If you were a scientist studying hurricanes, which type of source would you rely on most? Cite evidence from the text in your answer. by Tamoy Rudduck

2025-10-06 15:18:36 UTC

I would relay on secondary, because I would want to research what these people did and what happens so I can information for other people and other things.

2025-10-06 15:20:41 UTC

I would rely on primary source because I would have personal experiences of the hurricanes that have happend over the years

2025-10-06 15:21:02 UTC

In my opinion I would depend on primary source because I would know more detail primary source because primary give you more details and secondary source would not give detail about

lucasjavier — 2025-10-06 15:21:15 UTC

I think the source I would rely on the most if I were a scientist is the primary source. I would use the primary source because the person who is in the hurricane can give better information than the information that is put online or is said by the interviewer

2025-10-06 15:21:40 UTC

I would rely on both secondary primary source because I have experienced a hurricane but don't have evidence so I would research and read other text to find evidence for detail to describe what it feels like

2025-10-06 15:22:43 UTC

I would rely on secondary source because I wont to know how do the hurracain hunter go threw hurracains and without getting hurt..

2025-10-06 15:23:00 UTC

I would use secondary source because I want to know what these people did.

2025-10-06 15:23:16 UTC

but I would like primary source more better because it helps you understand about the text more better

2025-10-06 15:25:40 UTC

In my opinion I would rely on secondary source because I could learn online , on the news, or just research about hurricanes so that I can learn about hurricanes without having to experience it.

justinbutler1 — 2025-10-06 15:25:46 UTC

I would rely on primary source because if I want to know what was the speed of the storm I can know the speed but when I get off the internet it be telling the right information so that is why I would rely on primary.

2025-10-06 15:26:26 UTC

I think I would rely on primary because I would know more information and understand the text more and get more detail about the storm.

2025-10-06 15:26:36 UTC

I would use primary source because I would be able to tell my feelings on how the event was and what happened in the event and share my emotions more in depth and give a story about it and they can go 34-63 knots so I could tell a lot about the hurrican

2025-10-06 15:26:51 UTC

I will rely on both because I have experienced a hurricane but not on a plane and for secondary source I can research did some people survive a turbulence or perished ( mean died) or other things about a turbulence happen on a plane

2025-10-06 15:26:59 UTC

I would rely secondary the most also because would want to know how it is like to fly in a hurricane also because what they researched on how to do it.

2025-10-06 15:27:17 UTC

if I was a scientist I would use primary so I can have personal information and describe what happen.

2025-10-06 15:29:13 UTC

I would rely on primary source because I would know more information and study more objects

2025-10-06 15:31:12 UTC

I would also use secondary because I would know what is going on in the story.

2025-10-06 15:31:37 UTC

If I was a scientist I would rely on primary sources because I would be able to give more information about how I flew into a hurricane and tell people like the news company how it felt to fly into a hurricane and what I learned about the hurricane.

2025-10-06 15:33:24 UTC

if I were a scientist I would rely on the secondary source, Hurricane a force of nature because it gives information about how hurricane

2025-10-06 15:33:59 UTC

I think that would rely on Secondary Source because If I were a scientist studying about hurricanes I would know about hurricanes and able to study about hurricanes and I would get details about hurricanes to know or can search details about hurricanes and would get information about the hurricanes and would know what is going on the story.

2025-10-06 15:36:02 UTC

If I was the scientist I would use both because it shows what I know and what I need to learn about hurricanes that I did not know about hurricanes.Like how it looks like In then midel of a hurricanes or if there was a hurricane that reaches over [156 mph].