Week 5 Lab - Questions for discussion by

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:45:48 UTC

P/N is quantitative

2025-10-16 11:45:49 UTC

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:45:55 UTC

Quantitive

2025-10-16 11:45:55 UTC

Quantitative and Qualitative

2025-10-16 11:45:58 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:01 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:07 UTC

Both (qual= the words, quan= numbers of negative words in both groups)

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:07 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:07 UTC

Independent: warm/cold

2025-10-16 11:46:16 UTC

Quantatitive

2025-10-16 11:46:21 UTC

IV- adjectives ‘warm and cold’

2025-10-16 11:46:24 UTC

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:26 UTC

Iv is whether the ppts were shown the word warm or cold in their word lists

2025-10-16 11:46:26 UTC

quant

2025-10-16 11:46:27 UTC

quant

2025-10-16 11:46:27 UTC

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:31 UTC

Independent

2025-10-16 11:46:32 UTC

Warm/cold

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:38 UTC

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:39 UTC

DV- amount of negative words ascribed to person

2025-10-16 11:46:41 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:44 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:44 UTC

2025-10-16 11:46:45 UTC

IV - warm/cold

DV - amount of Negative responses

2025-10-16 11:46:49 UTC

character sketch is qualitative and then the number of pos/neg words is quant

2025-10-16 11:46:50 UTC

Quantitative

iv-warm/cold

2025-10-16 11:46:50 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:52 UTC

2025-10-16 11:46:57 UTC

Both quantitative and qualitative

IV = description, DV = the attribution

2025-10-16 11:46:58 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:58 UTC

2025-10-16 11:46:59 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:46:59 UTC

quantitative

Dependent: amount of negative words

2025-10-16 11:46:59 UTC

IV warm/cold

2025-10-16 11:47:00 UTC

DV impact on impression

Independent warm/cold, dependent amount of negative words

2025-10-16 11:47:00 UTC

Mostly Quantitative but Qualitative was also collected when describing the individual with the attributes

2025-10-16 11:47:01 UTC

Iv - Word ‘warm’ or ‘cold’

2025-10-16 11:47:02 UTC

Dependent

2025-10-16 11:47:03 UTC

Amount of negative words

independent = warm/cold

2025-10-16 11:47:05 UTC

independent:warm and cold dependent:negative traits

2025-10-16 11:47:05 UTC

DV- the number of negative words they associate with the person being described

2025-10-16 11:47:06 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:47:09 UTC

both - character sketch + p/n values

2025-10-16 11:47:10 UTC

quantitiative

2025-10-16 11:47:13 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:47:13 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:47:15 UTC

Both

2025-10-16 11:47:17 UTC

do-negative attributes

2025-10-16 11:47:18 UTC

2025-10-16 11:47:21 UTC

Both quantitative and qualitative

IV- wording of question (warm or cold)

2025-10-16 11:47:22 UTC

DV- no of negative words

negative descriptors was dependent, use of words warm and cold was independent

2025-10-16 11:47:23 UTC

IV - inclusion of warm/cold

DV - number of negative words assigned

2025-10-16 11:47:24 UTC

Dependant- the words Intelligent, skilful, industrious, determined, practical and cautious

Independent- the words warm/cold

quant

2025-10-16 11:47:24 UTC

Independent variable = adjectives warm and cold

2025-10-16 11:47:25 UTC

For the participant to gauge a good idea of their assumptions about the person

2025-10-16 11:47:27 UTC

When you compare answers and tabulate them it is Quant

2025-10-16 11:47:27 UTC

Dv- Amount of negative words used to describe

2025-10-16 11:47:28 UTC

2025-10-16 11:47:29 UTC

IV= warm/cold word

DV= how people viewed the person

IV - descriptive adjectives (warm/cold)

2025-10-16 11:47:29 UTC

allow us to get a clearer image of the 'person'

2025-10-16 11:47:29 UTC

IV- Cold and warm the DV is the amount of negatives words used t describe the person

2025-10-16 11:47:32 UTC

(a)IV- adjectives warm and cold (b) DV- amount of negative words used to describe

2025-10-16 11:47:33 UTC

2025-10-16 11:47:34 UTC

IV - Adjectives

DV - How individuals view the adjectives

2025-10-16 11:47:40 UTC

quantitative study

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:47:41 UTC

2025-10-16 11:47:43 UTC

To allow for the participants to make a fictional person in their head, making it clearer which adjectives to describe in the next section

IV: Adjective with Warm or Cold. DV: Amount of Negative Attributes underlined out of 18

2025-10-16 11:47:44 UTC

DV - number of negative responses

2025-10-16 11:47:46 UTC

To prime the participant

2025-10-16 11:47:48 UTC

Get a better picture of the person in the participants head

2025-10-16 11:47:50 UTC

Independent was warm/ cold and dependent was the opinion of the person being described

2025-10-16 11:47:51 UTC

For ppts to start thinking about who this person is

2025-10-16 11:47:52 UTC

Independent- the adjectives given warm or cold

2025-10-16 11:47:52 UTC

To allow participants to create an image of the person

2025-10-16 11:47:53 UTC

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:47:53 UTC

Quantitative

2025-10-16 11:47:54 UTC

to get a clearer picture of who they are

2025-10-16 11:47:56 UTC

to reinforce an idea of the persons traits and characteristics in our mind

2025-10-16 11:47:57 UTC

To give the participant an idea of their impressions of the person

2025-10-16 11:47:58 UTC

P/N values are quantitative, while the character sketch is qualitative

2025-10-16 11:47:59 UTC

the get a clearer image of this person

2025-10-16 11:48:00 UTC

IV - warm/cold

2025-10-16 11:48:02 UTC

Independent - Warm/Cold Dependant- All other adjectives

2025-10-16 11:48:03 UTC

to create and reinforce and idea of the character

2025-10-16 11:48:04 UTC

Qual and Quant if youre counting the wee para we did

2025-10-16 11:48:05 UTC

biases

2025-10-16 11:48:06 UTC

allow us to understand the person

2025-10-16 11:48:08 UTC

2025-10-16 11:48:10 UTC

Subjective whether some adjectives were positive or negative

Independent is the warm/ cold adjective. Dependent- the other adjectives.

2025-10-16 11:48:10 UTC

2025-10-16 11:48:15 UTC

Independent -> warm/cold

ind: warm vs cold adjective, dep: p/n score

2025-10-16 11:48:17 UTC

IV: warm/cold DV: amount of negative adjectives

2025-10-16 11:48:17 UTC

the positive and negative traits are subjective

2025-10-16 11:48:19 UTC

Some adjectives could be interpreted as positive or negative

2025-10-16 11:48:20 UTC

To allow the Pps to create a character in their head

2025-10-16 11:48:21 UTC

I/V warm cold

2025-10-16 11:48:21 UTC

2025-10-16 11:48:22 UTC

Independent = Warm/cold adjective

Dependent = amount of negatives the person receives

2025-10-16 11:48:26 UTC

so the participant had an opinion before deciding which would best described the character

2025-10-16 11:48:26 UTC

the positive/negative pairings are subjective. e.g is “serious” positive? different people might decide differently depending on what traits they value themselves, not all the pairings are clear cut

so the participant could think about their own assumptions without being prompted by the word suggestions, also to make it easier to decide with the p/n words

2025-10-16 11:48:27 UTC

DV- no. of negative words describing the person

2025-10-16 11:48:27 UTC

Some traits that one person perceives as negative, another could view as postive for ex determined

2025-10-16 11:48:29 UTC

How the words were perceived by participants

2025-10-16 11:48:32 UTC

Think more clearly about our impression of the person they’re describing- make more internal attributions

2025-10-16 11:48:36 UTC

Participants knew they were being experimented on and the past research

2025-10-16 11:48:36 UTC

So you can get an idea of what the individual may look like or be like so it is easier to describe the person

2025-10-16 11:48:37 UTC

could be different if we were judging a real person

2025-10-16 11:48:39 UTC

So you have a clear idea inyour head of who they are and what theyre like

2025-10-16 11:48:45 UTC

IV= the use of the adjectives 'warm' and 'cold'. DV= number of negative characteristics attributed

2025-10-16 11:48:45 UTC

For participants to gauge a sense of who the individual is and critically form negative or positive connotations with them

2025-10-16 11:48:46 UTC

A) whether the word is “cold” or “warm” in the list of adjectives. B) how many negative words were circled in regards to what kind of person each would be.

2025-10-16 11:48:46 UTC

Biases based on birthday

2025-10-16 11:48:47 UTC

2025-10-16 11:48:49 UTC

Quantitative

bias

2025-10-16 11:48:54 UTC

subjectivity

2025-10-16 11:48:54 UTC

Biases

2025-10-16 11:48:54 UTC

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:48:56 UTC

2025-10-16 11:48:58 UTC

some adjectives are subjective as to whether they are positive/negative

2025-10-16 11:48:59 UTC

quantitative

Different perception of the adjectives

2025-10-16 11:49:01 UTC

Reinforce the ‘character’ - forces the participant to create false perceptions and stereotypes

2025-10-16 11:49:01 UTC

quant

2025-10-16 11:49:04 UTC

2025-10-16 11:49:06 UTC

quantitative

To allow for people to flesh out their ideas of these adjectives when combined together and apply it to scenarios they might imagine this character in to then decide on their attributes firmly

2025-10-16 11:49:06 UTC

not randomly allocated

2025-10-16 11:49:08 UTC

Dependant- the number of negatives

2025-10-16 11:49:10 UTC

IV = using the word warm/ cold. DV = the P/N values

2025-10-16 11:49:10 UTC

to get a better idea of the person you're imagining

2025-10-16 11:49:12 UTC

Mixed method design

2025-10-16 11:49:15 UTC

Social desirability

2025-10-16 11:49:15 UTC

iv = word descriptions + p/n values. dv = language descriptions

2025-10-16 11:49:15 UTC

2025-10-16 11:49:16 UTC

Help participant get a better vision of who they are analysing

to try to humanize/make the words more personal to us

2025-10-16 11:49:16 UTC

Ppts might guess the aims of the study as it is quite simple and so might be biased in order to please the researcher

2025-10-16 11:49:17 UTC

It was so difficukt to describe someone after already seeing the description in single words

2025-10-16 11:49:19 UTC

If people registered the adjectives with themselves or a loved one then they may be less likely to attribute negative adjectives to them overall

2025-10-16 11:49:22 UTC

subjective some adjectives could have been seen as either depending on the participants own view of certain traits

2025-10-16 11:49:22 UTC

To make us think more for ourselves and reduce any social desirability or demand characteristics.

2025-10-16 11:49:24 UTC

To create an image of the person

2025-10-16 11:49:26 UTC

2025-10-16 11:49:30 UTC

Dependent -> the number of negatives circled

Subjective answers unless the researcher stated categorically which is P/N

2025-10-16 11:49:30 UTC

peoples interpretation of postive and negative characteristics are subjective, they may see serious or hardheaded or imaginative as positive or negative depending on context

2025-10-16 11:49:32 UTC

the adjectives p/n

2025-10-16 11:49:33 UTC

p's not knowing meaning of some of the words, subjectivity on word meaning

2025-10-16 11:49:38 UTC

For the participants to create a more clear image of the “ person”

2025-10-16 11:49:42 UTC

to further develop that first impression of the person

2025-10-16 11:49:44 UTC

2025-10-16 11:49:50 UTC

independent: “cold” or “warm”

dependent: number of negative words

Differences in interpretation

2025-10-16 11:49:53 UTC

some of the positive/negative adjectives were subjective so the total of each P/N may not be accurate between participants

2025-10-16 11:49:57 UTC

figuring out/knowing the aim of the study could influence answers

2025-10-16 11:50:01 UTC

Individual differences in imagination levels and/or views about whether certain characteristics are positive/negative

2025-10-16 11:50:03 UTC

Mixed

2025-10-16 11:50:10 UTC

Limited information about the person given

2025-10-16 11:50:12 UTC

2025-10-16 11:50:15 UTC

adjectives are subjective and may be interpret differently by different people

form an impression for the participant to imagine a character

2025-10-16 11:50:16 UTC

Independent = warm/cold as central traits

2025-10-16 11:50:17 UTC

Could be highly subjective in terms of what people view as positive and negative

2025-10-16 11:50:17 UTC

So that the participant could create short judgments to see what affects them

2025-10-16 11:50:19 UTC

Everyone's description could be different
Bias
P/N could be interpreted differently e.g serious could be thought of as good by some people

being reminded of someone you know

2025-10-16 11:50:22 UTC

some traits could be viewed as both positive and negative depending on personal opinion

2025-10-16 11:50:26 UTC

bias

2025-10-16 11:50:30 UTC

2025-10-16 11:50:45 UTC

Participants were told not to talk to one another but still could communicate

iv: warm / cold adjectives are changed. dv: attributions based/dependent on this change

2025-10-16 11:50:48 UTC

quantitative

2025-10-16 11:50:49 UTC

p/n adjectives are subjective

2025-10-16 11:50:55 UTC

some people might view an adjective as positive while others view it as negative

Individual Group Design - Participant variables mightve influenced decisions rather than if they got "warm" or "cold" condition

2025-10-16 11:50:59 UTC

IV= Warm/cold

2025-10-16 11:51:12 UTC

to allow us to form assumptions / make attributions based on the adjectives

2025-10-16 11:51:15 UTC

i nunnoooooo

2025-10-16 11:51:28 UTC

varying life experiences and associations with people in the participants life and the chosen adjectives

2025-10-16 11:51:38 UTC

subjective

2025-10-16 11:51:52 UTC

Some words may not be seen the same by the particpant as the researcher i.e shrewdness may not be viewed as more negative than wisedom or some traits may be viewed neutrally.

2025-10-16 11:52:17 UTC

quantitative (p/n), qualitative (evaluation)

2025-10-16 11:52:32 UTC

What she said [BAHHHH] between the different labs would create a bias.

2025-10-16 11:53:20 UTC