<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>TRIAL by Vonn Andrei Villamiel</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8</link>
      <description>try</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-03-23 12:38:06 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-03-23 14:21:26 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>[GROUP 2 - WEAVING] Question 1</title>
         <author>eurichmariano012</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109703442</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Weaving is indigenous and traditional<br><br></div><ul><li>Weaving is an important part of the Philippine culture as it could create clothing or objects depending on the needs and culture of their respective groups of people.</li><li>They use native materials in weaving such as cotton, abaca, and pineapple which fibers are extracted to make threads as well as dyes from vegetable substances. For example: annatto or achuete seeds could produce orange-red dyes, while langka bark could product yellow dyes.&nbsp;</li><li>Due to the use of organic materials in mat weaving, it is suitable to the hot tropical climate of the Philippines. Mat weaving became a portable, eco-friendly solution for bedding for many Filipinos.&nbsp;</li><li>Textile weaving is significant in portraying the high statues of women in indigenous communities as they were appointed as the leaders, healers, and the people who are tasked to maintain the knowledge of their culture.&nbsp;</li><li>Besides the former, textile weaving is used for ritual purposes.&nbsp;</li><li>In other areas of the country, weaving was an activity for the community to band together and work in creating cloth.&nbsp;<br><br></li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.canva.com/design/DAE7zTvM3fE/view" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-23 13:29:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109703442</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[GROUP 2 - WEAVING] Question 3</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109717414</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A. Post War Challenges<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; 1. Importation and industrialization of weaving materials&nbsp;</div><ul><li>Machine-made fabrics also rose to prominence due to faster production, which threatened the life of traditional weaving industries.</li><li>Though materials are cheaper, some&nbsp; weavers say the quality, textures, and designs integral to the identity of these weaving traditions are lost. Support for farmers (e.g., abaca, cotton) can help ensure the quality of materials used, and consequently, the quality and identity of the produced fabrics/clothes.</li></ul><div>&nbsp; &nbsp; 2. Subsequent lack of interest in maintaining strictly traditional weaving practices</div><ul><li>Those who stayed traditional faced lack of interest from younger generations, unwilling to continue local weaving traditions because of meager pay, lack of materials and support from the government.</li><li>Weavers want to stay loyal/true to and maintain the unique cultural identities in their respective weaving traditions (if we want to preserve their cultures) and regard themselves as agents of their heritage, but are in need of economic stability</li></ul><div>&nbsp; &nbsp; 3. Industrialization and Mass-Production of textiles</div><ul><li>Locally (traditionally) produced fabrics are challenged by the machineries of industrial fabric companies who can more effectively produce enough supply to meet the demand.</li><li>With the decline of the number of local weavers that use traditional means such as handloom weaving, supply cannot meet demand</li><li>Some local weavers are also forced to work with unfair compensation and working conditions in bigger textile companies, with no courage/power to demand for better</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.canva.com/design/DAE7xfTT-_w/view" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-23 13:36:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109717414</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[GROUP 2 - WEAVING] Question 2</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109723985</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><em>(See Canva slides for complete info)</em><strong><br></strong><br><strong>Support from Indigenous Communities </strong><br><br>Before its commercialization, only a few, mostly members of indigenous communities, supported and appreciated indigenous art. In recent years, however, there has been a renewed interest and demand for indigenous crafts. This encouraged designers and businesses to use traditional textiles.<br><br><br><strong>Support from Businesses and Consumers</strong><br><br>Consumers (which includes traders, retailers, or end-customers) play a major role in the preservation of weaving traditions as they are also a part of the indirect transmission of culture.<br> <br><br><strong>Support from Organizations</strong><br><br>To support the industry, organizations have extended assistance in the form of financial subsidies, and access to market opportunities that benefit weavers and local cooperatives and enterprises.<br><br><br><strong>Support from the Government</strong><br><br>There are several government projects and programs that directly and indirectly support indigenous weaving traditions in the country.<br><br>These include the creation of agencies and awards, the establishment of learning centers, and the provision of financial and material subsidies for weaving communities.<br><br><br>Despite all these efforts, support is still lacking. Some weaving traditions still lack economic platforms and financial resources to remain alive. Both government programs and non-government initiatives are also not sufficient to ensure the sustainability of the weaving industry.&nbsp;<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.canva.com/design/DAE7xytqacU/view" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-23 13:38:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109723985</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[GROUP 2 - WEAVING] Question 5</title>
         <author>eurichmariano012</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109755271</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>T’nalak<br><br>Expansion and Commercialization</strong></div><ul><li>The arrival of missionaries in Lake Sebu affected the culture and tradition of the T’bolis. They converted locals into their own religion through intermarriages and religious missions. As such, many T’bolis became Catholics, Protestants, or Muslims.&nbsp;</li><li>&nbsp;Due to the above, the T’boli adapted some elements of Christianity into their own traditions. An example of this is shown in the Lemlunay Festival. It is a harvest festival that combines the beliefs of the T’boli as well as the symbols and rituals of the Catholics. However, these changes do not replace the traditions T’boli had, but rather, is in co-existence with each other.&nbsp;</li><li>Because of the Christian migration, the missionaries established the St. Cruz Mission. It helped the community in developing their own market in producing t’nalak and to have a consistent income with making such art. It proved to be a huge improvement compared to the barter system T’bolis implemented before 1960s, but it also paved the way to the commercialization of the t’nalak industry.</li><li>The widespread appeal of t’nalak led to some outsiders to produce their own t’nalaks with their own modern version of the art form. They were easier to weave and provided a competitive price for the market compared to the traditional t’nalaks.</li><li>Lang Dulay, a GAMABA awardee for t’nalak weaving, explained the contrast of modern t’nalak designs in the market compared to the traditional ones.<ul><li>Modern t’nalak has a looser and rougher hemp compared to the smooth and shiny texture of the traditional one.</li><li>They are focused with their outward appearance compared to staying faithful to the tradition.</li></ul></li><li>Lang Dulay respects the need of profit for T’bolis and can’t blame their modernization of the craft, but she continued to push for the preservation of their traditional ways.</li></ul><div><br></div><div><strong>Examples</strong></div><ul><li><strong>Elizabeth Clenci’s dress in Miss Grand International (2017)</strong><ul><li>Jearson Demavivas created a t’nalak-inspired dress for Elizabeth Clenci in the Miss Grand International beauty pageant. He said that the dress was inspired by the T’boli tribe and is a representation of what a modern T’boli princess would look like in haute couture.&nbsp;</li><li>This dress has caused controversy amongst T’boli locals. Some accepted the design as they are used to seeing t’nalak designs in mass-produced products and they would not be selling the products if they are against the innovations presented. Some of them have reservations.</li><li>Michael Angelo Yambok, head of the T’boli cluster of the NCCA’s Subcommission on Cultural Communities and Traditional Arts, and Carlo Ebeo, cultural worker and former vice chair of the National Commission for Culture and the Arts’ (NCCA) National Committee on Cultural Education, both assert that it was an admirable effort on Demavivas’s part to make a avant-garde representation of the t’nalak art, and that getting inspiration from the local’s art is a good thing, however, the designer should have asked for approval from the locals before creating such a piece.&nbsp;</li></ul></li><li><strong>Catriona Gray’s dress/dresses in Miss Universe (2018)</strong><ul><li>In contrast with his last work, Demavivas consulted the locals for assistance in using the T’nalak properly. A representative of T’nalak Tau Sebu said that their team came to them last July and they had a proper talk about the Code of Practice the locals maintain to make sure of their quality is authentic to traditional T’nalak fabrics.</li><li>The dresses have the TTS collective mark, which indicates that the product is authentic and fits the standard the group had for those dresses. It also indicates that the product was carefully created by the members of TTS themselves.</li></ul></li></ul><div><br></div><div><strong>Cordillera Weaving<br><br>Expansion and Commercialization</strong></div><ul><li><strong>Conditions of the Weaving Industry</strong><ul><li>In the panel, “Habi: Weaving Philippine Textiles’ Future”, Prof. Analyn Salvador-Amores gave a talk about textile weaving in Cordillera. She pointed out that there are reasons for the slow decline of the weaving traditions in the province.<ul><li>The age of expert weavers ranges from 70s to 80s. Unless they have a generation to pass it through, the knowledge of the craft will steadily decline.</li><li>The youth doesn’t have enough interest in continuing the tradition.</li><li>Weaving through traditional methods on long periods of time impacts the weaver’s health. They suffer skeletal problems, lower back issues, poor eyesight, and upper respiratory illnesses.</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>There are programs made to combat the decline such as the Schools of Living Traditions, the Cordillera Textiles Project (Corditex), and the Geographical Indication Product (GI) program, but they either need more funding on these projects or the weaving is not yet recognized for protection.</li><li>She added that weavers may have shifted to commercial threads due to decline in cotton yields. It enables them to weave more, however, their production would have focused on catering to tourists and that might make them a target of cultural appropriation by rampant copycats or replicas in the market.</li></ul><div><br></div><div><strong>Examples</strong></div><ul><li><strong>Art of the Loom</strong><ul><li>Binakul is one of the many weaving designs in Cordillera. It has geometric patterns that act as optical illusions as a representation of the waves of the sea which was once said to defend them from evil spirits. Binakul is usually done on blankets, however, modern perspectives have transformed the weaving into current-day fashion and other objects.</li><li>Art of the Loom is a special exhibit for the different ways artist spun around the concept of binakul as a contemporary form in the Yuchengco Museum.</li><li>Some of the works displayed are the binakul and snakeskin clutches designed by Pepito Albert, the binakul flats by Ruby Diaz Roa, and the variety of clothes created by fashion designer Jojie Lloren.</li></ul></li></ul><div><br></div><ul><li><strong>Little Islanders</strong><ul><li>Little Islanders is a Hong Kong-based kidswear brand the cooperates with weavers in the Philippines to create clothes that showcases the culture of traditional weaving techniques through modern hand-loomed clothing.</li><li>Gwen Vetuz created the brand with the intent of reviving dying weaving techniques by utilizing them in modern ways such as creating clothing for kids.</li><li>The clothes are said to be long lasting and, as a proof of its durability, is said to be heirloom products that a generation could pass down to another. The fabrics are locally sourced from the Philippines and the company helps in encouraging the use of hand-loomed textiles and the local weaving industry.<br><br></li></ul></li></ul><div><br></div><div><strong>Tabungaw/Gourd Hat<br><br>Expansion and Commercialization</strong></div><ul><li>&nbsp;Teofilo Garcia is one of the only people, if not the only person, who creates Tabungaw Hats. It has been difficult for him in creating the hats due to having to source his materials himself, the amount of upo depends on the weather in his area, having no database for potential plants that could be used as raw materials, and lastly, the tradition depends on his continuous production to thrive.</li><li>&nbsp;Despite these problems, he never stopped experimenting to achieve a more resilient hat and he had to adapt on the available supplies that he can acquire.</li><li>As support for the endangered craft, the NCCA commissioned Garcia to transfer his knowledge to the next generation by integrating the creation of Tabungaw Hats in the Technology and Livelihood Education subject in the DepEd curriculum. The initial modules were drafted by the training staff of San Quintin National High School before they were sent out nationwide.</li></ul><div><br></div><div><strong>Example</strong></div><ul><li>There is no current adaptation by other people outside the originating culture currently. Once the tech transfer to San Quintin National High School is successful, it might popularize tabungaw hats and it might spark a modern interpretation of the hat.</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.canva.com/design/DAE7zmMLPjc/view" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-23 13:52:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109755271</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>[GROUP 2 - WEAVING] Question 4</title>
         <author>angalang1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109776618</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><br>WHAT HAS THE GOVERNMENT DONE FOR OUR WEAVERS?<br></strong><br></div><ol><li>PRESENT: IPRA 1997 (GOVPH, 1997)<ul><li>Notably, the IPRA 1997 was enacted two decades ago. But, the external environment of the Indigenous people (IPs) has changed over the years. More competition, both local and international, and the increasing difficulty to access supply and the market are just some of these. Ultimately, <strong>the IPRA 1997 falls in taking into account the current pressing issues of the IPs, such as preserving and protecting their art traditions such as weaving, all considered part of their decades-long rich culture. We need to shed light on what exactly this law fails to achieve as the longer we take, the harder it will be for IPs to sustain their life practice, among many other things they hold dear and identify themselves with.</strong></li></ul></li><li>State awards for indigenous art by CCP, and NCCA after through the Gawads sa Manlilikha ng Bayan (Baradas and Guillermo 2020)</li><li>Other interventions by 2020<br><br></li></ol><div>The long history of weaving proves that <strong>art is a living tradition and has survived changing conditions in the physical and social environment</strong>. We can see our history in the weaving patterns of our IPs. Animism influenced the designs and motifs in mat weaving. Islam reached Mindanao Sulu in the 13th century, and from thereon, began the integration of the Burraq in boras mat weaving. Early exploration, colonization, and trade with Southeast Asia (SEA) regions explain why our weaving designs have a cultural affinity with SEA. The raw materials for weaving were vulnerable to displacement and damage as seen in the American period and World War II, respectively. Ilocos' weaving tradition changed with industrial cotton and dyes. IPs were displaced multiple times. The market economy led to the conversion of the value of these art forms into commercial products (Baradas and Guillermo 2020).<br><br></div><div><strong><br>But…<br></strong><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote><em>While these art forms are often used as symbols of national identity and pride, the needs of the traditional communities have not been properly addressed by the government. - Baradas and Guillermo (2020)</em></blockquote><div><br></div><div><em><br></em><strong>The government is not yet guaranteeing the life of weaving because unfortunately, weaving is a dying art.</strong> This is ironic and unfortunate as indigenous art is considered a living tradition (Baradas and Guillermo 2020), and always should be. It holds much of our historical and cultural significance.<em><br></em><br></div><div>The weather threatens production, weavers are aging, commercialization and lack of financial resources are among the reasons the chances of a future for weaving is dwindling (Castelo 2020). And <strong>the government has the power to transcend NGOs’ and private sectors’ efforts to address these factors and help weavers thrive amidst changes in the external environment.</strong> Are they using the power to achieve this? We can see the IPs situation in some aspects as follows.<br><br></div><div><strong><br>WHY GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS NEED TO IMPROVE…<br></strong><br></div><div><br></div><div><em>What is the problem or context?</em></div><div><strong>Poverty and the lack of economic opportunities (e.g. quality education, basic social services) (ILO, 2012) for the T’boli community</strong> led them to resort to <strong>accepting business proposals to convert their weaving or textile products to tourism products</strong> (Candeleria et al. 2017). In the process, the economic value replaces the cultural and social value (T’nalak as worship for their god for abaca). If the IPRA 1997 was indeed working, then the T’boli would have had more economic opportunities in the first place, and thus have better bargaining power when it comes to <strong>asserting the maintenance of the significance of their T’nalak.</strong></div><div><br></div><div><em>How is this related to ARTS 1?</em></div><blockquote><em>Our colonial experience which had laid down the academic canons of art has left a tradition of suppressing sectors of Philippines expression, such as that of the Muslim Filipinos and the animist ethno-linguistic groups. - Guillermo (1997)</em></blockquote><div><br></div><div><strong>Up until now, weavers experience this as they have to conform their products to the trends of tourists and the current market</strong> in order to sell them. Tourists get to dictate how they want a local textile product to be in – shirts, bags, table runners, purses, etc. Hence, <strong>it is important that the authentic form of these weaving products are preserved, transmitted, and documented</strong> so that future generations will still gain this sense of identity and pride for it, and embody the culture and ideology present in the weaving.<br><br></div><div>----------</div><div><br></div><div><em>What is the problem or context?</em></div><div>Around January 2021, there were reports of <strong>machine-made imitations of Cordillera’s blankets and garments being imported from China and then sold in Baguio</strong> (Fernan and Cerilles Jr. 2021). Many of the replicas were made of conventional textiles, which is inferior to the genuine fabrics of Cordillera weavers. Imitations are sold cheaply and have duped multiple customers, which in turn, affected small local businesses (Philippine Daily Inquirer 2021). Hence, native weavers are seeking the protection of their weaving. Virginia Doligas, manager of Easter Weaving Room Inc. in Baguio City, mentioned that failure to protect weavers from fake products will result in “irreversible damage” (Philippine Daily Inquirer 2021). Indeed, this imitation mocks the rich culture of weaving, and the days of hard work weavers dedicate to making their art. <strong>While the IPRA 1997 exists, government agencies failed to instantly file cases against the counterfeiters.</strong> This was due to factors such as limited financial resources and lack of coordination (Fernan and Cerilles Jr. 2021). Lawyer Atanacio Addog, legal officer of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) in the Cordillera, asserted that international treaties banned the entry of counterfeit products and that the NCIP is working to the "NCIP is working to amend laws protecting cultural art forms and indigenous knowledge". It prohibited shops from importing and selling these fake products, while it was preparing to sue retailers. The city council was drafting measures to stop companies from pirating crafts by Cordilleras (Philippine Daily Inquirer 2021). Still, while measures were in the process of being implemented, we cannot deny that the Cordillera weavers were being robbed of their deserved revenue and their claim to that weave in general. Unlike the Cordillera weavers, imitators not belonging to the centuries-old culture of Cordillera will just see weaving as a mere commodity, thus producing it just purely for money, and if it fails to do so in the long run, ditches the product. Moreover, the drafting of measures in response to the importation proves that the government agencies and bodies must be more proactive. Not only should the city council of Cordillera do this, but for all Philippine city councils in service of the IP communities to protect the weavers from the likelihood of competing with counterfeit products.</div><div><br></div><div><em>More about the Cordillera weavings can be read in the next slide.</em></div><div><br></div><div><em>How is this related to ARTS 1?</em></div><blockquote><em>Art has sensual properties that reckon to us to engage with it bodily&nbsp; - Flaviano (2020)</em></blockquote><div>Have you ever tried appreciating an artwork by running your fingers through its texture? Similarly, we cannot fully appreciate a weaving piece just by looking at it. Rather, <strong>touching the threads that are intricately and carefully laced together enhances the sense of respect for the art, for the skills, the passion, and days of hard work by the weavers.</strong> So conventional textiles are considered inferior to genuine fabrics, and may not give the feel of the texture that authentic ones do.</div><div><br></div><blockquote><em>Art as embodied meanings – the material of the work itself forms part of its meaning&nbsp; – Desmond (2011)</em></blockquote><div><strong>The imitation of the Cordillera weaving may not be considered an art as the material itself. Conventional textiles (Philippine Daily Inquirer 2021) do not carry the meaning of genuine fabrics. </strong>Genuine fabrics can represent the dedication of weavers to source materials and produce the weaving.</div><div><br></div><blockquote><em>Some artists in nonWestern societies don’t sign their work like Western artists do because it is thought to be an integral part of the community and not the work of just one person. </em>– Desmond (2012)</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Because of this communal nature of Filipinos, ownership of a weaving product cannot pinpoint one person. This may be <strong>a limitation for claiming ownership over a weaving product</strong>, thus may appear very similar to those imitations when placed beside them.</div><div><br></div><div><em>How is this related to BS Tourism?</em></div><div><br></div><div>Experiences and studies will show that the continuation of traditional industries that we know of has also been apparent or has also taken place because of the presence of people who are still willing to support it – one of those are tourists (Cabigas-Sy 2021).</div><div><br></div><div>Tourists who are seeking authentic tourism experiences are likely to pay a premium for the real Cordillera weaving pieces. Knowing that <strong>tourists will always support weaving, we have to ensure that tourism products and services available to them are authentic</strong>. Hence, national policies must be made to uphold the rights of IPs to ownership of their weaving, and then have these cascaded local communities.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><em>What are the possible solutions?</em></div><ol><li><a href="https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1129907">HB </a><a href="https://www.bworldonline.com/legarda-calls-for-stronger-protection-for-ips-after-whang-od-controversy/">7811 </a>or An Act Safeguarding the Traditional Property Rights<ul><li>This act will ensure that IPs gain full ownership of their cultural and intellectual property. Royalties are to be granted for collective and individual creative expression. Legal protections and remedies will be given by the government through clear registration for IPs (BusinessWorld 2021).&nbsp;</li></ul></li><li>Clear assigning of roles to agencies concerned with the protection of traditional knowledge (e.g. NCCA and NCIP) (Fernan and Cerilles Jr. 2021)</li><li>Tighter border control measures to ban fake products (Fernan and Cerilles Jr. 2021)</li><li>More discussions on a protection system for traditional knowledge and traditional culture (Fernan and Cerilles Jr. 2021)</li></ol><div><br></div><div>----------</div><div><br></div><div><em>What is the problem or context?</em></div><div><strong>The Philippines is a very disaster-prone country (Mina 2021) and the marginalized communities including the Indigenous People usually bear the brunt.</strong> Not only do weavers lose their homes, but also suffer drastic interruptions in their livelihoods. For instance, Tikog stems in Basey, the Philippines are used for intricate mats, bags, pouches, and more. But the Typhoon Haiyan destroyed all those necessary to create the Tikog. It damaged the native reed in the area, salted the soil, and materials and work areas were lost or damaged. Yet, it is the women associations who responded aptly to this and are helping make the Tikog industry competitive (CARE 2015). Overall, government policies still need to respond better.</div><div><br><em>What do the ARTS 1 references say?</em></div><blockquote><em>Art as construct - Guillermo (1997)</em></blockquote><div>As with any other art, weaving has its resources, mediums, and techniques. <strong>Policies need to take into account the conditions and problems of weaving production.</strong> One of these, of course, is the weather and climate for supplies.</div><div><br></div><blockquote>Closely linked with the natural environment, the production of such art is part of everyday life - Baradas and Guillermo (2020)&nbsp;</blockquote><div><br></div><div><strong>We cannot sustain weaving without protecting and sustaining the natural environment it sources its materials.</strong>&nbsp; Especially during the American occupation, we have seen how weavers have been suffering from damages to their environment. It is about time we address this. Weavers source their raw materials for their environment. Without them, they could not weave.</div><div><br></div><div><em>How is this related to BS Tourism?</em></div><div>In terms of supply, <strong>suppliers of weavers get hit by disasters too. They may struggle to supply the weavers with raw materials.</strong> This, coupled with the decline in local manufacturing, makes it harder for weavers to find a consistent supplier for raw materials.</div><div>We need to increase their use of the weaving industry to make them more self-sufficient. Sometimes, IPs would sell the amount needed to survive daily. But, they need to earn more than what can sustain them every day. <strong>Earning more income daily than what is needed to survive secures survival and resiliency in disasters</strong></div><div><br></div><div><em>What are the possible solutions?</em></div><ol><li>Collaborate and fund research for a sustainable weaving industry (MUNI 2020)<ul><li>Sustaining the weaving industry will include its resilience in the Philippines. Thus, the government needs to fund research and collaborate with the private sector for the weaving industry's sustainability. Research can include "production of raw materials, to trainings and workshops, provision of equipment and materials, product development and promotion program, and a systematic marketing system." (Malasig 2019). Research may unearth ways on how we can find substitute supplies to the local textile products, or how the soil can retain its conduciveness for growing the raw materials. Overall, we need research to help weavers recuperate instantly after disasters, among other important benefits of sustainability.</li></ul></li><li>Sufficient government financial aid and/or loans to get them back on their feet.</li></ol><div><br></div><div>----------</div><div><br></div><div><em>What is the problem or context?</em></div><div>Indigenous weavers <strong>lack access to the market, particularly regular customers</strong>. Also, there is a lack of policies implemented to support the weaving industry in the global market. In fact, the DTI's Garments and Textile Industry does not include the hand-weaving industry. According to the MUNI (2020), there is no clear and unified direction for the growth and sustainability of the industry in the government policies and regulatory framework.</div><div><br></div><div>Further, the government agencies supporting the weaving industry need to cooperate more. For instance, looking at weaving using the tourism industry perspective, tourism will accredit the tourism circuits and programs. But developing these, using the economic perspective, will need the engagement of the DTI, which would require different prioritizations in plans and programs for the weaving industry (Cabigas-Sy 2021).</div><div><br></div><div><em>What do the ARTS 1 references say?</em></div><div><br></div><blockquote><em>The art forms of the ancient past continue to the present as living traditions, adapting to and transforming based on the changing conditions in the physical and social environment</em><br><em>- Baradas and Guillermo (2020)</em></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So many competitors are out there, and worse, IPs cannot fully access their markets. <strong>A way to keep the weaving industry alive is to ensure they can access the markets through modern forward linkages (e.g. online platforms)</strong>.</div><div><br></div><blockquote><em>Any artifact can be a work of art as long as it is “admitted” by the artworld. In other words, art is the consequence of social agreement rather than having intrinsic aesthetic features, or art is what the artworld says it is. – Desmond (2011)</em></blockquote><div><br></div><div><strong>When we adapt to the changes of distribution by strengthening the forward linkages of art, the more these local textile products will spread to the public or the markets. These people who purchase can themselves identify the weavings as art.</strong> By recognizing it as art, it becomes art. This identification can even be a motivation for consumers to purchase it through online websites.</div><div><br></div><div><em>How is this related to BS Tourism?</em></div><div><strong>The weaving industry should be led using a macro perspective.</strong> The national government should craft the framework then cascade it to the local communities as the latter do not have the necessary forward and backward linkages. The government needs to strengthen both the backward and forward linkages. Backward linkages are of great concern as aforementioned, the weaving industry sources the raw materials from the agricultural sector which is declining (migrating to other countries). Meanwhile, forward linkages refer to promotions online (Cabigas-Sy 2021), in tourism packages, or whatever distribution channels are most accessed by the markets today.</div><div><br></div><div><em>What are the possible solutions?</em></div><ol><li>The government agencies should not just fund the weavers to go to urban city trade fairs (MUNI 2020). Rather, government programs should be executed to empower the weavers to establish a better supply chain management system, coupled with laws to protect the IPs’ rights when transacting. This way, they will be less dependent on government funds to go to urban cities as they have access to a growing market.</li><li>The industry's inclusion in the BOI's Textile-Garment Industry Roadmap to have a clear direction for growth and sustainability (MUNI 2020), especially the contribution to the economic gains of the country.</li><li>Access to education is necessary as this will help weavers increase not just their social mobility, but their English proficiency which is found by IPs to be necessary to better promote their products, especially to the international market. In fact, weavers value education greatly (MUNI 2020).</li></ol><div><br></div><div>----------</div><div><br></div><div><em>What is the problem or context?</em></div><div>Some weaving groups such as in Lake Sebu expressed that they need <strong>additional or expansion of facilities for cultural transmission</strong>. Oral transmission may need the <strong>documentation </strong>of weaving too. CulturAid asserts the "need for communities to document their own cultural heritage and currently teaches cultural mapping to several of the communities they work with." (MUNA 2021)</div><div><br></div><div><em>What do the ARTS 1 references say?</em></div><blockquote><em>In some non-Western cultures and periods, artists had to study the traditions of art making from family members (like European guilds and master studios) </em>– Desmond (2011)</blockquote><div><br>This is generally true as mentioned earlier, <strong>mothers and the elders teach the younger generations to weave.</strong></div><div><br></div><blockquote><em>It is in our human nature to engage with art because we make and do art to connect with our communities and the natural world around us. Aside from their aesthetic value, these [indigenous/ethical/traditional] forms of art also have practical and religious value. They can also usually be locally sourced and are environmentally sustainable. They are participated in by the community as a whole and destined to merge. </em>– Flaviano (2022)</blockquote><div><br></div><div><strong>By engaging in art with others, we unconsciously transmit the art informally. Weaving is not just done privately, but with society as well for both social and religious functions </strong>(e.g. rituals, ancestral worship). In short, weaving is not just a source of income, but it is a venue for bonding. In terms of nature, <strong>the sourcing of raw materials is a manner of communing with nature.</strong> IPs learn how to use the natural resources around them for weaving, and in turn, appreciate and make use of these wisely. However, <strong>rather than relying on communities to informally transmit this, we must have formal measures such as cultural facilities</strong> that will teach the younger generations the meaning of this art and how to sustainably use the resources crucial in producing it.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><blockquote><em>Our folk/ethnic expressions that grow out of the oral traditions constitute the underlying stratum of our cultural identity. – Flaviano (2022)</em></blockquote><div><br></div><div>As weaving is used to engage with society and the environment, it continues to be transmitted to the next generations. By communing, they preserve the Filipino cultural identity. Attached to these weavings is the cultural identity of our ancestors which has evolved to become ours today.<br><br></div><div>Weaving is an ethnic expression that has been passed down by the elders through oral tradition. Attached to these weavings are the cultural identity of our ancestors which is present in ours as well. For instance, the Ifugao weave ceremonial textiles as a form of both ancestor worship and Catholicism (Milgram 1996). And even in our present Catholic practices, we practice rituals to bring our dead to heaven (e.g. wake, 40th day). The woven ceremonial textiles of Ifugao, especially about ancestral worship, can be one of the earliest signs of this culture of ours. Overall, documentation is important as it can give us the roots of our cultural identity, especially those found in weaving.</div><div><br></div><div><em>How is this related to BS Tourism?</em></div><div>Not only mothers (Fabro 2022), but elders too are consciously or unconsciously passing on the art of weaving because it is their <strong>hobby and they find it therapeutic</strong>. Still, there must be a <strong>formal framework</strong>, which the government can implement, to ensure that there are formal venues used for transmission. An example of these efforts is the School of Living Traditions in the South (Cabigas-Sy 2021).</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Documentation is so critical that it is the first step of the four-stage planning process of heritage planning. This step entails the identification of the intrinsic and extrinsic values of the asset, i.e. weaving. </strong>With documentation, we can better preserve, highlight, and respect these values associated with weaving (Du Cros and McKercher 2014).</div><div><br></div><div><em>What are the possible solutions?</em></div><div>Support from the government can help add and expand these facilities (e.g. weaving centers) to facilitate the transmission of weaving to the younger generations, thus its preservation. Such facilities will help accommodate the demand of the young to learn the art of weaving. Notably, government agencies have the power to access and acquire documentation tools and expertise (MUNI 2020).</div><div><br></div><div>----------</div><div><br></div><div><em>What is the problem or context?</em></div><div>Despite the provision of IPRA 1997 including consultation (Howells et al. 2008), weaving groups in Lake Sebu expressed <strong>the need for government agencies to consult</strong>. Without discourse and consultation, the policymakers failed to address what the weavers really needed, and that was security and health (MUNI 2020).</div><div><br></div><div><em>Is there a possible solution? How is this related to BS Tourism?</em></div><div>From a tourism development perspective, <strong>we need to always involve the local communities in tourism planning and development</strong>, especially when they are those providing the local tourism products and services (in this case, it is weaving). If the goal of tourism is to help the locals, then it is just fair that locals can share how exactly they should benefit from it. Without consultation, the development will just be a “hit and miss”, and thus likely be unsuccessful, let alone unsustainable.</div><div><br></div><div>----------<br>References: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VgPrQ8yZBMOUcnroDNmBWBTFX8zX-ssJL6-iW3vctUc/edit?usp=sharing</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.canva.com/design/DAE7zR2XrOY/view" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-23 14:01:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/vevillamiel/mmo1on9ncig8f2j8/wish/2109776618</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
