<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Laws That Affect Youth Rights by Ramany Kaplan</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu</link>
      <description>We just reflected on the relevance of “Supreme Court Cases Every Teen Should Know”: The teens that initiated these cases were aware of their rights. Because they knew their rights, they were able to take action, and they won certain protections for teenagers. Now, let&#39;s conduct some quick research on current city, state, or federal laws that affect youth rights.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-08-31 05:06:28 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-09-01 19:46:42 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Write down 1 fact you found in your research + an interpretation. Make sure to add the link to your source at the end of your post</title>
         <author>kaplanramany</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277260591</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-08-31 05:10:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277260591</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Federal laws apply to everyone in the country</title>
         <author>kaplanramany</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277261516</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-08-31 05:10:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277261516</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>State laws apply to everyone who resides in the state</title>
         <author>kaplanramany</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277261719</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-08-31 05:11:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277261719</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>City laws apply to people who live or work in a particular city, town, or village.</title>
         <author>kaplanramany</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277262196</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-08-31 05:11:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2277262196</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mrs. Kaplan</title>
         <author>kaplanramany</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680354609</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>"Lower courts are beginning to grapple with challenges to students’ Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure as it relates to the digital environment, cell phones in particular. "&nbsp;<br><br>The first trail ruled that the school was in the right to search the students purse and the evidence can be used in trial. The appeal (a later case against the original ruling) said that the school is a representative of the government and cannot actually search the students purse.&nbsp;<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1159120.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 21:59:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680354609</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cris</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680356801</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>June 25, 2009&amp;#151; -- The Supreme Court ruled today that school officials' <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/SCOTUS/story?id=7380771&amp;page=1">strip search of a then-13-year-old Arizona teen</a> suspected of possessing a painkiller violated the girl's constitutional rights, despite the school district's zero-tolerance policy for drugs.<br><br></div><div>The court said, however, that school officials are protected from personal liability in the case.<br><br></div><div>The ruling is a partial victory for Savana Redding, who had been summoned from her middle school classroom and was asked to strip down to her underwear as school officials searched for prescription strength ibuprofen.<br><br></div><div>The decision could redefine student privacy rights and outline important guidelines for school officials as they seek out dangerous contraband, like drugs, weapons or alcohol.<br><br></div><div>An 8-1 majority of the Court found that the search was unconstitutional. <a href="http://i.abcnews.com/Politics/SCOTUS/story?id=7483045&amp;page=1">Justice David Souter</a>, writing for the majority said, "Savana's subjective expectation of privacy against such a search is inherent in her account of it as embarrassing, frightening, and humiliating. … Here, the content of the suspicion failed to match the degree of intrusion."<br><br></div><div>"The strip search of Savana Redding was unreasonable and a violation of the Fourth Amendment," the court ruled.<br><br></div><div>The Court emphasized that the intrusiveness of the search was not justified because Savana was not suspected of carrying <a>dangerous drugs</a>. "The Fourth Amendment places limits on the official, even with the high degree of deference that courts must pay to the educator's professional judgment."<br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:04:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680356801</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sirye</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680358613</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The girls felt like their rights were violated because of their article being "public speech" but with their article being a school assignment they lost their court case, the supreme court decided that students involved in school papers are not public and are controlled by the school and only the schools.<br><br>"In a 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the principal's actions did not violate the students' free speech rights. The Court noted that the paper was sponsored by the school and, as such, the school had a legitimate interest in preventing the publication of articles that it deemed inappropriate and that might appear to have the imprimatur of the school."</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2123194446/83e9c380c166f87ce90a98eaf3db2a8a/Screenshot_2023_08_31_3_01_32_PM.png" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:08:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680358613</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>MR: Mohammad S </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680370511</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Six percent of schools required<br>clear book bags or banned book<br>bags altogether, but this practice<br>ranged from 2 percent of primary<br>schools, to 13 percent of middle<br>schools, and 12 percent of<br>secondary schools. Between 3<br>and 4 percent of primary schools<br>reported performing one or<br>more random metal detector<br>checks on students, using one<br>or more random dog sniffs to<br>check for drugs, and performing<br>one or more random sweeps for<br>contraband (not including dog<br>sniffs). In comparison, 15 percent<br>of secondary schools reported<br>random metal detector checks,.&nbsp;<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:32:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680370511</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Szofi </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680370863</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The minor who was a stalker was aware of his actions and didnt seem to change them. He had no remorse towards them.<br><br>"The conviction of a man who made extensive online threats to a stranger, saying free speech protections require prosecutors to prove the stalker was aware of the threatening nature of his communications."<br><br>https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/27/supreme-court-true-threat-stalking/</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/27/supreme-court-true-threat-stalking/" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:33:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680370863</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Isabela</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680370930</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; <br> <strong>Search of Student Car Parked on School Property: </strong><strong><em>State of New Jersey v. Thomas E. Best.<br></em></strong> Brandt, the assistant principal of Egg Harbor Township High School, received a report of a student suspected of being under the influence of drugs. Brandt met with the student, who admitted he ingested a green pill that eighteen-year-old defendant Thomas Best gave him during fifth-period auto shop class.<br><br> randt and another assistant principal, Ted Pugliese, interviewed Best, who denied any wrongdoing. Brandt explained to Best that a student claimed he received a green pill from Best. Brandt then searched Best and found three white capsules in his pants pocket, but no green pills. Best admitted that he sold a pill to a student for five dollars, but claimed that the pill was merely a nutritional supplement. Brandt subsequently searched Best’s locker but discovered no pills.&nbsp;<br>“the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,”&nbsp;<br><br>I learned that you shouldn't do drugs at school because it can lead to&nbsp;bad things and go to court.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.brcsm.com/four-fourth-four-cases-impact-fourth-amendment-search-seizure-schools/" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:33:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680370930</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Saurabh</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680371013</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In an article Tinker v. Des, a group of students were trying to show their support for a truce in the Vietnam war. They wore the armbands in school to show their support. The school got involved in this case and created a policy stating that "any student wearing an armband would be asked to remove it, with refusal to do so resulting in suspension". The group still decided to wear the armbands at school and were suspended. This caused hate and, the group sued the school for violating their 1st Amendment, for their freedom with support.&nbsp;<br><br><br>In December 1965, a group of students in Des Moines held a meeting in the home of 16-year-old Christopher Eckhardt to plan a public showing of their support for a truce in the Vietnam war. They decided to wear black armbands throughout the holiday season and to fast on December 16 and New Year's Eve. The principals of the Des Moines school learned of the plan and met on December 14 to create a policy that stated that any student wearing an armband would be asked to remove it, with refusal to do so resulting in suspension.<br><br>https://www.oyez.org/cases/1968/21</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1968/21" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:33:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680371013</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Haris</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680371441</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>He said that congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of<br>religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging<br>the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people<br>peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:34:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680371441</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lizzy Locklear</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680372766</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>"The officer began to follow Lange and soon after turned on his overhead lights to<br>signal that Lange should pull over. Rather than stopping, Lange drove<br>a short distance to his driveway and entered his attached garage."<br><br>This case talks about someone who was driving with loud music and honking his horn by a police officer. The police officer turned his police lights and the person decided to not pull over. Instead he drove a short distance to his house and pulled into his garage. The police over thought he was intoxicated and tested him. He came back positive for alcohol in his system. When he got charged for driving and being intoxicated he pleaded the 4th and said that he didn't have a warrant. The courts said that he was still in the wrong.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-18_cb7d.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:38:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680372766</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zhen</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680374323</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Arizona Court of<br>Appeals held that the officer's conduct was not a seizure under the<br>standard set forth in Terry v. Ohio. The court further found that even<br>if it were a seizure, it was not an unreasonable one.The court applied a balancing test and held that the public's "strong and legitimate interest in the welfare of its children"' outweighed the officer's<br>minimal interference with the minor's liberty.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NYULawReview-71-3-Rosado.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-08-31 22:42:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kaplanramany/ngqacfsumhgpzbbu/wish/2680374323</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
