Hate Speech-1st Amendment by NE'SHA JONES (Student) https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o Should hate speech be protected? en-us 2019-04-09 12:03:20 UTC 2019-04-12 12:03:30 UTC hello@padlet.com 1st Amendment jonesni62 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/349897625 Protects freedom of speech including hate speech.]]> 2019-04-09 12:44:53 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/349897625 Consequences jonesni62 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/349900242 Although hate speech protects citizens from going to jail, it doesn't protect your reputation.]]> 2019-04-09 12:50:07 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/349900242 deckerbe23 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350302549 Hate speech in the United States is not regulated, in contrast to that of most other liberal democracies. ]]> 2019-04-10 11:48:49 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350302549 hate speech that isn't allowed deckerbe23 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350302728
  • Obscenity
  • Fighting words
  • Defamation (including libel and slander)
  • Child pornography
  • Perjury
  • Blackmail
  • Incitement to imminent lawless action
  • True threats
  • Solicitations to commit crimes

    • ]]>     2019-04-10 11:49:28 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350302728     is hate speech protected by the first amendment? deckerbe23 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350304199 There’s no exception for hate speech under the First Amendment’s protection for freedom of expression, unless the speech is direct, personal, and either truly threatening or violently provocative.]]> 2019-04-10 11:54:02 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350304199 Free speech is essential to a free society. jonesni62 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350311061 2019-04-10 12:16:46 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350311061 deckerbe23 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350322176 In 1942, the Supreme Court said that the First Amendment doesn’t protect “fighting words,” or statements that “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace” (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942)]]> 2019-04-10 12:44:05 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350322176 deckerbe23 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350322741 In one case, the father of a military veteran sued the Westboro Baptist Church for emotional distress after church members picketed his son’s funeral with hateful, antigay signs. The Supreme Court found that the First Amendment protected the picketing. The Court focused on the fact that the signs (like “God Hates Fags” and “Thank God for Dead Soldiers”) mainly addressed public issues. (Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011).)


    ]]>     2019-04-10 12:45:17 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350322741     deckerbe23 https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350323247 Courts have allowed more limits on students' freedom of expression than on college students or adults in other settings, as part of balancing students’ rights with schools’ responsibility to ensure that children have a safe learning environment.


    ]]>     2019-04-10 12:46:37 UTC https://padlet.com/jonesni62/mk405y9t859o/wish/350323247