand, Fox news kept pointing out their opinion of the flaws in the speech, they stated the convention was a "largely wasted night" and "it wasn't a great speech". They also kept mentioning how she looked good however did not deliver properly. Therefore only positive aspect they mentioned was about her appearance. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:53:40 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488918405 Alberto https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488920761 The  MSNBC was supportive of the speech and the policy describing the speech a "perfect" and careless 
about the country. They repeatedly mention that she did well because it was "well performed" and the her views and real means.
But the FOX news shows a little opposition to her speech but saying that was a bit "wasted" but still supporting her on the speech, although they were not to happy.]]> 2021-05-04 09:54:38 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488920761 Serene serenefarah1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488924307 1. C-span provides an outlet for all media coverage, c-span is all news channels raw footage provider
2. they all put their own graphics on the screen , to give their own analysis of the events taking place
3.  Witch hunt 
4.  CNN is biased and speaks their own opinions, there are too many people and reporters talking at a time which makes it harder to comprehend and take in all the information given 
5. they suggest to turn off the TV to avoid fake news and to watch live blogs like the new york times, Washington post, politico, or an uncensored, unedited and raw footage from C-span itself. ]]> 2021-05-04 09:56:05 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488924307 Rayan https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488925247 1. C-Span provides all the footage to the media outlets
2. Their own analysis of the event that are occurring
3. When the describe the impeachment as a "witch-hunt"
4. Too many people talking over each other
5. C-Span or any media that does not present bias opinions]]> 2021-05-04 09:56:31 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488925247 Muhammad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488925894 The view of MSNBC on Michelle Obama's speech was content. Stating that it was 'well-performed' and 'delivered it very well'. They kept on mentioning her view on the country or saying that she loved it which implements a vary bright mood and tone to the audience towards Michelle Obama.
Fox news portrayed Michelle Obama's speech as 'not interesting' and very 'generic'. They mostly implied flaws of the speech and did not give any since of content as they were very tepid toward is. Fox news kept on chiding on how Michelle Obama only mentioned the troops few times versus the way MSNBC portrayed that statement which was in a bright way.]]> 2021-05-04 09:56:51 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488925894 Firas https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488926299 1. C-Span
2. They add their own graphics to the videos they receive. 
3. It had been referred to as 'witch-hunt'.
4. Many reporters are talking at once. 
5. C-span]]> 2021-05-04 09:57:03 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488926299 Lauren laurenwatson3 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488927035 1. C-Span
2. Cable news add their own graphics and analysis over the original live footage.
3. "Witch Hunt"
4. Everyone is talking so it can be difficult to keep up with what they are saying or how to interpret what they are saying. 
5. It is always an option to update yourself with live blogs such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, and/ or just watch the original C-Span footage without any graphics.]]> 2021-05-04 09:57:19 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488927035 Danyal https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488928056 1. Cspan
2. Graphic boxes and analysis
3. A 'witch hunt'
4. Too many people talking
5. Reading live news blogs like  The New York Times and The Washington Post. Another option is to watch the original Cspan footage, without the added graphic boxes and political analysis that new channels add on.]]> 2021-05-04 09:57:48 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488928056 Tehya tehyakinghorn2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488931050 1. MSNBC view on Michelle obamas speech was supporting her tone, her message and just overall supporting her as a member of the Democratic Party but also supporting her message about the troops and love for America. As the news caster repeated " Her tone was pitch perfect and her character was pitch perfect. 

2. Fox News said Michelle obamas speech was generic and repetitive. However this news network is openly known to be biased to the conservative party.

]]> 2021-05-04 09:59:16 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488931050 Rayan https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488935398 1. MSNBC completely support Michelle Obama's speech by saying things such as "That could not have gone better for them" and "I'm very proud of my country"
2. FOX show complete disapproval of Michelle Obama's speech by saying "Cant help but feel, that it was a largely wasted night" and "I thought it was sort of generic, it didn't say that much that was interesting"]]> 2021-05-04 10:00:51 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488935398 Yousef yousefabuaisheh2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488936087 1. C-Span
2. Graphics on screen and analysis
3. Witch Hunt
4. With CNN, there are too many people talking at the same time, making it unclear to understand what is being said 
5. He suggest to watch C-Span's coverage as it is unbiased and only shows footage without the graphics and analysis CNN, MSNBC and fox news put on the screen.]]> 2021-05-04 10:01:12 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488936087 Michaél michaelkonig1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488936595 One persuasive technique that is often used in popular movies or documentaries which are intended to give out a message or persuade their audience is the use of celebratory endorsement. This is as most movies or documentaries which star a well known person whom has a following behind them can result in change within the audiences opinions or understanding of the cause due the audiences devotion towards their celebratory idol, and their opinion or portrayed understanding in the specific film or documentary. ]]> 2021-05-04 10:01:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488936595 Firas https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488936960 1. MSNBC had been completely supportive of Michelle Obama's speech, as they had mentioned it to be 'perfect' through emphasizing that her 'tone' had been quite good.
2. Fox News had been in contrast, unsupportive and very critical, and had disapproved Michelle Obama's speech, as suggested through the reporters mentioning it was a "largely wasted night" and that it was "generic". ]]> 2021-05-04 10:01:38 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488936960 Lauren laurenwatson3 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488937445 1. MSNBC's perspective on Michelle Obama would be angelic. A woman who delivered a powerful speech to the people and did it with grace and elegance. 
2. FOX on the other hand did their best to downplay her speech and the effect it had on the crowd. They did this by saying her speech was bland and "generic." At one point a news correspondent said that how she delivered the speech was powerful but what she said wasn't the great, only before saying "and she came across as extremely attractive." By objectifying her they decrease the power of her words.]]> 2021-05-04 10:01:55 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488937445 Roudha roudhaaltamimi https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488938769 1. MSNBC was completely supportive of Michelle Obama's speech, supportive of her message and love for America. They also claim her performance was “pitch perfect”, she balanced her content and tone.  

2. On the other hand, Fox News was unsupportive and very critical, they only shared negative opinions on the speech. They mentioned it was very generic, repetitive, and that it was a “largely wasted night”. This new network is known for its bias political view and “hate” for black people. 
]]> 2021-05-04 10:02:33 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488938769 Alberto https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488940894 Usually a persuasive technique used in documentaries is the expressions of people face to produce more moral effect on the viewer and to transmit their message in a visual and efficient way. This technique is effective since just with the image and little text the audience automatically understand and experience the feelings the documentary tries to transmit.]]> 2021-05-04 10:03:30 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488940894 Persuasive Device: Emotive Language (Appeal to Emotion) https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488941219 One of the main persuasive techniques is appeal to emotion. By tapping into the audiences emotion, it is easy to create a bias or sway opinions. This is achieved by using the persuasive device; emotive language. Emotive language is the use of language to stimulate an emotional response.
Example:
Non-emotive version: The men were killed.
Emotive language: The victims were murdered in cold blood.]]> 2021-05-04 10:03:40 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488941219 Faiza faizaalariqi2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488941481 Colors 
In documentaries colors are used to appeal to the audience. Turning the visuals black and white creates more of a serious mood or negative perspective, on the other hand colorful visuals displays positivity and happeniess.
Black and white visuals can also suggest something happening in the past or flash backs. 

]]> 2021-05-04 10:03:49 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488941481 Muhammad- the use of dynamic range https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488943107 The use of dynamic range is quite a prominent technique for persuasion in documentaries. It is " the ability of the camera to see in either bright or dark areas at the same time". This technique is used to convey the type of feeling the documentary wants you to feel towards a particular image, message, or setting. ]]> 2021-05-04 10:04:36 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488943107 Rayan (Repetition) https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488944103 Using repetition to repeat facts or statistics can be a great way to persuade the audience as you are consistently presenting your ideas and backing them up with evidence]]> 2021-05-04 10:05:05 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488944103 Tehya (Slogans) tehyakinghorn2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488945680 One persuasive device used in documentrys ]]> 2021-05-04 10:05:50 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488945680 Firas (rhetorical questions) https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488947230 One persuasive technique used in documentaries is the use of rhetorical questions, defined as a question asked that is meant to emphasize a dramatic effect rather than to receive an example, one written example of this would be "how would you feel if...?".]]> 2021-05-04 10:06:40 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488947230 juliajang4 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488948345 1. When they talked about BLM, they showed the view that BLM protesters were ignorant and violent, even though they knew there was a legitimate reason for the protests to take place. Also I could notice that these hosts were all white women and men. 
2. People's choice of words can have a big impact on what perspective they will look like to others. Therefore, the strong, negative tone words used by BLM protesters made them appear to be violent people only.
3. The people who will receive the coverage are middle aged men and women ]]> 2021-05-04 10:07:13 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488948345 Ali alialshamsi1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488948793 MSNBC was more steady of Michelle's speed. They depicted her as "pitch-great" with the equilibrium of substance and tone. They support her references to the country and guarantee her general speed was awesome and closes by saying "case shut". 
Then again, Fox News continued bringing up their assessment of the defects in the discourse, they expressed the show was a "generally squandered evening" and "it was certainly not an incredible discourse". They additionally continued referencing what she looked like great anyway didn't convey as expected. Accordingly just certain viewpoint they referenced was about her appearance.]]> 2021-05-04 10:07:28 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488948793 Faiza faizaalariqi2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488949140 Staten Island Protests vs. BLM Protests
0;36: Emphasis on words, "criminal behavior" "justified"
1:05: Rhetorical questioning. "how do you stop the rioting"
1;30 repetition. "no reasoning, no excuse"
]]> 2021-05-04 10:07:38 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488949140 Ali (Hyperboles) alialshamsi1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488950177 The use of exaggeration makes the documentary more exciting and also more persuasive and get the listeners hooked through the use of making things sound more interesting whilst avoiding lying.]]> 2021-05-04 10:08:06 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488950177 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488950414 1. During the video of the BLM protests, the news reporters made logical sense about how there were some things that were being taken too far, it was clear that there was not a lot of information or any type of positive outlook with the speech that Michelle Obama had said.
2. This might be the case because there are a lot of people who might not like the fact that there was a democratic convention in general and sometimes these things might affect the way that people view the situation as others, which allows themselves to be easily swayed by what is said.
3. The people who might want to watch these types of news are the people who either disagree with BLM movement and generally do not want to get themselves involved, or they are people who think of looking at things differently and not like black lives in general.]]> 2021-05-04 10:08:14 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488950414 Serene serenefarah1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488950616 The MSNBC spoke positively about her speech, they described it as ‘pitch perfect’, that it was amazing and could not have gone better for them, they talked about tone more and not content, which is one of the negatives they talked about in MSNBC , they described that she had 6 mentions of the country and the troops to protect them, there was one person who said not everyone was going to be charmed but overall they portrayed Michelle Obama as patriotic, positive, with grace, elegance and angelic. 
The fox news on the other hand described it as..]]> 2021-05-04 10:08:20 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488950616 Sarah https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488951621 Emotive language: "Excusing criminal behavior as somehow justified" (emphasis on 'criminal' and 'somehow')

Rhetorical question: "How do you stop the rioting, if the rioters are arrested but not charged or fined."

Repetition: "There is absolutely no reason, no excuse, that this continues to take place."]]> 2021-05-04 10:08:49 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488951621 Yousef yousefabuaisheh2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488953007 1. MSNBC's perspective was that Michelle Obama's speech was 'perfect' and they also supported her references to the country
2. On the other hand, Fox New's perspective was that it was a very unclear speech, where she didn't make much references to the country and said that it was "a largely wasted night".]]> 2021-05-04 10:09:33 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488953007 Rayan https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488953154 Repetition: 0:44 (Michelle Obama video)
Repetion: 1:27 (Trump Impeachment video)
Repetition: 0:50 (Trump Impeachment video)]]> 2021-05-04 10:09:37 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488953154 Muhammad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488953468 Facial expression: 0:26- Fox News vs MSNBC: Michelle's speech. The Fox News correspondent tries to integrate dull and disappointed expression when referring to Michelle Obama's speech to emphasize a very abysmal speech coming from Michelle Obama.

Repetition- 1:36: 

Should you follow impeachment on Fox News, MSNBC or CNN? None of them. (to reinforce a statement linked to an opinion)


repetition- 0:45-0:49: 

Fox vs. MSNBC: Michelle's Speech (to castigate on t4he overall performance of Michelle Obama. Stating examples how how she should have overcome the flaws she made by conveying those techniques as 'pitch-perfect'.





 
]]> 2021-05-04 10:09:47 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488953468 Alberto https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488955940 4. CNN have and unclear idea since too many people talk at the same time about the same thing
- 1. -san
2. Graphics on screen are diferents
3. Which HUNT
5. He suggest to turn of the TV since the information is not really useful without the graphics.


]]> 2021-05-04 10:11:04 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488955940 Duaa https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488957324 1. When broadcasting the two events there was a clear difference in perspective. Staten Island was portrayed as more lightly and with reporters trying to justify the protestors actions. In contrast, the BLM were faced with criticism as well as the protests being portrayed as aggressive and ignorant. Overall, there was a stark contrast in portrayal with a bias towards a certain group potentially due to racial issues.
2. As mentioned beforehand, this may be due to racial issues. Throughout the years America has been known for a history of racial disputes between certain communities, the BLM protests are an example of said issues. However, these events have always been portrayed in a certain light due to popular media and so on. Furthermore, another detail to consider is all the news hosts reporting the matter are white thus not giving a different racial perspective nor justification of what they are portraying. Essentially, a white host can potentially be biased in what they say.
3. Biased coverage in this case more caters towards those in the white, middle aged (30-50+), middle to high class and republican/right leaning individuals. These views are generally beneficial and or preferred to be seen by these communities or individuals as it portrays their (sometimes strong) opinions. ]]> 2021-05-04 10:11:41 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488957324 Evandros https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488957342 MSNBC constantly stated that Michelles speech was a perfect balance between content and tone, claiming that if the speech had to be about either one of them it would have succeeded.

In the eyes of fox news, her speech was bland and dry, but they still had to admit that the speech had a good deliverance.]]> 2021-05-04 10:11:42 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488957342 Firas https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488964393 1. Repetition : Michelle Obama video : 0:45
2. Repetition : Trump Impeachment video : 1:30
3. Repetition : Trump Impeachment video : 0:53

]]> 2021-05-04 10:15:12 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488964393 Michaél michaelkonig1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488964937 rhetorical questions are used in the Michelle Obama video at 0:48, where the reporter repeats a question in a different form to which emphasizes his understanding of the quality to which was displayed during her speech. This is also a clear example of repetition, as the same intended message was being constantly fed to the audiences in hope to impact their understanding.]]> 2021-05-04 10:15:28 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488964937 Roudha roudhaaltamimi https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488967455 Michelle Obama- Rhetorical question (1:30)  "How do you stop the rioting, if the rioters are arrested but not charged or fined."

Michelle Obama- Repetition (0:44) "if the speech was to be more about tone than the content pitch-perfect, if was supposed to be more about content than tone thats pitch-perfect".

Fox New Protests- Repetition (1:30) "no reasoning, no excuse" ]]> 2021-05-04 10:16:43 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488967455 Ali alialshamsi1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488968347 Repetition: 0:44 (Michelle Obama video)
Repetion: 1:27 (Trump  video)
Repetition: 0:50 (Trump  video)


]]> 2021-05-04 10:17:13 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488968347 Yousef (Statistics) yousefabuaisheh2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488969293 Many documentaries use statistics, they are mainly used not to only give the viewer some facts about the topic, but sometimes they are also used to bring over an emotion to the viewer to persuade them. ]]> 2021-05-04 10:17:41 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488969293 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488983323 1. C-span gives all the media coverage and photos.
2.They add their own graphics and ideas revolving around what is happening within the coverage.
3. They referred to the entire thing as something that wasn't going to be memorable, it did not have enough talk about the U.S, and that it shouldn't have been used.
4. CNN has a lot of people talking with different opinions so it can be hard to listen.
5. The critic says that they should either watch c-span or they would not watch the tv since they can wait for the next day for news paper reports.]]> 2021-05-04 10:24:41 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1488983323 Yousef yousefabuaisheh2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1489333344 Repetition - Michell Obama video 0:44
Repetition - Trump Impeachment video 1:27
Repetition - Trump Impeachment video 0:50]]> 2021-05-04 12:46:46 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1489333344 kayla kaylagalbraith2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1489426115 1. The difference amongst the two media coverages is clearly perceptible, the reporters executed bias behaviour with a racist judgement against the BLM movement however showed a completely different attitude as opposed to the Staten Island protest dismissing it claiming “there’s still freedom in this country." However in reference to the BLM movement the reporter inclined “curfews need to be enforced”
2. Purely Racism. The US chooses to air News Channels that shed light on events from a political perspective as strategy to influence the audience.
3. An individual that is easily manipulated and drawn to politics, under the influence that the police are always right.
]]> 2021-05-04 13:07:42 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1489426115 kayla kaylagalbraith2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1489559471 1. Cspan provides all media coverage amongst all news channels.
2. Each cable news channel provide their own graphics on screen over the original footage with the aim to carry out their own visual portrayal.
3. “Witch hunt.”
4. CNN is a bias network that reaches an extensive audience, encouraging falsely executed reports.
5. Critics suggests to switch go the tv and become more informed from live blogs from other news sources, such as the New York Times.
]]> 2021-05-04 13:33:52 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1489559471 Duaa https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491304067 1. C-span all raw footage to news networks.
2. News channels add their own graphics and text to the footage.
3. They referred to it as a "witch hunt" and an "impeachment scheme" which was called tiresome and pointless. 
4. CNN was difficult to understand as they all spoke over each other which made it hard to interpret.
5. The critic recommends watching C-span as they have unfiltered and unbiased coverage. ]]> 2021-05-04 19:01:57 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491304067 Duaa https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491430849 1. MSNBC praised Michelle Obama's speech and called it "perfect" along with many other compliments to her tone and use of certain terms and structure. Moreover, they thought there was a perfect balance in both content and tone and overall portrayed her speech in a positive light. 
2. In contrast FOX News portrayed Michelle Obama's speech as essentially a waste of time and boring or dry. Furthermore, the criticized how she did not make many references to the country going as far as to say it was "generic".]]> 2021-05-04 19:32:04 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491430849 Duaa https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491449621 Documentaries will sometimes use celebrities or popular figures (political, entertainment, etc) in their content through interviews or references to persuade the audience. ]]> 2021-05-04 19:36:57 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491449621 Duaa https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491663462 1. Repetition - Michelle Obama (0:45)
2. Rhetorical question - Staten Island Protests vs. BLM Protests (1:04)
3. Repetition - Trump's Impeachment video (1:27)
]]> 2021-05-04 20:40:05 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1491663462 Dareen dareenalshamali2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493095398 1. There was a clear and observable contrast between the two reporters' perspective. When reporting on the Staten Island Protests, the reporters were trying to justify the protests. On the other hand, when reporting the BLM protest, the reporters were against it and showed a racist perspective on the protests. 

2. The reporters are clearly racists and view the BLM protests as violent or unnecessary.

3. White racists who view the police as always right. They're around 30-50 years old and are close minded.]]> 2021-05-05 09:43:23 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493095398 lily https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493095493 1.
The reporters feelings about each of the two issues sounded like they were being bias towards the Staten Island issue, rather than the BLM protests. You can clearly see with the contrast in the reporters tone and speech that they are defending the Staten Island issue, but then with the BLM go against what they just had said about rights, etc., therefore making them hypocrites.
2.
This is maybe because they have issues with race, and will favor one race over the other.
3.
Someone who is a white American and is easily gullible.]]> 2021-05-05 09:43:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493095493 Fiorella fiorellafrancione2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493101644 1) The reporters were being hypocritical and bias with their statements towards the Staten Island Protest and BLM Protest.
2) The Staten Island Protests were mostly held by right wing republican people and the Fox News are also right wing so they have this bias to support and defend the protests from Staten Island while they are being blatantly racist when covering the BLM Protests.
3) White privileged right wing racist people are most prone to believing the fake news spread by FOX News.]]> 2021-05-05 09:46:21 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493101644 Adam adam_khalil https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493103441 1) There was a lot of hypocrisy with the coverage, as they would defend the protestors against covid restrictions, but would criticize the BLM protestors.
2) This is likely because Fox news is a right wing news company, meaning they will defend white people more and be more discriminatory towards African-American people and their causes.
3) The type of person that would be drawn to this perspective would be older white people with far right political perspectives.
 
]]> 2021-05-05 09:47:12 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493103441 Daniele https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493104657 2021-05-05 09:47:43 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493104657 Haitham haithamayyash2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493107312 1. The coverage was heavily biast towards showing the negatives of the BLM protests and the COVID 19 saftey regulations. They decided to focus on specific stories and incidents that support their views, and tend to ignore any fact or event that apposes their opinions. 

2) This can be the result of arrogance amongst the journalists, as they see that only their opinions matter. 
3) The target audience of such media coverage is rich and old racist individuals. ]]> 2021-05-05 09:48:54 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493107312 Naomi naomigray1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493108642 1. Between the news coverage depending on the situation and the political perspective their wing holds on the event in general (right wing) their values of what is right and wrong are unstable and twisted to fit a narrative. Very often in moments of unrest such as the BLM protests they tend to zero in on cases that benefit their narrative instead of looking at the perspective as a whole.  The tone they approach situations becomes hypocritical as seen in the shocking contrast between the lockdown protests and the BLM protests. 
2. During this age media has less become a unbiased and informative outlet to get information from regarding daily topics but rather a source of entertainment and as a result the media outlets will do whatever to keep their audience following. This means twisting narratives and in somecases blantantly lying so the audience hears what they want to hear, this results in the political polarization we see today. 
3. More outdated and conservative views tend to be more common in older and whiter individuals but lately due to the political polarization this inflamattory content also effects younger audiences too. These political perspectives are everywhere allthough they sometimes are more prominent in certain beliefs. In terms of wealth I believe its more targeted to middle class and up due to common themes invoked such as taking away the suburbs, Fox news is also very popular with evangelical christians.]]> 2021-05-05 09:49:30 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493108642 Austin austinbanks4 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493114330 1. Each event was described in two different perspectives and opinions depending on the side which the news channel leans towards, unfolding the news in both the citizens perspective, and in the governments view. 

2. These media outlets have clear biases that have been proven countless times.

3. This would be older white people with older political views.]]> 2021-05-05 09:52:11 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493114330 lily https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493115451 1.C-Span provides all raw footage to news networks.
2. they add graphics above the raw footage
3. a which hunt
4. different perspectives from people on CNN which made it hard for the audience to interpret the information.
5. to not watch it at all.]]> 2021-05-05 09:52:44 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493115451 Ziad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493116421 1) There was a distinct and noticeable difference in the perspectives of the two reporters. The reporters covering the BLM protests were against it and portrayed negative reactions and comments towards the protest and took a stereotypical view of the protests as they showed bias, whereas when commenting  on the Staten Island Protest, they were explaining the protests and agreed with what is being done.
2) This could have happened because they  might have bias towards some races and cultures and prefer some people over others due to their backgrounds and races.
3) Older people, (usually somewhere between the middle class or higher towards the upper classes) between the ages of mid 20s and 60s.]]> 2021-05-05 09:53:10 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493116421 Fiorella fiorellafrancione2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493120117 1) C-SPAN provides all the footage to the News Networks.
2) Different news channels add their own visual graphics and text over shots.
3) FOX News referred to the Trump impeachment trial as a "witch hunt" and a "scheme".
4) CNN presents multiple perspectives which makes it hard for the audience to comprehend information.
5) The critic recommends to not trust anything on television and people can alternatively read news articles or original C-SPAN footage without added graphics and text.]]> 2021-05-05 09:54:56 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493120117 Dareen dareenalshamali2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493125325 1. C-span

2. Cable news outlets add graphics and quotes to share their perspective on global events.

3. They described Trump's Impeachment as a "witch hunt."

4. CNN is based on bias and since it's a huge and worldwide known news channel, many people around the world watch their reports on global events. This gives the people an incorrect perspective on the events, one that is purely based on bias.

5. The critic recommends watching C-span or switching off the television and waiting for the following day for the news article from news sources such as the New York Times. ]]> 2021-05-05 09:57:28 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493125325 Adam adam_khalil https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493125441 1. C-Span
2. The add their own graphics and overlays.
3. They referred to it as a 'witch-hunt'.
4. CNN is too biased and has too many people talking and giving their opinions, making it hard to understand what is truly happening.
5. Alternatives include live blogs such as Washington post or New York times, or just watching the raw footage on C-span.]]> 2021-05-05 09:57:32 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493125441 Haitham haithamayyash2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493132320 1) C-  span.

2)  They add headings, subtitles, and various opinions and analysis of journalists commenting on the revived news. 

3)Which Hunt

4) CNN provides to many opinions and too many journalists on the topic , getting the viewer lost. 

5) Reading online news outlets or simply watching Unfiltered C-Span footage. ]]> 2021-05-05 10:00:48 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493132320 Austin austinbanks4 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493132885 1. C-Span provides all the raw footage to the news anchors.

2. Their own take on the event that are occurring.

3.  It had been referred to as 'witch-hunt'.

4.  Everyone is talking at the same time.

5. The critic recommends watching C-span or switching off the television and waiting for the following day for the news article.]]> 2021-05-05 10:01:06 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493132885 Ziad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493135156 1) C-span
2) They add their own graphics and texts to their channels/footage
3) Witch hunt
4) Hard to comprehend or understand what is being said as it has many reporters talking in the background.
5) Watch coverage of C-span or waiting and reading for news articles from reliable sources.]]> 2021-05-05 10:02:14 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493135156 Naomi naomigray1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493136752 1) C-Span
2) They graphics, narration, additional sources (quite often interviews), they also cut and pick what parts of footage they want.
3) They often invoke 'witchhunt' and 'impeachment scheme' to make a objective process of justics seem like a skewed political event of some sort.
4) CNN can often overload the audience with opinions and often has a bias itself.
5) He suggests reading political articles such as the NewYork Times and the Washington Post and also unfiltered footage from C-Span.]]> 2021-05-05 10:03:00 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493136752 lily https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493138309 1.MSNBC's perspective on her speech was supportive, and stated that it was "pitch perfect". They also referenced the positive attributes that her speech conveyed.
2. Fox News perspective was more of a bias perspective explaining first person opinions about the speech such as "wasn't a great speech", or "largely wasted night. This shows that Fox News did not provide factual information about the speech in general unlike MSNBC, rather biased information about the speech. ]]> 2021-05-05 10:03:44 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493138309 Fiorella fiorellafrancione2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493138321 1) MSNB's perspective on Michelle Obama's speech is supportive, they describe it as "pitch-perfect" and compliment her by saying that "it could not have gone better for them".
2) On the other hand, FOX News was not pleased with Michelle Obama's speech, they thought that it was "generic", they criticized her for not mentioning the soldiers of the country or the Ivy League schools that she and her husband attended.]]> 2021-05-05 10:03:44 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493138321 Adam adam_khalil https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493140799 1. MSNBC was very supportive of Michelle Obama and her speech, referring to it as "pitch-perfect" and claiming that "it could not have gone better".
2. Fox was very critical and hostile towards Michelle Obama's speech, referring to it as "generic" and saying that "it was a largely wasted night".]]> 2021-05-05 10:04:59 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493140799 Dareen dareenalshamali2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493141586 1. The MSNBC loved Michelle Obama's speech and praised her. They described her speech as "perfect" and the perfect balance between tone and content. They also stated that she made 6 references to the country.

2. On the other hand, Fox news acted as the opposite of MSNBC by criticizing Michelle Obama's speech. Fox news, a news outlet purely based on racism, described Michelle Obama's speech as repetitive and very generic. They also said that it was a largely wasted night. ]]> 2021-05-05 10:05:20 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493141586 Haitham haithamayyash2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493143091 1) MSNBC captured the speech as being close to perfect, they quoted various sections of the speech the supported their opinions. They also assessed various aspects of the speech, showing that they were all done in a great manner. 

2) Fox News took a negative approach toward her speech, highlighting it as being too "generic". They used similar quotations as MSNBC but implied them in a manner that supports their views "she only mentioned I love my country once" . ]]> 2021-05-05 10:06:04 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493143091 Ziad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493144929 1) Michelle Obama's speech, according to MSNBC (who supported her), was quoted to be 'perfect,' and that stressing on her 'tone' had been excellent. They also said that her speech could not have been done in any better way.
2) Michelle Obama's speech, according to Fox News, was predictable and repeated. This news organization, on the other hand, is well-known for being biased towards 1 party.]]> 2021-05-05 10:06:51 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493144929 Malena https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493150620 1. The coverage for the anti-mask protests was defensive and understanding and on the other hand, the coverage for BLM was ignorant and misleading. This is a clear example of racism.
2. This Fox News report demonstrates the US political perspective, which is racist and characterize black people as violent and criminals. 
3. The type of people that might be drawn to such coverage are white middle aged adults. 
]]> 2021-05-05 10:09:28 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493150620 Malena https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493151238 1. C-Span provides all coverage to the news channels
2. Cable news add their own graphics and analysis over the original live footage.
3. "Witch Hunt"
4. With CNN, there are too many people talking at the same time, this makes it difficult to understand what is being said 
5. Critics suggests to switch off the tv and become more informed from live blogs from other news sources, such as the New York Times.
]]> 2021-05-05 10:09:45 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493151238 Naomi naomigray1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493151658 1) According to MSNBC michelle Obamas speech was 'perfect' and had good equilibrium, they showed clear support of her tone and it automatically registers they also agree with her political views.
2) Fox news coverage was a lot more cynical refering to it as 'generic' and criticised it for focused more on tone and fluff rather than content and also used it as a moment to criticcise the Obamas history in multiple IVY league schools. 
Both sources commented on her appearance too. ]]> 2021-05-05 10:09:58 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493151658 Malena https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493151893 MSNBC was more supportive towards Michelle's speech. She was described as "pitch perfect" referring to the balance of content and tone. They clearly supported Michelle’s references and claimed that her overall speed was good.

On the contrary, Fox news kept pointing out their opinion of the flaws in the speech. They portrayed it as 'not interesting' and very 'generic' and that it was a “largely wasted night”. The only positive aspect they mentioned was about her appearance.
]]> 2021-05-05 10:10:06 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493151893 Austin austinbanks4 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493153925 MSNBC was in full support of Michelle Obamas speech as they claimed it was 'perfect'.  FOX News was not pleased with Michelle Obama's speech, they thought that it was "generic" which she was then criticized for not mentioning the soldiers of the country or the schools / colleges that she and her husband attended.]]> 2021-05-05 10:11:00 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493153925 Malena https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493153930 Rhetorical questions
These are questions that do not require an answer and are asked for effect only. They also engage the audience. ]]> 2021-05-05 10:11:00 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493153930 Adam adam_khalil https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493155951 Use of regular people
Using regular people that are not well-known or famous adds authenticity to the documentary and allows it to include a public opinion. Viewers will trust the opinions of an average person more than that of a celebrity.]]> 2021-05-05 10:11:59 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493155951 Fiorella fiorellafrancione2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493157814 One persuasive device used in documentaries is emotive language which is the diction used to imply a certain tone/mood towards the audience. An example of this technique is calling out people who litter and contribute to ocean pollution, this will make the audience feel guilty for their selfish actions.]]> 2021-05-05 10:12:52 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493157814 lily https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493158575 a persuasive device used in documentaries is colors in the visuals. Using colors can contrast different ideas that the documentary is trying to convey. It can imply the setting, or the theme of the documentary. the color scheme can also apply a tone, or mood given off by the visuals to the audience.]]> 2021-05-05 10:13:12 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493158575 Malena https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493159247 Rhetorical question - Staten Island Protests vs. BLM Protests (1:04)

Repetition - "no reasoning, no excuse" Staten Island Protests vs. BLM Protests (1:30)

Repetition - Michelle Obama (0:44)]]> 2021-05-05 10:13:31 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493159247 Naomi naomigray1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493160854 Quite often then use rhetorical questions or direct the questions or concepts that may harm many people in a personal direction to make the audience view the issue more personally. Viewing the issue more personally allows the audience to not only be more openminded and empathetic but also causes them to agree with the argument more often. ]]> 2021-05-05 10:14:11 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493160854 Ziad https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493162226 Repetition/ MSNBC (0:45)]]> 2021-05-05 10:14:53 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493162226 Naomi naomigray1 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493163877 Repetition: Trump Impeachment video : 0:53
Repetition: Trump Impeachment video 1:27
Rhetorical question: Staten Island vs BLM 1:04]]> 2021-05-05 10:15:43 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493163877 Dareen dareenalshamali2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493164274 Emotive language:
Definition: The use of emotive vocabulary refers to the selection of words. To elicit emotion in the reader, specific diction is used. The words you use have a big impact on how people respond to your writing and speaking. Different words will elicit different responses from the audience.
Example: An innocent bystander suffered facial injuries when the thug launched his glass across the bar.]]> 2021-05-05 10:15:57 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493164274 Haitham Ayyash haithamayyash2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493169851 A Clear Call To Action: 

When there is a clear call to action within the Documentary, which guides the viewers to a clear path to implement solutions to the discussed problem, viewers are more likely to start that initiative and begin doing those actions. ]]> 2021-05-05 10:18:43 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493169851 Dareen dareenalshamali2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493170019 1. Repetition in the Trump Impeachment video- 1:27
2. Repetition in Michelle Obama's speech- 0:44
3. Emotive language in the Staten Island protests vs. BLM protests- 0:34 ]]> 2021-05-05 10:18:48 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493170019 Fiorella fiorellafrancione2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493172362 1) Repetition - Michelle Obama's speech: "That could not have gone better for them" 0:28
2) Rhetorical question - Staten Island Protests vs. BLM Protests: "How do you stop the rioting if the rioters are arrested but not charged and set free?" 1:05
3) Repetition - Trump's Impeachment: "Witch hunt" 1:28]]> 2021-05-05 10:19:56 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493172362 lily https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493173651 repetition in Michelle obama video - 30 seconds, the news reporter emphasizes how "it could not have gone better for them", repeating this phrase.
Staten Island - BLM protest:
rhetorical question 1:04
Trumps impeachment:
repetition - 1:27 ]]> 2021-05-05 10:20:38 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493173651 Haitham haithamayyash2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493184442 Trevor Noah Starter Video: 

Emotive Language: On seconds (0:47) , Fox News reporter uses language such as (coward) to convey his opinion regarding governor Cuomo. 

Rhetorical Questions : 1:09 

"How do you stop the riotings  "]]> 2021-05-05 10:26:19 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493184442 Adam adam_khalil https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493753217 Michelle Obama video:
0:42 - Repetition
The words 'pitch perfect' are repeated multiple times.

1:25 = Emotive Words
The phrase "I'm very proud of my country tonight" is used to convey the effect that the speech had on the audience.]]> 2021-05-05 13:35:45 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1493753217 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1495231592 1. MSNBC had a outlook that made it seem biased for Michelle Obama and called the entire speech as amazing and one of a kind, whereas Fox News was saying that the entire thing is pretty normal and was a waste of time saying that there wasn't enough in the speech]]> 2021-05-05 18:29:08 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1495231592 ethanni3 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1505923647 1) The coverage of the staten island protests showed that the news anchors agreed with the protesting that when a human has their rights taken away then people are going to be mad. On the otherhand for the BLM protests the news anchors were mad and upset that people were destroying things and causing mayhem
2) This is because the staten island protests were peaceful protests and the BLM protests had lots of looting, rioting, and fighting with police.
3) People that watch Fox News are usually on the "right" and are Republicans. Mostly older Americans or republicans would watch Fox News.]]> 2021-05-09 06:18:11 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1505923647 ethanni3 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1505935103 1) C-Span is the provider for all the footage to the News Networks
2) News Networks add their own graphics and facts or opinions on the screen depending on if they are right, left, or nuetral.
3) Fox says that the impeachment trial is a witch hunt meaning that the Demcratics are chasing something that's not going to happen.
4) CNN can be hard to understand because it has a lot of stuff going on at once like footage and reporters talking in the background
5) You can either watch C-Span which is unfiltered or you can read news articles instead of watching TV.]]> 2021-05-09 06:28:24 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1505935103 ethanni3 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1505940728 1) MSNBC obviously is supporting Michelle Obama and making note of everything that she says that makes the Democratic party look good.
2) On the otherhand Fox News obviously does not like the democratic liberals so they try to pick out whatever Michelle Obama said to contradict herself or make her look bad.]]> 2021-05-09 06:33:03 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1505940728 kayla kaylagalbraith2 https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1507068222 An image tells a thousand words; Powerful images create strong visuals for the topic being discussed, it displays a range of credibility towards the audience as they have been provided with perceptible evidence on the issue/matter the documentary centres.]]> 2021-05-09 22:37:30 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1507068222 Alberto https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1508099902 Repetition: trump speech - 1.27
Repetion: Obama's speech - 0.42
Emotive language: Fox News - the presentator uses the word "coward" to express his points of views]]> 2021-05-10 07:25:08 UTC https://padlet.com/mandarinsam/nlo7zbe6huvg4vv2/wish/1508099902