Digital Board for Reflection by Fuji Andayani, M.pd

Evelyn

2024-05-02 10:56:14 UTC

I think it’s more comfortable to do the interpretation the second way, where the interpreter can take notes first. The reason why is because this way, the interpreter won’t miss the important information from the speech and can deliver it correctly.

Katherine

2024-05-02 11:01:03 UTC

Personally, I prefer to interpret in situations where I'm given time to take notes or at least process the speaker's words. Not only this minimize mistranslation, I believe interpreting this way is more efficient since the amount of time I would need to re-confirm the message would also lessen significantly. As an addition, I think I prefer to interpret from English to Indonesian since I'm more or less more familiar with the latter.

Melenia

2024-05-02 11:01:06 UTC

I think it's more efficient with the second way because we can take a note and read it again so we can get the right meaning. Meanwhile, the first video sounds chaotic to me because the target language and source language talking at the same time.

Angelica Patricia

2024-05-02 11:04:49 UTC

I think that not all of them can interpret well if they say it directly, therefore I favor the second video where someone interprets by writing where not everyone can remember well and clearly, so it is necessary to take a note to interpret it. then someone will be able to interpret well and not lose important points or parts of someone's speech.

Nurfitriani

anifitri717 — 2024-05-02 11:05:50 UTC

I prefer the second way as the interpreters can have some time to interpret the speech in their mind, pick the words and take note of crucial information. Therefore, The interpreters can convey valid and clear information.

Steven

2024-05-02 11:06:56 UTC

I prefer the second way of interpreting because we can take notes and have time to think before interpreting. Meanwhile, for the first video, I would have difficulty interpreting immediately after the speaker delivered the speech.

Andreas

2024-05-02 11:07:32 UTC

i prefer the second way to interpreting, because it hard to remember all the sentences and even we got the point of speech there may still be some mistaken i take when interpreting,so i need to take a note first

Noviana

2024-05-02 11:09:36 UTC

I think the second method makes it easier for an interpreter who has just entered the field. Because take notes first can help interpretation more accurately, however an interpreter must keep practice to enhance the skills in interpreting:)

Angelina April Fransisca

2024-05-02 11:09:40 UTC

I prefer the second way because it is a better choice as it enables hearing everything before interpreting, unlike the first where interpretation occurs simultaneously with the native speaker's speech, creating a challenges for the interpreter to do interpretation. So, I think number 1 is quite difficult to do.

Miranda

2024-05-02 11:10:02 UTC

Interpreting while being able to take necessary tabs on what's important would be better in my opinion. Doing it at the same time would be good in a situation where it's urgent, and if it's possible, the audio can be separated to avoid confusion. To make sure that every fact and crucial detail could be delivered would be ideal, hence taking notes is more advantageous.

On a side note, interpreting from Indonesian to English would be a preferable option for me.