<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Theory and Methods - 20 Markers by katiewoodhead</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/m4x54539l9tr</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-06-01 09:25:06 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-27 01:56:14 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Evaluate the view that sociology cannot and should not be a science</title>
         <author>katiewoodhead123</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/m4x54539l9tr/wish/174775124</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Paragraph 1:<br>INTERPRETIVISTS: shouldn't<br>-Value laden, subjective, verstehen.<br>-Phenomenology = how meanings are socially constructed.<br>EVAL- POSITIVISTS - Inaccurate.&nbsp;<br><br>Paragraph 2:<br>KUHN: isn't/couldn't<br>-Paradigms = unified set of assumptions e.g. gravity.<br>-Sociology has no paradigms.<br>EVAL- Alternative view - separate paradigms.<br><br>Paragraph 3:<br>DURKHEIM (POSITIVISTS): should/is<br>-"Le Suicide" - official statistics.<br>-Established social facts.<br>-Falsification = quantitative data cannot be interpreted - objective.<br>EVAL- official statistics based on coroners decisions.&nbsp;<br><br>Paragraph 4:<br>POPPER: could/isn't<br>-Scientific = needs the possibility of being proven false.<br>-Sociology = unfalsifiable.<br>EVAL- Popper's approach means that a discipline will be stronger - the more evidence that we cannot find to disprove it, the stronger the theory becomes.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-06-01 09:25:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/katiewoodhead123/m4x54539l9tr/wish/174775124</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
