<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Sue Rodriguez by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-04-12 18:26:05 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-04-15 17:57:22 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Brief Summary </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351277186</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Sue Rodriguez was a Canadian who was diagnosed with ALS which is a terminal disease in August of 1991. </li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>She ultimately made the decision to end her life and she sought the help of a doctor however, no one would help her as under section 241(b) of the Nation's Criminal Code, which stated that anyone who "...aids or abets a person to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years". </li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association filed a lawsuit, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodriguez_v_British_Columbia_(AG)"><em><mark>Rodriguez v British </mark></em></a><em><mark>Columbia,</mark></em> which challenged section 241(b).</li><li>Sue Rodriguez argued that with the prohibition of assisted suicide, it violated her right to life, to liberty, and security of herself.</li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>After on May 20, 1993, her case was then heard by the Supreme Court of Canada, however, on September 30 of that year, they disagreed as well. </li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>On February 12, 1994, with the assistance of an anonymous doctor, Sue Rodriguez took her own life by consuming a liquid mixture of morphine and secobarbital.  An investigation was taken, however, there were no charges as Robinson (her supporter) vowed to never reveal the anonymous doctor's identity.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-12 18:32:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351277186</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Verdict</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351277262</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>Law of assisted suicide was kept illegal in order to protect life in the community</li><li>The Supreme Court of Canada, as well as The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, did not believe that there were any violations in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  </li><li>However, on June 17, 2016, medically assisted suicide became legal in Canada. Svend Robinson told the press: “Today’s ruling is a victory for compassion, for justice and for humanity. And I pay tribute to the memory of Sue Rodriguez, who with courage, passion and dignity blazed the trail that led to this historic day. She would have been thrilled"</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-12 18:32:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351277262</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>                                      Rodriguez v. British Columbia </title>
         <author>591942</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351406796</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/opinion/editorials/2016/02/26/trudeau-government-should-move-cautiously-on-right-to-die-editorial/sue-rodriguez.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-13 20:46:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351406796</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rodriguez Supreme Court verdict Sept 30, 1993</title>
         <author>591942</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351510039</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1757276186" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-14 21:18:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351510039</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Legal Significance </title>
         <author>597079</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351513271</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>This case was one of the few cases that showed the government is not invincible</li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>Showed people how Canada's criminal code can overlap with the Charter and create issues</li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>Morally addressed the idea of people living a life of being "tortured"</li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>Ties with <em>Carter v. Canada</em> because it was revisited after declaration of section 241(b) of the Criminal code infringes section 7 of the Charter</li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li>Made the members of the Supreme Court and the government ask themselves whether preserving life is more worth it than the "life, liberty and security of a person"</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-14 21:59:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351513271</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What Rights Were Violated? </title>
         <author>591942</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351544558</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Section 7: right to life, liberty, and security of the person.<br>Section 12:  right not to be subject to cruel and unusual punishment. <br>Section 15:  equal treatment before and under the law, and equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-04-15 02:45:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/591942/neei50k4qgdz/wish/351544558</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
