<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>week 3 reading by mustafa yılmaz</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mustafayilmaz150110051/mlup9q0bdd8u7h9c</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-03-20 23:17:56 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-10-28 07:40:17 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>WEEK 3 READİNG </title>
         <author>mustafayilmaz7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mustafayilmaz150110051/mlup9q0bdd8u7h9c/wish/2524354796</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Mankind wanted to understand and know the world he was in from the moment he set foot on the earth. But knowing is a very deep event contrary to what you might think. All philosophers and social scientists have studied being, being, and knowing. And in this position, we first come across two concepts; One is ontology and the other is epistemology. In fact, these two concepts are both very related and disconnected from each other. Ontology focuses directly on the nature of being, that is, it knows only what exists and focuses on it. The basic question to be answered here is what is the nature and form of reality, and what can we know about this reality? While seeking an answer to this question, ontology is divided into several sub-branches. One of them is realism. Realism tells us that there is a real world outside of what we know. While ontology forms the basis of knowing, epistemology constitutes another layer in which knowing branches and knots. In epistemology, what is the relationship between the one who knows the subject being examined and the known. One point that goes from ontology to difference is what we can know about the world outside of what exists. At this foundational point, knowing is divided into two branches, one is realism and the other is positivism. Positivists argue that a real world exists and that this world is shaped outside of our knowledge. Another breaking point is that in the social sciences, like the natural sciences, they argue that it is testable and that the observer can be objective. knowing is divided into a deeper branch outside of foundationalism. Interpretivism argues that it is illogical for us to test our capacity for knowledge of a world that we do not believe exists and cannot know, and that this is not a testable phenomenon.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-03-20 23:18:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mustafayilmaz150110051/mlup9q0bdd8u7h9c/wish/2524354796</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>week 6 readin feminism</title>
         <author>mustafayilmaz7</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mustafayilmaz150110051/mlup9q0bdd8u7h9c/wish/2549334873</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The triennial wave of feminist movement, that arose in the 1990s and persists to the epoch, has happened apparent by a better prominence on variety and intersectionality. Third-wave feminists have wanted to address issues of race, class, passion, and grammatical rules applying to nouns that connote sex or animateness correspondence, and have questioned established desires of girlishness and manliness. They have too fixated on issues in the way that proliferation, environmentalism, and the impact of science on grammatical rules applying to nouns that connote sex or animateness and desire.Feminist beliefs is established the assumption that masculine is a friendly build, alternatively a organic likely, what mothers have existed historically and orderly underprivileged and marginalized by fatherly associations. Feminist belief and grant have investigated a roomy range of issues had connection with common, containing neuter similarity, sensuality, generative rights, intensity against daughters, and the impact of worldwide integration and commercialism on wives's lives. Feminism has more happened carefully connected to additional friendly fairness shifts, in the way that antagonistic-bigotry, LGBTQ+ rights, and restriction rights, as feminists have wanted to address the habits at which point feminine intersects accompanying added forms of hardship.<br><br></div><div>Feminism has branched into different streams over time due to the diverse experiences and perspectives of women around the world. Each branch of feminism is rooted in the common goal of achieving gender equality, but they differ in their approach, focus, and strategies.<br><br></div><div>1 Liberal Feminism: This arm of feminist movement stresses individual rights and balance of moment for wives. Liberal feminists trust that girls endure have the unchanging allowable and governmental rights as husbands, what masculine bias maybe removed through allowable correct and instruction. They devote effort to something issues in the way that equal pay, generative rights, and the likeness of daughters in campaigning and guidance positions.<br><br></div><div>2 radical feminism:This branch of feminism sees patriarchy as the source of women's oppression and seeks to challenge and overturn traditional gender roles and social norms. Radical feminists believe that gender is an essential aspect of power relations and that women can achieve true liberation only by dismantling patriarchal structures and institutions. Their concerns included violence against women, reproductive rights, and the gendered division of labor.<br><br></div><div>3 Intersectional feminism: This branch of feminism recognizes that gender is only one of many interconnected social identities that shape human experience and possibilities. Intersectional feminists emphasize the importance of considering the intersection of gender and other forms of oppression such as race, class, sexual orientation, and ability. They simultaneously seek to challenge and disrupt multiple systems of oppression and recognize the importance of inclusive and diverse feminist activism.<br><br></div><div>Together, these fields of feminism offer diverse perspectives on issues facing women and strategies for achieving gender equality. Each field has its strengths and limitations, and many feminists identify with more than one field or incorporate ideas from different schools of thought into their activism.<br><br></div><div>Feminism and political science are two closely related fields of study. Feminist theory has had a significant impact on the study of politics and has shaped the development of political institutions and policies. Meanwhile, political science has created a platform for feminist scholars to analyze the role of gender in political behavior, representation, and decision-making. Feminist political science emerged in the 1970s in response to the exclusion of women's experiences and perspectives from mainstream political analysis. Feminist scholars have sought to challenge gender biases and assumptions inherent in mainstream political theory and to expand the scope of political analysis to include issues such as gender inequality, reproductive rights and violence. towards women. Feminist political science has made important contributions to the study of political institutions, policies, and practices. Feminist scholars have analyzed the impact of gender on political behavior, voting patterns, and representation in elected office. They also explored the gender dimensions of political violence, conflict and peace building. One of the most important contributions of feminist political science is its emphasis on the intersectionality of gender with other forms of social identity, such as race, class, sexuality, and ability. Intersectional feminist scholars have pointed to the ways in which multiple systems of oppression and privilege intersect and interact to shape political outcomes and experiences. For example, they have shown how race, gender and class interact to produce various forms of political marginalization and exclusion. Feminist political science has also led to the development of feminist approaches to policy analysis and research. These approaches prioritize the voices and experiences of marginalized groups, challenge dominant narratives and assumptions, and seek to advance social justice and equality. Feminist methodologies, such as participatory action research and feminist ethnography, prioritize collaboration, reflexivity, and community engagement. In recent years, feminist political science has expanded to include a wider range of issues and perspectives. Feminist scholars have analyzed the impact of globalization, environmentalism, and human rights on gender and politics. They also explored the intersections between gender and emerging fields such as digital politics, artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. Despite these important contributions, feminist political science continues to face challenges and limitations. A major challenge is the lack of representation and inclusion of women, especially women of color, in the industry. Feminist scholars have also drawn criticism for their focus on gender at the expense of other major political issues, such as class, race, and globalization. In summary, feminism and political science are two closely related fields of study. Feminist political science has greatly expanded our understanding of the role of gender in political behavior, representation, and decision-making. By promoting an intersectional approach to policy analysis and research, feminist political science has also contributed to a more inclusive and just political system. However, much remains to be done to ensure the full representation and inclusion of women and marginalized groups in political science research and practice.<br><br>The interpretive turn in feminism has challenged traditional views of gender and social relations by emphasizing the subjective, contextual, and intersectional nature of these phenomena. This approach recognizes that gender is not a fixed or universal category, but rather something that is experienced and interpreted differently by different people in different contexts. It also emphasizes the importance of language in shaping our understanding of gender and the ways in which different forms of oppression intersect to create unique experiences of inequality and marginalization.<br><br></div><div><br>As a student in Turkey, I can see how the concepts of the interpretive turn in feminism can be applied to my own context. Women in Turkey face a range of challenges, from unequal access to education and employment opportunities to high rates of domestic violence and femicide. By critically analyzing the ways in which gender is constructed and experienced in Turkey, and by working to promote more inclusive and egalitarian forms of gender expression and social justice, we can help to address these challenges and create a more just and equitable society for all.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-04-10 23:52:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mustafayilmaz150110051/mlup9q0bdd8u7h9c/wish/2549334873</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
