Admittedly, allowing the olders attending to jobs provides a skillful and experienced team of workers. In fact, in many industries like pottery, jewelry making or even education prioritize to people that have decades working, are familiar and fluent enough to the work. The basis of this is the fact that they have been trained for so long, gaining secret techniques and skills- which makes them do faster and better than those who are still young.

 

Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the health condition of older people may not allow them to go to work. To be more specific, in the age of 60-70 when people get older, physical and cognitive capacity decreases as a natural funtion of the body, limits their ability of moving and performing. For example, in US, there are approximately more than 5 million people over 65 suffering from Alzheimer- a desease lead to the loss of memory and ability to control thought.

 

It is worth mentioning that letting old people become a part of the workforce means limiting the modernization in working method. The explanation for this is the fact that it is not easy for older generations to change their traditional processes or learn new things- which might be a challenge for company in competing with others. On the flip side, the youth tend to try new initiatives; their creativity and the update in strategy are suitable for new innovation.

 

In a nutshell, giving old people career opportunities can contribute to the labour experienced workers; however their well-being is no longer suitable for heavy works, and their inability to update current technology also limits the chances to the bussiness. I want to emphasize that the government should give more chances for new generation instead of using old workforce.

Most countries just allow people to work until 60 years old, yet some others let their old citizens to go to work at any age they want. For me, the disadvantages of this new policy overshadow the advantages.

 

Admittedly, allowing the old to work for longer can provide the country with a skillful and experienced addition to its workforce. In fact, in many industries like pottery, jewelry making or even education prioritize to people that have decades of work experience and are familiar and fluent with every task that they need to accomplish. The basis of this is the fact that these workers have been trained for so long, gaining secret techniques and skills- which makes them do their job faster and better than those who are still young.

 

Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the health condition of older people may not allow them to work safely. To be more specific, in the age of 60-70 when people get older, physical and cognitive capacity decreases as a natural function of the body, limiting their ability of to move and perform many tasks. As a matter of fact, in the US, there are approximately more than 5 million people over 65 suffering from Alzheimer- a disease leading to the loss of memory and ability to control thought, which means they can’t even do simple office work.

 

Furthermore, it is also worth mentioning that letting old people become a part of the workforce might mean limiting modernization in working method. The explanation for this is the fact that it is not easy for those of the older generations to change their traditional processes or learn new things- which might be a challenge for company in competing with others. On the flip side, the youth tend to try new initiatives; their creativity and adaptability to new and improved technology and work strategy can create a competitive edge for the companies they work in.

 

In a nutshell, giving old people career opportunities can contribute to the experienced work force; but their well-being is no longer suitable for heavy works, and their inability to update current technology also limits the chances to the business to compete. For these reasons I strongly advocate that the government should give more chances for new generation instead of using old workforce.

 

First and foremost, purchasing food from other regions immensely fosters and maintains diplomatic relations. In fact, proposing and implementing maritime and trading agreements have always been an effective strategy to assert friendship and willingness for further collaboration between governments. This is because cuisine, as a massive factor in representing a civilization, plays a significant role in accelerating cultural exchanges and promotion of mutual understanding. It is far too obvious that as long as deep and stable cultural connections between nations are found, rifts will be healed, national security will be protected and peacekeeping operations will thrive.
 

More appreciably, the wide diversity of food choices substantially stimulates people’ well-being. Acknowledging by a myriad of prominent researchers, for millennials, homo sapiens as foragers were far too familiar with a broad range of comestible that even in the present, humans still have not evolved enough to cope with the limited food choices provided locally. This results in the state of unconsciously falling into nasty dietary habits such as excessive absorption of carbohydrates and fats, which often give rise to severe chronic maladies such as diabetes, high blood cholesterol or hepatitis. Nevertheless, food trading not only aids humans in overcoming adaptability struggle, but also introduces and furthers a much more sensible diet by supplying a far more variety of foodstuffs and fares. 

In conclusion, not only does grocery and food commerce nourish association between different areas of the world, but it also elevates the public’s health in a natural yet remarkable way. For these reasons, I strongly advocate importing comestibles as well as beverages from other countries.

Nowadays, most countries is seeing a significant upswing in the amount of food that is imported. As far as I am concerned, this growth of food commerce is a positive phenomenon with tremendous practical potential.
 
 

First and foremost, purchasing food from other parts of the world could help immensely in fostering and maintaining diplomatic relations. In fact, proposing and implementing agricultural agreements have always been an effective strategy to assert friendship and willingness for further collaboration between governments. Food security+ commercial cooperation
  

More appreciably, we cannot deny that the wide diversity of food choices can substantially facilitate people’s well-being. As a matter of fact, many prominent researchers have asserted that homo sapiens as foragers have evolved to consume a broad range of nutritional sources. However, the regional specialization brought about by the agricultural revolution have resulted in the state of human unconsciously falling into nasty dietary habits such as excessive absorption of carbohydrates and fats, which often give rise to severe chronic maladies such as diabetes, high blood cholesterol or hepatitis. Therefore, food trading not only aids humans in overcoming adaptability struggle, but also introduces and furthers a much more sensible diet by supplying a far more variety of foodstuffs and fares. 
 
 

In conclusion, not only does grocery and food commerce nourish association between different areas of the world, but it also elevates the public’s health in a natural yet remarkable way. For these reasons, I strongly advocate importing comestibles as well as beverages from other countries.

 

We need to admit that students should spend time learning main subjects such as maths, literature or language to help them in achieving successful career later in life. The basis of this is the fact that academic subjects can provide teenagers the foundational knowledge which is necessary for the university entrance exam and their profession in the future, thus, learning these subjects may make it easier for them to choose any line of work that they like.For example, we can acquire logical thinking through learning maths, and literature also helps us to write a report better.  On the other hand, taking time to study the science of food and how to prepare it can distract students from learning the basic subjects and lead to poor performance in these important fields.

 

We need to admit that students should spend time learning main subjects such as maths, literature or language to help them in achieving successful career later in life. For example, we can acquire logical thinking through learning maths, and literature also helps us to write a report better. I want to emphasize that academic subjects can provide teenagers the foundational knowledge which is necessary for the university entrance exam and their profession in the future, thus, learning these subjects may make it easier for them to choose any line of work that they like. On the other hand, taking time to study the science of food and how to prepare it can distract students from learning the basic subjects and lead to poor performance in these important fields.

 

We need to admit that working will help old people have more enjoyable. As far as I know, many old people who choose to be taxi drivers are not only making money, but mostly they are extremely bored, thus being a taxi driver might open the door for them to have conversations with others. This is because the old’s children always go to work or study all day, or even at weekends, with this reason, working will help old people do not feel fatigued even they cannot spend time with family members. On the flip side, if the old would not work, they could get depression and feel self-pity, thus they might have problems with mental or physical health.

It goes without saying that working might help the old become healthier. The explanation for this could be the fact that the less activity we experience, the weaker we could become as our body get used to not doing anything, thus allowing the old to work will open the door for them to force their brain and body to operate and prevent diseases like….. For example, Japan is one of the countries that have the highest life expectancy because their senior citizens always spend time doing light work as the security, cooking for companies, or arts and crafts instead of wasting time doing nothing. I want to emphasize that becoming healthier this way will allow the elderly to enjoy their lives to a much greater extend

 

We need to admit that working will help old people have more enjoyable lives. As far as I know, many of the elderly who choose to be taxi drivers are not only making money, but mostly they are extremely bored, thus being at work might open the door for them to have conversations with others. This is because the old’s children always go to work or study all day, or even at weekends, and for this reason, working will help old people no to feel alone even if they cannot spend time with family members. On the flip side, if the old do not engage in any kind of activity, they could get depression and feel self-pity, thus they might have problems with mental or physical health.

 

Opponents of including culinary programs at school often say that adding a new subject can distract students from other academic lessons. This line of thinking stems from the presumption that learning food science means they need to spend some time and effort on it, and thus have less time for the compulsory ones. They argue that the main subjects like math, science or history are decisive in the unniversity entrance exam, thefore being distracted by another subject could be adverse for them in this fierce competition. 

 

This might be true to a certain extent; however it is undeniable that learning cooking help students to relax after a hard day of studying. In fact, when studying math or chemistry, students have to overheat their brain with numbers and flexible problems which make them under the pressure. On the other hands, since most people love food, concentrating on cooking and enjoying good food relieves stress and bring positive energy to students, prevent them from depressiom.

 

 

More importantly, discovering about making food and its importance in our life promotes a healthy lifestyle for students. The basis of this is the fact that this subject brings to students knowledge about the role of nutrients and choosing ingredients, thus giving us more options to build our own diet and tremendously improve our health. As a matter of fact, after having an overview about food science, students may realize the drawbacks of eating instant food too often- a very common issue of the teenagers nowadays- and try preparing meals by themselves.

  

To conclude, although the new science reduces school time for some academic subjects, it obviously can help students to have healthier eating habits and save their money. I strongly believe that it should be concerned more and will soon become one of the school curriculum.

 

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that permitting old people to work can make them not dependent on their children. This is because when their children gets older, they have to worry about their personal life, so if the aged parents can support themselves, it would reduce a lot of the financial pressure for them. As a matter of fact that, Japanese elder not only live independently but also support their children financially.

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that the elder can give their experience to the young. I want to emphasize that when government allow people without age, the old have more experience in their major that can help them to give some advantages of the development of their company. For example, Bill Gates work in his company in many years and his company now is developing sustainably.

 

In conclusion, I definitely believe that the advantages of working without age limit outweigh the disadvantages.

 

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that the importation of food in many countries help the local foodstuff to develop. I want to emphasize that when the importation of food in many countries create an opportunity for local food to export therefore give a boost for the local food in the world market and the local food industry. For example, the exportation of longans in Vietnam for Australia helps these fruits well-known in many big markets such as the USA or Japan which leads to the raising of exportation of many others fruits and brings a huge profit to Vietnam food industry.

 

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that the import food diversifies the experiences of the costumers. This is because import food will allow people to enjoy the cuisine of many places in the world that don’t have in their own countries and thus people will have various option for their eating. As a matter of fact, through the trend of imported food, Vietnamese people now can enjoy cherries- the fruit that cannot be grown in Vietnam therefore diversify the Vietnamese cuisine.

 

To sum up, imported food not just brings a huge profits for the country but also diversify the people cuisine knowledge. For these reason, I strongly believe that the trend of importing food is a positive growth for the country. 

n my opinion, I firmly believe and support that development of importing food from many places in the world is a positive growth for the country due to its benefits.

 

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that the import and export of food can allow the agriculture of every country to develop. Exchange of food => create demand => improve agriculture sector. 

 

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that the imported food diversifies the experiences of the costumers. This is because import food will allow people to enjoy the cuisine of many places in the world instead of just having their own countries, and thus people will have a wider variety for their eating. As a matter of fact, through the trend of imported food, Vietnamese people can enjoy now cherries- a fruit that cannot be grown in Vietnam therefore diversify the Vietnamese cuisine.

 

To sum up, imported food not just brings a huge profits for the country but also diversify the people cuisine knowledge. For these reason, I strongly believe that the trend of importing food is a positive growth for the country.

 

 

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that working can make older people healthier. This is because allowing the elderly to work opens the door for their brains and bodies to be more active, which significantly improves their immune system, thereby helping to prevent and reduce the incidence of diseases in the elderly such as stroke, pneumonia, hypertension,... As a matter of fact, in Japan, the country with the longest life expectancy in the world, the elderly always make time to be physically active every day by doing light jobs such as cleaners, cooks, security guards...instead of wasting time doing nothing.

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that working also makes life more enjoyable for the elderly. I would like to emphasize that older people tend to feel lonely, so working helps them connect with the community, which opens up more opportunities for them to chat with others. As far as I know, most old people go to work not only to make money, but the real reason they go to work is to have someone to talk to.

 

In conclusion, I strongly believe that  it would be more advantageous for some countries to allow older people to work at any age they want.

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing old people to work to any age that they want can lead to an improvement in the overall well-being of the elderly. This is because when old people to work,  there are some jobs such as coaching or performing, which improves physical health more than sedentary life style. For example, the elderly can do jobs have physical activity will help keep them fit and free of ailments.

In addition, it is also worth mentioning deny that allowing old people to work to any age is beneficial for scientific developments. I want to emphasize that when old people tend to have a lot of experience and knowledge in any field, when they are allow to continue working, they can contribute a lot of our scientific knowledge. As a matter of fact, physical researchers and scientists received patents as well as gained the highest citation publications award after they older.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that old people should work to any age that they want.

In my opinion, I agree that old people should be allowed work to any age that they want.
 
 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing old people to work to any age that they want can lead to an improvement in their overall well-being. This is because when old people work, they can engage in physical and mental activities, which is much better for their health than just living a sedentary life style. For example,....

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that allowing old people to work to any age is beneficial for scientific developments. I want to emphasize that old people tend to have a lot of experience and knowledge in any field, therefore when they are allowed to continue working, they can contribute a lot of our scientific knowledge. As a matter of fact, physics researchers and scientists usually receive patents as well as gain the highest citation publications award after their 50s
 
 

In conclusion, I firmly believe that old people should work to any age that they want.

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing the elderly to work according to the age they want will effect on their health. This is because when they get older, their health becomes weaker and more susceptible to diseases such as high blood pressure, vestibular disorder which must be properly treated and rested. For example, the elderly who still working are usually have more strokes than people in convalescent homes

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that things that they are definitely encounter in their old age that will affect the progress of the company. I want to emphasize that when they are old, they are no longer agile and acumen to finish their work, which will affect the growth of the company. As a matter of fact, the productivity of people over 60 years old cannot be equal to that of young people

In conclusion, I strongly believe that allowing old people to work as long as they want will not bring any benefit to personal or society

In my opinion, allowing old people to work to any age that they want is not a good idea

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing the elderly to work according to the age they want will have detrimental effects on their health. This is because when they get older, their health becomes weaker and they are more susceptible to diseases such as high blood pressure, vestibular disorder, therefore constantly working could put their health at risk. For example, the elderly who still working are usually have more strokes than people in convalescent homes

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning problems they will have due to their old age that will affect the progress of the company. I want to emphasize that when people are old, they are not as agile and acute as their younger selves, which means they will be less productive and might negatively affect the growth of the company. As a matter of fact, the productivity of people over 60 years old cannot be equal to that of young people

 

In conclusion, I strongly believe that allowing old people to work as long as they want will not bring any benefit to personal or society

 

Undeniably, when senior citizens work to any age that they want, it could detrimentally affect their health. The basis of this is that when people get older, their health condition might make it hard for them to keep working and even lead to myriad health diseases like…. I really want to emphasize that when old people's health is affected, then the government has to pay their health insurance which will be a burden on the national budget.

 

However, there is no denying that when the government permits the elderly to work, it brings more benefits due to their skill and experience. The explanation for this is the fact that because most senior citizens would have a tremendous amount of experience in their industry, they would have more knowledge and be familiar with work, and thus allowing them to work can create a massive contribution to society. As a matter of fact, to truly invent science products, scientists need to do research and experiment many times, so almost all of them are awarded their patents  at very old age. What we have to realize is that allowing experienced people like the aged to work will help enterprises reduce time and money to train the young generation.

 

Additionally, we need to admit that working will make the elderly’s life more enjoyable. For example, senior citizens can do light work such as taxi drivers, shippers, security guards, or chefs, which will help them make money and have a chance to meet and have a conversation with others. On the other hand, if old people just stay at home and wait for other family members to come back home, they might feel alone and have a myriad of  mental problems like depression, anxiety or…..

 

In conclusion, allowing the elderly to work not only brings more benefits due to their skill and their experience but also makes their life more enjoyable. Therefore, I strongly believe that senior citizens should work at any age that they want.

Obviously, some people think that learning academic knowledges at school will allow students to smoothly transit into a professional environment. For instance, logical thinking acquired during math lessons or critical thinking fostered from literature are prerequisite to more nuanced problem-solving skills employed in fields like engineering or law. What I want to realize is that students who focus diligently on the important subjects at school can get a successful career with higher average income.

That may be true, however, we need to admit that those courses about food and cooking can allow students to know about basic nutrients to take care of their well-being. As a matter of fact, controlling the basic nutrients such as vitamin, fiber or protein in each meal for students could help them develop in both mental and physical. Therefore, when learning those courses, they can combine those substances suitably and reasonably to protect their health. In contrast, the students may get some diseases like obesity when absorb too much protein or fat.

Moreover, there is no denying that studying the food science could find many students who are talent to cooking. This is because they can contact the most basic things of food from the early age, which can stimulate their passion of cuisine. I want to emphasize that those students can elevate the traditional dishes or find some new methods of cooking when they enjoy cooking from the young.

In conclusion, despite the fact that main subjects at school give the students chances to work in a good professional environment, it is clear that not only does food science protect their health, but it also promotes the students enjoying cooking. For those reasons, I claim that the school should teach students about the courses of food.

 

Admittedly, studying the science of food or cooking skills might make students less concentrated on study academic subjects. For example, my sister used to participate in a cooking club at school, and because of it she did not spend enough time practicing maths, therefore she did not get a high mark and she even got stressed as she was not able to handle every subject. This is because students have a lot of academic knowledge and exams to remember and study, thus it is difficult for them to spend enough time on those subjects if they are also cooking at school.

 

However, it is undeniable that that the science of food will open the door for students to improve their bodies. What we have to realize is that this subject can help students have versatile knowledge about calories, fat and nutrients, therefore if it is included in the study program, they would be able to control their food nutritional intake more effectively. For instance, one of my friends has a nice body shape due to joining a nutritional class which helps her can be a model in high school, and she even can create a healthy menu for others to make them lose weight without negative affect. I want to emphasize that being able to follow a healthy diet can also help students study other subjects more effectively by eating in a way that give them more energy.

 

In addition, learning cooking skills can help students be more independent. In fact, many parents do not want to let their children study aboard just because they cannot cook by themselves and the parents are afraid that their children will not be able to live alone. From this we can see that cooking is an essential skill that opens the door for students who has it to adapt to an environment where they have no one to cook for them. 

 

In conclusion, even if studying more subject might make the student be stress, they can get more knowledge to improve their body, health, and survival skills. For these reasons, I strongly believe the advantages of studying the science of food and how to prepare it to outweigh the cons.

Obviously, some people think that the authorities can save more people when spending money curing the patients who have been ill. The explanation for this could be the fact that amount of money can allow many researches to find vaccine or pharmacy to prevent the illness. What I want to realize is that the more new ways to treat the diseases, the more chances of live that people can take.

That may be true, however, we need to admit that there are more and more dangerous diseases that scientists cannot find specific medicines to treat. For example, people use such huge amount of antibiotic that their health is becoming weaker, which are the result of antibiotic resistance. That is why inventing new medicines may decrease the well-being of many people, even make the patients who are already ill become more terrible.

More importantly, there is no denying that using money in promoting healthy lifestyle can open the door to develop the infrastructure of the countries. As a matter of fact, the government can upgrade or build more places that people can play sports or do exercises, which can help people to get a healthier body. I want to emphasize that constructing those places give the residents a fresher environment that people feel comfortable after working.

In conclusion, although people can be saved with the research of methods to cure, it is more necessary that the government should spend public money on growing and expanding the infrastructure of the country. For those reason, I totally agree that we should take public money on the society health. 

Nowadays, whether to spend public money on preventive measure or develop better treatment option for diseases have been an on-going debate in most countries. From my point of view, I firmly believe that the governments should take funds to elevate the well-being of people life.

 

Obviously, some people think that the authorities can save more people when spending money on curing the patients who have been ill. The explanation for this could be the fact that channeling a large amount of money into this sector can allow many researches to find vaccine or pharmacy to prevent the illness. And indeed it is true that the more new ways to treat the diseases, the more chances of live that people can take.

 

However, we need to admit that there are more and more dangerous diseases that scientists cannot find specific medicines to treat. For example, people use such huge amount of antibiotic that their health is becoming weaker, which are the result of antibiotic resistance. That is why inventing new medicines may decrease the well-being of many people, even make the patients who are already ill become more worse.

 

Argument: better for public health to spend $ on preventive measures. 

Explain: diseases more dangerous => treatment might not be able to keep up

Contrast: preventive measure = raise general well-being and immune system => better for public health

 

More importantly, there is no denying that using money in promoting healthy lifestyle can open the door to improving the citizen’s quality of life in general. As a matter of fact, to promote a healthier lifestyle, the government must upgrade or build more places that people can play sports or do exercises, which can not only help people to get a healthier body but also provide a place for them to socialize or just relax. I want to emphasize that constructing those places give the residents a fresher environment that people feel comfortable after working.

 

In conclusion, although people can be saved with the research of methods to cure, it is more necessary that the government should spend public money on growing and expanding the infrastructure of the country. For those reason, I totally agree that we should take public money on the society health.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that importing food is a positive development for the country

In my opinion, I certainly support that importing food from many parts of the world as a positive development.
  
 First of all, we need to acknowledge that importing food helps people in many countries enjoy the food that their own countries cannot provide. This is because each country has different geographical location and it also has many types of climates, so importing the food they cannot produce themselves can help the meals of their citizens become more diverse and healthier. For example, Laos is a landlocked country, but their citizens can still enjoy the taste and healthy benefits of seafood thanks to imports from countries such as Vietnam or Japan. 
 
 In addition, it is also worth mentioning that when all countries import each other’s food, it can help the local food industry to develop. I want to emphasize that exporting foods to other countries makes it more widely known in shopping market leading to the development of local cuisine. As a matter of fact, Vietnam are country that supply coffee the most, so many European restaurants chose them to import coffee which leads to bring a great profit to Vietnam coffee exporter.

 In conclusion, I strongly believe that importing food is a positive development for the country

 In the first place, we need to admit that exporting or importing food will help people have more options in their daily eating habit. The explanation for this is the fact that when nations exchange their food supplies, the citizens will have access to not only local food but also foreign food with different uses and prices, and thus, they can choose any kind of food that they like or suitable for them. (Better evidence). What we have to realize is that when having more food options to satisfy their culinary requirement, people in each country would also be able combine flavors and bring more innovation and diversity to their own cuisine. 

 

 To sum up, importing food from other countries not only helps people have more options in choosing food but also makes the country's cuisine more diverse. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the government should encourage to import of food from different parts of the world.

Admittedly, it is commonly presumed that the involvement of elderly people in the workforce may inject a degree of economic instability. This line of thinking stems from the assumption that granting people absolute independence in determining when to give up their occupations would hinder economists and governments from taking the proactive role in managing the job market’s demand and supply. As a matter of fact, labour’s shortages and surpluses may befall more frequently, severely and suddenly.

However, we have to acknowledge that economic crises and downturns are not synonymous to a negative phenomenon as chaos and uncertainties have always been a tremendous boost for further economic progress and development. In particular, despite having met with great obstacles to achieving an age-free society, Japan and Germany are now among countries that possess the most flexible and active working environment. This is because facing difficulties posted by removing limits on working age have brought about marvellous opportunities for these two economies to further their resilience and adaptability.

More appreciably, there is no denying that allowing people to work until whenever they wish to will span the growing gap between generations. It is true that regular contact within any working environment is inevitable, and this accounts for deeper mutual understanding and greater respect between people of different ages serving in the same field. In fact, according to a myriad of psychological researches, it has been emphatically stated that the more liaison and communication between the old and the young collegues, the more chances of establishing rapports and companionships among them. 

In conclusion, not only does a policy eliminating age restrictions for working bring about reasonable chances to enhance the country's economy, but it also helps bridge the gulf between different generations. For these reasons, I strongly advocate the idea of permitting people to work to any age they want to. 

Today, numerous countries in the world impose age restrictions for working. However, as far as I am concerned, it would be a much more appropriate policy if people were authorized to pursue their careers up to any age they wish to.
 
 

Admittedly, it is commonly presumed that the involvement of elderly people in the workforce may inject a degree of economic instability. This line of thinking stems from the assumption that granting people absolute independence in determining when to give up their occupations would hinder economists and governments from taking the proactive role in managing the job market’s demand and supply. They often emphasize/argue that….
 
 

Need better argument

 

More appreciably, there is no denying that allowing people to work until whenever they wish to will help span the growing gap between generations. It is true that regular contact within any working environment is inevitable, and this accounts for deeper mutual understanding and greater respect between people of different ages serving in the same field. In fact, according to a myriad of psychological researches, it has been emphatically stressed= emphasized that the more liaison and communication between the old and the young colleagues, the more chances of establishing rapports and companionships among them, which would definitely contribute to better understanding and empathy across multiple generations. 
 
 

In conclusion, not only does a policy eliminating age restrictions for working bring about reasonable chances to enhance the country's economy, but it also helps bridge the gulf between different generations. For these reasons, I strongly advocate the idea of permitting people to work to any age they want to. 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that the elder can help the young by giving them there experience. The point i want to emphasize is that when government allow people do works at any age, the old have more experience in their major can help some new and young employees and give some advantages of the development of their company. For example, Bill Gates works in his company for many years and his company is being well developed even he is no longer operating it.

First of all, we need to acknowledge that working can increase the elderly health. This is because working allow them to be more active and helps prevent some diseases that are particularly likely to occur in their old and weak body like heart attack or high cholesterol levels. For instance, Japan is known for possessing one of the longest life expectancy in the world because senior citizens in Japan always make time to be physically active every day by doing for light jobs in companies such as cleaning , cooking instead of wasting time staying at home and do nothing.

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that the elderly can help the young by giving them there experience. The point i want to emphasize is that when government allow people do works at any age, the old with more experience in their field / industry can help some new and young employees and give some advantages of the development of their company. For example, Bill Gates works in his company for many years and his company is being well developed even he is no longer operating it.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that encouraging citizens to a healthy routine might decrease pressure on the national budget. The basis of this is the fact that when people live scientifically and have effective illness prevention, the number of patients will reduce, thus the government does not have to spend a huge amount of money on cure and treatment of easily preventable diseases. For instance, young people who have a nutritional daily habits can avoid high blood pressure when they get older, while others have to pay a much money to purchase medicine to alleviate.

 

In addition, we need to admit that having a healthy lifestyle might help people live

 

In conclusion, not only does giving a boost on promoting a healthy lifestyle can help that nation decrease pressure on the budget, but it also . For those reasons, I believe the government should spend public money to encourage people healthy daily life.

Nowadays, there are some countries allow oldster get any job with any age that they want, even they are nearly in the age that they should be retirement. However, I do not  think that this legacy should be removed at any cost.

We can not deny that let the oldster to work create a team work in the best stable about skill and experience. The explanation for this could be the fact that the oldsters have a wide range of experience and knowledge through many years in working, this fix an important problem that new guys have their youth and dynamism and they do not have much experience and the older can help them this problem in team work. In fact, the leader in Apple is the people have many experience in this department so they lead the young who can have many unique idea and the leader check out about its cons and pros, after that a new idea to come out new products.

Nevertheless, the oldster in age 60-70 have unstable heath, let them to work have many risk, they can be exhausted in any time. In fact, most old people in the world affront with a disease name Alzheimer- a disease about brain, impact on intelligence, thinking and behavior; it is more wide range than you think about 5 millions America are living with it. The explanation for this could be the fact that the older people are, the worse their health are, they are easy to get sick and we can not against so the best solution for oldster is that we should make them to rest and enjoy these days in comfortable.

In conclusion, letting oldster to work in any age that they want is not a positive legacy because it has many risk which we can not prevent. For these reason, I completely and strongly not agree with this policy, taking a rest after many year in working is more necessary for the oldster

Nowadays, there are some countries allow oldster get any job with any age that they want, even they are nearly in the age that they should be retirement. However, I do not  think that this legacy should be removed at any cost.

We can not deny that let the oldster to work create a team work in the best stable about skill and experience. The explanation for this could be the fact that the oldsters have a wide range of experience and knowledge through many years in working, this fix an important problem that new guys have their youth and dynamism and they do not have much experience and the older can help them this problem in team work. In fact, the leader in Apple is the people have many experience in this department so they lead the young who can have many unique idea and the leader check out about its cons and pros, after that a new idea to come out new products.

Nevertheless, the oldster in age 60-70 have unstable heath, let them to work have many risk, they can be exhausted in any time. In fact, most old people in the world affront with a disease name Alzheimer- a disease about brain, impact on intelligence, thinking and behavior; it is more wide range than you think about 5 millions America are living with it. The explanation for this could be the fact that the older people are, the worse their health are, they are easy to get sick and we can not against so the best solution for oldster is that we should make them to rest and enjoy these days in comfortable.

In conclusion, letting oldster to work in any age that they want is not a positive legacy because it has many risk which we can not prevent. For these reason, I completely and strongly not agree with this policy, taking a rest after many year in working is more necessary for the oldster

with to age that they want, even when they are nearly in the age that they should retire. However, I think that this policy brings more drawbacks than benefits.

 

Admittedly, we cannot deny that letting old people to work could help create teams that are more balance in skill and experience. The explanation for this could be the fact that the elderly have a wide range of experience and knowledge through many years in working, which could be of great help to young employees have their youth and dynamism, but do not have much experience. In fact, the leaders in Apple is the people have much experience in their fields, so they lead the young who can have many unique idea and the leader check out about its cons and pros, after that a new idea to come out new products.

 

Argument 2: working damage old people’s health.

 

Argument 3: letting old people work can cause unemployment among the young. 

 

 

 

 

In conclusion, letting oldster to work in any age that they want is not a positive legacy because it has many risk which we can not prevent. For these reason, I completely and strongly not agree with this policy, taking a rest after many year in working is more necessary for the oldster

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing to retire as wished will prevent the elder from many health problems. The point that i want to emphasize is that the condition of lacking of activities after retirement will force our whole body systems to get used to the situation which will at least lead to anxieties or even some serious health problems like Alzheimer or stroke in long-term. As a matter of fact, some research shows that working after retirement will keep the elder people’s mind keep on working which will reduce the chance of having health issues by 11%.  

 

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that allowing people decide their retirement will increase the country economy. This is because elder people without retirement could still devote to the process of developing of the country which create a boost to the productivity therefore enhancing the economy. For example, after published the policy, Japanese economy have significantly rising due to the accelerating in the working process therefore making this country one of the richest countries in the world.

 

In conclusion, letting old people decide whenever they retire brings health benefits to the elder people themselves and also increasing the country economy. For these reason, I strongly believe that this policy is a positive growth which have to be applied worldwide. 

In my opinion, I strongly believe that giving permission for elder people to work until whenever they want is an important development because of its benefits.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing people to work past retirement age / into old age will protect them from many health problems. This is because the lack of activities after retirement will can lead to many issues like anxieties and even some serious health problems like Alzheimer or stroke in long-term. As a matter of fact, some research shows that working after retirement will keep the elder people’s mind keep on working which will significantly reduce the chance of having health issues. 

 

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that allowing people decide their retirement will increase the country economy. This is because older people without retirement could still devote to the process of developing of the country, which create a boost to the productivity and enhance the economy. For example, after Japan removed limit on working age, it’s economy have significantly improved due to the accelerating in the working process, therefore making this country one of the richest countries in the world.

 

In conclusion, letting old people decide whenever they retire brings health benefits to the elder people themselves and also increases the country economy. For these reasons, I strongly believe that this policy is a positive growth which have to be applied worldwide.

 

As far as I am concerned, imported food exposes domestic products to the risk of losing its position. This is because it is hard for domestic foodstuffs from small farms to compete with the imported ones which are seemed to be higher-quality and  sometimes cheaper. As a matter of fact, in 2015, the price of native rice and vegetables was decreased significantly, due to the foreign exchanges on neccessary materials that the government have to restricts the import then the problem was finally solved. We need to acknowledge that when imported food dominates in the market, it will make the local farmers- those just can rely on agricultural production- go bankrupt or unemployed.

 

In addition, it is worth mentioning that imported food is not good for our health. For instance, one EWG report found that America strawberries in an Asia shop contains more than 30 types of pesticides and preservatives which can lead to many food-borne diseases and especially dangerous with pregnant woman and children. The explanation for this is the fact that presevatives are neccessary in prevent fruits and meat from being rancid after transporting; and most of them are harmful for our health. On the other hand, locally grown products are much safer since it does not have far to travel before being sold, which means that it contain less or no chemicals.

 

In general, importing food challenge the consumption of domestic foodstuff and lead to problems of food safety. Personally I think that imported products- especially food- should be controlled strictly in order to protect citizens’ benefits.

In these recent decades, there has been an increasing trend of importing different types of food from different places over the world. Though some people agree with this, I advocate that this tendency will bring more negative effects.

 

First of all, we need to admit that in less developed countries, an increase in imported food exposes domestic products to the risk of losing its position. This is because it is hard for domestic foodstuffs from small farms to compete with the imported ones which appear to be of higher-quality and sometimes even cheaper. More specific evidence. We need to acknowledge that when imported food dominates the market of poorer countries, it is very likely to make the local farmers- those just can rely on agricultural production- go bankrupt or unemployed.

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that imported food tend not to be good for our health. For instance, one EWG report found that America strawberries in an Asia shop contains more than 30 types of pesticides and preservatives which can lead to many food-borne diseases and especially dangerous with pregnant woman and children. The explanation for this is the fact that preservatives, most of which are harmful for our health, are necessary in preventing fruits and meat from being rancid during transport, which means most imported food carry with them a certain degree of health risk. On the other hand, locally grown products are much safer since they does not have far to travel before being sold, which means that they contain less or no chemicals.

 

In conclusion, not only does importing food challenge the survival of domestic food industry but it also leads to a myriad of problems of food safety. For these reasons I think that imported products- especially food- should be controlled strictly in order to protect citizens’ benefits.

 

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that encouraging a healthy life style can significantly help prevent diseases. This is because many diseases today are the result of unhealthy lifestyle, so they can be prevented if people understand more about harmful effects of bad habits. As a matter of fact, many children today eat fast food and greasy food everyday, which will make them overweight, fat, therefore… (thêm lợi ích của việc tránh ăn đồ ăn nhanh)

 

. In addictions, it also worth mentioning that only focusing on curing diseases is effective there are some incurable diseases. I want to emphasize that there are some incurable disease, so instead of trying to cure them we need to try to avoid these diseases by living healthy and exercise everyday. For example, cancer is an untreatable disease, but with an optimistic spirit, miracles will come to you. 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that importing food products from other parts of the world provide a different experience for customers. This is because imported food from other parts of the world, which are non- existent in their country, consumers are offered a wider range of choices. In fact, some countries import tropical fruit such as mangoes and watermelon from Vietnam because the climate and terrain can’t be grown.

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that importing food products from other parts of the world help businessman save costs. I want to emphasize that buying food from its native country may mean costs are more affordable as the supply higher than growing it locally, products with low price and high quality will help them save some money. As a matter of fact, Vietnam and Thailand were two nations where supply rice the most ine the world, so many European and America companies have chosen them to import rice.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that many countries should import food from different parts of the world.

First of all, we need to acknowledge that impoting food will help the food in the country become diversity. This is because the variety of food and ingredients will help consumers have more choices, which mean their meals will become plentiful and more nutritious. For example, in cold climates it is not possible to grow all fruits and vegetables throughout the year, and thanks to imported food you can have fresh bananas, mangoes, tomatoes or potatoes at any time you want.

In addition, it is also worth metioning that imported products will have a high quality. I want to emphasize that before being put on the market for consumption, food and ingredients such as fruit, vegetables, meat, fish must go through a very strict quality control process, so that consumers can use the best quality product. In fact, the process of checking food imported from abroad into Vietnam usually goes through 4 steps

In conclusion, I strongly believe that importing food of diferent countries brings many benefit to the country 

In my opinion, importing food from different countries is one of the important parts of economic development
 
 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that importing food will help the food in the country become more diverse. This is because the variety of food and ingredients will help consumers have more choices, which mean their meals will become plentiful and more nutritious. For example, in cold climates it is not possible to grow all fruits and vegetables throughout the year, and thanks to imported food people there can still have fresh bananas, mangoes, tomatoes or potatoes at any time they want.
 
 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that imported products are usually of higher quality than domestic products. I want to emphasize that before being put on the market for consumption, imported food and ingredients such as fruit, vegetables, meat, fish must go through a very strict quality control process, therefore this allows consumers to enjoy the best quality product. In fact, the process of checking food imported from abroad into Vietnam usually goes through 4 steps in order to ensure that 
 
 

In conclusion, I strongly believe that importing food of different countries brings many benefits to the country 

 First of all, we need to acknowledge that the trend of importing food from different parts of the world means that the cuisine of the country becomes more diverse. This is because when they have access to dishes with many different flavors in the world, their taste buds also become better and more sensitive, thereby the dishes also become more diverse and wonderful. That's also why famous chefs often spend their time traveling to many different places to enjoy the dishes of different regions, such as the "Gordon's Great Escape" program of top chefs England's - Gordon Ramsay.

In addition, the import of food from different parts of the world is also a way to trade and increase solidarity between countries. I want to emphasize that food exchange is also a way to strengthen friendship between countries around the world because when tasting a dish of another country people tend to be curious about that country, from there they will learn more about that country. For example, in Vietnam  many food festivals are often held to strengthen ties between countries such as "Vietnamese-Korean food festival", "Japanese-Vietnamese food festival", "Vietnam - China food festival",...

 In conclusion, imported foods not only diversify the country's cuisine but also make an important contribution to tightening the friendship between countries. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the trend of food imports is a positive development for the country.

In my opinion, I agree that more countries importing food from different parts of the world is a positive development.
 
 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that the trend of importing food from different parts of the world means that the cuisine of the country becomes more diverse. This is because when citizens have access to dishes with many different flavors in the world, their taste buds also become better and more sensitive, thereby the dishes also become more diverse and wonderful. As a matter of fact, this is why famous chefs like Gordon Ramsey often spend their time traveling to many different places to enjoy the dishes of different regions.

 

Rewrite 2^nd argument. 
 
 

 In conclusion, imported foods not only diversify the country's cuisine but also make an important contribution to tightening the friendship between countries. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the trend of food imports is a positive development for the country.

In addition, it is worth mentioning that it is important to study other science subjects in the school. This is because beside food, there are many things that people have to do in their life. As a matter of fact, students should learn foreigner languages because it will help them to communicate with foreigner and it’s a opportunity to have some knowledges. 

In conclusion, for those reasons, I strongly believe that spending school time learning other subjects is more important than spending it on learning science of foods and how to prepare it.

 In addition, it is also worth mentioning that when countries import food from each other, it means that the local food industry develops better. I want to emphasize that exporting foods to other countries makes it more widely known in shopping market leading to the development of local cuisine. As a matter of fact, each country and region has its own specialty that will also become a plus point for that local food industry. For example, Vietnam is famous for coffee, Indonesia is famous for durian while Korea and China are famous for traditional dishes such as kimchi, Bibimbap, tteokbokki rice cake, Chongqing hot pot, duck Beijing filming...

In conclusion, imported foods not only diversify the country's cuisine but also help the domestic food industry develop better. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the trend of food imports is a positive development for the country.

First of all, we need to acknowledge that student should focus on core subjects to get good results in exams and studies. This is because those subjects can provides basic and advanced knowledge for students, which important and necessary for them to pass the entrance exam. For example, in Viet Nam, the student who are about to enter high school must take three compulsory subjects such as maths, literature and English.

In addition, it is also worth metioning that knowledge from important subjects can help us have a higher chance of getting a job. I want to emphasize that knowledge of ingredients and food is not the criteria that companies require. To get hired, companies want employees have logical thinking and understanding, which are fostered from math and literature. In fact, students who focus on main subjects often have successful careers and stable incomes.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is not necessary for student to study the science of food and how to prepare it at school time.

In my opinion, I agree that school time should be used in learning important subjects instead of studying the science of food and how to prepare it.

 First of all, we need to acknowledge that student should focus on core subjects to get good results in exams. This is because those subjects can provide basic and advanced knowledge for students, which are important and necessary for them to pass key exams like those that grand entrance to colleges. For example, in Việt Nam, the student who are about to enter high school must take three compulsory subjects: Maths, literature and English, and preparing for these subjects well would take average of 30 hours a week for an entire year. 
 
 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that knowledge from important subjects can help us have a higher chance of getting a job. I want to emphasize that knowledge of ingredients and food is not the criteria that most companies require when they look to hire new employees, but instead they want people who have understanding in things like math, logic or languages. In fact, students who focus on main subjects often have successful careers and stable incomes.
 
 

In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is not necessary for student to study the science of food and how to prepare it at school time.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing old people to retire whenever they want will raising the rate of unemployment. This is because giving old people admissions to retire whenever they want means they could working longer therefore increase the competition in jobs and lead to the escalation of unemployment. For example, Korea in 1997 because of letting old people to keep working over their retirement age have pushed their whole country in the situation of job crisis that leads to thousands of young unimployers therefore cluttering the country. 

 

In addition, it is worth mentioning that allowing old people decide their retirements can slowdown the developing process of the company. I want to emphasize that nowadays many company tends to modernizing their systems therefore their employees have to be fast and know how to use the technologies which seems impossible for old people therefore elder people no longer suitable for jobs. In fact, many technology company have their retirements age at 45-50 in order to secure the quality off their employees which can dedicating to the raising of the company.

 

In conclusion, giving permission for the elder to choose whenever they retire will result in the raising in unemployment and slowdown the development of the company. For these reason, I strongly believe that this policy is taking a step back in our work platform. 

In my opinion, I firmly believe that letting older people to work until whatever age they want is a negative trend due to its drawbacks.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that allowing old people to work without an age limit will raise the rate of unemployment. This is because when old people could work longer, there will be increase in competition for jobs, which can lead to the unemployment among younger people. For example, after Korea removed its retirement age in 1997, many of its older worker chose to work well into their 80s, making it significantly harder for young university graduates to find employment. 

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that this policy can slowdown the developing process of the company. I want to emphasize that nowadays many companies prefer to modernize their systems therefore their employees have to be fast and know how to use the technologies, which is something very difficult to achieve for older workers. In fact, many technology companies have their retirements age at 45-50 in order to secure the quality of their employees who can dedicate to the improving of the company.

We can not deny the importance of studying about food and learn to prepare it, it is a reality skill which most people should have to make them more independent. What I want to emphasize is that  the knowledge about food and cooking skill are useful for students when they start leaving their parents and learn to live their own life, they can cook their own dishes when no parents or acquaintances nearby. In fact, without knowledge and cooking skill, many middle-aged people in the US prefect to buy overcooked food for their meals instead of buy fresh food and cook their own meals because they do not know anything about ingredients and how to turn it into a dish

That may be the true that learning about food is more necessary, however, we need to admit that the wide range in important subjects let students to work with many fields and environment easier, they do not worry about unemployment. In fact, a student learn well at math and foreign languages make them have skill in calculate data and read more information from other document of foreign enterprises, make them have advantage when they apply a job in fields like financial management. What I want to emphasize is that students focus completely in important subjects at school can help them get a good job with higher salary.

Moreover, we can not deny that learning important subjects at school can make many good people, this is chance that they can develop their countries. The explanation could be the fact that many people have high overage income from their job make the economy in their country grow, from that many foreign company find their countries to invest. What I want to emphasize is that not only does it make economy develop, it also help unemployed people have more chance to get a job.

In conclusion, learning important subject at school help students get more chance for a high income-job and it also contribute economy development. For these reason, I strongly agree that school should teach important subjects instead of the course of food.

Nowadays many paprents have started to request that schools introduce classes that teache students about food science and how to cooking. In my opinion, I strongly believe that introducing these subjects will produce many detrimental effects. 
 
 

Admittedly, we cannot deny that studying about food and learning to prepare it could make people more independent. What I want to emphasize is that the knowledge about food and cooking skill are useful for students when they start leaving their parents and learn to live their own life, because with it they can cook their own dishes when no parents or acquaintances are nearby. In fact, without knowledge and cooking skill, many middle-aged people in the US prefer to buy ready-made food for their meals instead of buying fresh ingredient and cook their own meals.
 
 

Cooking = learn at home 

 

This might be true, however, we need to admit that focusing on the wide range in important subjects like… can improve students’ chance of finding jobs after graduation. In fact, a student who is good at math and foreign languages can have skill in calculating data and processing more information from other document of foreign enterprises, which makes him or her have advantage when applying for a job in fields like financial management. What I want to emphasize is that most high paying job require people with a deep understanding of academic subjects, so focusing on them should be prioritized in students’ education. 
 
 

.
 
 

In conclusion, learning important subject at school help students get more chance for a high income-job and it also contribute economy development. For these reason, I strongly agree that school should teach important subjects instead of the course of food.

We need to acknowledge that spending money on treatment cannot be the long-term solution to people's problems. This is because health services and hospitals only have limited human resources and capacity, thus when an epidemic breaks out, it is difficult to cure all infected people. Besides that, the resident, who lack knowledge about the disease and don't have a healthy lifestyle, can get sick again or have the same disease. In contrast, if people are encouraged to lead a healthy lifestyle, they will have more chances to avoid disease and have better health. 

 Moreover, it is worth mentioning that encouraging a healthy lifestyle can significantly save the country's budget. The basis of this is the fact that promoting a healthy lifestyle costs little or no while the government has to pay a tremendous amount of money for treatment such as the salary of medical staff and necessary equipment, which makes the treatment more expensive. For example, the cost to treat tooth decay in Vietnam is 4 million due to expensive porcelain materials, while encouraging individuals to brush their teeth regularly and properly to have healthy teeth does not require government money. The point I want to emphasize is that the money saved can be used to improve people's lives.

To sum up, spending money on a healthy lifestyle not only helps people have better health but also significantly saves the national budget. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the government should spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle.

Traditionally, most governments tend to dedicate a large portion of their health budget to building hospitals and developing treatments for sick patients. However, in my opinion, I strongly support that it is more beneficial to encourage people to lead a healthy lifestyle so that diseases can be avoided in the first place.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that spending money on treatment cannot be the long-term solution to people's  health problems. This is because health services and hospitals only have limited human resources and capacity, thus when an epidemic breaks out, it would be difficult to cure all infected people. Besides that, the resident, who lack knowledge about the disease and don't have a healthy lifestyle, can also get sick more easily and become a burden for the medical system. In contrast, if people are encouraged to lead a healthy lifestyle, they will have more chances to avoid disease and have better health. 
 
 

 Moreover, it is worth mentioning that encouraging a healthy lifestyle can significantly lessen the stress on the country's budget. The basis of this is the fact that promoting a healthy lifestyle costs little or nothing while the government has to pay a tremendous amount of money for treatment such as the salary of medical staff and necessary equipment, which makes the treatment more expensive. For example, the cost to treat tooth decay in Vietnam is 4 million due to expensive porcelain materials, while encouraging individuals to brush their teeth regularly and properly to have healthy teeth can be incorporated into the education system at little to no cost. What we have to realize is that is that the money saved can be used to improve people's lives in other way, such as…or even improving medical facilities to treat more dangerous diseases.
 
 

To sum up, spending money on a healthy lifestyle not only helps people have better health but also significantly saves the national budget. For these reasons, I strongly believe that the government should spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle.

 

First of all, promoting healthy lifestyle can actually prevent people from many diseases. The basis of this is the fact since most of the bad habits are root causes of diseases, having healthy lifestyle means that we can be healthier and stay away from many chronic health problems. For example, a research in England shows that more than 70% people having a habit of using phone more than 3 hours a day- a very common habit- suffer from problems like back pain, weight gain and sleep deprivation. What I want to emphasize is that when there are less people suffering from the common diseases, the burden on budget money for curing can also be decreased.

 

In addition, I advocate that spending on encouraging healthy living is much cheaper than treatment. The explanation for this is the fact that  the wide addaption of policies can solve the root of the problems, create long-term effects instead of maintaining the treatment for many years. As a matter of fact, in 2010, the cost of heart diseases- leading cause of death in the US- was about more than 450 million dollars, including fees of hospital charges, medicine and surgery. Conversly, with the tremendous effort of the government in decrease the obesity: educate children about nutrition of food, limit unhealthy food and acohol in people’s meals; the money spending for those treatment decreased to 200 billion dollars in 2018. 

 

To sum up, priotizing to promote healthy lifestyle for citizens not only can prevent people from diseases but also can save the  public money. For those reasons, I think that this policy should be enhanced in order to improve awareness of people in protecting health, build a healthy society.

Some people think that the budget should be utilised to focus on treatment of people who are ill. However, from my point of view, I advocate that it is much better to spend public money for improving people’s lifestyle.

 

First of all, we have to acknowledge that promoting healthy lifestyle can actually protect people from many diseases. The basis of this is the fact that most of the bad habits are root causes of diseases, so having healthy lifestyle means that we can be healthier and stay away from many chronic health problems. For example, a research in England shows that more than 70% people who have a habit of using phone more than 3 hours a day suffer from problems like back pain, weight gain and sleep deprivation, and these problems can be much improved by simply cutting down 30 minutes a day on the phone. What I want to emphasize is that when the entire public can live more healthily, their quality of life will also be much improved, which can create an overall more satisfied society.

 

In addition, I advocate that spending on encouraging healthy living is much cheaper than treatment. The explanation for this is the fact that because the wide addaption of healthy lifestyle can solve the root of may medical problems, it can create long-term health benefit for the entire public that costs the government next to nothing to maintain. As a matter of fact, in 2010, the cost of heart diseases- leading cause of death in the US- amounted to hundreds of million of dollars, including fees of hospital charges, medicine and surgery. Since then the US have focused more of its effort on educating children about nutrition of food, limit unhealthy food and acohol in people’s meals, and as a result the money spending for those treatment decreased by about half in 2018. 

 

To sum up, priotizing to promote healthy lifestyle for citizens not only can prevent people from diseases but also can save the  public money. For those reasons, I think that this policy should be enhanced in order to improve awareness of people in protecting health, build a healthy society.

 

First of all, we need to admit that prevention is almost always more effective than treatments for most diseases.  For example, a baby will be encouraged to be vaccinated at an early age to prevent myriads of infectious diseases like hepatitis B, Measles, or Rubella instead of waiting for the disease to happen to be treated. The point that I want to emphasize is the fact that prevention is the preparation to cope with infirmities and healing is solving problems when we are sick but it takes a lot of money and time, thus countries should invest in ameliorating citizens' well-being to avoid diseases.  Moreover, when we are already ill, our sickness not only affects our health but also can spread to people around us, so focusing on prevention is a much more logical solution.

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle can help to decrease the burden of the national budget. The explanation for this is the fact that encouraging people to have healthy lives costs little while treatment require a tremendous amount of money on things like importing drugs or foreign medical equipment with high technology. 

 

In a nutshell, encouraging a healthy lifestyle is not only better than inventing a cure but also can significantly lessen the stress of the nation's budget. For these reasons, I strongly believe that government should invest in promoting a healthy lifestyle.

 

We need to admit that working might open the door for senior citizens to be healthier. This is because the older they become, the less exercise they could do, and the elderly will be weaker by the time, thus forcing their brain and body to operate to prevent illnesses such as heart disease, or losing memory. As a matter of fact, Japan is one of the highest life expectancies because their elderly still do light works as guardians, cook for the companies or arts and crafts instead of staying at home. 

 

In addition, we need to acknowledge that allowing the old people to work will help them have more satisfied in their lives. As far as I know, the elderly who choose to cook in the companies are bored, therefore not only do they want to make a budget, they also would like to have others to talk with. The basis of this is the fact that the old people cannot spend as much time as they want with their grandchildren, because they all go to work and school all day, or even weekends, therefore the elderly will feel alone or depressed. I want to emphasize that working can help senior citizens improve their health, especially their mental conditions.

 

In conclusion, besides working can help the elderly be healthier, it can open the door for them to have more enjoyable. For these reasons, I strongly believe the advantage of this trend will outweigh its disadvantage.

First and foremost, there is no denying that supporting ill patients is more pressing and practical than allocating substantial sums for dissemination of healthy lifestyles. This is because morbidity is often linked with exorbitant medical bills and serious destruction of labour power, which tend to induce impoverishment and death. In particular, according to a myriad of in-depth surveys, inability to afford medications is one of the main reasons why diseases such as cancer, dementia or cirrhosis bear a real risk of fatality. Obviously, while there are numerous needy patients relying on social welfare to seize a chance of surviving, drawing on the already-limited fund to foster sensible ways of living is absolutely a colossal waste.  

More appreciably, we have to acknowledge that subsidizing treatments of ill patients could profoundly facilitate good living practices. In particular, countries having the highest life expectancy such as Japan or Australia are also those providing the greatest monetary assistance to the people developing severe illness. The explanation for this is that a healthy lifestyle would only prevail when every citizen in communities has owned similar physical and psychological resources. It has been proven that mortality rate mostly depends on ability to afford hospital fees, therefore undoubtedly, alleviating patients' monetary burden will considerably reduce the number of fatalities, which is likely to bring about an equilibrium in health among a society's residents. 

In conclusion, not only is fiscal support for ill people a more urgent expense, it also helps foster health - balanced lifestyles in society. For these reasons, I firmly believe that policies granting people financial assistance should be fully implemented.

Nowadays, numerous countries are sponsoring large programmes aiming for better health awareness among citizens. However, as far as I am concerned, it would be a much more appropriate policy if governments financed the therapies of those suffering from physical or mental disorders.

 

First and foremost, there is no denying that supporting ill patients is more urgent and practical than allocating substantial sums for the promotion of healthy lifestyles. This is because morbidity is often linked with exorbitant medical bills and serious destruction of labour power, which tend to cause poverty and death. In particular, many researches have proven that inability to afford medications is one of the main reasons why diseases such as cancer, dementia or cirrhosis bear a real risk of fatality. Obviously, while there are numerous needy patients relying on social welfare to seize a chance of surviving, drawing on the already-limited fund to foster sensible ways of living is absolutely a colossal waste.  

 

In conclusion, not only is fiscal support for ill people a more urgent expense, it also helps foster health - balanced lifestyles in society. For these reasons, I firmly believe that policies granting people financial assistance should be fully implemented.

Firstly, we need to admit that importing food can supply new ingredients that enrich the food sources for the citizens. As a matter of fact, many hot and wet countries like Vietnam can hardly grow foods that only live in cold parts of the world. Therefore, importing food from the opposite weather is the only way that people in Vietnam can have and use them in each meal.

More importantly, there is no denying that we can store the imported food in order that we can use them if the supplying of the tradition one is not enough. The explanation for this could be the fact that we cannot prevent the occurrence of natural phenomena that negatively affect our growth of food. For instance, the crop cannot harvest on schedule due to the bad weather like droughts, flood or storm, and thus people must import the food from the different countries that can meet the requirements to all people. What I want to emphasize is that the more imported food we can store, the more chance of supplying enough food to everyone.

In conclusion, not only does the imported food help people have enough food to supply to everyone, but it also creates new sources of food for the residents in each meal. For those reasons, I claim that the authorities should encourage to import new food from the other cultures 

Nowadays, most countries buy food and ingredients from the others. From my point of view, I firmly believe that those countries can get several benefits when they encourage this development.

 

Firstly, we need to admit that importing food can supply new ingredients that enrich the food sources for the citizens. As a matter of fact, many hot and humid countries like Vietnam can hardly grow foods like….., which can only be only cultivated in cold parts of the world. Therefore, importing food from the opposite weather is the only way that people in Vietnam can have and use them in each meal.

 

More importantly, there is no denying that we can store the imported food in order to use if local supply is not enough. The explanation for this could be the fact that we cannot prevent the occurrence of natural phenomena that negatively affect our growth of food, therefore having additional sources of nutrition is critical in these circumstances. What I want to emphasize is that the more imported food we can store, the more chance of supplying enough food to everyone.

 

In conclusion, not only does the imported food help people have enough food to supply to everyone, but it also creates new sources of food for the residents in each meal. For those reasons, I strongly believe that the authorities should encourage to import new food from the other cultures

First and foremost, there is no denying that granting financial aid for ill patients is far more urgent and practical than squandering this money on fostering healthy lifestyles. This is because morbidity is significantly associated with exorbitant hospital bills, serious impairments and fatal medical sequels, all of which causing poverty and death. In particular, a myriad of surveys has conclusively demonstrated that one of the principal reasons why diseases such as cancer, dementia or cirrhosis bear a real risk of fatality is due to people' inability to afford necessary fees. Obviously, while there are innumerable needy patients relying on social welfare to seize a chance of surviving, drawing on the already-limited fund to foster sensible ways of living is absolutely a colossal waste.

More appreciably, we have to acknowledge that governments are one of the few forces that are capable of subsidizing the costly treatments of the ill, whereas countless organizations whose chief purpose is encouraging a health-balanced life have been found. In particular, to name the most prominent associations working on healthy communities, there are AARP Foundation, AASA, Alliance for a Healthier Generation or AFSCME, yet regardless of the national monetary assistance, only The HealthWell Foundation and NAFC prevail as associations providing monetary assistance to people contracting with deadly diseases. This could be accounted for by the fact that curing severe maladies is so extortionate that only governments could barely afford. Besides that, when sensible living practices are being promoted effectively by a plethora of organizations, governments’ concentration on this is undoubtedly unworthy and needless.

In conclusion, not only is fiscal support for ill people a crucial expense, it also makes the best use of the domestic budget. For these reasons, I firmly believe that policies granting people financial assistance should be fully implemented.

In addition, it is worth mentioning that learning science of food not only help students have healthy diet, but also help them how to cook delicious meals every days. I want to emphasize that cooking is not just a survival skill to live independently, it is also a good point in the eyes of others. As a matter of fact, teenagers who can cook well will be compliment praised from adults and have more sympathy from them.

In conclusion, for those reasons, I strongly believe that science of foods and how to prepare it should be learned with academic subjects.

In my opinion, I firmly support the idea that the science of foods and how to prepare it should be included in school curriculum .

 

 First of all, we need to acknowledge that cooking is one of many skills to help students live independently. This is beacuse teenagers tend to depend on their parents in their daily life and without learning how to cool, they would not be able to control what they are eating, which means it will be difficult for them to live on their own. As a matter of fact, when we know how to cook, we would be able to create healthy meal for ourselves and live without relying on expensive and unhealthy junk food. 

 

 

In conclusion, for those reasons, I strongly believe that science of foods and how to prepare it should be learned with academic subjects.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that promoting a healthy lifestyle can significantly helps prevent disease. I want to emphasize that most diseases are caused by unhealthy lifestyles and bad habits, so they can be prevented if we change those bad habits into a healthier behaviors. As a matter of fact, the habit of eating fast food and greasy food is the cause of an increased risk of obesity, blood fats and diabetes, but all of these diseases can be prevented by simply switching to a healthier, more balanced diet. 

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that the cost of treating people who are already sick is often far greater than the amount spent promoting healthy lifestyles. This is because the amount of money that needs to be spent to treat a disease is very large, which includes a lot of mandatory expenses such as medicine, medical examination or hospitalization, while encouraging a healthy lifestyle among citizens often cost little or nothing at all. 

Evidence: cost of treating teeth cavity vs teaching children how to brush their teeth.

 

In conclusion, promoting a healthy lifestyle not only helps us to prevent disease and improve our health, but it can also save us a great deal of money on cures. For those reasons, I believe the government should spend public money to encourage people healthy daily life.

Firstly, some people think that people who are already ill should be take care more; this will help more people alive. The explanation for this could be the fact that spending public money into this sector can allow more people to have more medicine, vaccine and medical facility to heal and prevent diseases.in fact, many sources of money from many supporters have been transfer to buy medicine and build hospital in Africa, this has saved many people in there. What I want to emphasize is that more ways to treat and prevent the diseases, more people can be saved

That may be true, however, we can not admit that spending money on preventive measure contribute people to get a better public health. This is because many diseases come more and more dangerous, treatment might not be able to keep up people’s health, sometimes it can make their health get worse. For instance, lungs disease come from smog and waste from gasoline transport; in Singapore they increase vehicle tax and extend public transports to reduce air pollution, decrease the amount of people who get lungs diseases. 

Moreover, there is no denying that investing money to contribute a healthier lifestyle for people, make them have a better health in general. As a matter of fact, to promote a healthy lifestyle for citizens, the government have to build more place that people can do more exercises and play which not only make them have a better health, it also help them to communicate more with people around or rest after working. I want to emphasize that spend public money to upgrade those places make citizens have a fresher and more comfortable environment to live.

In conclusion, although many people can be saved if the government spend money on treatment for diseases but it is more necessary that the government should invest on building and growing more play ground for people. For these reason, I completely agree with the idea is spending public money on society health 

Traditionally, most nations have the tendency to priority developling treatments for those who are ill when planning their budget. However, from my point of view, I strongly believe that the government should spend more on promoting a healthy lifestyle for citizens.

 

Firstly, some people think that people who are already ill should be take care of more because this will help keep more people alive. The explanation for this could be the fact that spending public money into this sector can allow more people to have access to better medicine, vaccine and medical facility to heal and prevent diseases. In fact, various sources of money from many sponsors / philanthropists have been raised to buy medicine and build hospital in Africa, which has saved many people there. 

 

Nevertheless, we cannot deny that spending money on preventive measure can contribute more significantly to improving public health. This is because treatment are not always the most effective method to deal with diseases, and many can be more effectively dealt with by preventing the root causes. Rewrite evidence 

 

Moreover, there is no denying that investing money to encourage a healthier lifestyle for people can allow them to have better health in general. As a matter of fact, to promote a healthy lifestyle for citizens, the government have to build more places where people can do more exercises and play, which not only make them healthier but also help them to communicate more with people around or rest after working. I want to emphasize that spend public money to upgrade those places make citizens have a fresher and more comfortable environment to live.

 

In conclusion, although many people can be saved if the government spend money on treatment for diseases, it is more necessary that the government should invest on building and growing more play ground for people. For these reason, I completely agree with the idea is spending public money on society health 

 

First of all, the trend of importing food from many countries in the world will significantly harm the environment. This is because the process of transportation takes an unreplaceable role in importing, however it also creates a tremendous amount of detrimental wastes that affect the environment directly. In fact, only the process of importing food through sea have dump tons of harmful matters to the sea such as petroleum and leads which poisoning the water therefore destroy the sea environment.

 

In addition, the trend of importing food from many countries will lead to the decrease of the country economy. I want to emphasize that the rising in importing food will lead to the enhance the competition with the local foodstuff which slow down the local food industry therefore significantly harm the economy. As a matter of fact, in many supermarkets in Vietnam, it is easy to find the imported fruits but difficult to buy the local fruits, which show us that the local foodstuff is being prevailed by the importing food in its own market.

 

In conclusion, importing food make the country economy go down and destroy our environment. For this reason, I firmly believe that the trend of imported food is a step back in our development

In my opinion, I strongly believe that importing food is a negative development due to its bad impact to the economy and environment.

 

First of all, we canno deny that the trend of importing food from many countries in the world will significantly harm the environment. This is because the process of transportation takes an irreplaceable role in importing, however it also creates a tremendous amount of detrimental wastes that affect the environment directly. In fact, only the process of importing food through sea cause millions of tons of harmful matters such as petroleum and leads to de dumped into the sea every year, poisoning the water and destroying the sea environment.

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that the trend of importing food from many countries will lead to a decrease of the country economy. I want to emphasize that the rise in importing food will lead to more intense competition for the local food producer, which can slow down the local food industry  and therefore significantly harming the economy. As a matter of fact, in many supermarkets in Vietnam, it is easy to find the imported fruits but difficult to buy the local fruits, which show us that the local foodstuff is being taken over by imported food in its own market.

 

In conclusion, importing food make the country economy go down and destroy our environment. For this reason, I firmly believe that the trend of imported food is a step back in our development

First of all, we need to acknowledge that studying the science of food and how to prepare it will make students less focused on learning core subjects. This is because when student learn about the food, they have to practice and do it over and over again, leaving them not enough time for core subjects, therefore they will feel stress and pressure because they don't understand the lessons. In fact, it is very difficult to balance between studying the main subjects and learning to cook.

 

In addition, it is also worth metioning that having a lesson about food will waste time at school. I want to emphasize that the time at school should study main subjects to provide basic and advanced knowledge for students, which are important and necessary for them to pass key exams like those that grand entrance to colleges. For example, in Việt Nam, the student who are about to enter high school must take three compulsory subjects: Maths, Literature and English, and preparing for these subjects well would take average of 30 hours a week for an entire year. 

 In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is not necessary for student to study the science of food and how to prepare it at school time.

In my opinion, I agree that school time should be used for learning important subjects instead of study the science of food and how to prepare it.

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that studying the science of food and how to prepare it will make students less focused on learning core subjects. This is because when student learn about the food, they have to practice and do it over and over again, leaving them not enough time for core subjects, therefore they will feel stress and pressure because they don't understand the lessons. In fact, in my sister’s chool….

 

 

 In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is not necessary for student to study the science of food and how to prepare it at school time.

First of all, we need to acknowledge that spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle help people avoid a host of health problems. This is because all people become fully convinced of the importance of choosing healthy diets, they will start to adopt such a healthy lifestyle, limit stomach and heart disease. In fact, many people in modern society are significantly affected by the increasing advertising of junk food nearly every where and become lazy to eat vegetables so they are prone to obesity.

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle can help us reduce the financial burden. I want to emphasize that people don’t understand about disease with high mortality, the rates for hospitalisation will increased, which can often place a heavy burden on patients’ families and on society as a whole. As a matter of fact, there are a number of incurable disease, such as HIV, AIDS and many from of cancer often don’t have a cure but there are several ways to maintain life at very high cost.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that governmental money should be spent on the promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill.

In my opinion, I agree that government money should be spent on the promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness rather than on treatment of people who are already ill. 

 

First of all, we need to acknowledge that spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle helps people avoid a myriad of health problems. In fact, many people in modern society are significantly affected by the increasing advertising of junk food nearly every where and become lazy to eat vegetables so they are prone to obesity.Therefore, when people become fully convinced of the importance of choosing healthy diets, they will start to adopt such a healthy lifestyle, limit stomach and heart disease. 

Explain : most diseases = caused by bad lifestyle => improve in life style => reduce disease

Evidence: obesity = junk food => healthy diet = take care of obesity. 

 

In addition, it is also worth mentioning that spending public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle can help us significantly reduce the financial burden of the government. 

Explain: treatment = more expensive than prevention => healthy lifestyle = less hospitalization = less expense

 

 

In conclusion, I firmly believe that governmental money should be spent on the promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill.

 

 First of all, we need to acknowledge that cooking is one of many skills to help students live healthily. This is beacuse teenagers tend to depend on their parents in their daily life and without learning how to cook, they would not be able to control what they are eating, which means it will be difficult for them to live on their own. As a matter of fact, when we know how to cook, we would be able to create healthy meal for ourselves and live without relying on expensive and unhealthy junk food. 

 

In addition, It worth metioning that learning cooking skills can help students be more independent. I want to emphasize that cooking is students who have this essential skill,   can adapt to the environment without food supply. As the matter of fact, some freshmen can't live independently because they focus too much on academic subjects without knowing how to cook.

 

In conclusion, for those reasons, I strongly believe that science of foods and how to prepare it should be learned with academic subjects.