2. Because it causes chaos which could break out into fights and this could cause people to be injured

3. Disagree because it is the responsibility of the citizen to respect others religion but we also agree because it could potentially harm other people when the chaos lead to fights. All rights comes with responsibilities, and so the responsibility for the citizens is to

2. To prevent chaos from breaking out further, which results in casualty and injuries. It is also noisy and disturbs the people in the surroundings.

3. Disagree. It is unfair as all other religions do not get this ban for their religious procession. The procession can also be done at less-crowded areas and at night to prevent disturbing other people

2. Because it causes many inconvenience to the public as the music may be too loud.

3. Disagree. As a citizen of Singapore, we must respect the religion and beliefs of others. All citizens should have the right to practice their religion.

2.To prevent fights from breaking out and to maintain peace.

3.Disagree.It contradicts article 15 and it defeats the purpose of a democratic country.

2. because people found it noisy and the music led to chaos which caused fights

3. disagree. this is because if the government should respect the religion and give them the rights

2) Because people find it noisy and this will create chaos among people and fights will break out.

3) Disagree. Each religion should have their own rights and this rule is disrespectful towards the religion.

2. Thaipusam lasted so long that traffic congestions were built up, this brought about communal stress and great disturbance to the public.

3. I agree with the ruling as although we are given the freedom or religion, we need to be thoughtful of other citizens as well