<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Reliable Websites by wendy</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb</link>
      <description>Compose an informational paragraph informing readers about the qualities of a good website as well as the clues to look for in a &quot;bad&quot; or unreliable website.  Use the sites in the hyperdoc as evidence.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-01-07 19:00:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-09-30 12:56:30 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lily Dipple, Lauta Tillak, Kaylie Shelton, and Daniel Lee</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150886298</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The first thing you might look at when trying to decide if a website is reliable or not is the url suffix. Usually, reliable sources end with “.net”, “.org”, or “.edu”, though sometimes “.com” can be a good resource. You can’t just trust the suffix only, however. It is also helpful to see if the author is a professional in that area, or topic. For example, if you look up the author that wrote an article about dog health, and you find that they have no record of any thing to do with animals, it is most likely an unreliable site. Also, it would be see where the author got his/her information, or what evidence they have to back up their written work saying it’s true. Lastly, make sure that there aren’t many ads on the side of the article. So if you check to suffix, the author, area or topic, if it looks professional, and if there aren’t many ads, you might have found a reliable source!&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/133182702/10c5687e86b83d20055a2388d2ba7d53/WriteForWeb.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 16:20:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150886298</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Neel Batwara</title>
         <author>20232068</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150945583</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There are many ways to find out if an article is not trustworthy for research. One of the many ways you can find out if an article is trustworthy is by looking at the suffix of the URL. If the article ends in (.gov; .org; or .edu) these websites should be trustworthy of getting information from. You can also see if a website is trustworthy is by seeing its grammar and spelling. If you look at a website that has a suffix of (.gov) it means that the website is owned by the government. If the website has a suffix of (.edu) it means that the website is owned by a school professor or it is just owned by a school itself. The suffix (.org) can either be safe or not safe (It depends on the features that are stated above). The same things go with the suffix (.com and .net). For example, if you go to the website below it is basically informationless and it has spelling errors all over it. This would be a good example of a bad website because of the fact that the website looks unofficial and the company's name is not matching with the domain. From this, we can conclude that all websites like the one listed below should not be used for informational purposes and should be known by other people that they are not supposed to be used for research because they are a big impact on actual grades and projects for students in college</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.icrwhale.net/" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 18:46:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150945583</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Joshua Yun</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150945633</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Joshua- What we learned that makes a great article is that their is information on the bottom of the article.&nbsp; Their are also not that many mistakes.&nbsp; If they have .net or some other weird thing on the url than most of the time the website is irrelevant.&nbsp; In the article that I read doesn't have that much info.&nbsp; I think that this article is garbage because it is useless if it doesn't have that much info. It also had tons of advertisements which probably isn't a good article.&nbsp; Lastly, this is the url for the article I have read.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.icrwhale.net/">http://www.icrwhale.net/</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 18:46:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150945633</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lizzie Adelman</title>
         <author>20232089</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150947560</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; When evaluating websites, look for key features in the website. One key feature, is the link. If the link has: .org, .gov, or .com; it's on the road to being a reliable website. Those links mean that they have been checked, and .gov means it's been approved by the government. If the link has .net, or doesn't look like it has an official link;&nbsp; it isn't to be trusted. Also, if the website like "The Endangered Pacific Tree Octopus" has images that look unrealistic and look like the've been photoshopped, so it must fake. In the website, "The Endangered Pacific Tree Octopus," the sources that are "ligament" lead to nothing but random pages that have nothing to do with the topic. One of their sources was a YouTube song called the "Octopus Song." What kind of source is that? Also, they were using Wikipedia for most of their sources. Going on with that, most of the non-Wikipedia websites were also make believe websites. The Sasquatch is it's predator? That sounds like a children's story. <br>Now, if they wanted to make this a good website they would try and do something like this. <br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;First, they would find sources that they could use that has .org, .gov, or .com in their links. They would have a professional website page in neat orders. Their link would also be professional instead of, "<a href="http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/">http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/</a>" this link doesn't even look real. Also, they would actually have a name of the company or website. With that, they don't even have a name for their website which also means that they can't be trusted. Also, they would go and find these creatures and get their own pictures; instead of finding an Evergreen and photoshopping a brown octopus, with white spots on it's branches. Those ways would make their website more realistic and useable. Other an that, their just a bag of lies waiting to catch someone.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 18:51:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150947560</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nimo Yahalomi;</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150958612</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To evaluate a website people have to look for important features. One way to find out if it's a trusted site if seeing&nbsp; if it has a .gov, .org or .com.<br>.Gov means that it has been approved by the government.&nbsp; The Pacific Tree Octopus is fake because it just looks really fake. In wikipedia it states that in 1988 Lyle Zapato created the Pacific Tree Octopus and other endangered species that turned out to be hoaxes. On the site it shows a picture of a octopus on an evergreen tree, but octopus isn't camouflaging as it states in the article. Another reason this is a big fat lie is that the octopus's predator's are sasquatch's. In the end this is just one big internet hoax.  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 19:16:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150958612</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hana Cami, Ariel Goldberg, Alex Infanti, Rohit Jain, Allen Lee</title>
         <author>20232083</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150982389</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>	When evaluating a website, it is important to look for certain details. First, you must pay attention to the suffix on the link:. If it ends in .edu, .gov,, it is reliable. However, if it ends in .net or .com, it might not be reliable. Another thing that you should do is see when the website was last updated. The more recent, the better. Also, it helps to do some quick research on the author of the website. If the website is on George Washington and the author is a history professor, you can most likely trust the website. However, if the author’s only identification is a name and a sketch, like it is on Zapatopi.net’s article on the Northwest Tree Octopus, it would classify as an unreliable resource. A helpful hint is to try and stay away from Wikipedia. After all, <em>anybody</em> with an account can try and change the content and information; the website has no firm rules. It is also helpful to check if the website contains opinions or is bias. If it is bias, you are most likely not getting both sides and all facts possible. Plus, if it contains words like “i, we, my etc.,” it is unprofessional.&nbsp; Finally, you should try to avoid websites with ads swarming the whole page. If a website follows these rules, it is a reliable source.<br><br>By: Ariel Goldberg</div><div>In order to have a successful and reliable website, you should have proper appearance, good content, correct grammar, and it should function properly. Some things you should come across while looking over a website is first, an updated date. You need to look for this feature because it will tell you if it is recent or new. When you use a website as a resource, you should always find a date to get the most recent answer or solution. Dates in websites come in very handy for a work cited page or any assignment that you need to complete. You should also look for a nice big title with sub headings (etc.) because it will make readers know what kind of perspective the author is writing about. In addition, having a font that looks professional where you can see the words properly, will be another reason why it is reliable. Content is important with reliable websites because it is important that you know what you are reading/listening to. Next, having good grammar in a website shows you that it is reliable and that authors are taking the time to go over the information. Last, if you have a hard time following directions on the website, it would be considered an unreliable resource. In conclusion, listening to these rules will help make your website a better one.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 20:26:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150982389</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hara Kyriacou, Katie Kim, Walker Reiss, Anna Governale and Lucas Browde</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150985972</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When evaluating a website there are some main details of a website that will determine if it is reliable or not reliable. Look to see if&nbsp; the website has a professional looking appearance meaning it is organized, has the company logo and has few ads.&nbsp; Also, when evaluating a website make sure that you take notice of the suffix of the link or the last part of the address. These suffixes include .com, .gov, .net, .org,&nbsp; and .edu. In Addition, make sure that you can find the same facts from one website on another website.A characteristic of a reliable or good website includes having a professional appearance. This would include organization, a logo and few ads. Another thing that a reliable website would include is the date of when it was last updated at the top or bottom of the page.If the date is recent then it is better to use because it has the most updated information. In Addition, if the company name or logo at the top and you can google the company it is reliable. Furthermore, if the suffix or the end of the address of a website is .gov, or .edu it is an indication that it is a reliable source. One of the qualities of a non-reliable or bad website includes having many ads. This is because it means that the owner of the website is getting paid to have all the ads on the website which is an indication that the website is not reliable and the author is using the website to get money. Also, a website having information that does not make sense grammatically or logically is a sign that the website is not reliable. Another indication that a website is not reliable is if the website has no logo because if the website has no logo the reader can tell that the website is not owned by a real company. If a website has personally opinions or bias in the website articles it is a clear indication that it is not a reliable website. This is because if the author gives his or her personal opinions they may change the information in order to support their argument. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 20:40:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150985972</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alison Chin, Drew Hefter, Sam Carlin, Zoe Lobel-Response</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150987836</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>	There are many things to look for to see if a website is reliable.&nbsp; One of the most important things in the website to make sure it is a “good” one is the author.&nbsp; Once you find the author, look their name up.&nbsp; If many sources agree that the author is unreliable, not alive, or fake (fake and pseudonyms are not the same thing), the website is unreliable.&nbsp; Make sure that the text cannot be edited by anyone who wants to.&nbsp; For example, Wikipedia is open to be edited by anyone.&nbsp; Check that other sources agree with what the website says.&nbsp; Do this by copying a couple of facts and searching them up on the internet.&nbsp; If the fact(s) that you searched up come up in multiple reliable websites then the fact is most likely true.&nbsp; Also, check for bias in the website by checking how their emotions and words show opinion on the topic.&nbsp; There is a very important part of the link: the suffix.&nbsp; Websites ending in .edu (education), .gov (government), and .org (organization) are often good sources. While .com (commercial) and .net (network) can be reliable, they tend not to be quite as reliable.&nbsp; Blogs and rants are often unreliable sources due to the amount of bias.&nbsp; Another example of what not to fall for on a website is, if the email seems weird and does not sound real, then the person is probably not too official.&nbsp; There are many things that make a website bad.&nbsp; For example, if the the website has not been updated since 1970, it probably isn’t reliable. We have learned how to find good sites, we have learned how to not fall for bad sites, and we have learned to not use Wikipedia.&nbsp; The last of the “Five Pillars” is that Wikipedia has no firm rules. Also, you can create a Wikipedia article. Another thing that you can do is just go and adopt an article. Finally, two questions we have are: Is a .co.uk site reliable? What does this suffix mean?</div><div><br><br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 20:45:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150987836</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ben M, Gianna G, Shaya R, Netta M</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150994509</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Padlet Evaluation</div><div>By: Ben M, Gianna G, Shaya R, and Netta M</div><div><br></div><div>We learned that when evaluating websites you have to do many things. For example, reliable websites are usually have a professional appearance. First, they are organized, which means the information isn't thrown in random places, but that the information is labeled correctly and neatly. Second, to look professional they usually have a logo to represent their website. Lastly, the website should have few to no ads.&nbsp;</div><div>We also learned that when you evaluate a website is fully updated to the right time. This means that the website is current, 2016-2017, and not from 10 years ago. The website should also have the right credits for authors. This means that the authors or company’s names must be states and they should be professionals on the topic the website is talking about. Next, you should check the suffix of the website. For instance, most reliable websites have suffixes like, <strong>.gov, .edu, or .org. </strong>You can tell a website is good if you recognize the domain. Lastly, you should be able to find the same facts in other websites, so you know that it is the right information.</div><div>Not all websites are reliable, so if you see any of the following in a website it isn’t reliable.&nbsp; First, you can tell if a website is bad it the tone of the writing is very emotional. This means that the text is probably filled with opinion and bias instead of reliable facts. You can also tell if a website is bias if it only talks about one side of a topic instead of having arguments for both sides. You can also tell if a website isn’t reliable if it is a blog writing gossip or an angry rant that is all based on opinion.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 21:13:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150994509</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ryan</title>
         <author>20232085</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150995860</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We learned that when you Survey a text there is many ways to find if it is a good text or a bad text. First if it ends in .com u need to check there Author and there sources. Also you must look up the author and make sure that it is not a blogger. Also if the website ends in .gov, .edu, or .org  are viable. Next the website the right crudencials. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 21:21:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/150995860</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Jenna J, Ori M, Hunter D, Rachel K, Evan C.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151000535</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Jenna- Have you ever been on a website and didn’t know if you trust the information?&nbsp; Here are some ways to find out if the website is real.&nbsp; A good website should include all of these things: author, date, logo, etc.&nbsp; Without all of these features you can’t trust a website.&nbsp; Trusting a website is hard because their website could look like the real deal, but it might not be.&nbsp; If you find someone’s opinion on the website you will know it is not real.&nbsp; Also, if the website makes you feel mad or sad it is not a real website.&nbsp; To find out if a website is real, you could also search up the facts you found and see if they are true.&nbsp; Another way to find out if it’s fake is by searching up the author if there is one.&nbsp; If there are no results for the author, that means it is fake. &nbsp;<br><br>Ori - In order for a website to be good it should include/say these things: look professional, if it says, “about us” so we can talk to them if there is a problem, date, logo, etc. You can also trust websites by their url, for example, .gov which means government and I can trust the government, or .edu which means education, so I can trust it because it is educational and it helps me learn. If you think that the website shows bias it means that it is not a real website. If the website shows facts and you look for them in another website or two and it shows the same exact facts so it means it is a real website.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 21:45:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151000535</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Arielle Shaked</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151001979</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Some ways we learned about finding out if a website is reliable are the following bellow. First, you should check the suffix in the link. That means the end of the link. For example, if you see a .org, .gov, or .edu it is most likely that you can trust the website. If you see a .com you will have to survey the text. By surveying the text you would have to first look at the prefix in the link. Say the link of the website is www.dogslife.com then you would have to see if the website logo matches the prefix in the link which in this case is dogs life. If it doesn't match the website logo then most likely that it is a fake website. Next, you can look at the website format. Look at how the website looks. Maybe it will look professional maybe it would look not so professional. Another way is to look at the author name. The website should usually contain an author name for each article, but if it doesn't it is not reliable. If the website does contain an author name look that name up to make sure it is a real reliable author. If the source also doesn't cite the sources they used it's not reliable. If it does then look those up, and make sure they make sense. Also, you can read through the article, and if you see a continuous amount of typos the website is not reliable. Next, you can check when the website was last updated. If it was updated a long time ago it is not reliable because the information could have changed over the course of those years. If a website looks professional that doesn't mean it's a good website, so you should be careful. If the website you are looking at doesn't contain any false information, long ago update, no author name, bad suffix, bad matching prefix, and typos then go ahead, and use that website.<br><br>An example of a bad website is&nbsp;<a href="http://www.thedogisland.com/">http://www.thedogisland.com/</a>, once I went on it it didn't look professional at all. It had false information, it had no author name, it ended with .com, it had no sources cited. That website was not a good website to use. If you look at that website you will get a good idea of what a bad website would look like. If you want to take a look at what a good website would look like then look at this one: <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/">https://www.nasa.gov/</a>. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 21:55:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151001979</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criss Guzman, Sam Park, Ella Cho, Lauren Cha, Luca Dipple</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151002802</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Some websites are fake, and the maker of the website can put anything on the website even though the facts are fake. However, one is able to see if a website is fake or not. First, one can look at the suffix of the link. If it is .org, .gov, .edu, it is most likely going to be reliable resources, but there can be other resources that can be true or fake too. If one is in that area, one should survey the text. If the title of the link matches the pictures of the website, it may be reliable. However, many websites try to look professional, so people would add anything someone would do to make someone think that the website is reliable. If one thinks the website looks professional but fake, read the text. For <a href="http://allaboutexplorers.com/">http://allaboutexplorers.com/</a>, it looks really professional, and it fooled many people, but if one reads it, it says that is that Christopher Columbus was born in 1951, which is clearly not true. One can use their background knowledge to see if that is true or not.<br><br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 22:01:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151002802</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sarah Slowikowski, Alvyn Kwon, Dillon Shelton, Hannah Lee, Mia Fernandez </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151013990</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>You will be able to evaluate if websites are good or bad by reading what we wrote.&nbsp; If the link has a “.gov” for government, or a “.edu” for school and others like “.org”, you may rely on these websites.&nbsp; However, if it has the ending like “.com” or “.html”, you will have to check if there is a company name that matches the name in the link and see what day it was updated in.&nbsp; Also, if the same information that is on the website that are on other websites, it is most likely true.&nbsp; One can tell or find if a website is reliable enough to use.&nbsp; Good websites should mostly have a good suffix. For example, .gov for government or .edu for education.&nbsp; If it is a .com, you must check for the author, sources, content, and when it was edited.&nbsp; But some websites can trick people and try to look reliable when they are really not.&nbsp; If it looks professional, check if it is really reliable.&nbsp; For example the website, <a href="http://allaboutexplorers.com/">http://allaboutexplorers.com/</a>, it looks really real and reliable but it actually isn’t.&nbsp; First of all, if you look at the link, it has .com in it.&nbsp; That already shows you that the website may not be reliable.&nbsp; In the article it states that Christopher Columbus was born in 1951, but then later in the text, it stated that he died in 1906.&nbsp; This proves that the article isn’t reliable because it isn’t possible to die before you are born.&nbsp; Another website that isn’t reliable is <a href="http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/">http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/</a>.&nbsp; Just like the other website, it looks reliable even though it isn’t.&nbsp; There is a picture in the article of a tree octopus, and in the caption the author stated that the picture is rare even though it is the first picture that pops up on google if you look up tree octopus.&nbsp; In conclusion, people always have to be cautious of what websites they are looking at because they may not be reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-01 23:32:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151013990</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Colin, Riley, Christina, Wyatt, Aydin, Aaron</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151016679</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There are some websites on the internet that are fake because the makers of the website are allowed to put whatever they want on it including fake information. After previewing all the articles and watching the videos, we learned a lot of new information. The first thing we learned was, websites that are verified are more reliable than others. The second thing we learned was, if a website has a suffix such as: gov, edu or org, they are most of the time more reliable than those with the suffix com. For example the website<a href="http://allaboutexplorers.com/"> All About Explorer</a> may seem real, but it actually contains false facts about well know sailors and leaders. The most deceiving part is the fact that is looks like a real cite. In addition, another website<a href="http://www.thedogisland.com/"> http://www.thedogisland.com/</a> is so hoax. The creators came up with a make believe island were thousands of dogs live. There's no such thing!. Lastly, if a website is sad or emotional, you can understand that someone blogged about it or its not a valuable website because of its bias opinions. Also if a website is overly anger and mad, you can conclude the same thing, that its bias and a blog. In conclusion, people always have to be careful what they read and cite information from online. Sometimes a website seems professional when a random person made it to either joke around, or trick people. So you have to remember to be careful about what you read online and to know good websites should have a good suffix, like gov for government or .edu for education.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 00:03:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151016679</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Elman, Sungmin, Cherie, Katie</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151016711</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There are many websites out there that are fake, but you can look for many things to indicate fake ones. If the link or url has a suffix with a .org, .edu, .gov, it is going to be mostly likely be real. If the link has a title, there is supposed to be a title on the website, so if there is a title on the website, it is good. However, people try to make a website look professional, so one can get fooled by it easily. If that is the case, see when the website was made or if it copyrighted anything, or if it has grammatical errors. That means that the website cannot be trusted, and it is written by somebody not very reliable.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 00:04:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151016711</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gianna C, Lilly M, Matty F, and Mason J</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151018008</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Lilly</strong>- I learned that even though some websites look professional they can be tricking you. Some websites are opinionated so the facts aren’t correct. While researching you need to look out for bias. Author’s that are bias write their point of view. Wikipedia cannot be trusted because many users can edit the text and it may not be true.&nbsp;</div><div><br><br></div><div><strong>Gianna</strong>- I learned to never trust a website if it looks unofficial. SUch as the website Dog island it has information like how many dogs are there the climate and why you should bring your dog there. But, they don’t support their own evidence which is interesting due to in the writing it says 2,500 dogs live there when the statistics say there are 1,570 dogs. Also, it is very unofficial due to there was no cited author. It is very important to not listen to a website that has incorrect information because if using for report can lead to bad grade due to wrong or incorrect information.&nbsp; I think if the website was more official, supported it’s own writing and it had an author it would be a reliable source.&nbsp;</div><div><br><strong>Matty Freeman</strong>: There has been a lot that I learned from all of these websites. One thing is that if the end of the link in Edu,Org or Gov you can trust it. If they have an author on it and an about the author look up the author and if they are real or a trustworthy person then you will know that&nbsp;</div><div>the source is real.</div><div><br></div><div>On the website “All About Explorers,” I learned that it wasn’t a good website. For example, the information was emotional. What I mean by this, is the author gave his/her opinion. The author stated “The voyage was so much easier than sailing east.”&nbsp; Also the author never stated his/her name. Because of this, we weren’t able to figure out if the author knew what he/she was talking about. I learned that you have to check the suffix. What this means is that you can’t use websites that don’t have the suffix: gov, org, edu(most of the time). I also learned that you have to check if the website looks professional, and that the logo is professional. Also wikipedia can’t be used. This can’t be used, because the website can be edited. But some of the resources wiki uses can be used, because they are valid.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 00:20:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151018008</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chase Marks, </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151019013</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There are many ways to find information about certain topics. Most people look to online sources for their answers. I'm not saying that is wrong, jus that their are same sources that are unreliable. Not everything posted on the internet is true.&nbsp; For example, I read a web site about this place called dog island. I looked up dog island and didn't really see anything about the island making it seem that dog island isn't a real place. Now, I also noticed that most cites I can trust end with .gov, .edu, or .org. I noticed most of the sites that were not reliable ended with .com. Im not saying that all site that end with .com are unreliable, but most of the time a reliable site does not end with .com. Another aspect a reliable site should have is to look professional. If the site has many spelling issues and doesn't look authentic, then it is not reliable. If the article is a blog or a rant, you will most likely see bias and that makes the site unreliable. Bias is when someone shows prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another. Although the internet is a great source for learning, just look out for unreliable sites.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 00:31:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151019013</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Laura T, Kaylie S, Lily D, Daniel L</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151019823</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The first thing you might look at when trying to decide if a website is reliable or not is the url suffix. Usually, reliable sources end with “.net”, “.org”, or “.edu”, though sometimes “.com” can be a good resource. You can’t just trust the suffix only, however. It is also helpful to see if the author is a professional in that area, or topic. For example, if you look up the author that wrote an article about dog health, and you find that they have no record of any thing to do with animals, it is most likely an unreliable site. Also, it would be good see where the author got his/her information, or what evidence they have to back up their written work saying it’s true. The last things you should do are make sure that there aren’t many ads on the side of the article, and check to see if the article isn't emotional, like an angry rant about something. So if you check to suffix, the author, area or topic, if it looks professional, and if there aren’t many ads, you might have found a reliable source!</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 00:40:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151019823</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hunter DiResta</title>
         <author>20232020</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151021551</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>If you have been on a website that is not to be trusted you know what I'm about to say. In a reliable website you see a logo, it will have .edu,.com, and .gov. An unreliable webpage would have a rant, an opinion, a bias, and might look a little messy. Usually when you see 2 links that have something similar it should be trusted. If the webpage has a date and it was in the timezone within months or even years you can trust it. For instance if the webpage says 1990 is should not be trusted. A reliable webpage would have an author on it or logo. You can look up the author to see if the author is a blogger, and starts drama online on in media rather than her being a strong author that has won awards and has important facts and history online. If it is wikipedia or some other webpage like that, it can't be trusted. The reason why being that these websites can be edited and changed to silly information to trick you. Use these tips to help to determine if the website your looking at is reliable or not.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 00:58:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151021551</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Hana Cami, Ariel Goldberg, Allen Lee, Alex Infanti, Rohit Jain</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151023230</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>BY: Hana Cami</div><div>When evaluating a website, it is important to look for certain details. First, you must pay attention to the suffix on the link:. If it ends in .edu, .gov,, it is reliable. However, if it ends in .net or .com, it might not be reliable. Another thing that you should do is see when the website was last updated. The more recent, the better. Also, it helps to do some quick research on the author of the website. If the website is on George Washington and the author is a history professor, you can most likely trust the website. However, if the author’s only identification is a name and a sketch, like it is on Zapatopi.net’s article on the Northwest Tree Octopus, it would classify as an unreliable resource. A helpful hint is to try and stay away from Wikipedia. After all, <em>anybody</em> with an account can try and change the content and information; the website has no firm rules. It is also helpful to check if the website contains opinions or is bias. If it is bias, you are most likely not getting both sides and all facts possible. Plus,, if it contains words like “i, we, my etc.,” it is unprofessional.&nbsp; Finally, you should try to avoid websites with ads swarming the whole page. If a website follows these rules, it is a reliable source.</div><div><strong>&nbsp;</strong></div><div><strong>What makes a “good” website</strong></div><div><br></div><div>By: Ariel Goldberg</div><div>In order to have a successful and reliable website, you should have proper appearance, good content, correct grammar, and it should function properly. Some things you should come across while looking over a website is first, an updated date. You need to look for this feature because it will tell you if it is recent or new. When you use a website as a resource, you should always find a date to get the most recent answer or solution. Dates in websites come in very handy for a work cited page or any assignment that you need to complete. You should also look for a nice big title with sub headings (etc.) because it will make readers know what kind of perspective the author is writing about. In addition, having a font that looks professional where you can see the words properly, will be another reason why it is reliable. Content is important with reliable websites because it is important that you know what you are reading/listening to. Next, having good grammar in a website shows you that it is reliable and that authors are taking the time to go over the information. Last, if you have a hard time following directions on the website, it would be considered an unreliable resource. In conclusion, listening to these rules will help make your website a better one.</div><div><br></div><div>By: Rohit Jain</div><div>There are many things to look out for in a bad website. These things are things you can’t let fool you. For example, bad websites will most likely have made up information and that is something that looks real. Many people fall for that and use that website for research. That is one of the many things that you should not fall for in a bad website. Secondly, many bad websites have misspelled text or they talk like they are texting. For example, a if a website was to say “for example,” sometimes they would say “4 x ample”. Those are two things that you should not fall for in a bad website.</div><div><br><br></div><div>By Alexandra Infanti</div><div><br></div><div>When trying to get a good website, you have to look for many things. You have to make sure that the website ends in something like edu or org or gov. That shows that it is education or government. You also have to look for the publicing and edit date. If it wasn't edited from 1982 maybe you shouldn't use it. You have to look to see if there are ads. A lot of ads means that it isn't a reliable website. Also, if the spelling or grammar is off, then that alone is a little sketchy. You wouldn't expect bad grammar to be on a website that people go on the get information. If you don't believe it enough, go to the author’s name and search them up. If he or she is a garbage worker, probably don't use their website about being a doctor. Bad decision if you did. If you look on the title and it looks like “the tree octopus” maybe don't use that website. There is no such thing as a tree octopus. So you shouldn't use that resource.</div><div><br></div><div>By: Allen Lee</div><div><br></div><div>When trying to look for a trustworthy website, you should look for many features. For example, you should look to see if there is a way to contact the author. If there is no way to contact the author, then it probably isn’t credible. Also, if the url ends in com, it probably isn’t credible. It should end in edu, gov, or org. In addition, if the page was last edited 20 years ago, then it probably isn’t credible. We would have found new facts that would replace the old and false facts. For instance, Wikipedia isn’t a credible source. People can edit and add false facts. People can use those false facts or opinions in their essay and it would be wrong. Another feature the tone. If the article sounds bias, then it probably isn’t all facts. Most of it is probably opinions because the author is bias. Finally, you should look to see if it look professional. Look at the website and see if it has many ads and very little description. That probably means it isn’t professional. You should also look for a logo. Usually, websites that don’t have a logo, the author was just trying to put up something fake on the internet.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 01:19:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151023230</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Criss Guzman</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151027148</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I learned that some websites look professional, but aren't. For example, one of the websites we went on in class today. Stated that Christopher Columbus was born in 1951. Also I learned that some websites look bad, but have the correct information. So my advice is that you should look at the informations before you judge it. And I also learned that to make sure that information you are using in valid. You should go onto other websites and see if it states the same or similar facts. While you are searching for a reliable site to use for a project remember the following. Look at the suffix of the website( .edu - from a reliable school, .gov - government owned.). Also check if the website has professional look to it. But before you don't use it. Check the information. Because you never know, it could be the site you are looking for. Also look at the author, and if you find the author on the page. Try and search him up to see if he is legit, or to see who he is. Or if he can be trusted.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 02:01:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151027148</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Julia, Chase, </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151027185</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-02 02:02:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hefflerw1/niwrmi1ofqnb/wish/151027185</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
