- ScienceDirect
- Elservier
- Taylor&Francis
- Springer Link
- SSRN
- NBER
- Econstore
- ResearchGate
- Crossref
- Kantar
- Nielsen

→ agree with Hoang, add some other reference materials:

We agree with Hoang partly:

Both reference materials on the Internet or from books are beneficial. For books, I think it is a huge source of official writing materials. But while citing from a book, we have to take into consideration when was the book published? Was the information still relevant to this day? Were there any biases in the book? → be critical when selecting details.

Internet, additionally, provides wide-ranging information on several fields. However, we should read while being critical and selective to avoid fake/ unreliable news, since the Internet is a huge source of information -> unverified and verified news will be mixed up.

Besides the Internet and books, there are other sources to find references which we’ve mentioned above.

Situation: The Target audience is students - where should you go? - If you choose that place, bring out a controversial topic?
* Observing phenomena prompts an attempt to understand them by asking questions (Why does this exist? Why is this happening? Do things have to be this way?) and examining alternatives (Maybe this doesn’t need to exist. Maybe this could happen another way instead.). 

+ Observe the news in the daily world, any things that be outstanding and be much discussed, or the observation may be come from research, so you can compare them with other research to reach an academic topic

+ Observe world events, on a smaller scale changes in daily lives or in a closed environment like an office/ school. It’s best to observe the areas that concern the writer, once an area of interest has been located, read the papers published recently in academic circles and notice the gap or missing elements in those researches, or recurring patterns or respond critically to opposing ideas or develop on existing research. 
* For the situation: When the target audience is students?
+ we should go for observation at places where there are many students (schools /library/ sport center/ street food stalls/ finding information about people they tend to interest or their favorite celebrities/ what might have an impact on them?)

+ we should aim at topics related to students and go to sources familiar to them, like social media. Besides skimming academic materials on the internet or books, etc surveys, and interviews are also necessary, this should include measurements of reaction to social media postings and how students choose to communicate them 
+ Observing emerging issues on the social networks, students are mostly internet addicts and they are attracted by controversial information which appears on their feeds.  

+ Observe mental health issues in students, what have led to these issues. 
--> A chosen topic: 
Student mostly revolve around Genz, so why the generation that have access to many conveniences, modern technology tend to be more depressed? (What are the reasons for this phenomenon)?

The impact of over focusing on scores at university in Viet Nam.

Observation location: Universities in Viet Nam

Online and offline, on a daily basis (uni clubs, family,...)

Observe that students only focus on getting high scores at all cost => spend too much time at home studying => ignores other skills such as soft skills

- Reasons:

+ Most students try to schedule afternoon or evening classes anyway – While it is true there are cases where students would prefer an afternoon or evening class, assuming that most students make the same choice is a big generalization. Furthermore, just because students may prefer it, it doesn’t mean it is better for them. This supporting idea is neither reliable nor accurate.

+ Experts say that the students who are alert learn more and learn more quickly – Who are these experts? How reliable are they? What kind of studies have they conducted? Moreover, “alert” is a very vague term. What does it mean to be alert? Is it relevant to the example provided later? Regarding the example, many reasons can account for “slightly higher advantages”: Differences in the tests prepared for each class, the participation of students, or just simply the luck of the draw. The fact that the distinction between the two classes’ results are “slightly” should be enough to prove that the time at which you study doesn’t affect the effectiveness of the course. Moreover, one example of two classes is not enough to generalize the whole of university students. This supporting idea is, once again, unreliable and inaccurate. 

- No concessions nor counter-arguments.  

Type of claim: Policy (Because there is “should” in the sentence => calling for change the current situation)

- Most students try to schedule afternoon or evening classes.

- Experts say that students who are alert learn more and learn more quickly.

+ We do not know whether the research of Southern State University is reliable or not. (How many students take part in the research? And how does the researcher choose the two groups of students?)

+ The author mentioned “ experts” , but only in general terms, and didn't name any experts, what field they are in. So, this information may not be reliable.

+“Slightly higher averages”: What is the background information/ ability / academic performances of the students in both classes? Maybe, the students in Dr. Miller’s afternoon classes are more hardworking than those in his morning classes.

Concession: There is no concession offered in the writing. It seems that the author believes that their side of the argument is absolute. 

Counterargument: There is no counter argument offered in the writing.

→ This example may need additional information to be more reliable and accurate.
 - No counter-argument or concession