<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Section 3: &quot;Freedom Of Speech and of the Press&quot; by REBECCA STREIT</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q</link>
      <description>How are freedom of speech and press guaranteed under the 1st and 14th amendments? What freedoms of speech are/ are not protected under the 1st and 14th amendments?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-11-27 14:57:09 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-12-04 16:23:49 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Libel</title>
         <author>rstreit1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308308932</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Libel is false information written about a person that could harm the individual's reputation. The first amendment protects speech but does not protect this form of speech. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:02:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308308932</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slander</title>
         <author>rstreit1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308311759</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Slander is false information spoken about a person that could harm the individual's reputation. The first amendment protects speech but does not protect this form of speech if the speech is damaging to the reputation of the person. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:06:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308311759</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tinker Vs Des Moines </title>
         <author>pramos11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308312004</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This is a court case where students wear black armbands at school to support for truce for the Vietnam war. The school sent them home everyday they wore the black arm band. The students sued the school for violating freedom of speech, but the court ruled that the school was not reasonable. This form of speech is protected.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:06:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308312004</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Symbolic Speech</title>
         <author>alopez217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308312337</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Symbolic Speech is an action that expresses an idea. only some actions are protected as symbolic speech. In court cases involving symbolic speech the speaker is asked whether there is a particular message that they are trying to convey and whether or not that message was understood by people who viewed it. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:07:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308312337</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Prior Restraint </title>
         <author>cdefilippis</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308313095</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Prior restraint is the judicial censorship of material that would be broadcast or published because it is libelous or harmful. Speech and expression that is dangerous or misleading is not protected under the right of free speech. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:08:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308313095</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Seditious Speech</title>
         <author>rstreit1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308314828</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Seditious speech is anti-government and relates to an overthrow of the government. Seditious speech is protected by the constitution in the first amendment as long as it does not indicate a threat of violence or immediate action. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:10:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308314828</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Flag burning </title>
         <author>pramos11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308315528</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Supreme court ruled that flag burning is a form of speech protected by the first amendment. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:12:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308315528</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Shield laws </title>
         <author>cdefilippis</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308316282</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The shield laws protects the rights of the people to with hold certain information. People like witnesses, journalists, and victims are protected by the rights of free speech. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:13:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308316282</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Acts of Dissent</title>
         <author>alopez217</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308317570</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Dissent is having a different opinion, especially with the majority opinion.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:15:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308317570</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Commercial Speech</title>
         <author>pramos11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308318316</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Advertising or commercial speech has been protected by the first amendment after the Supreme court essentially rewrote the first amendment</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:16:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308318316</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Defining Obscenity and the three-part-test </title>
         <author>cdefilippis</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308318325</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Obscenity refers to offensive  inappropriate words or phrases.  Freedom of speech is only protected if it passes the three part test. The three part test consists of legality, legitimacy and proportionality.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-11-27 15:16:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rstreit1/mkd1cverw73q/wish/308318325</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
