https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc Archaeologists are scientists who dig up and study very old things. They do this to learn about people who lived long ago. What do you think? Is studying objects from the past more interesting than studying objects from today? en-us 2017-03-27 12:57:19 UTC 2017-03-27 13:54:12 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162806362 I think studying objects from the past are more interesting because you can find something that is ancient and might be from prehistoric times.]]> 2017-03-27 13:31:02 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162806362 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162806391 I do think that studying from the past is better than today because we know almost everything about it but not from the past.]]> 2017-03-27 13:31:06 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162806391 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162806888 I think that studying things from the past is more interesting than studying modern things because you then get to see how things evolved from then and now. I have actually always been one for history than new artifacts that have just been made. And anyway, we know just about pretty much all there is to know about the things that we have in the present, but not the same for the past. ]]> 2017-03-27 13:32:06 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162806888 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162808067 I agree because studying things from the past are interesting because you can see how things once worked like 80 years ago. Also we could see stuff that we never seen before.]]> 2017-03-27 13:34:53 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162808067 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162810006 I agree because if you study things from today, you would know the things that we have. but if you learn from the past, it could open a new world for you. ]]> 2017-03-27 13:39:17 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162810006 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162810217  I agree that the past is more interesting than the things we do now because we don't know what it was like 5500 years ago when the egyptions started to build the paramids and that's why we study the past, and by studying the past we can know what our kind did  2020 years ago when Jesus did and that is why we have the bible to know that what Jesus did. We could know what happened thousands of years of ago when the human races started. We could see how the dinosaurs were 65 million years ago by their fossils and how they got blown away by rocks and asteroids from outer space.
   Do you agree or disagree with me?]]> 2017-03-27 13:39:46 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162810217 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162810895 In my opinion, Studying things from the past is more interesting since you can learn things that you have never learned before. For example, There are many books about dinosaurs, but have we ever see one in person? No. So, If we study things from the past we might have the chance to get a look from its left overs, like bones, teeth, or many of other things. You mostly get to see very old things in the past at the museam. It will be cool to see things from a ancient time.]]> 2017-03-27 13:41:13 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162810895 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162812960 Yes it is more interesting because we know what everything is from today and how to use it. is and stuff from a very long time ago since we weren't born at that time we don't know how to use those objects.]]> 2017-03-27 13:46:12 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162812960 https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162813675 I think ]]> 2017-03-27 13:48:03 UTC https://padlet.com/johnsomi/m6jsl99e04wc/wish/162813675