<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>How Good Is the Evidence? by Mr Fittipaldi</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e</link>
      <description>Made with a quick smile</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-12-13 02:46:16 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-30 23:42:12 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>What is Evidence?</title>
         <author>tom_fittipaldi</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661318</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>Mr Fittipaldi</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 02:51:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661318</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Neddong</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661709</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 02:56:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661709</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bob</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661720</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In my opinion, these evidences are good evidence.&nbsp; The first will be Exemplification, use a a representative example to prove things. The second one is causation evidence, we can use it to explain the connection with the opinion. Last one should be deductive argument. We use our common sense or same thing happened in our life to prove our opinion.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 02:56:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661720</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>William</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661778</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br></div><div>In argumentation, authors often use different specific information or details to demonstrate their views. Common evidence forms include facts, statistics, quotations from (other) experts, the results of experiments or other research, examples, etc. Although the forms of evidence differ, they are all consistently supporting the author's point of view.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 02:57:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215661778</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Morrison</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215662967</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>People regard evidenve as the&nbsp; base. The authors alwasy find something real or details in order to support their opinions. There are sevral components to form a good evidence: facts, quotations, data, and researches.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 03:13:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215662967</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Oscar Yang</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215663440</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>For the good evidence, the authors should use different real facts or specific details to support their views. The good details should include facts, data, statistics, quotations, experiments, examples, researches and etc. All of the different evidence can support author's view in different aspects</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 03:18:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215663440</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chuck</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215771332</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>An evidence should be a fact that is dependable. In other words, you can count on the evidence to support your claim. The quality and the quantity of the evidence decide its strength. An evidence can be insufficient if there is not enough information to support the statement. The more reliable the information, the more dependable the evidence is. There are many types of evidence such as intuition, personal experience, case examples, and research studies. A good evidence should have specific details including facts, numbers, and data, forming in a conclusive sentence.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 13:30:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/215771332</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Karl li</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216014729</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>By adding evidence, we can illustrate and prove the viewpoints more clearly. And also the evidence attract more interests than only illustrating. The evidence means more details, quotations and examples. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 23:57:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216014729</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sunny</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216014762</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A good evidence is a explicit information which can help people support and justify the reasons. There are many kinds of evidence so people can choose a proper evidence depending on their topic. Most people will make a mistake that they will use the common sense as a evidence to support their perspectives. However, this kind evidence lack of authority and cannot be &nbsp;testified by other people or information.&nbsp;A good evidence make claimed by a person or a organization which has enough authorities. When we use other's words as a evidence, we need to judge how much expertise they have. Those quotation may do not have much personal preference or biased. <br>&nbsp;.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-13 23:58:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216014762</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Martin </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216015770</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It  is widely known and generally accepted that a good argument  should be evidence based. However, the  soundness of evidence is demanded to be questioned and distingusied well. It is a common method , appealing the evidence from the authority in order to increase the credibility of evidence. In such scenario, it is necessary to us the examine the  source of evidence. In on e way , the authority would be more careful giving his or her opinion, which means it would be more valuable than other ideas. However, authority could have its own opinion, own perception. Hence, the argument and evidence from authorith could be easily biased, therefore it would become less creditbale. In general, it is necessary to us the examine the evidence carefully and make sure that evidences is not abused.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-14 00:12:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216015770</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Johnny</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216016467</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/246501519/bd42f6bfa67fb25be051b3c4f25965ad/Evidence.docx" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-14 00:21:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216016467</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Eileen</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216737289</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Authors use evidences to support the claims and statements that they want to express. Good evidence is dependable and factual. Unlike the intuition which is used as evidence based on the common sense, good evidence should have enough authorities and should be testified by specific people or some organizations. A good evidence should have details, including facts, data, and quotations. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-17 09:17:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216737289</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Crystal</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216762125</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A good evidence should prepare many factors. First, an institution should not be an evidence. A good evidence should depend on factual and it should also reliable. Sence is too weak to persuade others and it's unconvincing. Second, a good evidence should have authority. An expert is more reliable because they usually spend much time on a topic before getting a result. They should also better understand the topic than others. So, get an evidence from them is more convincing. Also, when we need to use evidence from other people, we should think critically. We should just copy other people's idea, we also need to think about their idea with our own perspective.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-17 14:49:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/216762125</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Karida Liang</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/217991145</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Evidence is explicit information shared by the communicator that is used to justify the dependability of a factual claim. People have to know how to achieve a best decision by using persuasive and overall evidence to improve their critical thinking when making decisions. Generally speaking, the greater the quality and quantity of evidence supporting a claim, the more we can depend on it. Before judging the persuasiveness of belief, people need to know the dependability based on the critical questions they ask. There is substantial evidence can be found in a dependable claim because it knows it has sufficient supports to convince people are struggling. A power evidence may include intuition, authority, testimonials, etc. First of all, intuition relies on common sense with no solid basis and much ignores relevant evidence. People should be wary of both personal experience and testimonials because they are always limited and one-sided. Besides, appeals to authority should be taken more seriously as evidence than others because they were much more carefully given but for many reasons, authority is often wrong. For example, a university's president will undoubtedly disagree on cutting the education found because he is in his position. It's evident that the authorities full of bias and prejudice cannot be the core factor when making decisions. Thus, people need to judge the problems comprehensively and get perfectly combined evidence to achieve the optimal choice by asking critical questions.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-12-26 02:58:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tom_fittipaldi/n825cod6jd3e/wish/217991145</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
