by Shayne Burke

shayneburke610 — 2013-11-26 13:53:13 UTC

Anthony Contipodero

lordtom16 — 2013-11-27 13:45:58 UTC

It's Bulking Season Shayne Keep up the good work

They huskier than you.

johnbarlowphoto — 2013-11-27 13:53:02 UTC

shayneburke610 — 2013-12-02 13:41:58 UTC

Thomas Heffner

lordtom16 — 2013-12-02 13:44:16 UTC

1) The three most pivotal points in the article are the fact that Grant had Lee's army divided in half,

Confederates did a counter attack to fill in the missing troops and continued to fight for about 20 hours, It is also one of the most feriousious battles of the war.

2) The battle put Grant one step back from battle because he lost two generals and had heavy loses so he stepped back.

Barlow

johnbarlowphoto — 2013-12-02 13:56:18 UTC

1. Divison of Lee's Toops in two

Union had almost double the amount

Union was attacked by Confederates by a counter attack

2. The loss of two union generals Sedgwick and Rice affected Grant in the war.

Michaela

mdutton_chiches — 2013-12-02 14:10:16 UTC

1. The three most pivotal concepts learned from this article are that

it almost divided the Confederacy in to two halves, it has not been officially determined who

won the battle, attempts made by the Confederates to attack the Union's right flank failed causing many injuries and death.

2. This battle held significance in ending the war because it was a Union victory that allowed Grant and the rest of the Union army to continue on their way to attacking Richmond. However it would of course lead into Cold Harbor which was a Union failure.