<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Legal Guide by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq</link>
      <description>Restraint and Seclusion in Texas Schools</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:34:21 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-11-23 23:06:31 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Slide #13 - Recommendations and Best Practices</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906255629</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>* Restraint and/or seclusion is absolutely never to be used as a form of discipline<br>* All campuses should have a documented de-escalation protocol in place <br>* All teachers on campus should be trained twice yearly on the de-escalation protocol policy<br>* If a restraint/seclusion is deemed necessary at least two staff members must be involved in the procedure and documentation of appropriate use of deescalation protocol must be provided within 24 hours of the restraint/seclusion<br>* Campus administrators must have protocols in place to protect staff during a crisis scenario involving seclusion/restraint&nbsp;<br>* Post-crisis protocols must be established for notification of parents/guardians if a restraint or seclusion occurs at school<br>* Campus-wide PBIS (Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports) must be implemented to address tier 2 and tier 3 behaviors before concerning situations develop into crisis on the campus<br>* Districts and campuses should establish a tiered intervention program on par with academic intervention programs&nbsp;<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:37:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906255629</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #12 - Personal Connection to the Legal and Ethical Standards</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906256187</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Personal Educational Journey-<br>Throughout my career in education, I have worked with Special Education as an Instructional Aide and am currently serving in the role of general education teacher, with the goal of moving into campus-level administration. I have recently had an experience that required the restraint of a student in order to ensure the safety of 38 other students. My understanding of the law and the requirements of restraint only as a last resort and utilized to ensure the safety of the student and others, helps me to see that the process was legally and ethically appropriate. This has impacted my personal educational journey since it has shown me how the correct application of this process can protect all stakeholders. <br><br>Reflective Feelings-<br>Throughout the process of researching the use of restraint and seclusion, I feel that the law is providing an appropriate amount of protection for all stakeholders if administrators apply their understanding of the law appropriately. Prior to my own research, I was under the impression that there was essentially "no hope" for teachers or administrators when it came to being physically abused by students. I see now that this is not the case and it is actually a very destructive practice to allow a student to physically abuse another person. Growing in my understanding of the law will allow me to advocate for better outcomes for my students and future staff. Students with emotional disturbances face challenges that are harder to overcome than students with other disabilities (Samuels, 2018). Knowing that I can help my students reach their full potential while protecting staff and other learners empowers me to pursue further training and education on this topic. <br><br>Samuels, C. A. (2018, March 19). <em>Students with emotional disabilities: Facts about this vulnerable population. </em>Education Week. <a href="https://www.edweek.org/leadership/students-with-emotional-disabilities-facts-about-this-vulnerable-population/2018/03">https://www.edweek.org/leadership/students-with-emotional-disabilities-facts-about-this-vulnerable-population/2018/03</a><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:38:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906256187</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #11- Ethical Principle - Standard 3.2, 3.5</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906256597</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=T&amp;app=9&amp;p_dir=N&amp;p_rloc=192645&amp;p_tloc=&amp;p_ploc=1&amp;pg=2&amp;p_tac=&amp;ti=19&amp;pt=7&amp;ch=247&amp;rl=1<br><br><br>There are two ethical principles in the Texas Administrative Code that have implications related to restraint and seclusion.&nbsp;<br><br>The first is Standard 3.2- The educator shall not intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly treat a student or minor in a manner that adversely affects or endangers the learning, physical health, mental health, or safety of the student or minor (19 TAC §247.2).<br><br>The second is Standard 3.5 - The educator shall not intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly engage in physical mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of a student or minor (19 TAC §247.2).<br><br>Both ethical standards address teacher conduct from a perspective where the educator is aware of how their actions could impact the student on a continuum moving from the effects of inappropriate actions (standard 3.2) to actions themselves that violate good ethical standards (standard 3.5). Both standards connect to the legal topic in terms of how an educator decides to pursue a restraint or seclusion action and if the educator has intent or is reckless and causes harm to the student. Any decision to restrain or seclude a student must be taken with serious care and only to ensure that imminent harm does not befall the student or others. &nbsp;<br><br>Educator’s Code of Ethics, 19 Tex. Admin. Code §247.2.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=T&amp;app=9&amp;p_dir=N&amp;p_rloc=192645&amp;p_tloc=&amp;p_ploc=1&amp;pg=2&amp;p_tac=&amp;ti=19&amp;pt=7&amp;ch=247&amp;rl=1" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:38:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906256597</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide # 10- Local Administrative Policy Regarding Restraint of Students in San Angelo Independent School District</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906256912</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://pol.tasb.org/Policy/Download/1139?filename=FO(LOCAL).pdf<br><br>The San Angelo ISD School Board policy states that restraint can be utilized by an employee with an appropriate position, within certain parameters. The following situations allow for restraint of a student if: 1) the restraint is protective in nature. Either for protection of the student of others; 2) the purpose is to gain control of a weapon; 3) a student is not complying with a lawful request and order must be restored to a situation; 4) a student is irrational; 5) to protect from serious property damage (San Angelo Independent School District, 2018).   <br><br>San Angelo Independent School District. (2018, August 8). San Angelo ISD Board Policy Manual, Student Discipline, Physical Restraint. Retrieved from <a href="https://pol.tasb.org/Policy/Download/1139?filename=FO(LOCAL).pdf">https://pol.tasb.org/Policy/Download/1139?filename=FO(LOCAL).pdf</a></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://pol.tasb.org/Policy/Download/1139?filename=FO(LOCAL).pdf" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:38:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906256912</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #9 - Statutory Law - Federal and State Examples</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906257247</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Federal-<br>https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2015-title42/USCODE-2015-title42-chap21-subchapI-sec1983<br><br>Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. (42 USC §1983).<br><br>*Federal law allowing pursuit of a legal claim for a civil rights violation against a state or federal entity. <br>*Provides possible avenue of recourse for families if a student's civil rights are violated as a result of unlawful restraint or seclusion. <br><br>State-<br>https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/ed/htm/ed.37.htm<br>Sec. 37.0021.&nbsp; USE OF CONFINEMENT, RESTRAINT, SECLUSION, AND TIME-OUT.&nbsp; (a)&nbsp; It is the policy of this state to treat with dignity and respect all students, including students with disabilities who receive special education services under Subchapter <a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/GetStatute.aspx?Code=ED&amp;Value=29.001">A</a>, Chapter <a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/GetStatute.aspx?Code=ED&amp;Value=29">29</a>. A student with a disability who receives special education services under Subchapter <a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/GetStatute.aspx?Code=ED&amp;Value=29.001">A</a>, Chapter <a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/GetStatute.aspx?Code=ED&amp;Value=29">29</a>, may not be confined in a locked box, locked closet, or other specially designed locked space as either a discipline management practice or a behavior management technique (TEC §37.0021).&nbsp;<br><br>*The Texas statute prohibits the use of restraint and seclusion as a means of discipline.<br>*Districts and schools must ensure compliance with the Texas Education Code and provide appropriate measures with which to handle situations that require seclusion and restraint as a last resort.&nbsp;<br><br>The Public Health and Welfare, 42 USC §1983<br><br>Alternative Settings for Behavior Management, 37 TEC §37.0021<br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/ed/htm/ed.37.htm" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:38:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906257247</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #8- Judicial Law - Payne v Peninsula School District</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906257663</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.copaa.org/resource/resmgr/docs/wp_section_1983_case.pdf<br><br>*Parents brought charges against the teacher who locked seven-year-old child with autism in dark closet multiple times as a means of discipline and behavior modification.<br>* The student's constitutional rights were violated during this process.<br>* Additionally, the student experienced trauma due to the seclusion practices employed by the teacher.<br>* The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the parents and determined that the student's Constitutional rights had been violated.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br><br>Payne v. Peninsula School District, 653 F.3d 863 (2011)</div><div><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.copaa.org/resource/resmgr/docs/wp_section_1983_case.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:38:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906257663</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #7 - Constitutional Law- 4th Amendment</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906257981</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/<br>* The fourth amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizures.<br>* Students do not shed their rights at the school house gate (Tinker v Des Moines, 1969)<br>* Students are protected from unreasonable seizures. If a student is unreasonably removed as a means of seclusion for disciplinary purposes, their fourth amendment rights have most likely been violated. <br><br>Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)<br>U.S. Const. amend. IV.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:38:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906257981</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #6 - Administrative Law - DOE Dear Colleague Letter</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906258284</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201612-504-restraint-seclusion-ps.pdf<br><br>*Is the process of restraint and seclusion being discriminatorily imposed on students with disabilities?<br>*Restraint and seclusion should never be used as a means of discipline, but only employed when a student or staff member is in imminent physical danger.<br>*The Dear Colleague letter seeks to clarify federal law related to the practice of restraint and seclusion. <br><br>Lhamon, C. E. (2016, December 28). Dear Colleague Letter, Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. Retrieved from <a href="https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201612-504-restraint-seclusion-ps.pdf">https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201612-504-restraint-seclusion-ps.pdf</a><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:38:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906258284</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #5-Current News Article #2 - K-12 Education Dive</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906258681</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://www.k12dive.com/news/education-civil-rights-data-release-takeaways/587339/<br><br>*Education Dive - K-12 Dive - highlights data from the Education Department indicating a rise in the amount of restraint and seclusion instances in the United States. <br>* Students receiving special education services represent the majority of restraint and seclusion cases.<br>* This high percentage should alarm teachers and administrators. Alternative training and supports need to be investigated and implemented to ensure that the most vulnerable of student populations are being served appropriately.<br>* Analysis of campus/district policies should take place to ensure use of restraint and seclusion is used ONLY when there is imminent danger of harm to a student or staff. <br><br>Arundel, K. (2020, October 20). <em>Ed dept civil rights data shows restraint, seclusion, sexual assault on the rise.</em> K-12 Dive. <a href="https://www.k12dive.com/news/education-civil-rights-data-release-takeaways/587339/">https://www.k12dive.com/news/education-civil-rights-data-release-takeaways/587339/</a></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.k12dive.com/news/education-civil-rights-data-release-takeaways/587339/" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:39:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906258681</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #4 - Current News Article #1 - Education Week</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906259068</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://www.edweek.org/leadership/seclusion-and-restraint-in-schools-to-be-dramatically-limited-in-illinois/2021/06<br><br>*2019 investigation uncovers widespread use of restraint and seclusion being used as discipline in Illinois schools. <br>*The practice was not being utilized as a last resort to prevent imminent danger. <br>*Illinois lawmakers unanimously pass legislation prohibiting the use of restraint and seclusion except for scenarios in which there is imminent physical harm. <br>*The article represents a pressing need for schools and districts to update, train and require staff to adhere to local, state and federal policies and laws regarding restraint and seclusion. <br>*Districts cannot wait for something "bad" to happen. Administrators must act preemptively to ensure the safety of students and staff before crisis situations arise. <br><br>Cohen, J.S., Richards, J.S. (2021, June 1). <em>Seclusion and restraint in schools to be dramatically limited in Illinois</em>. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/seclusion-and-restraint-in-schools-to-be-dramatically-limited-in-illinois/2021/06</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.edweek.org/leadership/seclusion-and-restraint-in-schools-to-be-dramatically-limited-in-illinois/2021/06" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:39:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906259068</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #3 - Professional Association - Council for Exceptional Children</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906259369</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/Restraint%20and%20Seclusion-2020.pdf<br><br><br>The Council for Exceptional Students issued a position statement regarding the use of restraint and seclusion and how this practice relates to students with exceptionalities receiving special education services. The Council's position states that restraint and seclusion as a means of disciplinary action should never be used and should be immediately discontinued if in use as a discipline measure, is used as a threat, or as an initial form of de-escalation. Additionally, this process should never be included in the IEP, or BIP for a student as a means of discipline or initial de-escalation. Noting that this procedure disproportionately affects students with exceptionalities and minorities, the position statement also advocates for training and awareness of the application of this process. Lastly, the Council recognizes that the use of restraint and seclusion is appropriate only in the scenario in which a student or staff member is in imminent danger. <br><br>Council for Exceptional Students. (November, 2020). <em>Position on restraint and seclusion procedures in school settings. </em><a href="https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/Restraint%20and%20Seclusion-2020.pdf">https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/Restraint%20and%20Seclusion-2020.pdf</a></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/Restraint%20and%20Seclusion-2020.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:39:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906259369</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #2 - Interview Summary - Megan Welch, InSpire Special Education Behavior Teacher, Bonham Elementary</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906260392</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Importance of Legal Guide Based on Learning from the Interview-<br>The interview with Ms. Welch provided an inside view of how restraint and seclusion can be used appropriately to maintain the safety of the student in crisis, other students on the campus and the teachers providing support during the time of crisis. Ms. Welch shared about experiences she has had where she has been injured while assisting a student in crisis. Even as a trained professional, injuries can still occur and it is vitally important that general education teachers understand this physical risk and the legal implications of attempting a restraint or seclusion without proper training. Additionally, administrators must also fully understand the application of the law and be bound by the duty to protect both the student in crisis and the professional educator providing support to the student in crisis. The information in this legal guide will provide guidance to both the classroom teacher and the campus administrator as they navigate this important topic.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br>Best Practices Related to Restraint and Seclusion Gleaned from the Interview-<br>* Restraint and/or seclusion should only be used as a LAST RESORT and only after a systematic process of deescalation procedures have taken place and imminent harm to the student(s)/teacher(s) is likely or has occurred.&nbsp;<br>* Restraint can only be used by an adult who has been trained with the Crisis Prevention Institute's Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training (commonly referred to as CPI Training) and holds a current certificate in the training.<br>* At least two adults are present during the restraint or seclusion process.<br>*While a good-faith attempt to notify parents/guardians of a restraint/seclusion is a Texas legal requirement (19 TAC §89.1053), Ms. Welch shared that a student can experience significant physical and emotional effects within the first 24 hours from a trauma/crisis event at school and parents/guardians need to know the danger signs to look for in their child after an event takes place. She emphasized the vital importance of speaking with the parent/caregiver on the day the restraint occurs.&nbsp;</div><div><br>Emerging Issue- Tiered Behavior Interventions that Mirror Academic RTI Systems<br>Ms. Welch shared that out of the campuses she has worked at during her career, the campus with the best outcomes for students with adverse behavioral issues was the one (and she noted the only one she has seen) where "red-flag" behaviors were treated with the same importance as learning gaps. Tiered behavior interventions were in place and documented in the same ways that academic interventions were used for Tier 2 and Tier 3 students. Diagnoses of Emotional Disturbance (ED) peak in late adolescence. (Samuels, 2018). Recognition of indicators in elementary aged students could help identify students who exhibit warning signs of possible ED. Educators need research-based training on recognition of warning signs in much the same way that training is provided to recognize math and reading deficits with the goal of closing those gaps and impacting student academic growth and learning. Tiered behavioral supports similar to academic tiered interventions are likely to benefit students at risk for emotional disturbance and are becoming more popular across the United States. If supports can be established to meet these emerging needs in the elementary-aged child, those students may have a higher likelihood of academic and societal success in the future. &nbsp;<br><br>Procedures for Use of Restraint and Time-Out, 19. Tex. Admin. Code §89.1053</div><div><br>Samuels, C. A. (2018, March 19). <em>Students with emotional disabilities: Facts about this vulnerable population. </em>Education Week. <a href="https://www.edweek.org/leadership/students-with-emotional-disabilities-facts-about-this-vulnerable-population/2018/03">https://www.edweek.org/leadership/students-with-emotional-disabilities-facts-about-this-vulnerable-population/2018/03</a></div><div><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:39:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906260392</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Slide #1 - Professional Perspective Regarding the Use of Restraint and Seclusion in Texas Public Schools</title>
         <author>lchilds15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906260662</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>As a general education elementary teacher and future campus administrator, my perspective on restraint and seclusion has developed as I have worked with students representing a large degree of diversity in behaviors. This school year my campus became one of two elementary campuses within the district to host a highly specialized behavior program. This program serves students receiving Special Education services and who also are diagnosed with behavioral disabilities. My understanding of restraint and seclusion has changed significantly based on this experience and I view this topic with the perspective that restraint and seclusion is absolutely necessary IF certain criteria are being met and the goal of the restraint or seclusion is to keep the student and others safe.<br>I chose this topic for two reasons:&nbsp;<br>1) ALL students (even those with extreme behavioral needs) have the right to be safe and receive the education that meets their needs - even when those needs differ from their peers;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br>2) Educators have the right to be safe in their workplace. There is a very public, very legitimate teacher shortage in the United States. One of the reasons teachers are leaving the profession is because they are not being protected or respected while at work. Specialized teachers that work with students with severe behaviors receive more abuse than others and have the right to be protected as they serve the most vulnerable of student demographics. <br>Restraint and seclusion is a necessary but highly misunderstood component of public education. The purpose of this legal guide is to provide classroom teachers and campus administrators with legal information pertaining to restraint and seclusion and the legal implications of misuse of the procedures.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-22 14:39:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lchilds15/m7x55f9ly8gyvtkq/wish/1906260662</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
