<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Weekly Journal by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-07-03 14:46:48 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-08-08 17:50:44 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Journal entry week 1</title>
         <author>ariannapirbhai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3509816627</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Media that we use to discuss in class such as instagram, YouTube, discord, etc, is used daily and can affect our daily lives. Such as our attention spans,  our need to have more than one thing going on. It is also a connector to our emotions and how we gather information about what is going on in the world. These device convergences continue to expand. One of the main convergences I found interesting was Spotify, how they have added in features such as podcasts or short clips of songs. </p><p><br></p><p>I would see old media as something that is not in much use of, for example Snapchat. It is a media platform that is of use and there are many people that use it, but it is not used as much as instagram or YouTube. To me new media is media that is continuously updating and improving, and that is in constant use of an individual. In class we talked about how instagram is used as a platform for chatting even with close family members, or discord how it is used for clubs, classes, gaming. Discord is not a new platform however due to what it can do, it is being used more often and any way that it is updated or improved or is pushed to have new features people seems to enjoy interacting with it. </p><p><br></p><p>Another fascinating idea that was brought into class was the idea that during Covid our use of these media platforms increased in order to help fill the days left at home. Instead of Skype, platforms like Zoom and discord became popular. Giving easy access to live streaming and share content with people around the world. </p><p><br></p><p>Another point was that old media can be considered as text, blogging was and still is quite popular. However how we blog today is more towards a visual perspective than a written one. Having platforms such as twitter or tumblr have reduced over the years because people are more interested in seeing what is happening then reading about it. </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-07-03 17:02:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3509816627</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal entry week 2</title>
         <author>ariannapirbhai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3516233620</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>When something is no longer new, I find it interesting to see how the world becomes adaptive to that particular piece of technology. When we no longer see the media as new, that's when it becomes its most powerful, due to our trust in it. Before the idea that "our phones can hear us" people's awareness of their digital footprint and how the choices they make on social media are always being tracked was not of much importance. Still, even after becoming aware of this, there is no way to live in modern society without leaving a digital footprint or giving different types of media personal information. For example, in online shopping, when we use social media platforms like TikTok there are different ads/websites that are provided for you to purchase items, without thinking if these websites can be trusted we assume that because it is on a platform that many people trust, we can trust it too. So we feed these websites with our banking details and so on.</p><p><br/></p><p>I also found our conversation in class about how media consumers are just tools for marketing and the basic idea that we provide free labour very interesting. We don't realize how much of our lives are used for marketing until we deconstruct every conversation.</p><p><br/></p><p>In chapter 2 of the textbook, there is a little section that talks about Jane Austen sending letters, and the need for instant communication. Every piece of media that is made for us came from a problem that we requested to be improved. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and the internet itself, are all solutions to problems we want solved. This can also bring a point when we hear our parents say things like "When we were your age, we didn't have all these luxuries", but these luxuries are only provided for us because they had such a hard time. During covid people needed something to do and Instagram converging all these different features within it allowed us to find something to do.</p><p>Flew, T. (2014). New media: An introduction (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-07-10 18:59:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3516233620</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal entry week 4</title>
         <author>ariannapirbhai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3528878940</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>During our discussion on the connections between the differences between Hollywood and influences, I found it interesting that when we look at the audience and what the audience wants, in a way they are not so different. The scale at which the audience controls the content that is released, proves that Hollywood needs influencers and much as influencers need Hollywood. Though their difference with participatory media did make sense with the idea that influencers and audiences create deeper connections. For example, their access to communication through DM’s and comments.</p><p><br/></p><p>I personally didn’t know that there was such a thing as a Zine. Although I do remember there was a teen movie that had come out a while back where the daughter started a type of newspaper that was to impower girls. She had created it at home and photocopied it at school and left them in the girl’s bathroom. Even though these types of participatory culture may be slow moving, from the communities that are now present, I think that these kinds of strategies may work. This is because in my opinion everyone wants to be heard, everyone wants to get their opinion out there and I don't think that they would keep it to photocopying and leaving newspapers everywhere, but people would now see it as a way of being authentic and post it on their stories to show others how authentic they are.</p><p><br/></p><p>This can also connect with Hall's encoding and decoding model, where the newspaper article can purpose a dominant-hegemonic way of decoding whereas posting online may be negotiated or oppositional as people may feel that why post it if you want to be authentic, or maybe they don't a line with the same views, etc.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;Flew, T. (2014). New media: An introduction (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-07-25 18:29:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3528878940</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal entry week 5</title>
         <author>ariannapirbhai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3533947716</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The world of AI comes from the people, but not just anyone, these are the people who are in power. How do we know that the information we receive is not bias? From submitting resumes or even college applications, how do we know if there is an actual person looking at our work or AI. Even though AI was created to make life easier, to progress in intelligence.&nbsp;</p><p><br/></p><p>From the presentation I really loved how he was able to show the effects of fake news made by AI on social media platforms. It really goes to show how much we rely on the information that is given to us through platforms we trust.</p><p><br/></p><p>From the film I found it interesting when they said that our data sets reflect our history. When looking at the creators of AI and the group of men that surround the invention, most were white males. When it comes to facial recognition and technology that identifies what gender or race you are I find it interesting how segregated and biased people have made AI. There was a mention in the film that the future is here but it is unevenly distributed and that AI only replicates what the world is like today. Creating such a technology not only tries to identify who is worthy of what but also who is wealthy enough to collect revenue from. The expectation to find who is worthy of a job or of housing to me is crazy. As well as to have such a reliance on a machine that 90% of people don’t know where this AI’s information is coming from. Its coding is only determined by its creator.&nbsp;</p><p><br/></p><p>Kantayya, Shalini, et al. Coded Bias. 7th Empire Media, 2021.</p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-08-01 23:04:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3533947716</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal entry week 6</title>
         <author>ariannapirbhai</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3538756442</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>From the material we had this week, I felt I was really pushed to think about how media, technology and economic structures go hand in hand with each other and there is no way to talk about one without the other. We live in a complex economy that was defined as a knowledge economy.&nbsp;</p><p><br/></p><p>What I found the most intriguing was the difference between knowledge and information. From my understanding information is raw data, while knowledge is the application and understanding of that data and how that data turns into something of value. This is the foundation of why knowledge and information economies are so different.&nbsp;</p><p><br/></p><p>New media technologies are the Center for enabling this kind of system. Networked ICTs not only speed up communication, they also allow for wide spread of knowledge that is turned into new forms of value instantly. Bringing back our discussions on convergence, this really helped me understand why our phones can be tools for entertainment, work, commerce and evening learning all at once.&nbsp;</p><p><br/></p><p>Another thing that stood out for me was that from both the textbook and the lectures was the aspect of globalization. From my understanding the knowledge economy is truly global, with the flow of people, money and ideas. However, they both stress that there is a great inequality of access. Even though we live in a world with information that is more accessible, the availability of that knowledge is unsteady. </p><p>There is a limit in education, infrastructure, and social factors.&nbsp;</p><p><br/></p><p>Through this course I feel that I was able to connect with everything that was taught and I was given a deeper understanding as to how much our work revolves around our ability to communicate through these technologies.&nbsp;</p><p>Flew, T. (2014). New media: An introduction (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-08-08 17:50:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ariannapirbhai/mtreqgcgbwo0gnpf/wish/3538756442</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
