<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>12D Memory Q5 by KJ Welsh</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/kwelsh51/n6rf53rk1ejq76r8</link>
      <description>Outline and evaluate the enhanced cognitive interview as a way of improving the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (16 Marks)</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-03-31 14:11:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-04-01 09:10:17 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>A01 outline</title>
         <author>casparwee</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kwelsh51/n6rf53rk1ejq76r8/wish/2125108347</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Findings concerning the unreliability of eye-witness accounts have led researchers to attempt to devise methods for improving retrieval.&nbsp; One of these methods is the cognitive interview developed by Fisher &amp; Geiselman, 1992. The cognitive interview (CI) is a questioning technique used by the police to enhance retrieval of information about a crime scene from the eyewitnesses and victim's memory. Geiselman et al. (1985) developed the Cognitive Interview (CI) as an alternative to the Standard Interview. It takes into account psychological findings about cue-dependent forgetting and has four stages designed to stimulate as many cues as possible in order to maximise different retrieval routes. these routes in order are, Reinstate the context, Recall events in reverse order, Report everything they can remember, and Describe events from someone else’s point of view.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-01 09:00:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kwelsh51/n6rf53rk1ejq76r8/wish/2125108347</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>16pincottl</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kwelsh51/n6rf53rk1ejq76r8/wish/2125113756</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There is research support for the effectiveness of cognitive interview. Fisher et al (1989) examined the effectiveness of the cognitive interview in real police interviews. 16 Experiences detectives recorded a selection of interviews, using a standard interviewing technique. the detectives were then divided into two groups; one was trained in CI and the other (control) continued using the standard interview. After the training, it was found that the trained detectives gained 46% more information than the untrained ones. These results support the effectiveness of the cognitive interview, using real police interviews and highlights the fact the CI can be useful in catching and charging criminal, which is a benefit to society as a whole. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-01 09:04:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kwelsh51/n6rf53rk1ejq76r8/wish/2125113756</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Context dependent memory - what about Godden and Baddeley to show that this aids memory recall and this is why this technique works in Cognitive Interviews?</title>
         <author>sthomas348</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kwelsh51/n6rf53rk1ejq76r8/wish/2125118117</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-04-01 09:08:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kwelsh51/n6rf53rk1ejq76r8/wish/2125118117</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
