<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>comparative analysis of methods and approaches by Sardor Jumanazarov</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/blackstar6010/Bookmarks</link>
      <description>Сделано со смекалкой</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:26:36 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2022-03-14 09:27:53 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>blackstar6010</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/blackstar6010/Bookmarks/wish/2090281382</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The comparative method has taken many forms since Augustus Comte first employed the concept in 1853 in his foundational <em>Cours de philosophie positive.</em> Subsequently a variety of comparative methods have emerged in the social sciences with different goals, units of comparison, and types of data that reflect a variety of theoretical assumptions and interests. Comparison has formed the core of anthropology, sociology and other social sciences.<br>Three strategies are used in comparative methodologies: illustrative comparison, complete or universe comparison, and sampled-based comparisons (Sarana 1975). They are distinguished by the units of comparison (including cultures, societies, regions, or communities) and the particular items or features used to compare the units.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2022-03-11 11:37:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/blackstar6010/Bookmarks/wish/2090281382</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
