9AF Essay Critiques by

Juliana Céspedes

2021-01-14 15:30:06 UTC

I like this essay as is very complete using many sources to think and compare the information. He used the right words to express the two points of view of Robespierre. Eventhough he was a little bit more interested in the good things Robespierre has,
he doesn´t leave behind the wrong decisions Robespierre made.

Mafe Ferreira

2021-01-14 15:31:12 UTC

this essay was very complete and shows the perspective that people could have about Robespierre. also, use understandable grammar and had the right words to explain it. I really like that he use different sources to write the essay, also having in mind his own point of view. He focus on the good things that Robespierre did, but also explain the bad things.

duqueana — 2021-01-14 15:37:05 UTC

I really like this essay because they show the both perspectives that people could have about him, like when in the essay said "depraved monster of small talent" and latter in the text it said "Maximilian Robespierre was a man with good intentions" and i really like that because with that both points of view we can get a better comparison and understand more

Maria del Mar Serna

sernamaria1 — 2021-01-14 15:38:29 UTC

I think this essay is very good and complete, it shows both sides of the story the good one and the bad one, it has both points of view and at the end it really explains well the author's own opinion based on the facts they show. Also, the grammar of this essay is very good the author found the right words to explain the sources. This essay in general is pretty well done and honestly it was interesting to read about other people's opinion.

Susana Ospina P

susiospa1234 — 2021-01-14 15:40:23 UTC

In this argument the author makes good use of the sources in terms of their order and distribution, but they all talked about the same topic, it would have been better if most of the sources were different to give more variety to the text, although what he or she was talking about Robespierre did not show him as a good leader and damaged his image, I am totally agree with their point of view and with what he wanted to express, in addition the text was very well written and supported.

Juanita Valencia Upegui

valenciajuanita — 2021-01-14 15:43:47 UTC

In this essay we can distinguish the point of view the author is exposing by giving us details about how different people in the same country (France) saw him. The writer brings up Robespierre's past, creating an instant empathy and sorrow for him. Great way of citing quotes are used in this narration, the author explains his/her ideas based on the different sources. However, the author uses informal language and expressions that make the seriousness required to speak about this all-important subject go unnoticed. The writer shows a wide quantity of incorrect actions Robespierre did, but she/he do not exposes correct actions he had, focusing only on their point of view and making baseless his/her last argument. Even though the author made mistakes when writing, this is an enjoyable essay that I had no trouble reading.

Maria Paulina Vargas Lopera

2021-01-14 15:44:24 UTC

I consider that the author gave a great balance to each part of the essay and locating the sources in a strategic way makes the person who reads it intuit in a more constant way what were the thoughts of the writer to Robiesperre, also provides you with the necessary information to feel located while you read it.

Maria del Mar Serna

sernamaria1 — 2021-01-14 15:48:26 UTC

In this essay the author showed his opinion based on all the sources and other people's opinion, but also wrote other sides of the story and different point of views, showing not everyone had the same thoughts about Robespierre. I think the essay is very well written and even though the essay is shorter than other essays I've read, it was very complete and straight to the point, which is something good. His thoughts are also well explained and it was all based on facts.

duqueana — 2021-01-14 15:48:49 UTC

I really like this essay because in it we can see more thoroughly how French people feel about Robespierre and it convinces us that he could a bad person and inform us very good of how much hurt he make for the french village

Alejandra López F

lopezalejandra — 2021-01-14 15:48:50 UTC

This essay is very complete, has a very good structure and it can be said that it narrates the facts and gives us at the same time hes point of view.
He knows how to use the sources given, giving them a good explanation and argumentation, although he has several grammatical errors, but it does not take away from it how good it is and the great potential it has.

Juliana Céspedes

2021-01-14 15:51:50 UTC

In this essay we can see that the author´s point of view is Robespierre´s terrific ideas and actions that make him not a hero. He used very sophisticated and powerful words to describe how bad Robespierre was, and those words were very wise to describe his bad actions. But, I feel that he lacked information about good things Robespierre did, even though they were less good things than bad things, I feel that in this essay he was more interested in the bad things Robespierre did.

Sara Urbina Aramendiz

urbinasara — 2021-01-14 15:52:11 UTC

After reading this essay, I noticed it was a very well written report. I found interesting and entertaining to read it, because throughout the paragraphs it contains, you can notice the writer defending and at the same time attacking both the hero and the monster Robespierre was. The person who wrote this essay, express in an incredibly clear way his/her point of view about the actions, the decisions and the goals Robespierre took and achieved in his life. the owner of this excellent work, recognize Maximilien as a good leader and a humble person, but she/he doesn't deny the atrocities and the negative things this man did. To conclude, i could say this is one of the best reports i've read, i really liked how the author admits the promising future Robespierre gave to his country, but also let us know he chose the wrong methods to achieve it.

Luciana Vergara L. This assay was well written, the author showed both sides of the story and made it very easy to understand it, and understand his point of view, which was that Robespierre was a great leader, with maybe the best ideas for the country, but with the worst ways for trying to make them happen. He/she made really clear that Robespierre cannot be classified as a bad nor good person, but just a human being, like everybody else. The author used well the quoting and he/she never admitted he was a angel or devil instead what he or she did was that told us how Robespierre was a person with very good and outstanding ideas for the common good of society but he used the wrong methods and made bad decisions. His / her way of expressing its very understandable and clear and uses easy vocabulary which makes the essay easier to comprend.

vergaraluciana — 2021-01-14 15:53:34 UTC

duqueana — 2021-01-14 15:53:38 UTC

This essay is super easy to read and the information is pretty clear, I in my point of view like it because they are telling what I think about Robespierre and that is that he have good intentions but he take really bad decisions, actually the way that the author use to writte the essay is super good and complete

Susana Ospina P

susiospa1234 — 2021-01-14 16:00:56 UTC

I really liked this essay, since it was very well supported, everything in it had coherence, I thought it was excellent the way the author wrote it, because they asks questions during the text and that makes you interested in reading more and getting your own point of view. I thought it was very well done that he or she used different sources to not only show one side of Robespierre's coin, showing that he had good intentions but that they led him to be the villain of the story as he caused many wrongful deaths .

Maria Paulina Vargas Lopera

2021-01-14 16:02:54 UTC

I really enjoyed reading this essay as it generates great thoughts about each source and makes you reconsider the way you see it, what I think is really impressive, I strongly believe that the author explains what he thinks in a powerful way but is not based simply In that, also in the sources and the content, which are very complete, I would have liked the writer to express the facts in a more passive way, however, it is an excellent essay.

María José Guerrero Cortés

2021-01-14 16:03:23 UTC

This essay has a good writing, and its structure is well done, the author's way of citing is peculiar and interesting because it makes the idea understood without having to show the source, but specifying them. He makes his point of view understood in an explicit way.
An observation in the argument that the author makes with respect to the source D, the idea can be understood in a way that if we review well it does not relate to much to the concept of the source. but with respect to the other points of view, he made me understand the reason for his behavior and although he has more information on Robespierre's bad behavior, it seems to me that it is a fair article, unbiased, with respect to what he was.
It is a very good essay!

Maria del Mar Serna

sernamaria1 — 2021-01-14 16:04:26 UTC

I think this is one of my favorite essays, it really shows both sides of how Robespierre was, the author's point of view about Robespierre were really well executed and showed the author didn't really think he was a saint but he wasn't a monster either. (As the title says) It was really well written and the choice of words were also good. And I honestly think the title explains really well Robespierre, he had good intentions but the way he wanted to achieve some things were really bad, he wanted to punish bad people but ended being paranoic and thinking everyone is a traitor which led to killing innocent people and becoming a “monster”

Luciana Vergara L. This is a really well written and understandable essay it show us what Robespierre truly was, the author showed us both sides of Robespierre and the awful things he did but the good ideas and ideals he had. This report is so entertaining and interesting, I really like they way he/she used the quotes and made them so understandable. this author defend and attack both sides. I understand his/her point of view which he/she made it really clear throughout the report and he/she expressed so good and clear all the information and used a clean and so good vocabulary.

vergaraluciana — 2021-01-14 16:04:36 UTC

Isabel Sofia Sánchez A

sanchezisabel — 2021-01-14 16:07:44 UTC

I think this essay is very good because the author knows that Robespierre did bad things, but despite this, he not only focuses on them, he also highlights the things that are good in some way. In addition, the author was very clear, used the correct words, and was not too complicated to explain. He also used the sources in a good way and managed to combine them with the text so that his ideas make more sense.

Ana Maria Ortiz Hernandez

2006anaortizh — 2021-01-14 16:08:09 UTC

In this essay I can see that the author is giving us a short description about how was Robespierre, and I also can see the opinion of not just the author but also the opinion of different people, I think that that is good because now we have the opinions, ideas and different points of view of more people, but I would liked to see the author’s opinion more extensive, I also would liked him to use more sources, but the essay itself is well written except the name of Robespierre that the author lacked the letter “r” on the name, but is well understood, and the author’s idea is clear.

Susana Ospina P

susiospa1234 — 2021-01-14 16:10:59 UTC

Although this text shows Robespierre as someone dismissed and violent, I loved it because the author said what he really thought and did not let himself be blinded by what other people thought, it was very well supported since it shows the beginnings of Robespierre and what take him to be that way, it shows us that every villain was good first but the society turn they into monster with pain and sadness inside they although this does not justify what he did.

Juliana Céspedes

2021-01-14 16:11:19 UTC

I was very interested in this essay, especially in his name because it was very creative, so I thought that if the tittle is like this, the essay would be even better. And, I was correct, this essay shows both sides of Robespierre actions and the words the author used were very clear and specific. He made a very great balance about both things, using sources and questions for you to stop answered them and keeping reading it.

Maria Paulina Vargas Lopera

2021-01-14 21:01:38 UTC

This essay seemed concrete to me in a very effective way on both sides, she gave great support to each of the sources and was able to add the perfect touch to what she thought, which in my opinion transforms the essay into something relatively very serene and enjoyable to read, it gives a balance to each side in a way that lets the reader decide for himself what he thinks about it, also the writing is indisputably good and organized.

Sofia Jaramillo

jaramillosofia — 2021-01-15 18:48:40 UTC

In this essay the author used many of the sources to explain and describe very well the bad and terrible things that Robespierre did. He or she used specific words that describe all those bad things very well. But I think the essay is not balanced, because were missing more good things that Robespierre did.

Sara Urbina Aramendiz

urbinasara — 2021-01-15 18:50:45 UTC

At the moment I finished appreciating this wonderful essay, I realized how much I had liked it. The way this report attracted me to continue reading it, was just extraordinary. It caught my attention in many different ways. I was amazed by the splendid structure found in this argument, as well as the author’s unique way of expressing his/her judgment. I really liked the form in which the person who wrote it supports both points of view; how she/he accept and respect both ways of seeing this recognized leader, illustrating the black marks in his life, but never forgetting about the white ones, comparing it with such a great simbol as it is the yin and yang, worthy of a figure like Robespierre. But what really astonished and wondered me, was the really great quantity and quality of arguments and sources the writer provided to us, helping us to understand his/her point of view, and at the same time persuading and inviting us to agree or share the opinion expressed. The author of this essay is an amazing writer, not only for the way he/she states that our actions are the ones that define us, but also how she/he values the opposite side of his/her thoughts, never discarding the importance of both sides of a story, nor the two ways of judging a person. There is good in all evil.

Ana Maria Ortiz Hernandez

2006anaortizh — 2021-01-15 18:51:44 UTC

In my point of view the argument is very good written, because the author use coherent words that makes the readers to understand what he or she is trying to explain us, also the sources were use very good, because the author took the idea of them and explain us what she or he was understanding, but the author didn’t used to many sources so it would be better if she or he had used more because with more ides we will be able to now a little more about what was her or his point of view about the theme but anyway, it is completed and understandable.

María José Guerrero Cortés

maryjosepguerrero — 2021-01-15 18:52:27 UTC

This essay has a correct structure, the grammar is good, and the author's ideas can be understood in a very clear way, the sources are well cited and although it doesn't count as a mistake, but as an observation to improve the reliability of the essay to those who read it, in an argument it was possible to increase a source that would support his/her idea much better. But with respect to the essay in general, I found it very interesting and although it is explicit that the author doesn't support the idea that Robespierre was a hero, to demonstrate his point of view he/she explains this in a way unbiased and fairly, maybe could be specify a little more about the good ideas people had, but...
I find this to be a remarkable essay!

Ana Maria Ortiz Hernandez

2006anaortizh — 2021-01-15 18:53:55 UTC

The author of this essay made his idea very understandable, by having a good use of the different sources, also by explaining his ideas and in a detail way, also the author gave us different phrases of the sources, and he or she explain them to us, the language and the form of writing was very clear and understandable, I just think that she or he could used more sources to point good thing about Robespierre, I now that he wasn’t a good person, but the author just focused on the bad things he did, although the essay is good.

Maria camila jaramillo

jaramillomaria — 2021-01-15 18:54:24 UTC

in this essayi like how the author is telling that robespierre was a good man but the way that he said it make him look more like a villian. i can see in this essay that the author knew how to use good all the sources, and make us see the perspectives that the people had of robespierre that he was a good person but he didnt know how to exprees it well so make him look like a bad person, a villian.

Luciana Vergara L.

vergaraluciana — 2021-01-15 18:55:13 UTC

This essay name really attracted me to read which is something important and great cause you can assume that the report is good. So what I saw in this essay is that the person is focusing in the wrong and terrible things Robespierre did the bad decisions he made and his bad methods, but he also gave us to understand that the cause of his actions could be His way of raising and the absence of parents. I really liked what he/she wrote because it gives a clearer reason for all his bad actions. This essay was brief but very complete and I liked the way the author wanted to convey his point of view to us, very well and very clearly. Another aspect that I liked was that he/she used small paragraphs with very complete and clear information with makes it more entertaining and understandable.

María José Guerrero Cortés

maryjosepguerrero — 2021-01-15 18:58:09 UTC

The way in which this essay begins seems to me out of the ordinary and original, it makes the reader to be more interested in reading. Its structure is well done, it can be seen that the author wants to create a deeper meaning of reasoning. Some observations are that at the time of citing the sentences, the author put quotation marks around his/her own argument, which makes to refer at the fact that the source from which he/she is based says that, it is a small mistake, but it doesn’t mean that it is not a marvelous essay. I liked that while he/she made clear his/her ideas of what he/she thought of Robespierre, he/she showed the points of view of the people who supported him by making his/hers essay balanced, unbiased, and very fair. I could also notice that the author used a lot of hateful words towards Robespierre, this is not bad, I just would like to highlight it, but ...
I found this essay very interesting, unusual, and fabulous!

Maria Camila Jaramillo

jaramillomaria — 2021-01-15 18:59:01 UTC

In this essay the author let us see that robespierre had such a big position and a lot of power but robespierre didnt have the knowledge of how handle it. the author of this essay also make a good and so complete job writting it, it has a good source and it easy to understand, also a good vocabulary on it.

Maria Camila Jaramillo

jaramillomaria — 2021-01-15 19:02:34 UTC

In this essay i loved how the author put on his/her own point of view, that its so important for us, thaat we can know that an opinion not a fact, not something that its sure, that its something that the author thinks author all the sources that he/she had for making this argument also this essay has a great distribution, that dont let that the reader get lost or bored.This essay has a good support of ideas totally correct in each of the paragraphs

Alejandra López F

lopezalejandra — 2021-01-15 19:03:20 UTC

This essay is very good, it has a very good composition, grammar and context.
shows us the good side of Robespierre, trying to explain his actions in itself shows us the two sides of Robespierre, but I personally could realize that he was in favor of the good side of Robiesperre trying to give us the message that he was a good man who had made bad decisions
The author knew how to express something that is very good, he also knew how to use sources in a good way, trying to explain them and give them context

Martina Prats González

martipratsg — 2021-01-15 19:06:07 UTC

This eassay is very interesting and very complete i really like that hi use like Many sources and the words that they use are like very complete , the vocabulary are in a very good writting, i really like robespierre decisions and Thinking.

Sofia Jaramillo

jaramillosofia — 2021-01-15 19:06:55 UTC

In my opinion this essay was so complete, he includes the two points of view: the good and bad things that Robespierre did. The author used so good the sources to explain all the information in this essay, it was easy to understand, it was very clear, it was organized, and don’t have spelling mistakes.

Also, the author expresses very well his or her point of view.

Juanita Valencia Upegui

valenciajuanita — 2021-01-15 19:09:35 UTC

What should you expect from a two paragraph article that labels a powerful person as “a hero and a perverted failure “ ? When reading this essay, the first thing that caught my attention was the formal language employed by the author, making it effortless to read and adding a great detail. The writer upholds his/her opinion by using facts; this gives credibility and develops curiosity about what to find next. We can find both points of view in this short and concise article that traps your attention from the beginning. However, I would have enjoyed more facts about why Robespierre failed in his mission of becoming "a man of good intentions".

Isabel Sofia Sanchez A.

sanchezisabel — 2021-01-15 19:13:59 UTC

For me this essay is very good, his ideas were understood in a simple way, the few sources that the author used, gave his point of view, he/she also managed to connect them to the text in such a way that his opinion could be better understood. Although the use of sources was little and it would have been clearer if the author had put a few more, despite this it is possible to understand what he/she means. The words he/she used to write the essay seemed very clear to me and fit very well with what he wanted to imply.

Martina Prats González

martipratsg — 2021-01-15 19:14:20 UTC

In this eassey i like y that robespierre he realize wasn’t making good decisions and he reflect on that decisions , he was like and good man but the deccions they weren’t good i like the vocabulary he use in de esas y and is very clear and complete.

Sara Urbina Aramendiz

urbinasara — 2021-01-15 19:15:20 UTC

At the very beginning of this essay, us, the readers, can noticed the undisputed talent of the author at the moment of judging Maximilian Robespierre. I found this report unusually original, very different from the other ones I’ve read. I truly liked the way the person who wrote it not just mention, but highlight the good actions, the talent, the improvement ideas and intentions Robespierre had for France and it’s people. But what really caught my attention, was the path that the author decided to follow at the moment of state that this noted character in the French Revolution, had the amazing gift of been a lider, a speaker and mostly, a role model, but, although this man was very talented, he decided to use his abilities in the wrong way. I found astounding how the student who wrote this essay prove us that Maximilian has the nerve of abusing of his power, not only punishing people for having different opinions than him, but for also constantly forcing the country to obey him. I agree with the author as she/he states that Robespierre damage innocent lives, always encouraging, not only ruthless acciones, but also violent executions. Finally, I want to say I was astonished by this unique essay and the elegant, smart and clever way it was written, it is a splendid work of art, not perfect, but very delightful.

mafeferreirac — 2021-01-15 19:15:59 UTC

i really like this essay because was complete and have a great info that was based on his/her ideas, was small but was complete and entertaining also you could easily understand it, was focusing on the bad decisions that Robespierre made, but explain way he decide to take them. Now that i read it i have the topic more clear.

Juanita Valencia Upegui

valenciajuanita — 2021-01-15 19:18:11 UTC

It was a surprise when I found that this short essay had both points of view explained, criticized and with the use of sources. The author has an ability to conduct you through (what he/she perceive as) Robespierre's mind. However, the writer should use more formal words to express his/her feelings towards Robespierre and his actions. Nevertheless you can understand the author’s point of view, which explains in an excellent and summarized way Robespierre's conducts and behaviors.

Alejandra López F

lopezalejandra — 2021-01-15 19:18:38 UTC

I could say that this essay in my opinion is very good, it is based on the fact that Robespierre was a human being who made bad decisions but was not a good or a bad person because humans make mistakes, i could see that the author was never in favor of Robespierre being an angel or a devil but i can see that he was neutral seeing the mistakes and achievements of Robespierre, taking into account each fact and basing it on the reality of all humans,
This essay has a very good structure with a good beginning and a good ending, it has very good vocabulary and grammar,
this essay has great potential in every way

lopezalejandra — 2021-01-15 19:19:10 UTC

I could say that this essay in my opinion is very good, it is based on the fact that Robespierre was a human being who made bad decisions but was not a good or a bad person because humans make mistakes, the author does not know It was in favor of nothing but remained neutral seeing the mistakes and achievements of Robespierre, taking into account each fact and basing it on the reality of all humans, This essay has a very good structure with a good beginning and a good ending, it has very good vocabulary and grammar, this essay has great potential in every way

Martina Prats González

martipratsg — 2021-01-15 19:20:40 UTC

This eassey was very complete and understandable they did like a really complete ideas and the source that they use are very well, is very well to read , and they put the exact information that we need to do this critiques so y admire like robespierre becauese he did a lot of things but very well y really like this eassey the vocabulary, the was it was written.

Sofia Jaramillo

jaramillosofia — 2021-01-15 19:21:29 UTC

In this essay the author explains very well the two sides of the story. He or she used facts and used many of the sources that explain the information, he or she was so organized, the essay was complete and understandable.
In my opinion I think that the author can put his or her point of view for knowing what he or she thinks, and also the author can put more information of the bad things.

Isabel Sofía Sánchez A.

sanchezisabel — 2021-01-15 19:26:03 UTC

I like this essay because it was very easy to understand, I also found that he/she used the sources very well and managed to get his idea to be understood. The way the author wrote was very organized, everything made sense and each word complemented another. In my opinion, it has no grammatical or spelling mistakes, making the reading more pleasant and interesting.