https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d en-us 2022-05-16 20:36:44 UTC 2022-05-27 01:26:30 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f33b.png basem4 https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2186430447 First and foremost I would recommend that one get to the point and make that point as plain and simple as possible when attempting to write a philosophical work. Sure its possible to go about a different method ultimately but one can almost never go wrong by opening up with a straight forward point. Secondly as opposed to popular beliefs one should never be afraid to be bold in their statements and be ready to defend them, that's not to say that wont open the statement to be falsified however that falsification and only improves one knowledge and improves upon their philosophical foundation.]]> 2022-05-16 21:11:34 UTC https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2186430447 basem4 https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2186435539  I believe that when it comes to writing about philosophy one should always avoid making definitive statements o universal claims, and especially avoid using definitive words such as "always" or "Never". this will make your argument more defendable and less susceptible to being torn apart by a single counter example. Furthermore I would advise against choosing a broad topic to write about and instead to pick a narrower and focused point as this will be much easier to argue thoroughly rather than choosing a broad claim that will be hard to be as thoroughly explained and drawn out.]]> 2022-05-16 21:17:01 UTC https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2186435539 basem4 https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2186902920 Philosophy is in its nature a literary Genre, and I believe its important to foremost establish this as despite all else this point isn't always made as clear as it should be in the field. It should be noted that its more so of an Umbrella of genres in a way encompassing sub-genres. I believe Richard Rorty noted this best when he claimed "Philosophy can be viewed as a type of Writing" in his paper on post analytical writing in ties to Derrida's work. Furthermore I feel that its important to address the unfortunate reality of the unnecessary dichotomy that exists between analytic and continental philosophy sides of philosophy. I believe that this dichotomy embraces a long held misunderstanding there there needs to be a universal form of Philosophical writing other than acknowledging the strength of having respectable and differing aspects of literary philosophy that all fall under the same umbrella.]]> 2022-05-17 04:22:38 UTC https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2186902920 basem4 https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2188170559 To identify the two sides of the philosophical conversation ill start by noting the Analytical side to the conversation which predated the Continental side and is more so a strict and scientific style of objective philosophy that falls within a very accepted and strict framework of writing. As as mentioned the counterpart to the analytical school of writing and Thought is the Continental style which though is identical to the analytical style in many ways its is a more opened form of literary philosophy built upon unorthodox philosophers work. Its important to understand these sides to the conversation as it allows one to understand what side their work should work in line with. Its nearly impossible to strictly categorize all work into one field or the other but by educating oneself on the two it makes it easier to reach ones audience and better understand their sources and the way in which they want to develop as a philosopher.]]> 2022-05-17 18:50:03 UTC https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2188170559 basem4 https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2190122761 2022-05-18 20:11:54 UTC https://padlet.com/basem4/nfv1ldsup1cpxk2d/wish/2190122761